Red River Robin Hood (1942) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Red river Robin Hood
coltras3517 March 2024
A crime boss uses a corrupt judge and fake land grant to steal ranchers properties, but is met with strong resistance organized by two cowboys (Tim Holt and Cliff Edwards) and the town's newspaper editor.

There's no Robin Hood in this western, though there's a Zorro vibe with Tim Holt and Cliff Edwards donning cloaks and a mask, and fighting against Yeager, a crooked saloon keeper who is trying to steal land and rent it out to the rightful owners. What a skunk! Compared to the other Tim Holt westerns I have seen, this is fairly routine and lacks that punch, but it's fun with the some good action. Very hard for one not to like these 60 minute B-westerns.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Okay Oater
dougdoepke14 April 2015
Routine oater with the usual ingredients, but an interesting plot twist. Swindler Yager (Dew) uses phony Spanish land grant to evict ranchers unless they pay rent to stay. Few can afford to. Jim and Ike (Holt & Edwards) devise clever scheme involving black robes disguise to try to foil the scam. There's one well staged brawl, and some hard riding, but little good scenery since filming is in greater LA. Edwards is kind of lame comedy relief, showing why Richard Martin (Chito) was such an asset to Holt's later matinée series. I wish director Selander had given us more close-ups of the characters, especially Holt. As it is, events are photographed from an impersonal distance. Anyway, it's an okay oater without being anything special.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Mr. Justice
bkoganbing21 April 2018
Red River Robin Hood finds Tim Holt and sidekick Cliff Edwards doing the Robin Hood thing when they find their friend Russell Wade with whom they plan to go into partnership with on a ranch in jail. Seems as though Eddie Dew has forged himself an old Spanish land grant to which he is the heir. He wants to extort money from all the ranches in the area or evict them.

So Holt and Edwards don capes and masks and become Mr. Justice robbing Dew's rent collectors. They also go to work for Dew.

Red River Robin Hood got enough action to satisfy any B western fan. But I have to say I did have a problem with how dumb Dew and his crowd could be and how easy Holt and Edwards fooled them. The only ones who are in on the game are Wade, editor Otto Hoffman and his daughter Barbara Moffett.

Some good comic relief besides Edwards is found with Sheriff Tom London who's a rather dim bulb and his thicker than a brick deputy Earl Hodgins.

Tim Holt's fans will be pleased.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Very familiar stuff.
planktonrules30 May 2022
When the story begins, you realize that the plot is VERY familiar...too familiar for B-westerns in fact. Most B-westerns have about 3 or 4 diffferent plots....and I love it when the films feature a different one. But here, it's a typical story in most every way.

A local baddie wants to control everything and toss all the ranchers and farmers off their land. So, he uses a crooked judge to back up his schemes...and when that doesn't work, he uses his band of hired thugs. When Jim and Ike (Tim Holt and Cliff Edwards) return to town, they find the place in an uproar over the judge's decisions....but decide to fight him and the baddie boss by pretending to be evil and work for the side of evil...while actually working to expose their awfulness.

So, we have the VERY typical bad boss who wants everyone's land, the crooked judge (often it's a crooked sheriff), the good newspaper owner who is trying to fight them AND some good guys pretending to be bad...all elements that make this film about as unoriginal as possible...even compared to most Bs. To make it worse, and I know opinions will differ, but I think the likes of Hopalong Cassidy, Tim Holt and Roy Rogers (among others) simply did this sort of thing better. Overall, watchable but for fans of the genre, it's just too familiar and unimpressive to make this a must-see.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed