Road to Life (1931) Poster

(1931)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Has life in it
hte-trasme22 May 2014
Warning: Spoilers
"Putyovka k Zhizn" has the distinction and historical interest of being the first Soviet sound film, and its adaptations to the new technology make it a sometimes strange but quite worthwhile experience to watch. While sounds was new and undoubtedly must have presented some technical difficulties, the makers of this film must have made a definite decision not to compromise visual style in the face of the introduction of sound.

While dialog helps to tell the story, it remains a very visual film, full of lasting, striking images -- especially of the desperate street children in the earlier parts of the film. In fact, in many ways it retains a silent-film style -- with dramatic, close images, artists slowing of the film at various point, dwelling shots to convey story, and copious (interestingly realized) inter-titles to convey story. This combined with the audible voices makes for a unique and rather extraordinary viewing experience.

As perhaps might be expected for such a lavish expense of a film in its historical context, it is also a propaganda film -- but it is a well-made propaganda film that leaves a lot of strong impressions beyond those of its political message. The moral is that homelessness can be fought and street children made into useful members of society through the virtue of communal work -- but the film does not shirk from showing us the problem in a human way, so the boys do feel like characters. And, when all is said and done, we do have a piece where one of the boys is responsible for the other's death on the tracks. We end on a downer note with a prime reformed child needlessly killed, casting doubt on the idea that work really redeems absolutely everyone.

The pace is deliberately slow, which contributes to the dreamlike, visual nature of the storytelling. It may be a political message film, but it's not entirely a two-dimensional one, and it is one from before the imposition of Socialist Realism in Soviet art, which allows it to be an expressive, experimental film in its visual style. It's a confident step into sound filmmaking that operates by merely adding dialog to the bold, expressive, and occasionally almost avant-garde style of Soviet silent film, and that makes it well worth a viewing.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Wild Boys Of The Steppes
boblipton14 April 2019
"Wild Boys", homeless juvenile criminals, are reformed by the opportunity for honest labor in what is claimed as the first Soviet talking feature.

That means, of course, that it has a very strong propaganda component, and that the copy I saw, with a foreword by John Dewey and the New York State Censor's seal, with lots of English titles, was anything but the original version. The writer-director, Nikolai Ekk, only directed five features and a couple of shorts, none of which I have seen. The performers are likewise strangers to me.... oh, everyone is new to me. So, without putting this movie into the context of the career of any of the cast or crew, what's on the screen in what I assume to be a severely compromised version?

It begins as a very Academician-style movie: so much so that any movement is subordinated to the rigors of editing, and the soundtrack seems to be more a matter of scene-setting crowd noises, and bits of dialogue connected to characters when they are not on screen. In other words, it's more of a photo album with commentary for the prologue, telling how this marvelous reform began. It is not until the story is well away, and the youngsters are at the settlement where they will work, that things begin to settle down into what is more understandable story-telling.

I find the use of "wild boys" for what we would call "juvenile delinquents" to raise some questions. Certainly, William Wellman's WILD BOYS OF THE ROAD describes the American equivalent. Because the two movies are contemporary... well, some problems are universal, even if their solutions are not.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Communist Boys Town
theskulI424 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
A sort of spiritual Soviet precursor to Hollywood films like Boys Town and Going My Way, The Road to Life tells the age-old story of one good man trying to help a load of troubled (invariably male) teens and children reform their ways and become worthwhile members of society.

The film is unique though in that the "one good man" is in this case just another troubled teen, "Dandy" Mustafa (Yvan Kyrlya), who we meet after our initial protagonist Nikolai (Nikolai Batalov) has his life threatened by his father, stressed to the point of insanity after Nikolai's mother tragically and suddenly dies, and flees into the streets. Once there, the government, from an idea from Mustafa, forms a pseudo-Boys Town, a sort of Soviet "Communist for Kids" camp where the boys run everything, do everything and survive everything as a whole. It ultimately finds itself with problems because, just like Communism itself, it fails to account for human nature, for jealousy, for disagreements, for wandering eyes.

The film ends on a downbeat (and a bit melodramatic) note, but I was pleased to see that they didn't attempt to phrase this into some sort of propagandistic falsehood proclaiming the strength of the Republic and its Communist people WHO LOVE COMMUNISM. All in all, a solid, valuable addition to my film-watching, and another one off the top 1000.

{Grade: 8/10 (B) / #6 (of 10) of 1931}
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great Film
switch2trinity23 February 2004
I watched this movie for a film class in college. The Road to Life exemplifies Soviet propaganda. Promoting the "collective" experience which basically boiled down to child labor was an ingenious and effective method of encouraging young Soviets to join the cause. The performances were very moving, especially the character of Mustapha. I kept expecting him to turn out to be the bad guy and ruin the work of the others... yet another Hollywood cliche shot down by a foreign film. Thank goodness for film history classes or I would have never even heard of this gem of a movie.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
one of the best movies and book i have ever experienced
a_clockwork_orange_2218 February 2003
i have to say very little cause all you need to do is read his book "pedagoziki" cause its amazingness will drag you away from all that hollywood @#$%, i have never been to russia, or know many russian directors, but i have seen russian movies, and they were all better that the hollywood crap we're watching today
13 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed