Tentacles of the North (1926) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Almost Totally Lacking in Entertainment Quality
JohnHowardReid28 October 2008
On the evidence of In the Tentacles of the North (released, November 1926), maybe Louis Chaudet should be considered for the accolade of world's worst director. Here's a movie that looks like it was made in 1912 at the latest. Although set in the Arctic wastes, it is entirely played out on the floor (or rather the proscenium) of an impoverished Poverty Row studio, complete with a cast of hams led by slow-reacting Joe Girard as a mutinous mate, Gaston Glass (later a production manager and assistant director) as the frozen-faced hero, and the luckless Alice Calhoun as the deadly dull heroine. A major star of the silents, Miss Calhoun surely did much more ingratiating work and presented a far more pleasing appearance than she does here. Let us hope that only through the incompetence of her agent or by a nasty quirk of Fate, did she find herself cast in this miserable, static, almost totally actionless, "B"-budget excuse for an inept and totally uninvolving James Oliver Curwood potboiler. Even Joe Walker's photography, despite the use of tinted stock, comes across as disappointingly flat and almost completely bereft of artistry.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Parts are Missing, but They Might Not Have Helped All That Much
silentmoviefan27 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
It's painfully obvious that parts of this film are missing.

The opening of the movie shows a fancy/shmancy gathering in which you see the captain toasting an upcoming expedition. The next thing you know, he's lying dead on the floor! (Are we missing something here?) Toward the end, when the baddies are done away with (and are they EVER done away with!), it seems that...the actual event doesn't seem to happen in real time.

The leading man and leading lady escape and the next thing you know, they're in their home(?).

That's why I think parts of the film are missing.

But I also said the parts might not have helped this much...

In the final scene, the leading man cusses. You don't see the swear words, but you do see a bunch of symbols indicating swearing. I was not impressed! I'd go into more detail on this, but why bother? It's terrible! The only reason I don't give it a "1" is that Alice Calhoun, the leading lady, looks cute in her parka.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed