Wings of the Navy (1939) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Of exceptional interest to old movie buffs, historians and airplane buffs,...others might find it a bit contrived
planktonrules24 September 2006
I am biased, as are all film reviewers. There are certain types of films we are naturally more positively predisposed to, and this is one of them for me. I love history and aviation and so it's not at all surprising that I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. Heck, there were a lot of very similar movies in the 1930s and 1940s--films about young cadets trying to make it through flight school, bombardier school, etc. After a while, they tend to blend a bit together in my head and I am sure that the average viewer would get tired of the genre pretty quickly. But if you also consider that this film was made by Warner Brothers (who made a lot of similar films) and stars some wonderful actors that I truly enjoy watching (George Brent, Olivia DeHavilland, John Payne and Frank McHugh), it's natural that I should like it. But, on the other hand, will you? Well, if you love this type of film, you are sure to be impressed. If you have not, then you probably will find that the film is a tad contrived and clichéd--particularly regarding the romantic triangle in the film. But considering how marvelously done the flying sequences are (exceptional for the time), the consistency of the writing and acting and the overall fun of the film, I think the average person would still probably give this movie a score of 6. I myself give it an 8 but realize that a good compromise between non-aviation/old movie lovers/history teachers and nuts like me is a score of 7.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Impressive on-location and aerial photography highlight this film about naval air training and romance.
Art-227 January 1999
The U.S. Navy Department cooperated fully with the making of this film, which was dedicated to the United States Naval Aviation Service. With war clouds hovering over Europe, the Navy knew that enlistments would increase with the release of the movie, so they eagerly allowed on-location shooting at the Naval Air Training Station in Pensicola, Florida and the Naval Air Station on North Island in San Diego, California, and allowed the use of naval equipment. I was surprised at the clunky WWI biplanes used for training in Pensicola, but was impressed with the huge "flying boats" in San Diego. These were multi-crew seaplanes which were lifted out of the water by huge cranes for storage on land, an impressive sight. The movie is sprinkled with a bit of tedious romantic rivalry between brothers George Brent and John Payne for Olivia de Havilland, some comedy provided by Frank McHugh, and some suspense about the outcome of a test flight of a plane Brent designed. It's very typical of the military films of the period, following a group of would-be pilots, some of whom make it and some of whom don't.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
We Need Better Equipment!!!
xerses1323 May 2009
WINGS OF THE NAVY is a typical service picture of the time. It features parallel stories of a young Naval Aviator (John Payne) training and his eventual involvement with his Brothers' (George Brent) fiancé (Olivia De Havilland). It will come to nobodies surprise that this triangle will end in favor of the younger and better looking Payne with De Havilland. Brent no doubt retiring back to Bette Davis. The rest of the films cast is rounded out by standard WARNER BROTHERS contract players.

The real Stars' are the Planes and training facilities of the U.S. Navy. It is quite evident that the U.S.N. was deeply committed to the expansion of its air arm. This film focusing primarily on training, then the PBY Catalina Flying Boat, one of the most successful aircraft of its type, many still flying today. The prime striking arm of the U.S.N. the Aircraft Carriers are largely ignored.

Seeing this film a American no doubt felt that our Navy was ready for war. Others watching would not think so. Our future Allies' Great Britain and Soviet Russia were already flying the more advanced Fighters, Hawker Hurricane, Supermarine Spitfire and Polikarpov I-16 respectively. Future enemy Imperial Japan featured the likes of the Mitsubishi A6M Zero (I.J.N.) and Nakajima Ki-43 (I.J.A.), Nazi Germany their Messerschmitt BF-109 (Me-109). Even the Italians looked more impressive with their Reggiane Re.2000.

In the film our most advanced (experimental) Fighter is one of character George Brents' design. It is a Bi-Plane, looking more suitable for WWI then the coming conflict. No wonder Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany seeing films like this had such a low opinions of our war fighting capabilities. Fortunetly like a iceberg the unseen was far more impressive then what could easily be observed. They would find this out in less then a year once war commenced. Much to their chagrin.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aviation drama is formula film with good training exercises...
Doylenf26 September 2002
While the training exercises are realistic enough in WINGS OF THE NAVY, filmed on location at actual training grounds in Pensacola and San Diego, its story is strictly formula stuff with a love triangle between two brothers (George Brent, John Payne) in love with the same girl (Olivia de Havilland) holding the action sequences together.

This is almost like a B&W version of PEARL HARBOR--but lacking the punch of the PEARL HARBOR war scenes. It's a dated aviation drama, with a love story against the background of preparations for war. However, none of the characters have any real depth and there's the usual clumsy comedy attempts of Frank McHugh which become irritating after awhile.

The chief players are pleasant enough and it's interesting to see how the sea planes operated in San Diego--but the script is strictly off the Warner assembly line. Olivia de Havilland is pretty as a picture as the heroine but given little to do while Brent and Payne share most of the spotlight. The training scenes give us an interesting look at the air force equipment of 1939--and I'm sure it encouraged many young men to enlist two years before World War II broke out.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An Aviation Buff's Delight
bkoganbing23 May 2009
Covering a lot of the same ground, but a year earlier than MGM's Flight Command, Wings Of The Navy is one of those military preparedness films that Hollywood was importuned to make by the powers that be in Washington, DC. Those folks knew that we would be in a shooting war and shortly and this was their way of getting America psychologically ready.

George Brent and John Payne play a pair of brothers who are career Navy men, Annapolis graduates and sons of a late naval hero. Dad was an early Navy pilot and Brent has followed in his footsteps. Payne would like to do the same, but he's in the submarine service. Nevermind, Payne gets himself a transfer much to Brent's displeasure because Payne's a competitive sort and likely to get himself killed trying to out do big brother.

The brothers are also rivals for Olivia DeHavilland who was once again in a thankless role of the girl who was the object. For someone of her talents, DeHavilland had precious little to do except look pretty. She was desperately trying to get roles of more substance. She would shortly in Gone With The Wind that same year of 1939.

Wings Of The Navy is a real treat for aviation buffs with the various types of planes that were the latest thing in 1939 being shown. Also some even earlier types of planes were what the Navy was training with even then. We lagged far behind Germany and Japan and even Great Britain at this point.

After World War II when President Truman decided to consolidate the services into one Department of Defense, the big sticking point was Naval Aviation. The Army was willing to let their Army Air Force become a separate Air Force service, the Navy insisted on controlling its planes that were taking off and landing from carriers. The compromise was reached and both the separate Air Force and the Navy controlling its aviation service was allowed. What we see here in Wings Of The Navy is a stage in the development of Naval aviation that helped win the Pacific War.

And it is to those who were in that service in that war that this film review is respectfully dedicated.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Low on story plots but great on aviation shots
kijii7 November 2016
If you are interested in the aviation history (in general) or naval aviation (in particular), you might find this movie interesting. Otherwise, as a movie plot, the story is very thin indeed.

George Brent and John Payne play two naval brothers. Their father was a naval aviation hero, and Brent has followed in his footsteps as an aviator and instructor at the training station in Pensacola Florida. His younger brother, who has always looked up to him, wants to transfer from submarines to aviation after seeing his brother.

Filmed at the naval aviation bases in Pensacola and San Diego, there are some interesting shots of training sessions in the film. De Havilland plays Brent's fiancée who falls in love with Payne. Frank McHugh adds some humur, with that characteristic laugh of his, as one of Payne's fellow trainees.

Again, any plot here is overshadowed, for better or worse, by the aviation shots, thus making this more of a recruiting film than a movie with an interesting plot.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Nearly, but lacks Fire Power
dougandwin21 January 2011
Having read all previous reviews, and having just watched this Movie again on TCM, it seems Warner Bros have tried very hard to make a stirring story at the same time as glorifying the US armed forces (as they were at that time). Sadly, they have failed to give any real life to what should have been more than just a run of the mill programmer. Cast-wise, George Brent is far too stodgy in a role made for a Flynn or Cagney, John Payne was fine (very early in his career), Olivia de Havilland was gorgeous but really had nothing to do and was wasted, while the usual Warner stalwarts (like McHugh and Toomey) played the same old characters they have portrayed in countless films. Photography was not bad at all, and the sound track was very good.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
How did we ever win World War II?
vincentlynch-moonoi28 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I'm serious. After watching this film, I wonder how we ever won the Second World War.

My other question is -- why would the public go to such a film in that magic cinematic year of 1939 when they also had films like "Gone With The Wind" and "The Wizard Of Oz"? This film is so shallow that an ant couldn't drown in it.

The premise is quite simple and had potential: a young submarine man (John Payne) spends his whole life trying to compete with his impressive older brother (George Brent). And then they fall in love with the same woman (Olivia de Havilland)! Then tragedy strikes and pushes the romance in a particular direction.

There's really only two reasons to watch this film. First, that you really like one of the stars (and I like them all, but I still wish I hadn't wasted my time). The other is that you're a flying aficionado...which I'm not...because the one thing I'll give the film credit for is some really good flying sequences (although since when are cloud layers perpendicular to the earth?).

The 4 main characters here are played by: George Brent -- I usually like George Brent, particularly when he was starring with Bette Davis, but here he seems sort of wooden. Olivia de Havilland is the love interest here, and she has a couple of very good scenes; interesting to note that this was the same year as "GWTW"! John Payne, an underrated and mostly forgotten actor, does nicely here. Frank McHugh -- yawn...well actually here he's pretty decent here, and for a change he's not playing essentially exactly the same character as he did in most films.

I guess you could say this film has its moments, but they are few and far between.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I was seven years old when I saw this movie with my parents so I would say it left an impression on me
cmfield27 February 2005
I was seven years old when my parents took me to see "Wings of the Navy" in 1939 at the Vogue Theater in Montebello, CA. I believe this was the first movie I had seen. At least I don't recall any movie before this one. I remember sitting near the back of the theater with my parents. I really like the flying scenes and I remember the sounds of the airplane engines. The love scenes did not do anything for me of course. Boy that is amazing I can remember those details. I remember calling the movie Wings of the Avery. Does anyone know if there was ever a DVD or Video made of the movie? I have looked everywhere I can think of with no luck. If someone knows where I can get a copy of it I would be one happy guy.

Sincerely,

Charles Field
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertaining, not great
Mikel312 January 2016
I watched 'Wings of the Navy' (1939) on TCM Today. I wouldn't say it was a great film, it was entertaining and fun to see a VERY young John Payne and Olivia de Havilland in action. Olivia de Havilland was quite a talented beauty. She was at her peak in those years (1930s through the 40s) IMO. John Payne looked even younger than his 27 years at the time. I notice a marked improvement in his performance 8 years later in 'Miracle on 34th Street' (1947). In this movie he did little more than wear a uniform well and deliver his lines appropriately. George Brent was good in it as John Payne's older brother. He always could do the dignified characters well. I'd rate this a 4 out of 10 stars. I was just reading this about the movie at the IMDb: " 'Lux Radio Theater' broadcast a 60 minute radio adaptation of the movie on October 7, 1940 with George Brent, John Payne and Olivia de Havilland reprising their film roles." I find it interesting how many old films had the original cast do radio versions too. BTW - I enjoyed the footage of the early flying boat aircraft...especially the larger two engine models.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
***
edwagreen25 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
John Payne and George Brent play two brothers who have always been highly competitive with each other. They come from a well-known navy flier and Brent, as the older brother, has built quite a reputation through the years. This propels Payne to leave his submarine position and transfer into flying.

Olivia de Havilland plays Brent's girlfriend who has the opportunity to meet the Payne character and he falls for her. Of course, as she is about to tell Brent of her new love, he meets with an accident in the air and seems to be no longer able to fly.

Frank McHugh is a scene stealer and providing comic relief in this film. He looks like a sad-sack case who will easily strike out in flying only to overcome any adversity.

The positive ending was a pleasure to watch.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed