Hitler's Madman (1943) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
22 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Really does not do justice to the historic assassination of Heydrich.
FISHCAKE18 March 2000
This film story of the assassination of Reinhard Heydrich (titled by the Nazis as Reichs Protector of Bohemia and Moravia, by the Czechs as "The Hangman", and also one of the architects of "The Final Solution")and of the subsequent annihilation of the village of Lidice by the Nazis, really does not do justice to the subject. Although released by MGM, it was actually produced by poverty row Producer Releasing Corporation (PRC). Some of the cast members are old familiars and rather good, but none give a feeling that these are Czechs being murdered by Hitler's minions. As war propaganda, it is a success, and it at least gives the spirit of the tragedy of Lidice, if not historically detailed facts. John Carradine is effective as Heydrich, especially in his deathbed scene.

The facts about the assassination briefly are that two Czech partisans were parachuted into Czechoslovakia from an RAF plane. They managed to ambush Heydrich's open Mercedes, throw a bomb under it, and escape to a church. Heydrich died a few days later from complications arising from the penetration of his spleen by bomb fragments and debris from the car upholstery. Using torture, the Nazis discovered the whereabouts of the two partisans and the SS killed them at once. Lidice was picked more or less at random from among villages known to have anti-German leanings. On Hitler's orders, the men were shot and the women and children removed to camps, while the buildings of the site were levelled. When it became known in the allied world, this made excellent anti-Nazi propaganda, and more than one film was made of the subject. It may be that the massive retaliation backfired somewhat on the Nazis also by stiffening Czech resistance to the occupation.
28 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Iron Heart
bkoganbing28 August 2012
This film is starts with a deceptive title. Reinhart Heydrich was many things, but mad as in clinically insane was not one of them. In fact among his peers he was known as the man with an 'iron heart'. Cold blooded efficiency in some of the nastiest butchery ever seen on this planet was his stock in trade.

And John Carradine played him that way. In many ways Heydrich was the archetype Aryan superman that Hitler lauded, but this guy scared Hitler and all the other top Nazis.

MGM made this film and even though it is a quickie B picture hurriedly put together to take advantage of current events of the war, Hitler's Madman has that tiffany type gloss that MGM product was noted for.

As was reported and at the time not reported fully, how could it have been since we had little access to the news from the Nazi point of view. But word got out about the bloody reprisals made against the Czech people whom Heydrich was governing even from behind the lines. Lidice was razed to the ground as it was the location of the assassination. If anything we could only guess how bad it was.

There are three other interesting portrayals to note. First is Howard Freeman as Heydrich's superior, Heinrich Himmler. William Shirer said that he looked about as frightening as a schoolmaster and that's how Freeman does him as well. His scene with the dying Heydrich is classic as he tells Heydrich he's going out a hero for the Fatherland and Heydrich just doesn't want to go.

Then there's Edgar Kennedy whom I never knew doing anything else but being the slow burn comedian. He plays a cynical hermit who shunned Czech society, but has no use for the Nazis either. But being and choosing to live alone makes him better able to adapt.

My favorite however was Ludwig Stossel who plays the German mayor of Lidice who is a proud Nazi, but who also hears about the loss of his two sons in Russia. Still when Heydrich is attacked, he's arrested for not doing enough to keep the people down and appreciative of their new masters. All of Stossel's protests about what a good party man he is and how loyal to the Fuehrer he is, avail him naught.

One big star is in this, but Ava Gardner is an extra somewhere in the crowd of Lidice citizens. I couldn't spot her, but you might have better luck.

Despite the deceptive title Hitler's Madman does hold up well for today's audiences. A film about Heydrich's whole career would be a fascinating one for today's audience.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Depressing. Very.
blanche-29 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
What a godawful true story. So depressing. The same story is told in Fritz Lang's "Hangmen Also Die."

This is the story of the destruction of one town, Lidice, in Czechoslovakia after the assassination of a Nazi commandant, Reinhardt Heydrich, played by John Carradine.

All the men were killed, the women sent to camps, their children taken from them. All buildings and all land were set on fire.

One of the 17 children who survived became the mayor of the rebuilt town. 143 women survived.

This is an unsparing propaganda film. So much suffering by innocent people at the hands of brutal, sadistic Nazis.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not historically correct, but fascinating
theowinthrop20 February 2005
Douglas Sirk's career is recalled for his wonderful colorful attacks on the "American Dream" in those films he made (usually with Rock Hudson, Jane Wyman, and Agnes Moorehead) in the 1950s. Never was the lusciousness of American prosperity used to show the underside of our wealth oriented culture. But Sirk had a long career in Europe and Hollywood before he made "Magnificent Obsession" and "Imitation of Life". His films in the middle forties included some superb costume films with George Sanders (like "Summer Storm")and this early one which really stars John Carridine as one of the most monstrous figures of World War II, Reinhard Heydrich the so-called "Protector" of Bohemia, who chaired the Wannsee Conference of 1941 that created the "Final Solution". Whatever degree of venom Carridine brings to the role is nothing like the effortless evil the original Heydrich dripped. Still it is a very effective performance.

The film is based, by the way, on the poem "Lidice" by Edna St. Vincent Millay. Written shortly after that village was decimated in the reprisals following Heydrich's death, it is recited (in a woman's voice) in most of the film, but it's closing lines are recited by the male actors at it's conclusion - quite effectively as most of these actors (Edgar Kennedy, Jimmy Conlon, Ralph Morgan) have been slaughtered by the Nazis in front of us. As some of these actors (Kennedy and Conlon) usually were seen in comedies, their use as straight dramatic actors in this film is a revelation of what they might have done if they had not been used in comedy so much.

To me the best moment of this film (aside the use of the poem) is when Carridine lies dying in a hospital, visited by Howard Freeman as his comrade and fellow S.S. bigwig, Heinrich Himmler. Freeman was an affective actor in comic and dramatic parts, and here shows the hideous Himmler as a banal Babbitt bureaucrat. Perhaps not quite correct historically (Himmler was stranger than George Babbitt) but in it's way quite effective. Carridine had (in his characterization) shown something of the intellectual pretensions of Heydrich, but as he is dying he suddenly realizes he is frightened of dying. He tries to explain this to Himmler who doesn't care (so much for being a fellow Nazi comrade) and only sees the mission of the dying Heydrich to become a martyr to stiffen German will to victory. As Carridine finally dies, Freeman only sees his duty to make a large enough retaliation on the local population so that people will realize that he is harder than the dead martyr ever was.

Historically this is not accurate either. Heydrich had been in high level Nazi planning for several years, and frightened not only Himmler as a rival, but Bormann, Goebbels, and Hitler himself. Heydrich had a nasty "rumor" in his past: his father, a musician, may have been descended from Jews. This was never settled. However, due to this particular rumor, Heydrich's opponents felt they could control him. In actuality, it was easier to control an out of control Mercendes Benz. As soon as he could, Heydrich began collecting information on every one of his rivals about their family backgrounds (including Hitler's). It was his eventual determination that he would one day be the successor of "Der Fuhrer". Himmler, Hitler, and the others may have officially honored Heydrich as a national martyr, but in their own private moments they all were fully glad to see that he was dead and out of the way.

Their real reason for the massive retaliation was the fear of copycat plans. The Czechs who killed Heydrich were trained in London, and had Churchill's assent on their plot. No doubt, had they gotten away with it, plots against other Nazi big-wigs would have been set in motion. The retaliation was to remind the local populations that the Germans would not hesitate to depopulate them if anymore assassinations occurred. It was also a reminder to the Allies that if they wanted to save lives they better not plan any further killings. As such it worked. Although several plans for an attack on Hitler were finally set up, none were ever put into operation (the 1944 bomb plot was by the German General staff, not by Churchill). Whether this was wise or not is a matter we cannot ever tell the answer to.

Heydrich's actual death is nothing like the hideous death camps he set up for Jews, Gypsies, Slavs. etc. But it still is somewhat pleasant to think of the agony of his last days, his spine broken by the steel springs of his exploded car seat. The affection that his title "Protector" supposedly suggested is truly shown by a story of how a German soldier desperately tried to get passers by to assist to help move the "Protector" to a nearby hospital quickly. An unknown Czech citizen looked at the dying man in the ruins of his Mercedes, shrugged his shoulders, and said, "The hospital is around the corner. He could walk there." Then he left the flustered soldier.
48 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Redeemed by a brilliant turn from John Carradine
MOscarbradley9 August 2018
Let's not kid ourselves, "Hitler's Madman" is not only no masterpiece but pretty terrible in places yet director Douglas Sirk's movie about the assassination of Heydrich, made almost as the events themselves were unfolding, has great moments. There are scenes here as good as any in war movies, just as there are B-Movie moments as bad as any in B-Movies. Certainly the events portrayed are harrowing enough for this to feel like the ultimate feel-bad movie; perhaps what is most astonishing is that it was made at all while the war was still going on.

It's let down, (badly), by some awful acting but redeemed by Sirk's brilliant handling of individual scenes and by a terrific performance from John Carradine as Heydrich, (his death scene is Oscar-worthy). It may not stick very closely to the events but it's still preferable to the more recent movie dealing with the same subject.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
John Carradine makes a perfect Nazi Swine.
gordonl566 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
HITLER'S MADMAN 1943

This Producer's Releasing Corporation production is one of several put out by various studios dealing with the assassination of Nazi bigwig, Reinhard Heydrich.

The film is also the first film made in Hollywood by future hit-maker, Douglas Sirk.

It is June 1942, and the British parachute several Czech agents into their homeland to stir up trouble. They want the locals to sabotage the massive munitions and armaments factories situated throughout Czechoslovakia. The Czechs had ended up with quite a few heavy industries after the break-up of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1918.

Needless to say the Nazi types are not amused with this idea. Hostages are taken and the slightest whisper of dissent brings swift action by the Gestapo. In charge of the country, is the highly efficient, Heydrich. Heydrich is played here with particular glee by a blonde haired John Carradine. A perfect Nazi swine is Carradine , he smiles while signing death warrants , while at the same time he picks out young girls to serve as "comfort" girls for the troops on the Eastern Front.

The main leads here are Alan Curtis as the Czech agent, and his girl, Patricia Morrison. Also in the mix are, Edgar Kennedy, Jimmy Conlin and Alan Shean. At first the locals are reluctant to rise up against the Nazi types. That changes after Carradine has the local priest shot, and grabs up several of the village girls.

Heydrich is then bushwhacked on a forest road and badly wounded. He lingers on in hospital for several days before dying in agony. The Germans of course retaliate and round up the village women, shoot all the men, then raze the village, (Lidice) to the ground.

The story plays fast and loose with the actual facts of the event. But so what, it is meant to be a flag-waver, and as such it works. Most war films produced at the height of the conflict had gobs of anti-Axis propaganda.

MGM was so impressed with the film, that they bought the finished product from PRC and released it themselves. Needless to say the film turned a profit.

The director, Douglas Sirk, was a German Ex-pat who escaped Germany in 1939 and came to Hollywood. By the 1950's he was turning out big money earners like, WRITTEN ON THE WIND, ALL THAT HEAVEN ALLOWS, MAGNIFICENT OBSESSION, IMITATION OF LIFE and ALL I DESIRE. He also scored with an earlier series of film noir productions such as, LURED, SLEEP MY LOVE and SHOCKPROOF.

Look close and you will see a 21 year old Ava Gardner in an unbilled bit.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The greatest monster of Carradine's career.
mark.waltz11 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Real monsters really existed, and while Dracula, Bluebeard and all those mad doctors were nefarious, none were as evil as the Nazi leader he plays here, thriving on the misery of the Czech's in this quaint village. No non-Nazi escapes from his inhumane treatment, and with pleasure, he has a priest shot, drives a young girl to suicide (and then mocks her choice for freedom), and sends innocent men to the Russian front. But like others in occupied Europe, the people stand up and take matters into their own hands. As history has shown, the Nazi's won many battles, but ultimately lost the war and their immortal souls.

As I scream "Die, Nazi, die!" one more time at a viewing of this as the villains get what they deserve (wishing it was nastier and slow and painful), this elaborate propaganda film shows the atrocities. Filmed by the low budget PRC but released by MGM's B unit to give it bigger build- up, this has so much going for it. Future Broadway legend Patricia Morison is a fine young heroine who refuses to back down from teaching youngsters the Czech national anthem, while Ralph Morgan is outstanding as her father who takes things into his hands.

Ludwig Stossel, a Nazi victim in "All Through the Night" plays a traitor to his own people and pays for his crimes against humanity. The legendary dramatic stage actress Blanche Yurka has several key scenes as a town matron, but is surprisingly unbilled. Every role is cast perfectly, and the technical achievements are brilliant as well. As directed by a young Douglas Sirk, this ranks as one of the great world war II anti-Nazi films that reminds us that the fascists of the world will pay one way or another, yet the world never seems to learn that lesson.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
could have been more boring
RanchoTuVu18 November 2010
An interesting movie that does not do much to inspire the viewer through its portrayal of the Czech resistance, though they face a grim ending, but definitely catches the interest in the portrayal of Nazi brutality through the part played by John Carradine as Reich Protector Heydrich, who routinely had people shot in order to maintain a level of fear and control. The characterizations of the townspeople are too quaint for this subject, but they (the townspeople) do catch on as Carradine's brutality increases, with the most memorable scene being when he and his men take over a philosophy class, in a scene that manages to get fairly intense. If it were just up to Alan Curtis to carry the film as Karel Vavra, the film would fall into a dark pit of boredom, since within any resistance movement there is always collaborators within families that need to be killed. Those characters are all left out, and so the drama quotient is not very intense. Nonetheless, Carradine's Heydrich is definitely worth watching.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hitler Makes People Mad
wes-connors14 December 2016
From his relatively safe base in England, Czech soldier Alan Curtis (as Karel Vavra) parachutes into his former hometown of Lidice, now controlled by bloodthirsty German Nazis. The village is a resource-rich riverside farming community, now helping to fatten Hitler's madmen. Hiding out and encouraging residents to support British allies through sabotage, Mr. Curtis reacquaints himself with glamorous schoolteacher Patricia Morison (as Jarmilla Hanka). While on his mission to bolster local resistance, Curtis is unable to resist Ms. Morrison's movie-star beauty. Their greatest obstacle is John Carradine (as Reinhardt Heydrich), an especially nasty Nazi called "The Hangman" and "The Protector" (of Hitler's Third Reich)...

This was director Douglas Sirk's first American film, after arriving from Hitler's Germany. He makes a great first impression on US shores and had, no doubt, some personal observations about Adolf Hitler and his fascist regime. The brutality is addressed more vividly in modern movies. Older films had to tone down the violence or omit it altogether in favor of gun-ho propaganda. Sirk manages to covey the horror without gore and tells the story exceptionally well...

"Hitler's Madman" is bogged down by the ill-placed Hollywood-style romance played by co-leads Curtis and Morrison. They are out of place, here, but the film's supporting roles are marvelous. The "Madman" in the title refers to Mr. Carradine. There are a couple others who would have made "Hitler's Madmen" a more appropriate heading. Carradine has several great scenes. So does gluttonous Ludwig Stossel (as Herman Bauer), the mayor inserted by the Nazis. And, while only seen briefly, Sirk has portly Howard Freeman (as Heinrich Himmler) primping memorably in a mirror while planning a slaughter...

From the obvious twists in Edgar Kennedy's showy alcohol-drenched hermit (Nepomuk) to the subtle revenge enacted by mournful German mayor's wife Johanna Hofer (as Magda), there are engaging characterizations. Yet, the story belongs to the "organizers and intellectuals" targeted by Hitler, and represented by veteran actor Ralph Morgan (as Jan Hanka). The father of leading lady Morrison, Mr. Morgan initially doesn't want to support the resistance because he believes his entire village could be destroyed. His character's journey is the one to follow and Morgan's "Jan Hanka" walks away with the film.

******** Hitler's Madman (6/10/1943) Douglas Sirk ~ Alan Curtis, Patricia Morison, Ralph Morgan, John Carradine
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Nothing too great but it's good enough all.
Boba_Fett113823 May 2009
This is one of those little typical WW II allied propaganda-flicks, made during WW II. It's rather simplistic and cheap looking all but its all enough to still make this movie a good watch, of course especially when you're a fan of the genre. Of course the biggest problem with this movie now days is its propaganda undertone that can be basically seen back in every sequence of the movie. Cowards become heroes and bad men turn into good ones. It makes the movie a bit ridicules and not always credible enough to watch now days but it's a part of the time period the movie got made in. The story itself is quite interesting on its won right but you feel it deserved a better and more fair and closer to the truth treatment. Who knows, maybe filmmakers will pick up this story once again and give it the treatment it really deserves and making it the great movie that this movie in potential could had also been. None of the actors really known to impress within this movie but John Carradine still manages to push the movie to greater heights with his role of Nazi SS commander. It's a movie worth watching due to its main story but it's production values and acting make this movie also far from a great or impressive one. 6/10
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Heydrich the Protector
kapelusznik189 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** The second movie- The other "Hangmen also Die"- out of Hollywood in 1943 about the massacre of the people, Men 16 and over, of the Czech town of Lidice in the spring of 1942 by the Nazis. That in retaliation for the assassination of the country's Reich Protector Reinhard "Hangman" Heydrich, John Carradine, who was fatally injured-he died a few days later- by Czech resistant fighters lead by British based local boy Karel Vavra, Alan Curtis. Heydrich for his part was really asking for it in how he treated the local Czech population with total disrespect for their men, who more or less put up with it, and especially the women whom he treated like they were street hookers.

Always trying to outdo himself and get the Czechs to hate him even more then they already do, if that's at all possible, Heydrich guns down the local priest Father Cemlanek, Al Shean, who mildly protested his actions against the Catholic Church. This action by the "Hangman" finally got the Czech population to wake up and plan to do Heyderich in the first chance they got to get a crack or shot at him. This was when he was driving through the countryside in his armor plated Mercedes totally unprotected by his Gestapo goons. As he's dying from his wounds from an ambush Heydrich is promised by his boss SS chief Heinrich Himmler,Howard Freeman,that he'll have the nearest Czech village-Lidice-to his assassin site wiped off the map to show the world that he means business.

****SPOILERS**** We've seen it all before as well as since with the Germans acting like the movie calls them "Madmen" in wiping out the entire village of Lidice for the death of just one man whom almost all those in the tragic village had nothing at all to do with. As for the dying Heydrich he seems to have a vision of things to come, the complete defeat of Nazi Germany,by telling Himmler that he'll soon suffer, together with Hitler & Co., the same fate he's soon to suffer. As history showed Himmler was to kill himself less the three years later on May 23, 1945 by swallowing a vile of poison hidden in his mouth while in the custody of the British Army. P.S Check out a young 21 year old Ave Gardner as one of the young Czech women who were to be sent to the Russian Front by Hydreich to "entertain" the German troops!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A film too good for PRC?
planktonrules29 November 2019
Back in the 1930s and 40s, several very small film production companies were known collectively as the 'Poverty Row studios'. This is because they made films with the tiniest of budgets and these outfits generally didn't even own studios but rented space on major studios' lots....filming after hours when the staff of the more prestigious studios were finished for the day. Among these tiny outfits was PRC--maker of some of the cheapest and worst films. of the day. However, something strange happened with its film "Hitler's Madman"....apparently it wasn't a bad film after all In fact, it got attention from the largest and most prestigious studio, MGM, and MGM bought the film and released it as one of their own!

The story is broadly based on the assassination of the Nazi governor of Czechoslovakia, Reinhardt Heydrich. Heydrich was among the most evil of all the Nazis, having come up with the plan known as 'The Final Solution', i.e., the extermination of all the Jews. And, because he was such an important figure to the Nazi regime that the people of Ledice, Czechoslovakia were liquidated in retaliation for this killing.

So is this film any good and does it hold up well today? Surprisingly, yes...it is very well made and effective...and still packs a powerful punch. Part of it is that although the film lacks stars (not unusual for a PRC film), it has some excellent and familiar character actors. Additionally, although the film plays a bit fast and loose with the facts, it actually sticks closer than you'd expect and the way the Nazis were portrayed was rather realistic...as most low-budget war films of the era tended to make the Nazis either stupid or ridiculously evil (more like Snidely Whiplash than a Nazi). Overall, I was impressed by this one....much of it because I just cannot believe PRC would be able to make a quality picture!
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a lot more brutal than expected
SnoopyStyle2 September 2023
It's 1942. The Czechs are being brutalized by the Nazis starting with men like Nazi SS commander Reinhard "The Hangman" Heydrich. Karel Vavra parachutes in from Britain to organize resistance in his home town. He reunites with his young love Jarmilla Hanka. The villagers are initially reluctant. With mounting brutality, some villagers decide to act.

This is a wartime propaganda film. I don't recognize any of these actors. After recently escaped from Nazi Germany, director Douglas Sirk is not holding back. It's a lot more brutal than I expected. Of course, the war was brutal and uncertain at this time.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
hitler's madman
mossgrymk18 September 2023
Did you notice that the title character gets maybe fifteen minutes max of screen time? Maybe the film makers realized what is painfully evident on screen, namely that, thanks to the acting skills of John Carradine, the psychotic sociopath, Rheinhard Heydrich, is by far the film's most interesting character and that giving him additional exposure ran the risk of the odious Nazi's hijacking the film from the dull, noble Czechs none of whom, I might add, are played by Czech or Slovakian actors. In other words, if you watch the Carradine stuff, especially his ghastly deathbed scene that is the only time this boring film gets to the heart of the evil, Wehrmacht zeitgeist and the only time you realize that it is directed by a master rather than, say, Richard Thorpe, and skip the rest you'll do ok. Give it a C.

PS...Ava sure is one hot Czech!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Brilliant American Debut for Douglas Sirk
bowiebks17 May 2002
Although the history portrayed in this little cheapie is not 100% accurate, the power and style of the great director Douglas Sirk shines through all the way. Carradine's death-bed scene is superbly acted, photographed and directed, and the climax, propaganda or not, is unforgettable. It is well worth your time!
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
For 1943 This Was an Above Average Depiction of Nazi Perfidy
Turfseer4 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
"Hitler's Madman," released in 1943, stands as a remarkable example of American wartime propaganda cinema that manages to strike a chord of authenticity. Director Douglas Sirk, typically associated with 1950s melodramas, brought a unique perspective to this project, given his German background and firsthand understanding of Nazi ideology.

The film delves into an anomalous publicized chapter of Nazi brutality: the vengeful massacre of Lidice, a Czech town. In this heinous act, all adult males were ruthlessly murdered, while women and children were dispatched to concentration camps, where most met their tragic end. This atrocity was a response to the assassination of Reinhard Heydrich, the Reich Protector of Bohemia and Moravia, whom Hitler dubbed "the man with the iron heart."

John Carradine's portrayal of Heydrich carries a chilling resemblance to the Nazi leader. While Carradine effectively captures Heydrich's sadism in pivotal scenes, a touch of charm could have made his character even more sinister. Particularly striking is Heydrich's visit to a university in Prague, where he berates intellectuals, dooming male students to the Russian front and women to sexual slavery in brothels. A powerful moment unfolds as a student, Klara, chooses to end her life by leaping from a window rather than succumb to Nazi depravity.

In another grim scene, Heydrich publicly executes a priest during a procession. While historical accuracy regarding Heydrich's direct involvement in such acts is debatable, reprisals against civilians on baseless charges were tragically common.

Interestingly, the film began as a documentary but was transformed into a dramatic narrative by Louis B. Mayer of MGM, who was deeply impressed by it. One of the standout additions is Heydrich's deathbed scene after being mortally wounded during an assassination attempt. Heydrich, once formidable, reveals vulnerability, expressing his fear of death to Himmler (played by Howard Freeman). However, Freeman's portrayal of Himmler falls short, depicting him as a stereotypical sadist and inaccurately overweight, contrasting with Himmler's real-life slender and gaunt appearance.

The film shifts its focus to the plight of Lidice's residents. Karel Vavra (Alan Curtis), a Czech paratrooper sent from London to assassinate Heydrich, emerges as the central character. His childhood sweetheart, Jamilla Hanka (Patricia Morison), adds depth to the story. Jamilla's tragic fate serves as a martyrdom symbol for the resistance.

Jamilla's father, Jan (Ralph Morgan), undergoes a significant transformation from initial reluctance to join the resistance to becoming a determined participant after the murder of the village priest. It's worth noting that the film takes liberties with the historical accuracy of Heydrich's assassination, with most characters being composites or creations for dramatic effect.

Ludwig Stossel's portrayal of Mayor Bauer, a loyal ethnic German under Nazi rule, is noteworthy. His character's fate illustrates the fragility of those who appease their oppressors until they become scapegoats for major events.

The film's climax, depicting the harrowing roundup and murder of Lidice's inhabitants, may not fully capture the horror of the actual event. However, in the context of 1943, when details about Nazi atrocities were not widely known, it still delivers a powerful emotional punch. As the haunting images of the murdered townspeople fade in and out while their voices resonate, audiences of the time likely began to grasp the true extent of Nazi malevolence. "Hitler's Madman" is a compelling testament to the power of cinema as a tool for conveying historical truths and stirring emotions during a tumultuous period in history.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Powerful and Profound Film
jlthornb5118 June 2015
As poetically dark as the poem recited throughout, this is a motion picture that should be studied and reflected upon for many generations to come. We must never forget. Lidice by Edna St. Vincent Millay is powerfully incorporated into the drama as the assassination of the brutal monster, Reinhard Heydrich is recounted and the subsequent murderous destruction of the town of Lidice exposed. The diabolical evilness of Heydrich is blood chillingly brought to the screen by director Douglas Sirk in his first Hollywood film after fleeing the Nazis himself. While the use of the stunning poem and the direction are superb, no film or actor could possibly convey what happened during this time and do justice to its under barbarous criminality and hellishness. This film is indeed a sincere and moving attempt to do so and while doomed to failure by the enormity of the horror it must bring to the screen, it succeeds in bringing the tragic story of Lidice's destruction to a wide audience. However, neither that terrible event nor the sickening, pure evil of Heydrich and the Nazis can ever be captured on celluloid.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
****
edwagreen11 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Dramatization regarding Lidice, Czechoslovakia and its fate following the death of Heydrich, Nazi-protector of the city.

We find agricultural people, many of whom are apolitical and willing to lead their lives under Nazi rule.

One man who had gone to England returns with others and their goals are for sabotage.

John Carradine, as Heydrich, is the ruthless, outrageous leader who is willing to do anything to maintain strict order and control.

One of the towns leading citizens shows his contempt when a priest is shot down during a town festival for violating group gatherings.

Carradine, in his dying words, is not exactly flattering to the Nazi cause, but Himmler uses his assassination to speak of unspeakable horrors which befell the citizens of Lidice.

The tension is constant as a people show their determination to show right from wrong in society.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hangmen also die..
dbdumonteil28 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Although it was overshadowed by Lang's "Hangmen also die" , "Hitler's madman" seems closer to Borzage's "the mortal storm" ,with its depiction of life in an occupied town.But the finale was probably borrowed from Abel Gance's "J'accuse" (1919 and 1937) and its "wake of the dead" sequences.

Great sequences: the professor of philosophy resuming his lecture in front of the Nazis (there is a similar sequence in "the mortal storm");the female student,refusing to be treated as a beast ;the admirable scene where the mayor's wife,reading that her sons are dead, and cursing the "Fuhrer" (a famous lullaby the name of which I cannot remember ,makes a very moving score, as she remembers her boys' childhood).The hangman, in his bed and begging for morphine,as he too realizes that the Third Reich means nothing when you're dying.

Probably Sirk's best forties film .In the fifties,he would come back to WW2 and the Nazi barbarity with a work I consider his masterpiece : "A time to love and a time to die" (1958),from the great German pacifist writer Erich Maria Remarque's novel.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
dark days, but a mostly true story.
ksf-226 September 2023
Modus operandi of hitler's crowd, and the third reich... rule by terror, cruelty, and revenge. When the czech locals refuse to co-operate with the germans, ss officer heydrich wants to get revenge on the town, to destroy their morale. He takes extreme, cruel measures, hoping this will stop any further action by the local resistance. This was made in 1943, while the war was still in full charge! This wasn't something that was swept under the rug and not discovered until years later. According to wikipedia, this started out as a documentary, but when mgm studios bought it and made so many changes, it's more of a fictionalized account. The ending is pretty bleak. But mostly accurate. Directed by douglas sirk. Similar story to "the secret of santa vittoria", made much later in 1969, also a story of revenge by the nazis when the town won't co-operate. Well done, but a dark sign of the times, as the war was still going on.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Effective anti-Nazi propaganda
jarrodmcdonald-120 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The background for this motion picture is quite interesting, maybe more interesting than the film itself. It's an excellent piece of anti-Nazi propaganda...a "B" film turned out by personnel from poverty row studio PRC. Some of them were top-tier filmmakers in Germany such as cinematographer Eugen Schufftan, and of course, director Douglas Sirk. So despite the low budget, it's made by very competent craftsmen.

MGM boss Louis Mayer liked the film so much, he bought it from the original financiers when they were looking for a distributor. This delayed its release into theaters, since Mayer wanted scenes reshot and a few more added. This meant a film made on a shoestring suddenly had its budget expanded, and the end result is something I'd call a B+ (or A-) picture.

Sirk, Schufftan, and one of the original producers (Seymour Nebenzal) were Germans in exile, and they depict the Nazis in a more realistic way than other films covering the same ground. The people of Lidice, Czechoslovakia are presented realistically too-- the entire village of Lidice was wiped out by the Nazis.

When the Nazis gained power in Eastern Europe and took over neighboring countries, they would station "protectors" over these acquired regions. The high-ranking officials reported to Adolf Hitler and Heinrich Himmler. Underneath them were other officials and town mayors. In this case, the mayor of Lidice is a man who has turned on his people and sworn allegiance to The Fuhrer. Lidice's mayor (Ludwig Stossel) is presented as a fat buffoon who doesn't have his people in line. And this will cause problems later.

The protectors would usually drive through the various regions under their control and if something seemed off to them, the mayor and local police would be notified. One day the protector of this region (John Carradine) notices a religious assembly in Lidice. His vehicle stops, he hops out with his men, and they confront the local priest and townsfolk. Carradine is angry, because the people do not have a permit to gather in public.

During a quarrel with the priest, whom Carradine is trying to provoke, the priest is shot and killed. This is the first real violence in the area. Carradine plans to drive back through the village the next morning to see if the mayor has gotten the people back in line.

Before Carradine appears, life is idyllic. The people of Lidice may be under German control, but their way of life has not changed drastically. A resistance fighter (Alan Curtis) shows up; he's a Czech who's been working with American and British allies in England. He is reunited with his girlfriend (Patricia Morison), and he tries to convince her father (Ralph Morgan) to resist the Nazis.

It isn't until Carradine kills the priest that Morgan and the townsfolk realize they need to take a stand against the Nazi regime. The mayor's wife also sides with them, because her two sons were killed on the Russian front fighting for the Fuhrer, which upsets her terribly.

In real life Carradine's character was ambushed along a road outside Lidice. Sirk's film depicts that, though it takes dramatic license with some of it. This version has Curtis' girlfriend ride a bike into the middle of the road to slow down Carradine's jeep, so that Curtis and Morgan can get off a few good shots with their rifles.

The real life ambush did not involve any women, and the death of Carradine's character occurred much quicker. The movie drags it out for maximum dramatic effect-- before Carradine dies, we see Curtis run off with Morison; then she is shot and killed by Nazi soldiers in the woods.

After their love story concludes, we have a lengthy death scene for Carradine. Just before he finally goes to that big swastika in the sky, Himmler arrives to see him. The movie fails to include an interesting fact about the protector's death, such as how he refused to let local Czech doctors treat his injuries, since he felt these men were inferior to German doctors.

After Carradine dies, the last ten minutes are devoted to a bloody reprisal against the village of Lidice. During a comical phone call with Hitler, Himmler decides to destroy the entire village.

The atrocities committed against the people of Lidice are staggering. Although HITLER'S MADMAN was made during the production code era, the firing squad scenes are rather graphic. Probably because the film had been originally made at PRC. If the story had started at MGM with an American director, my guess is it would have been much tamer, more sanitized.

The scenes of mass death, and the fires that level the village are expertly staged, and the movie ends on a very somber note. However, the final sequence is also presented as something meant to inspire audiences...where moviegoers should want to carry on and fight the Nazis on behalf of those who were slaughtered that day, the 10th of June 1942, in Lidice.

A few things crossed my mind when I watched HITLER'S MADMAN. First, I don't think the Nazis and their underlings were ever buffoons. I'd say they were very brutal, very calculating. Eradicating a village was an extreme act that was in every way imaginable, a deliberate (and in their minds, justifiable) measure.

Second, Sirk had actually met the man whose character Carradine is based on, so it's interesting that he ended up becoming a "biographer" of Reinhard Heydrich through the art of motion pictures; one German denouncing another. Third, the event occurred early during America's involvement in the war. Americans entered the war in December 1941. The massacre of Lidice took place just six months later, and there would be another three years before Hitler and Himmler were brought down. Fourth, it's a powerful film that must have been shocking for audiences, particularly the final sequence. It's powerful and shocking to watch now, all these years later.

Fifth, I think there is still a lot of radical militant behavior occurring in the world today, some of it in our own country; so this movie and the legacy of Lidice is just as relevant as ever. And finally, I think this is a movie you have to watch with all other distractions drowned out. It's something where you have to embrace the propaganda, yet put it into perspective, but also realize the deeper message about the value of human life. The Nazis wanted to remove all traces of Lidice. But Sirk's film helps Lidice live. And if you watch HITLER'S MADMAN and absorb its message, you will be helping Lidice live.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Weak Drama
Michael_Elliott28 February 2008
Hitler's Madman (1943)

* 1/2 (out of 4)

Douglas Sirk's first American film was also filmed by Fritz Lang as Hangmen Also Die the very same year. War propaganda at its highest as the Czech people stick together to assassinate Nazi Richard Heydrich (John Carradine). This thing here gets mixed reviews but I found it incredibly slow, boring and just not all that interesting. Carradine delivers a good performance but outside of that everyone else is pretty boring and while the direction shines in a few spots it never really comes full circle. The ending with "we should all rise up" might have packed a punch in 1943 but today it comes off very, very stupid.
5 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed