Address Unknown (1944) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
27 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
One for the address book
tomsview1 May 2014
This is a fascinating movie on a number of levels.

For anyone who loves the look of films such as "Citizen Kane' or film noir, there is plenty to offer here. The director, William Cameron Menzies, was also a brilliant art director and he went to town on this picture. Just look at the camera work; he and his crew must have shot half the film from a pit in the floor judging from the dramatic angles.

The film is set a few years before WW2. Martin Schulz (Paul Lucas) and Max Eisenstein (Morris Carnovsky) run a successful art gallery in San Francisco, Both are German immigrants and are close friends. Martin's son, Heinrich, (Peter Van Eyck) who also works in the gallery, plans to marry Giselle Eisenstein, Max's daughter (K.T. Stevens). Max is due to return to Germany with his wife, Elsa (Mady Christians), to expedite the buying for the gallery. At the last minute, Giselle breaks off her engagement to Heinrich, and also decides to go to Germany to further her acting career.

In Germany, Martin communicates with Max and Heinrich back at the gallery by mail; through his letters they sense that Martin is falling under the spell of the Nazis. Eventually this hurts Martin's relationship with Max, who is a Jew.

Martin's seduction by the Nazis, and the advantages they offer has similarities to John Halder, Viggo Mortensen's character in the more recent "Good". Both are weak men who are easily led, and both turn their backs on a Jewish friend.

Much of the plot of "Address Unknown" hangs on the letters that go backward and forward between San Francisco and Germany. As the film goes on, we learn how powerful these communications are, especially with the Nazi censors involved.

Giselle's Jewish background puts her in jeopardy when she appears in a play. Interestingly, the lines she speaks, which offend the Nazi censors, are actually the words of Jesus from the "Book of Matthew".

"Address Unknown" has a couple of scenes that really hit home, with one that would have done Val Lewton proud, and has an ending with a twist worthy of an episode of "Alfred Hitchcock Presents".

Although heavily stylised, the film highlights the persecution of the Jews in Nazi Germany, but "Address Unknown" was made in 1944, and the war didn't end until 1945. Films made during WW2, give an insight into what was influencing audiences at the time. Although the full extent of what had been going on in Germany didn't come to light until after the war, "Address Unknown" shows that the plight of the Jews before and during the war was far from a complete mystery.

The film is more restrained than some of the more strident films made during WW2, and it's somewhat abstract quality has prevented it dating all that much.
29 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well crafted but unfortunately forgotten WWII film
AlsExGal5 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This little film received Academy Award nominations for art direction and score, and I have to wonder how it escaped a nomination for cinematography as well, because this story does not have a great deal of action in it. Instead, much is said through the vivid score and the masterful cinematography that renders the shadows that the Nazis cast often more menacing that the Nazis themselves.

Not commercially available as far as I know, this is a film that deserves rediscovery. The story opens on a celebration between two friends and partners in San Francisco. Martin Schulz (Paul Lukas) is returning to his home country of Germany along with his wife and four of his five sons. His partner, Max Eisenstein (Morris Carnovsky), will meanwhile keep their art gallery going in San Francisco along with Martin's son, Heinrich. Max's daughter, Griselle, is also going to Germany to seek out a career as an actress. Heinrich and Griselle are in love, but have decided to delay marriage so that Griselle can pursue her career.

Once in Germany, Martin gets swept up into the building Nazi movement when he is befriended and flattered by the silver-tongued Baron von Friesche, who eventually convinces him that he should cut off all communication with his old friend Max because he is Jewish. When the Nazis come after Max's daughter Griselle when they learn she is Jewish, Martin stands by and does nothing to help her, allowing his old friend's daughter to perish at their hands and on his doorstep. However, a society such as the Nazi's that is built on purity of opinion and constant suspicion can sometimes be cleverly manipulated to be an instrument of revenge. Thus, by means of a very simple plan executed by someone in the U.S., Martin soon finds himself isolated and under suspicion of espionage - a prisoner in his own home as well of his own imagination of what will come next.

I highly recommend this film as it is still relevant today, especially from a psychological standpoint of how totalitarian movements start out by preying on the desperation of the many and the self-importance of a few.
49 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
based on a story
blanche-230 January 2013
"Address Unknown" is a 1944 film starring Paul Lukas, which is based on a story of the same name by Kressman Taylor. It's directed by William Cameron Menzies, best known as an art director, and also stars Morris Carnovsky, Peter van Eyck, the later blacklisted Mady Christians, and K.T. Stevens.

The story concerns two German art dealers in San Francisco circa 1932, Martin (Lukas) and Max Eisenstein (Carnovsky). It falls to Martin to return to Germany with his family to buy and ship art work back to the U.S. gallery. With him and the family is also Griselle, Martin's son's (van Eyck) fiancée, who has acting aspirations and wants to work overseas.

Martin becomes seduced by the "new Germany" under Hitler and becomes friends with a baron (Carl Esmond) who encourages him to break ties with his Jewish partner, which he does. The baron also learns that Griselle, who uses the last name Stone, is Jewish. Griselle has a part in a play, and the Nazis have forbidden certain lines to be spoken from the Beatitudes. Griselle says them anyway, and, outed as a Jew by someone at the performance, she runs for her life. She makes her way to Martin's place, where she is turned away.

Martin starts to receive letters from Max that are written in obvious code, giving dimensions of Picassos and having certain numbers substituted for numbers previously sent. The baron warns him that sending and receiving codes is illegal. Martin denies that he is receiving coded letters, meanwhile begging Max to stop writing to him.

The film is very well done in a film noir style, and you can't go wrong visually with Menzies and with Rudy Mate on the camera. The shadows and camera angles are striking, particularly in the play scene and when Martin is alone in his house toward the end of the film. Well worth seeing for the art direction and cinematography alone.

In the actual story, Martin and Griselle have had an affair previously, and Griselle is actually Max's sister. The joke painting that Martin sends back to San Francisco that Max tries to hide from a customer is actually a Picasso - I'm not sure that was made clear in the film.

The action in this film, Martin's turning etc., take place seemingly very quickly and don't come off as believably as in the book, which is actually a series of letters. It has been republished, translated into many languages, and also turned into a play and adapted for radio; it was considered very important at the time it was published, so important that it was felt "too strong" to have been written by a woman, so Katherine Taylor used her maiden name instead to get Kressman Taylor.

The ending pf the film is unexpected. Very suspenseful and absorbing and amazing to look at - with a wonderful performance by Paul Lukas and the rest of the cast - Address Unknown is highly recommended.
28 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
His entire moral compass
bkoganbing8 February 2016
For a brief period, by dint of the Oscar he won Paul Lukas became leading man material. In Watch On The Rhine he played an anti-Nazi fighter. In Address Unknown Lukas tries the other side of the fence, playing a man who is seduced by Nazi ideas and makes a Faustian bargain for expediency.

Lukas and Morris Carnovsky play partners in San Francisco with their art dealing business. Nursing a bit of nostalgia for Germany, the Wilhelmine Germany he grew up in Lukas moves back to Germany as he says it might be better business wise for him to acquire the art on the scene and for Carnovsky to sell it in America. With the exception of his oldest son Peter Van Eyck who stays with Carnovsky, Lukas moves wife Mady Christians and his children back to Germany post World War I. Later on Carnovsky's daughter K.T. Stevens goes to Europe to pursue her acting career. Carnovsky is also Jewish.

Which is not looked kindly on by people who are rising in power. But Lukas who probably was not all that political is seduced by all the promises the Nazis and their leader. He gradually loses his entire moral compass. In that he was far from alone. K.T. Stevens is the one who loses her life tragically.

Lukas and Carnovsky are an interesting story of old friends torn apart. Carnovsky registers well as a man who cannot believe his old friend has turned on their past friendship and what it meant for business and personal reasons. Carnovsky cannot comprehend what is happening in the old homeland. In that he wasn't alone, those targeted by the Nazis including Jews couldn't quite believe it either. Remember Address Unknown was made before the concentration camps were liberated, but rumors were growing stronger by the day about what was happening.

As for Lukas he's brilliant with what he does as a man who loses it all. The ending is a truly original piece of vengeance and betrayal of Lukas, fitting payback for all he betrayed.

Address Unknown got two Oscar nominations for Art&Set Design and for music score. With William Cameron Menzies directing I'm sure he had a big hand in creating the set that got said nomination. But with what he does with Lukas and Carnovsky, Menzies shows how well he can direct people too.

One of the better films to come out of the World War II era it holds up brilliantly for today.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of many films on this subject, but compelling nonetheless.
mark.waltz22 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Films on World War II took many faces, whether it be musical inspiration for the troops ("This is the Army", "Thousands Cheer", etc.), the struggles of those conquered by the Axis ("The Mortal Storm", "Edge of Darkness", etc.) or life on the home-front ("Mrs. Miniver", "Tender Comrade", "Since You Went Away"). As news of what was really going on was released to the public, Hollywood stepped up to the plate and began to make stronger movies like "Watch on the Rhine" and this horrific tale of the evil treatment of the Jews under the Nazi regime. Paul Lukas, fresh from his Oscar Winning role in "Watch on the Rhine" (playing a man fighting the Nazis), plays the opposite of that character as a German art dealer who returns from America and rejects his Jewish partner whose daughter has gone to Germany with an acting troop only to face what every other Jewish person fears. This is a moralistic tale of giving up one's values simply to survive and the destruction of the soul it causes.

Lukas is excellent as the conflicted man, while the Veronica Lake/Lizabeth Scott look-alike K.T. Stevens is outstanding in a tragic role. While the film credits "introduce" her, she was already featured (under the name Katherine) in the Barbara Stanwyck film "The Great Man's Lady" as the young woman who interviews her. She only made a handful of films, but later in her career, worked regularly on soap operas. She gives an award worthy performance, particularly in the scene where she breaks out of character on stage to respond to Lukas's interruption of her work on-stage. Outstanding photography and music are other elements that stand out, topping a screenplay not only topical to its time (and ours) but emotionally touching as well.
21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Censored
AAdaSC8 February 2010
Martin Schulz (Paul Lukas) and Max Eisenstein (Morris Carnovsky) are business partners. Martin moves to Germany with all of his family except for his eldest son Heinrich (Peter van Eyck), who stays behind to look after things in San Francisco with Max. Meanwhile, Max's daughter Griselle (KT Stevens) travels to Germany to become an actress. The families are very close and Heinrich and Griselle have future plans to marry. Once Baron von Friesche (Carl Esmond) appears on the scene, Martin goes through a change and is indoctrinated into the Nazi lifestyle. This means rejecting his Jewish friend, Max, and his friend's daughter Griselle.

The story develops through letter correspondence between the two friends, Martin and Max. There are several stand out scenes, my favourites being the performance at the theatre when Griselle disobeys the Nazi authorities and the following chase that ensues in order to catch her. The acting is good, particularly from Carl Esmond. You just know that there is a nasty ulterior motive lurking behind everything that he says and does. Once Martin begins to receive coded letters, suspicion is aroused by the German censors and it's a matter of time before something happens to him... There is a twist at the end.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
From an amazing little book
merrywood26 July 2009
This movie was made from a tiny, now classic 1938 book by Kressmann Taylor (her full name was Kathrine Kressmann Taylor) that was written in the form of letters only between the two lead characters.

As such it is not only a brilliantly conceived horror story of how an evil idea poisons a society but how it continues on to destroy life.

The small book was re-issued in 2001 by Washington Square Press and at this writing currently available. No matter how you reacted to the movie this is a must read. It can be read in a single, short sitting but it packs an incredible wallop. The little story is compared to the best writing of O. Henry for its sly plot twists and lauded by Kurt Vonnegut who compares it to WWII as what Uncle Tom's Cabin was to the Civil War.

You can then return to the movie and enjoy it at a far deeper and more profound level. Beyond all of that…if Paul Lukas is in a film, any film, you can trust that it is worth watching if only for his performance.
58 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good...but a bit late.
planktonrules12 June 2010
I say this movie is good but a bit late because this tale of the progression of Nazism in Germany is very good but the timing awfully late. When the first film debuted, WWII was practically over--whereas films with similar themes, such as "Mortal Storm" came out before the US entered the war--and did a lot to turn public opinion against Nazi Germany. Heck, in 1944 saying the Nazis were bad and repressive wasn't exactly controversial in the United States--as we'd been fighting them for three years!

The film begins in the 1930s. Paul Lukas and his wife and kids (minus the oldest one) are leaving the US and moving back to Germany. They also decide to take their god-daughter (who is Jewish). Once there, Lukas slowly turns from a nice family man to a Nazi-lover. In the process, all sense of right and wrong seems to disappear from him. And, when his beloved god-daughter is in trouble, he refuses to help. At this point, there is a neat twist in the film involving coded messages and revenge. I won't say more, as it would spoil the film. Suffice to say that this twist gives the film a nice and fitting ending.

The acting, mood and story are all quite good and the film worth seeing. While not a great film it is clever and well-written--and a very good propaganda film to galvanize the folks at home in the war effort.
16 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
tremendous movie about incremental fascism
jellopuke8 April 2020
This is a must see with all the drama coming from tiny choices that add up and how you can be seduced by evil for nominal reasons. Well worth tracking down.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Address Unknown review
JoeytheBrit19 May 2020
Paul Lukas gives probably a career-best performance as a businessman who becomes seduced by Nazi ideology when his return to Germany coincides with the rise of Hitler. Director William Cameron Menzies piles on the tension in the final third of the film without gloating over his antagonist's increasingly precarious situation, and by doing so he strengthens the film's power and message immeasurably.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A small masterpiece
MOscarbradley12 August 2019
Long before "84 Charring Cross Road", there was "Address Unknown", another film based on letters between its protagonists, but this one is very different. The correspondence is between two business partners, one Jewish and living in San Francisco, the other a German who has returned to Germany during Hitler's rise to power and who has been seduced by Nazi propaganda. The film was made in 1944 and was yet another addition to the anti-Nazi pictures being turned out at the time. It was fundamentally a B-Movie, produced and directed by the great designer William Cameron Menzies and it looks terrific, (Rudolph Mate did the stunning, noirish cinematography; this is one of the greatest black and white films ever shot).

Paul Lukas, fresh from his Oscar success in "Watch on the Rhine", is the Nazi sympathiser and although the film is far from subtle it is very powerful and it has been shamefully underrated and ignored. The last section is like a nightmare out of Kafka but this nightmare is frighteningly real. Perhaps after the War people felt there was no longer any need for films like this and it simply disappeared. I think it's a small masterpiece that demands to be seen, particularly now. Absolutely unmissable if you can track it down.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Stylish Nazi Film - Address Unknown
arthur_tafero27 August 2021
What separates this film from several other morallity tales of WW2 is the fact that is concerns the upper class of both US and Germany houses. The production values are first-rate, and some of the cinematography is outstanding. In retrospect, the message of the film was a bit late; Nazi atrocities were already well-known by then. However, taken on its own merits, the film is an excellent exercise in the examination of human behavior. Well worth viewing.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
No such number no such zone
kapelusznik1823 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** Paul Luklas as American art dealer and later, after visiting Nazi Germany, fanatical Nazi Harr Martin Schulz more or less repeats his role as the crazed but not too bright American Nazi leader Dr. Kessell in the 1939 movie "Confession of a Nazi Spy" as he throws his best friend Max Eisenstein's,Morris Carnovsky, daughter Griselle, K.T Stevens, to the wolves or the Gestapo just to show how loyal he is to the his Fuhrer-Adolph Hitler- and Fatherland-Nazi Germany. That's after Grisell the star of the play ran from the Munich theater to Martin's place chased by a mob of die hard Nazi fanatics who besides being exposed by Nazi enforcer and race inspector Charles Hatton as being Jewish they not much cared abut her rotten performance and demanded their money back. With an I don't want too get involved Martin slamming the door in her face as she pleaded for help Griselle was shot to death by the Gestapo without even being told what crime if any that she committed!

Meanwhile back in the states in the city of San Francisco Martin's good friend Max gets a telegram coldly telling him his daughter, by not going into details, Griselle met an unfortunate accident by slipping in the bathtub on a bar of soap and bashing her skull in. It was Martins's son Heinrich, Peter van Eyck, who's engaged to marry Griselle who felt that there was something very fishy in her untimely death and planned to get to the bottom of it by checking out all the facts. Back in Germany Martin gets all these letters from Max that are censored by the Nazi postal service as well as Gestapo hinting that he's up to something no good and may even be an American spy. At first cutting himself off from his Jewish friend Max, to show how loyal he is to his Fatherland, Martin tries to contact him through his wife Elsa, Mandy Christians, to plead with Max not to send him any more letter that could end up with him being sent to the local Dachau concentration camp!

****SPOILERS**** Unable to stop the flow of incriminating letters and facing arrest Martin tries to blow his brains out only to chicken out at the very last minute. With the Gestapo assisted by a squad of Nazi SS storm troopers knocking at his door Martin knows that his goose is cooked but is unaware of who's the person who cooked it: His son Henrich who found out the truth behind Griselle's death and how he allowed it to happen. Who in return stuck it to him big time by, in sending him all these censored letters, turning his beloved Nazis against him.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
compelling but missing the final redemption
SnoopyStyle5 April 2020
Martin Schulz and Max Eisenstein are the best of friends and business partners. Max is an art dealer in San Francisco and his daughter Griselle wants to be an actress. Martin returns to Germany and gets swept up with the rise of Hitler. His son Heinrich stays in America to work for Max and intends to marry Griselle. Martin is befriended by prominent Nazi, Baron von Freische, and even joins the Nazi party to maintain his position in society. Max can't believe it when his best friend starts repeating Nazi propaganda back at him.

This was released in the heat of the war and right before D-Day. The story of Martin's transformation is very compelling. It's only 75 min long which begs for a final redemption. I wouldn't mind Martin making a final turn after Griselle. Her story is also quite compelling. The movie is missing that final turn and ends rather abruptly. Otherwise, it's a compelling story.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
So You Wanna Be In Sho-Biz?
sugarcoatedvision13 October 2019
Becoming an actor is much more dangerous than you think.
1 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid American effort to expose the damages of war carried out by Nazi!!
elo-equipamentos2 May 2024
Sold wrongly in Brazil as Noir picture this war drama made part of American effort in last past of WWII as anti-Nazi propaganda, as we are already know concerning the totalitarian system carried out by Fuher and their minions against some specific ethnicities and so for, it falls in the mass grave buried many decades ago, somehow it works as a rereading from the sad past events took place at Germany.

The plot about a successful German art dealer played by Paul Lukas that has a J.ew partner Mr. Max Eisenstein decides go back to your home country with his partner's young daughter Griselle at pre WWII and there he is hooked by Nazi turning his back when the girl caught in disgrace due his ancestry, he'll pay hard for his decision.

Thanks for reading.

Resume:

First watch: 2024 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 7.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
look for art in all the wrong places
RanchoTuVu11 February 2010
A German-American art dealer (Paul Lukas) returns to Germany during the 1930's after Hitler has taken power, in order to find, ship, and sell European art through his and his partner's (Morris Carnovsky) San Francisco gallery. Nazism's allure gradually creeps into his (Lukas') psyche, aided by his relationship with a wealthy baron played by Carl Esmond. Lukas ends up having to betray his family and friends in order to win favor with Esmond. His stay in Germany becomes fateful and deadly for the daughter of his partner (who is Jewish) who accompanies he and his family on the trip in order to gain acting experience in Berlin. Her stage debut qualifies as must see in terms of sets, photography, and overall impact. It's probably the best scene in the film. Lukas's character's transition is never fully realized. He constantly faces difficult choices and is under pressure from Esmond who, like any smart Nazi, suspects anyone exhibiting any sense of uncertainty or wavering commitment to the cause. In that aspect lies the film's major point, the differentiation between the two men, and the crushing consequences that await.
21 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Lots of interesting shots, good story and a brilliant, unexpected twist
amsaltcoats1 April 2020
I very much dislike reviews which recount the plot of a film and reveal spoilers so all I will say is that this is a film worth actually watching rather than having it on while you are messing about with your phone or tablet. There are many cleverly shot scenes which mirror the action of the story and hint at shadows to come.

I feel that the opening scenes are very good and authentically display the friendship between Max and Martin and their families and this of course makes the story all the more powerful.

I have read the short story/book on which the film is based - it is available to borrow from the Internet Archive on line free library - and in my opinion this one if the rare occasions when the film is better than the book, largely due to the devastating end twist in the film.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Seduced By A Vision of Order.
rmax30482322 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Well, this is a movie about Germany in the 1930s, released in 1944, when Germany had already established its international identity. So it's no surprise that when Paul Lukas takes his family from San Francisco to Munich in search of some paintings to be sent back to his Jewish partner at their art gallery, many of the Germans turn out to be swine.

So it's dated and a few characters are stereotypes, but it's not at all a stupid movie, not a flag waver, with the Nazi brutes waving pitchforks, beating hell out of the racially impure, and goose-stepping down the cobblestone streets under swastikas. As a matter of fact, there isn't a swastika in sight. No Nazi helmets either. A couple of Jewish windows are broken, but that's the only violence we see.

That, and the cinematography and the twist at the end, make it a little outstanding for what it is.

It's a tragic story. The immigrant Germans Lukas and his partner, Morris Carnovsky, are the best of friends as well as partners in San Francisco. Lukas' son, Peter van Eyck, and Carnovsky's daughter, K. T. Stevens, put off their marriage so that she can accompany Lukas back to the Old Country and pursue her acting career. She's eager but van Eyck is desolate because he's deeply in love with her.

Once in Munich, Lukas finds the Old Country changed and is swept up in the Nazi movement -- too quickly, if you ask me. He takes a position in the bureaucracy and becomes stiff and distant. He cuts off communication with his Jewish partner and follows all the orders of the local authorities. When Carnovsky's daughter, Stevens, is pursued because she's Jewish and pounds on Lukas' door, he turns her away. Shots are fired and she dies. But we don't see it. Like the trembling Lukas, we just hear it through the closed door. How many directors would give up a chance to underscore what doesn't need to be underscored, just to give the audience some action and blood? It's a nice adult touch.

There are a surprising number of such touches. Back home, when Carnovsky and van Eyck receive a brief formal letter from Lukas, informing them that Stevens is dead, Carnovsky slumps in his chair. Van Eyck stands next to him, reaches out a hand to place on his shoulder, then stops the movement, and the comforting hand turns into a fist. The gesture has a meaning but I'm not going to give it away.

The direction, lighting, photography, and some of the massive sets are unforgettable. The director, William Cameron Menzies, must have recently binged on Fritz Lang -- "Metropolis" certainly, and maybe "Ministry of Fear," since one shot in "Address Unknown" is almost identical to one in Lang's movie. I'm not kidding. The visual images are striking. Menzies shoots from floor level in one scene. Stark shadows abound. Even a lighted hallway becomes menacing. And it's all totally unexpected in a quickly made 1944 movie with no bankable stars that tries to tell us an obsolescent moral tale about an individual's being corrupted by a corrupt culture.

The crap they're grinding out today should be half as well done.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Another propaganda film....
byron-11628 January 2020
During WWII Hollywood produced several low budget. "Address Unknown" fits the caption.
3 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Address Unknown
robfollower5 April 2020
Director: William Cameron Menzies Writers: Herbert Dalmas (screenplay), Kressmann Taylor (from the story by) Stars: Paul Lukas, Mady Christians, Morris Carnovsky

This movie grabbed my attention right away because of its amazing cinematography. While the plot might be a little predictable, I would classify this film as "stunningly visual."

A short ,quick film, but a very intense study of a man (Lukas) driven by his surroundings. Dark, moody, mysterious, and satisfying. Paul Lukas was excellent.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An underrated film to be seen
camille-054244 January 2020
This was a film I almost missed one day. I am so glad I caught it on TCM's am lineup of films. The title and lead actor caught my attention and then I read viewer's reviews. If you have a desire to watch films during the WW2 period this is a film to see.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fiendishly Good
evanston_dad30 October 2019
A fiendishly wicked little thriller set during Hitler's rise to power.

Paul Lukas is a German art dealer who's been living in San Francisco. He returns to Nazi Germany and drinks the kool aid, turning on his business partner, who stays in America, and others who are horrified about what they're hearing about their homeland. In a scene that cements how definitively he's thrown in his lot with the Nazi movement, he allows his partner's daughter and son's fiancee to be gunned down on his doorstep when he refuses to hide her from the Gestapo. But his partner, or so he thinks, exacts his revenge when he starts sending him coded messages that bring him under suspicion of the Nazis. And then there's a last-minute twist worthy of a Hitchcock film.

"Address Unknown" is one of those little gems of a movie that you've never heard of and then after you've seen it wonder why. It manages to be both a serious exploration of the horrors of fascist ideology and a tense thriller with noirish overtones. Famed art director William Cameron Menzies directed the film, and while he's not credited with the art direction, you wonder if he had a major hand in it, as it's sensational, as is the off-kilter cinematography. At first I was put off a bit by the look of the film -- things are oddly framed and angles are weird. But as I got more into the film, I decided its look matched its tone and subject matter perfectly. I don't know how many shots there are of people looking small and overwhelmed by the environment around them, or of people visually imprisoned by the walls of corridors and doorways, all of which are visual metaphors for what happens to them as characters.

The art direction was singled out with an Academy Award nomination in the black and white category, back in the days when there were separate awards given for black and white and color films. It's a shame the cinematography couldn't be nominated as well. The film also received a nomination for Best Dramatic or Comedy Score, courtesy of many-times-nominated Morris Stoloff and his partner on this film, Ernst Toch.

Grade: A
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Didactic film takes zero chances
A film released in 1944 that talks about evil Natsies in the 1930s isn't exactly cutting edge, now is it?

The vaunted art direction is certainly interesting but if this movie is based on a best-selling book, the screenplay didn't do it justice,

Most of the story gets told by having the lead male actors read letters from each other. Weak.

The acting is try-hard Hollywood propaganda that treats the viewers like low-IQ dupes.

The letter-reading and the scenes that actually move the plot along are accompanied with obvious musical accompaniment that grates the nerves before long.

It's all such tiresome juvenelia. At 75 minutes it would make for a good film day during the WWII section of Grade 9 social studies.
0 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed