Cry of the Werewolf (1944) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
50 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"I am the daughter of a werewolf."
utgard1415 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
A gypsy princess (Nina Foch) who can change into a wolf kills to prevent her family's secrets from being exposed. Entertaining B movie that I'm surprised has such a low score and reputation here. It's got some nice atmosphere and a good cast. Stephen Crane is positively goofy but Barton MacLane makes up for it with his enjoyable tough cop routine. Heavily-accented Osa Massen is nice to look at, even if her acting leans to the melodramatic at times. The star of the movie is Nina Foch, Columbia's B movie queen in the mid-40s. She's excellent, as usual.

There's essentially two kinds of werewolf movies. The ones where the person transforms into a half-human/half-wolf creature and the ones where the person transforms into an actual wolf. Like most people, I prefer the Wolf Man type of werewolf. This one does the other, simpler version of just having Foch change into a wolf. Just like movies and shows today that deal with werewolves, it all comes down to budget or special effects limitations. Even though I prefer something more like Universal's idea of a werewolf, I don't hate this kind so it doesn't keep me from enjoying the movie.

Look, it's barely over an hour so it's not going to kill you to try it out. A lot of the complaints seem to be directed either at the lack of a person in werewolf makeup or at how the movie doesn't adhere to the so-called rules of werewolf movies. The former I've already addressed but to the latter I will just say "Are you serious?" Most of those rules didn't even exist until the 1941 Wolf Man movie made at a different studio so it's not surprising Columbia didn't try to make their movie fit that mold. If anything, they should be commended for trying to do something different instead of just ripping off what Universal did.
26 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not a bad film...........
NormVogel10 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoyed this film precisely due to the reasons that another reviewer DIDN"T! It was interesting to have a woman as a werewolf, there was no werewolf costume used, and there was an element of mystery in the proceedings.

I enjoyed the Val Lewton-ish scene in the mortuary basement where the hero is being stalked by the werewolf!

I myself am glad that the werewolf transformation scene was done in shadow (the Val Lewton touch), as the special effects of the time were far removed from today's slick computer-created animations. Anything other than the way it was done would've looked SILLY.

A nifty, seldom-seen film! Norm

(PS. Hull's makeup looks MUCH more "wolfish" than Cheney Jr's!).
21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
She-Wolf of New Orleans
sol-kay18 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
(There are Spoilers) Werewolf movie with a twist in that this time around the creature is a woman and there's, probably due to budget restrictions, no long and cumbersome stop motion sequences where the person slowly changes into a werewolf or visa versa.

The story has to do with this group of Gypsies, the Troyincas, who immigrated to the United States from their ancient homes in far off Transylvania. The curator of New Orlean's Occult Latour Museum Dr. Charles Morris, Fritz Leiber, has discovered the Toryinca's secret ceremonies that has to do with their involvement in the occult sciences. This leads to Dr. Morris being murdered by Troyincan Matriarch Marie Latour, Nina Foch, who with the help of fellow Troyincan Jan(Ivan Triesault), who works as the janitor in the museum, hid Dr. Morris' body.

It's when Dr. Morris' son Bob, Stephen Crane, shows up from New York that he suspects that his father, who's body had since been discovered, was not killed by a wild wolf, like the local police believe, but some kind of wolf-like man that his father uncovered in his investigation of Troyincan legend. Bob with the help of his father's assistant Elsa Chavret, Osa Massen, who just happens to have been born and raised in Transylvania finds Dr. Morris' burnt notes that if made legible will reveal the deadly secret that cost him his life.

As expected the evil Marie Latour does everything to stop the truth from coming out about her and the background of her mother, Marie Sr, in that their descendant of werewolves who are descant to rule the Troyincan tribe both in Transylvania as well as in the United States. The film soon turns into a tug of war between the two leading ladies, Marie and Elsa, over the handsome and a bit confused, by the plot, Bob Morris.

Marie seeing that she's getting nowhere with Elsa has her turned into a zombie like android muttering over and over to herself as well as out loud that she in fact was the one who murdered Dr. Morris. If that tactic on Marie's part was to turn Bob against Elas it fell flat on it's face. Bob as naive as he was wasn't convince that Elsa murdered his father since her fingerprints wren't found at the murder scene but, a it later turned out, Marie's were!

***SPOILERS*** The very predictable ending has Marie turn into a werewolf for the very last time but this time around the police lead by Lt. Barry Lane, Barton MacLane, are ready for her. It took a lot of lead to put put the big bad wolf down in a wild and almost five minute long shootout but it was Lt. Lane's movie ending, that was supposed to tie all the loose ends together, statement that really got to me. With the killer werewolf, Marie Latour, lying dead and crumpled on the floor Lt. Lane, a non-believer in these kind of things, is totally awestruck at the sight of a wild animal-werewolf-changing into a human being! The fact is that the dead Maria Latour didn't start changing back from werewolf to human well after Lt. Lane made that statement!
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"We Will Now Proceed To The Voodoo Room!"...
azathothpwiggins14 October 2018
CRY OF THE WEREWOLF is about a legend, a family secret, and a curse. There are gypsies, a devil doll, and a Transylvanian connection! Is the gypsy princess Celeste (Nina Foch) more than she appears to be? Of course, there's a werewolf as well, with a bit of a twist. Several deaths occur as the beast tracks down those who could expose the gypsy tribe.

Police Lt. Barry Lane (Barton Maclane) is stumped, while Bob Morris (Stephen Crane) does some snooping of his own. One of the best parts has him sneaking around the basement vaults at a mortuary, while the werewolf pursues him. Will Bob uncover the truth, before his fiancee, Elsa (Ossa Massen) becomes part of the tribe?

Indeed, there's a certain CAT PEOPLE vibe to this movie. Suspenseful and mysterious, COTW is a very entertaining entry in its sub-genre..

EXTRA POINTS FOR: Viewers spotting the rubber band around the poor wolf's snout to make him look more fierce! It sort of works, until it becomes obvious he's just trying to get it off!...
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Subtle horror
seance-647497 January 2018
Hi, I'd like to make known I'm not into Werewolf films. However 3 titles of such are a exception. Won't give titles here though in this review.

Very recently I viewed Cry of the werewolf (1944). Re plot other users have mentioned.,so I won't go into plot of film. Found film easy to view as it keeps your attention. 4 out of 10 I've given it, that may seem low but 'hey' I'm not knocking it! For me various scenes lighting and shadows etc remind me of The Cat People (1942). Something of Val Lewton effect.

Nina Foch I thought played her part effectively. She also appeared in Return of the Vampire which I have on DVD. So summoning up Cry of the werewolf is different.

By Seance223.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
No Larry Talbot, BUT...
docdespicable26 December 2006
There are far worse ways to spend an hour or so of your time. This movie was more than likely made for pocket change and contractual obligations, true; but despite not having someone like Val Lewton (who could conjure up palaces out of orange crates) behind it, this isn't at all bad. Nina Foch is quite capable and sympathetic, and ably supported by a raft of character actors who are old hands at this sort of thing.

There's plenty of atmosphere and suspense, with just enough mystery to keep your attention. As with some of the best of the afore-mentioned Lewton's work, until the denouement, you're never quite sure whether this is all in someone's mind or if there's a real bogeyman (or bogeywoman) stalking the night. Lon Chaney Jr's reputation is safe - or even Henry Hull - but the mug who called this the nadir of werewolfery is being a little harsh. With THE WOLF-MAN, Universal set the bar pretty high, after all. But if you're looking for some good old-fashioned fun, you could do much worse. If nothing else, it's an entertaining example of what can be done with some talent, care and craftsmanship, even if you couldn't quite buy dinner for a family of four to six people with the existing budget. Definitely check it out!
37 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Decent vintage werewolf story
cgvsluis14 November 2021
The former LaTour Family mansion in New Orleans has been turned into a museum that gives daily tours...with rooms dedicated to Voodoo, Vampirism, and Werewolves. A worker at the museum informs the local gypsy tribe's princess that the curator of the museum, it's resident scientist, has made a discovery that he is getting ready to publish...which involves having discovered the secret burial site of the former mistress of the LaTour family mansion. She was rumored to have been a werewolf and to have killed her husband. The mystery of her daughter seems to be unknown...but it looks like she has grown into the local gypsy princess and leader. Fearing discovery she returns to the mansion and kills the professor...on the night his son is coming home from Europe. The son and an employee of the museum who was like a daughter to it's resident scientist...try to get to the bottom of who murdered him, along with the local police. Great police chief, great sets and costuming...this was a different werewolf story.

Good family fun, this was a werewolf story that was not as cliché as some.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cry of the Werewolf
Scarecrow-8831 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I was a bit disappointed with this horror tale as Columbia Pictures decided to take a stab at their own werewolf flick as Nina Foch stars as a gypsy high Priestess, Celeste, whose mother was a lycanthrope passing the affliction to her. She kills a museum owner who has been delving into Foch's mother's history. The man's scientist son, Bob(Stephen Crane) and future Transylvanian wife, Elsa(Osa Massen) decide to follow a few leads through some burnt written words that his late father was penning for a forthcoming novel to be published about the infamous Marie La Tour and her werewolf lineage. The great Barton MacLane stars as Lt. Barry Lane, on the case to discover who murdered Bob's father. While the film certainly has that wonderfully polished B&W noirish look Columbia Pictures is known for, there aren't enough juicy bits with the werewolf that I desired, but Foch is striking in the lead role. No werewolf transformations except some shadow changes on the wall with Foch turning to a regular wolf. The film is more about the search for the killer of the museum curator, with Foch's Celeste using her mind-control black magic powers to persuade Bob and Elsa off her tracks. Too short with a conclusion that I found rather hastily finished. But, good cast and production values helps significantly. The idea of a woman werewolf certainly is interesting and I wish this film could've established that a bit more. Yeah, a woman in a werewolf costume would've definitely satisfied me, to tell you the truth.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Exposing what a werewolf really looks like, and it's not Lon Chaney...
mark.waltz7 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Actually, here the werewolf actually looks like a wolf, not the hairy beast of the still excellent Universal horror classic. The creature is actually a she-wolf, the Gypsy princess Nina Foch who seeks vengeance in the most sinister way. Like some of the Val Lewton classics, this has a very mystical feeling to it and the horror is a combination of psychological torment and subtle chills that wouldn't have the same effect had they been so blatantly gory. Foch, a soft looking actress, uses that quality to make her character all the more mysterious and deadly, while Osa Massen (who usually played more sinister characters) is quite lovely as the heroine who is the target of Foch's vendetta.

Another superb performance is by John Abbott as the museum tour guide who first discovers the horror while searching for a scared cat. His constant repeat of "Here kitty kitty" gave me chills, reminding me of Boris Karloff's claim in "The Body Snatcher" that "You'll never be rid of me". Barton MacLane is commanding as the police lieutenant investigating the mysterious goings on, set in New Orleans which gives an even more Gothic feeling to the proceedings. When Foch tells one of her people, "You will lie with your ancestors in the ground selected by my mother", even more chills are felt as he realizes the outcome of that prediction and a wolf howls in the background.

Blanche Yurka, who was so memorable in vengeful roles, plays a more thoughtful character here, a gypsy elder who is Foch's companion and aware of the secrets of the past which she is afraid will be repeated over and over. She still has a commanding presence that made her the most memorable Madame DeFarge on film, and is quite subtle after some major theatrics in other films such as "Lady For a Night" and "The Furies". Her Hungarian background makes her perfect casting to play a gypsy. While certainly not a masterpiece, this is a must see among the stylish horror films of the 1940's and will leave you feeling truly haunted.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
CRY OF THE WEREWOLF (Henry Levin, 1944) **1/2
Bunuel197623 January 2010
Apart from Universal's "Larry Talbot" series, it seems that most of the early werewolf films are fairly maligned nowadays; this one, emanating from Columbia, is another of them: ironically, that studio had inserted a talking(!) lycanthrope in their bloodsucking flick THE RETURN OF THE VAMPIRE (1944) but, when it came time to make a standalone entry into the subgenre, they opted to use a normal wolf (amusingly shown 'munching' all through the opening credits)!! To be honest, the film under review has much more to do with RKO's CAT PEOPLE (1942) than THE WOLF MAN (1941) – actually the principal inspiration behind the Val Lewton/Jacques Tourneur classic itself: not only is the monster of the female variety but, towards the end, she is likewise shown terrorizing the heroine (though these scenes have none of the impact of the panther's celebrated late-night stalkings!). Still, all things considered, I have to say that I enjoyed this 63-minute film: the obligatory concocted folklore may not have added up to much this time around, but the atmosphere is fairly nice throughout; Nina Foch (THE RETURN OF THE VAMPIRE's heroine here graduating to the monster role) and Osa Massen fill the central roles quite adequately, too (their authentic foreign origins helping more than their acting talent in this regard), and even the combined police detection and comic relief (usually redundant elements in this type of movie) prove tolerable under the circumstances.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Dull, badly acted werewolf tale from Columbia is a real yawner...
Doylenf31 October 2007
CRY OF THE WEREWOLF is on the level of an Ed Wood film, a surprisingly bad little programmer from Columbia with NINA FOCH heading the cast. Her transition from human to werewolf is so poorly staged with shadows that it's laughable.

The script is dull, full of exposition for the first half-hour, and populated by some hardly competent actors. Worst of all is STEPHEN CRANE (he was Lana Turner's husband--twice), whose performance has to rank among the worst in recent memory for one who has been watching Halloween films on TCM. OSA MASSEN isn't much better but at least tries to convey her part with more feeling than Crane is able to muster.

Nina Foch plays Marie LaTour, a woman in a travelling gypsy wagon who is actually a werewolf, killing to keep her secret from others. Maybe someone like Val Lewton could have pulled this thing together, but Henry Levin's direction is no help at all and the script is a mess.

Summing up: A trite tale, poorly written and acted, not worth your time and a vehicle certainly unworthy of Miss Foch's talent.

Trivia: Inexplicably, the two best performances in the film are uncredited--JOHN ABBOTT as Peter and FRITZ LEIBER as Dr. Morris.
7 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Cry of the Werewolf was another good obscure movie I was glad to discover
tavm22 June 2018
After looking at the list of werewolf movies on Wikipedia, I remembered this particular one was on YouTube so after watching Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man on YT, I decided to watch this one there since it was next in my chronological list of werewolf movies to watch list. Nina Foch-who I mainly remember from An American in Paris-is quite compelling as the title character as she tries to keep people outside of her gypsy family from finding out about her secret. The setting is New Orleans, Louisiana, which is a two-hour drive from my current residence of Baton Rouge but I'm guessing that this was shot on the Columbia backlot. Perhaps part of me was confused by some of the details in the story but for the most part, I was enthralled at Cry of the Werewolf. So, yes, that's a recommendation!
24 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun early werewolf tale
slayrrr66624 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"Cry of the Werewolf" is a decent enough entry in the genre, and is pretty entertaining.

**SPOILERS**

In a museum tour, guide Peter, (John Abbott) explains about local legends involving vampires and werewolves. After the last one, he and Dr. Charles Morris, (Fritz Leiber) retire for the night, only for Bob Morris, (Stephan Crane) and his girlfriend Elsa Chauvet, (Osa Massen) to find that the museum had fallen under a series of mysterious events. Starting to investigate what happened, a very long legal battle over the culprit resolves with nothing accomplished. When they find that a local gypsy tribe has a way of explaining what happened, they quickly race to stop the creature that has been attacking those nearby.

The Good News: This here is actually rather fun. The fact that this one is a predominant mystery makes it really good. There's a lot of back-and-forth over what is going on and that is rather entertaining. This also has a really believable one for this, since it manages to mix in a story about how the ancestors handled it and some rather intelligent areas explored in the back-story. That back-story allows for a bit of mystery concerning what has happened, which is done with the mixing together of a gypsy legend and that of a distorted family version. The huge museum also looks rather creepy, which is perfect for setting up an air of suspense and dread with it. The last big positive is that there's a lot more action than expected. This one has several really nice scenes , including a spectacular chase through the museum at the end, which has some great moments inside it and an earlier sequence where a character is stalked through a mausoleum by a large shadow across the wall. It's a great scene, but can't compare to how great the final museum chase sequence is. That is quite fun, and is the film's really good points.

The Bad News: This one doesn't have a whole lot wrong, and is a mildly flawed film. The biggest flaw is that there's a rather large chunk of time taken up with the impossibly long courtroom scene. This drags on forever and takes quite a long time to get through. This is also time consuming with a large segment without drawing anything with it. The case is concluded with only a few little pieces captured about the background but doesn't do anything else. This never says anything about what might've or could've helped, and that would've been a justifiable reason for keeping it there. It's a useless scene that only serves to eat up time. Another pretty big flaw is that this one's werewolf is played by dogs or wolves dressed up to look like werewolves. This really takes away from the creature when they're obviously completely against the norm. seeing a grown man do a horribly-choreographed shoving contest with a dog while others are screaming at him to avoid the werewolf is beyond ridiculous. These are the films with the film, and are responsible for lowering this one.

The Final Verdict: With a fair amount of both strengths and negatives, this one comes out as being rather decent overall. It's not mind-blowing spectacular, but serves just good enough for fans of the horror from the time period or those into the earliest werewolf movies to give this much of a look.

Today's Rating-PG: Mild Violence
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Gypsy Tribe Hiding a Horrific Secret
Uriah4321 December 2021
This film essentially begins in New Orleans at the Latour Museum which specializes on the occult with an emphasis on pictures, documents and other artifacts related to subjects like vampirism, voodoo and other related matters. Of particular interest to the director of the museum is a case of lycanthropy which he has traced to a local gypsy tribe and is set to publish a detailed manuscript on in the near future. Fearing how this news might affect them the leader of this tribe, "Princess Celeste" (Nina Foch) decides to pay the director a visit-and silence him permanently. Needless to say, the murder sets off an immediate investigation by the police and helping them is the director's son "Bob Morris" (Stephen Crane) and the director's lovely assistant "Elsa Chauvet" (Osa Massen) who has a keen awareness of werewolves from her days growing up in Transylvania. What neither Bob nor Elsa realize, however, is just how powerful Princess Celeste happens to be and the closer they get to uncovering the secrets of her tribe the more deadly she will become. Now rather than reveal any more I will just say that, considering the time this film was produced, this turned out to be an okay movie for the most part. That said, I must admit that I didn't care for the manner in which Princess Celeste was able to turn into a werewolf at will and without regard for the full moon. But even so, the film kept my interest for the most part and for that reason I have rated it accordingly. Average.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad Doggie!
dougdoepke28 October 2011
Apparently werewolf genes are inheritable as a young woman becomes one because of her mom; then, in a hairy mood, she goes after nice young couple who know about her problem.

This Columbia studio production shows why Universal had the franchise on the half-human half-wolf. Instead of going the Universal route by using big-time make-up and blended dissolves, Columbia employs an actual German Shepherd dog, (not even a real wolf, mind you), as the fanged menace. And the nice doggie all but wags his tail while "menacing" the humans. Needless to say, this turns a potential horror movie into a version of Lassie Goes Bad, despite the best efforts of a strong supporting cast— e.g. Abbott, Leiber, Yurka.

Then too, the war thinned out the ranks of Hollywood leading men, leaving lightweights such as Stephen Crane to haul the goods. Good thing he went into the restaurant business instead of staying on the stage. And what a waste of the talented Nina Foch who doesn't get nearly the screen time her character deserves. Instead, that goes to Osa Massen, a decent enough actress, but without Foch's special brand of haughty disdain.

No need to waste time on this B-movie disappointment. Columbia simply cut too many budgetary corners with not enough imagination to produce anything more than a sometimes amusing misfire and a general waste of acting talent.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
One Of The Least Frightening Werewolf Movies I've Ever Stumbled Across
sddavis6324 October 2011
There have certainly been some bad werewolf movies made over the years, but perhaps there have been none that have simply been lacking in so many ways as "Cry Of The Werewolf." This was a poorly acted, cliché- ridden (which was unfortunate, and I'll expand upon that in a moment) and completely atmosphere free film whose basic redeeming quality is that it's very short and therefore doesn't waste too much of your time. There were a couple of things that broke free of the usual Hollywood treatment of the subject that gave this some potential, which was largely wasted. The first was that this stayed more true to actual werewolf legends. The werewolf was actually a person who became a wolf, and not some hybrid wolf-man beast, and the werewolf was a woman - not unheard of, but unusual for the most part in the genre. There might have been some meat there; there was also the potential for atmosphere - the story revolves around a mysterious gypsy tribe and much of the action takes place in a mysterious house complete with a secret chamber and crypt. Neither was used to create much atmosphere, though, and both are admittedly part of the cliché-ridden part of the story.

Other clichés? People from Transylvania abound in this, and there's even a kind of goofy cop involved in the investigation (not central to the film thankfully and overshadowed - again thankfully - by a more competent superior.) The acting was poor to fair at best. Especially poor was the woefully lacking in passion performance of Stephen Crane, who you'd think would be a bit more passionate, given that his father has just been torn apart by some wild beast! There's nothing even remotely frightening about this, and as mysteries go - well, there wasn't much. I kept watching to see if a potential plot twist might show up in the end that would have at least come as a surprise, but no. What you see from the beginning is basically what you get. It's very disappointing, and seemed basically to be put together by people who had no idea how to make a werewolf movie work. (2/10)
3 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wolf, chick, and cat power
whitec-319 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Scenes featuring three magnetic actresses lift The Cry of the Werewolf to a brief but intriguing glimpse of an occult matriarchy and sisterhood who renounce men for lycanthropy. A short running time and shorter budget prevent these themes' development, but the film delivers one loopy turn after another:

*Despite being set in New Orleans, where water levels preclude underground construction, the film features two extended scenes in basements of surprising dimensions.

*Granted, New Orleans is a multicultural city, but who suspected it was teeming with immigrants from Transylvania, among them a sizeable encampment of Gypsy or Roma folk in traditional covered wagons?

*Several scenes hinge on a quadruped other than a wolf: Minnie the cat's yowls at wolves or gypsies earn her surprising screen time as well as solicitude from employees at the Marie La Tour Museum. Three scenes are punctuated by characters acting on Minnie's behalf.

*Those wandering Gypsies / Roma converge in New Orleans one month a year for ethnic courtship and to bury their dead. Just when you're asking yourself, "What do they do with their dead those 11 other months?", another eccentric scene answers the question. . . .

*"Adamson and Sons Undertakers" is, in its front rooms, a facsimile of a mid-20th-century funeral parlor, complete with drab furniture, cheap drapes, and recorded organ music playing in the background. Hurrying to turn it off is the last of the Adamsons, played by Milton Parsons (also uncredited), whose bald noggin and solicitous manner would lead to film and TV appearances through the 70s as a clerk, clergyman, professor, choirmaster, or coroner (thanks, IMDb).

*"Refrigerated vaults" keep the Gypsy dead "on ice" at Adamson and Sons. A quick tour leads to a basement as extensive as a hospital wing. There a four-legged werewolf stalks Dr. Robert Morris, the movie's insipid leading man played by Stephen Crane—no kin to The Red Badge of Courage author but doing his gosh-darnedest to imitate Jimmy Stewart.

*The other basement, back in the Marie La Tour Museum but unseen till late in the movie, is entered through a mantelpiece by a secret passage whose operations everyone seems to know. Murders are overheard occurring somewhere beneath the fireplace. For most of the movie, though, viewers aren't granted a view of this secret chamber of blood. Near the end, though, Dr. Morris and Ilsa (Osa Massun), his Translylvanian foster-sister-turned-fiancée, explore the space. An altar designed like a Murphy bed drops out of the wall, bearing a large stuffed wolf, a human skull, and a goblet.

These surprises aren't consistent enough to build on each other, but the film's a fast 66 minutes, so take a chance if only for the sake of its uncanny climax. That occurs in the covered wagon of Nina Foch's Gypsy Queen, named Marie La Tour after her mother—-herself named perhaps to evoke the historical Marie Laveau (1801-81), a Voodoo queen of New Orleans who shared the name of her similarly talented mother.

Under the guiding eye of Blanche Yurka as Bianca the "old woman," Queen Marie recruits her look-alike Ilsa, a non-Gypsy Transylvanian-American, to join her as a "sister" in the werewolf matriarchy founded by her mother, the previous werewolf-queen. No men!

Ilsa's eyes grow and glow, but the moment is so overloaded with feminine beauty, lycanthropy, and alternative sexuality that the only exit available to her is a dead faint. When Ilsa is rescued by the regrettable Dr. Morris, the revelatory allure of that occult alternative shines a little brighter.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Bohemian rhapsody.
ulicknormanowen27 August 2020
Bearing more than a distant resemblance to Jacques Tourneur's "cat people" (1942) ; the woman comes from Eastern Europa , there's a good use of shadows and light ,but an impression of deja vu , the wolf replacing the panther .There's also the good girl and the doomed one (French Simone Simon as Tourneur's heroine , Nina Foch here ) :in both cases, it's the bad one who has the edge on their bland "rival" .
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
More like Cry of the Alsation
Stevieboy66618 July 2019
This was described as a classic horror when I stumbled across a download of it online, yet in 40 years of being a fan of the genre I had never before come across it. The things that I liked about Cry is that it is nicely filmed, looking very good in black and white. The werewolf plot is just adequate to maintain an interest, it stars some very attractive women and there is an element of humour in the form of some comical cops. What lets it down somewhat is the werewolf action is very limited, a dog is obviously used for the part of the werewolf and some of the acting is wooden (Osa Massen gives by far the worst Transylvanian accent that I have ever heard!). At just over an hour it is a fairly enjoyable but forgettable, minor werewolf movie
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Stinkeroo!
bbowman-731 October 2007
I can't believe these User Comments! Sheesh! This one has GOT to be one of the worst travesties and wastes of time in my book! What's up with Stephen Crane? Terrible actor! He's attacked by the werewolf and then stands up calmly, brushes himself off and says: "Yeah..I'm okay..." This is the best that Lana Turner could do? The whole piece of garbage looked like it was made for about twenty bucks. Nina Foch must have gone home a gotten drunk every night. The "wolf" was the only natural actor in the movie! Fritz Leiber's wooden performance brings new meaning to the expression "bad actor"! And Osa Massen? I couldn't get Inga from Young Frankenstein out of my mind!
3 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Different Take on Werewolf Lore
Hitchcoc9 February 2020
There are some good moments in this film. At the center is Nina Foch who plays a gypsy princess who can become a wolf at will. It is her purpose to keep the gypsy band together by killing off those who know about her abilities. But a scientist begins to invade their domain. He is killed but it leads to his son and fiancee trying to figure out what happened. One down side is the keystone kops police force. Even if they don't believe in werewolves, they could be a tad more competent.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Bad enough to offend most peoples sensibilities.
BA_Harrison22 November 2020
Dr. Charles Morris (Fritz Leiber), an expert in occultism and owner of the La Tour museum, is killed in mysterious circumstances. His son Robert (Stephen Crane) investigates, aided by his Transylvanian sweetheart Elsa Chauvet (Osa Massen). Could Celeste, the beautiful leader of a tribe of gypsies, be involved?

I'm unsure as to whether it is an attempt at Val Lewton-style subtlety or a case of necessity due to a severe lack of budget, but the transformation scene in Cry of the Werewolf is one of the most pathetic I have ever seen: a shadow of a human fades into the shadow of a wolf. It's a lacklustre effect not helped by the fact that the resulting creature is actually an Alsatian dog.

Still, it's fairly befitting of this film - the directorial debut of Henry Levin - which is a disappointing affair all round, from its opening scrawl which is missing an apostrophe, to its uninspired and overly talky script, to its wholly unremarkable performances. When I watch an old werewolf film, I at least expect to see a hairy hand or fanged face (preferably with some time-lapse transformation effects involved) - not a few seconds of a dog, and a distinctly un-scary one at that.

Oh, and no grammatical errors would be nice too.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This film gets a bad rap, unfairly
jadflack-2213021 July 2017
This film when werewolf films are discussed gets a bad rap, and even though there are no " Special Effects", film is effective.It uses elements from two classic 1940's horror films " The Wolf Man" (1941) and " Cat People" (1942)and uses them well.Well made and acted apart from leading man Stephen Crane who acts like he is reading from cue cards.Overall this film is a nice surprise, i went into this not expecting much but thought it a good film, not that far behind the two classics already mentioned.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
SMART AND INTRIGUING AS THESE THINGS GO...CONFINED ATMOSPHERICS & MINIMALIST
LeonLouisRicci9 September 2021
Simultaneously Adopting the Universal Studio's Werewolf Template (Gypsies, Folklore, Supernatural) and Not (animal wolf, no moon cycle, hereditary, bite=infected),

this Columbia Release Holds its Own and Delivers a Respectable Mystery Thriller.

A Creepy Movie with Little Comedy Relief and an Emphasis on Scholarly Research and Police Investigation.

The B-Cast and Budget Restraints (Columbia was the most cash deficient of the Majors) keep the Film in a Low-Budget Look.

But Manages to Display Atmosphere and a Credible Tone of Other Worlds and a Haunting Layer of Dread.

Overall, a Better Movie than it has any Right to be.

Surprises with an Entertainment Value that makes it a Solid Entry in the Horror Genre from the Time Period.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Talk about LOUSY writing!!!
planktonrules11 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
In the 1940s, Columbia Pictures decided to try to cash in on Universal's horror films by creating a few of their own (such as RETURN OF THE VAMPIRE and this film)--with generally poor results. The biggest reason was that although the atmosphere and acting were pretty good in these films, the adherence to the lore surrounding the monsters was mostly ignored--leaving the audiences confused and irritated--especially in the case of CRY OF THE WEREWOLF.

Here is just a partial list of the inconsistencies that completely violated accepted notions of werewolf films. First, no one actually becomes a part-person/part-wolf in this film. The leading lady is either a lady or a wolf--nothing in between. Also, there's NOTHING about a full moon and instead the lady can change herself at will. And this wolf is easy to kill as would be the lady--just shoot it with ordinary bullets! And finally, instead of the nice and kind gypsy played by Maria Ouspenskaya and her tortured son played by Bela Lugosi in the original WOLF MAN (1941), here the gypsies are evil Devil-cult members!! Now if you ignore the fact that this film bears NO RESEMBLANCE to prior wolf-man films like WEREWOLF OF London (1935) and WOLF MAN (1941), then perhaps you'll find this film enjoyable. But, since I am a rabid fan (get it?) of the films, I felt this one had contempt for the audience and wonder if any of the writers had even seen a werewolf film before writing this silly film.
2 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed