Three Strangers (1946) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
50 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
One of the oddest and most fascinating movies of the 1940s
cherold19 December 2009
Three Strangers is not a typical Hollywood film. Dark and philosophical, it introduces the viewer to three people, strangers to one another, and then follows their sad, desperate lives. While one reviewer on this site says it's a shame they don't make movies like this anymore, the fact is, they almost never made movies like this back then. This is far less neat and more philosophical than your typical 40s flick, a movie about strange twists of fate and the ways in which people fail to take responsibility for their actions.

The cast is excellent, with Peter Lorre particularly impressive in one of the best performances of his career as an alcoholic who thinks too much and does too little. I was also quite taken by Joan Lorring's touchingly vulnerable performance as a girl in with the wrong crowd.

Admittedly the ending ties things up in a neat little bow, yet for the most part this movie is far closer in spirit to the indie movies of the 1990s than to the film noirs of the 1940s it could be mistaken for.
29 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting for unusual reasons
JuguAbraham7 November 2004
One of the most unusual facets of the movie that struck me was the gowns/dresses designed for the lead actress--they stood out in this black and white movie making a not-so-tall Geraldine Fitzgerald look tall and elegant. Very few films have costume designs that out-do the performances--this film is one that achieves this unusual distinction.

Equally unusual was the written prologue for the film on the statue. It wreaked of populist myths of the Orient and then ended with the statement that the film's location was London. One expected British mannerisms and accents and its distinctive transport--but the only reasons for the choice of the locations seemed to be the legal system, the law on Trusts, the pubs, the mention of Canada being far away, the South African mines, and the solicitor's office. The rest was distinctly American. Curious stuff.

The film was equally curious for another factor: two women Icey and Janet look disturbingly similar, two men look considerably alike Mr Shackleford and Mr Fallon, save for their difference in height. Was there some reason for this or was this a coincidence.

Apart from these details, the film provided much of the fare that "The Maltese Falcon" made cinema history--John Huston's screenplay and the enigmatic performances of Greenstreet and Lorre. Greenstreet did not have the brilliant lines of "Falcon" to aid him but his chortling performance is nevertheless fascinating. Lorre on the other hand provides the best performance because the grey cocktail of good and bad touches the viewer. Similarly the lead character of Fitzgerald leaves the viewer wondering whether the character deserves our sympathy or not.

At the end, the viewer is forced to see ourselves in the mirror--we are but pawns of a mightier force, and none of us is either a villain or a saint. The film quite unwittingly makes the viewer think about life. That is probably why this film ought to rate better than "The Maltese Falcon" which no doubt has more catchy dialogues but less substance.
29 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another dusky Huston jewel....
walzking18 October 2004
It was over 20 years ago that I first encountered this small cinematic treasure, on the now-defunct indie KHJ-TV, channel 9 in Los Angeles, but it was not at all by accident. Having been enthralled by the magic that is "Casablanca" some years before, I had been seeking out other films like it made by Warner Bros. in the late 30s, 40s and early 50s. Specifically I was after more work by that classic's storied supporting cast: Paul Henried, Sydney Greenstreet, Peter Lorre, Claude Rains, S.Z. Sakall and Joy Page, among others.

"Three Strangers" gathers two of those and weaves them into a unexpectedly amoral tale of the cost of reversing fortune. Lorre plays a fallen gentleman who fallen into a bottle and thus into some dicey company, while Greenstreet plays a solicitor who's been a tad too speculative with his trust accounts. The underregarded Geraldine Fitzgerald joins them as the mysterious woman who randomly gathers the other two off a London street to see if they'll take a chance on an ancient Chinese proverb coming true.

"Three Strangers" if anything goes "Casablanca" and that other Huston/Lorre/Greenstreet classic, "The Maltese Falcon," one better in the world-weariness department, with moral ambiguities and ambivalent characters straight out of films noir made five years later. Unlike those other two films, though, there's little likability to be found in the lead characters' roguishness --- save perhaps for Lorre, who gets redeemed by a "good" woman's love at the end.

Yet that very fact makes "Three Strangers" play out like a much more modern film (like one from the early 1970s, say), rendering it an intriguing admixture of old-style character-driven plotting and contemporary moral waywardness and antiheroism.
22 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Tortuous Story of Three Miscreants.
rmax3048236 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Geraldine Fitzgerald recruits two strangers -- Peter Lorre and Sydney Greenstreet -- from the foggy streets of Victorian London and asks them to her flat. She asks them to chip in for a sweepstakes ticket and sign a document that they are equal contributors and none will sell his third of the payoff to anyone else. Maybe I should explain because this confused me. The sweepstakes isn't a random drawing of a number. It's horse race. The favorite horse is announced just before the race, so suddenly anyone who happens to own a ticket with the name of the favorite on it -- in this case "Corn Cracker" -- finds himself with a bird in the hand. He can sell his ticket (or his share in the ticket) to someone else at a higher price than what he paid. But the document with three signatures forbids this. So we already know this is a set up for later conflict.

As a matter of fact, the three signators are all up to illegal or unethical doings. Geraldine Fitzgerald is a wife whose impulsiveness has alienated her husband, a Member of Parliament who is now in love and in bed with a Canadian woman. A scandal would be calamitous to his career. She squeals on him out of spite.

The bibulous Peter Lorre has been involved in a stick up in which a bobby was killed by his partner. He barely escapes hanging.

Greenstreet, a Mount Everest of blubber, has been embezzling funds from the trust fund of one of his agreeable but ditzy elderly female clients. When she insists on an imediate audit just before the race, Greenstreet becomes desperate and needs to sell his share of the ticket in order to make up the loss. He rushes to Fitzgerald's flat where he finds her and Lorre. Conflict ensues.

All the way through, I wondered how the screenwriter, John Huston, was going to pull these three disparate narrative threads together because, after that first adventitious meeting, they never meet again until the resolution.

Well, he does a pretty good job, and the director, Jean Negulesco, doesn't let the script down. Both the writer and director add something to what otherwise might have been a pedestrian story of suspense and murder and intrigue. The sets help too. Who can not be enthralled by the foggy streets of London where each shadow might hide a mysterious figure -- perhaps with a RAZOR? I kind of like it, especially the mountainous Sydney Greenstreet with his quivering lips and darting eyes. Great heavy.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Twists and Turns of Luck and Strangers
theowinthrop28 August 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Geraldine Fitzgerald believes in the Chinese God of Luck and Fortune. She goes out one night, and picks up Sidney Greenstreet. He follows her very easily (apparently believing her a prostitute, but why not), and they return to her apartment, where Greenstreet is surprised to find Peter Lorre there, having a drink. Lorre had been chosen earlier, and been waiting for his hostess to return. Fitzgerald explains to her two partners that if they work together the God of Luck will reward them. The Grand National is about to take place (this is 1938) and there is a lottery for a possible "winning" ticket. All three agree to join together in the purchase of a lottery ticket (but only one of them can have his or her name on the ticket - they agree to allow Ms Fitzgerald to have her name on the ticket). However, they have a written agreement to jointly share the results (if any) of the ticket. Oh...one condition - they can't allow any of the three to leave the agreement, or the chain binding their luck together will collapse.

It is a pip of a movie - not only the best of the Greenstreet and Lorre films (without Humphrey Bogart), but the best performance in the carreer of Geraldine Fitzgerald. Her Chrystal Shackleford is one of the least likeable or sympathetic women in the movies. She is having problems with her husband (Alan Napier). He is tired of her vicious nature and nymphomania (she burns his hand with a cigarette butt at one point). He's met Marjorie Riordan, and wants to divorce Fitzgerald and marry her. Fitzgerald breaks up his romance with Riordan by lying about Napier. She also is willing to allow Lorre to go to the gallows (when his luck seems going down the tubes), chortling in unholy glee with Greenstreet. And when Greenstreet tries to convince her to sell the race ticket they now own (Greenstreet desperately needs the money), she laughingly kicks him out of her apartment. When she does get her just desert in the conclusion, one can't sympathize with her.

Greenstreet's Jerome K. Arbutny, a solicitor who is too greedy for his own good, is as larcenous and dangerous as Casper Gutman or Titus Semple. It is amazing that an actor who was a brilliant comic performer on Broadway left such a long train of excellent performances as villains, but that is how it frequently happens. Like Chrystal, Arbutny brings about his own problems - he is convinced that he can make money on dubious stock deals, although he is aware of the laws about violating estate trusts (which a solicitor handles). Two of the best scenes in the film show him trying to solve his money troubles by marrying the dotty Lady Rhea Bellodon (Rosalind Ivan, in a marvelous cameo performance), and then (when this engagement collapses) his attempt to commit suicide carefully in his office. The former sequence is carefully built up, for the audience is kept from knowing one secret - that Lady Rhea is a believer in spiritualism, and always asks the "spirit" of her husband to advise her. When Arbutny offers his hand in marriage, Lady Rhea explains she has to ask her husband - the audience has not heard she is a widow yet, but we wonder how Arbutny could ask for her hand if her husband is still around. Then Arbutny hears Lady Rhea's request, but does not look startled. Indeed he takes it very seriously. Then we realize that the advise will be through Lady Rhea's favorite medium. [To cap it off, the medium or Lord Belladon suggests that Lady Rhea check the books of Arbutny's firm first - something that does shake up Arbutny!] As for the suicide attempt, Arbutny first gives his two clerks the day off (in an earlier scene he was yelling at them for being fools), then he writes a letter of apology to Lady Rhea, and starts moving his office furniture . He spreads out a newspaper on the carpet to prevent his bleeding on it when the bullet enters his head. As he leans forward in his stuffed chair to fall forward he starts. The favorite for the Grand National is Corncracker, the horse on the ticket that he owns one third of. All thoughts of suicide pass out of his mind. Perhaps, as things turn out, it would have been better if he had committed suicide.

Lorre's character, Johnny, is a ne'er-do-well, of good family but he's living under a pseudonym, and he works in a gang. He and a man named Bertam Fallon (and a third man (Peter Whitney) - a good guy who does not like Fallon) were involved in a robbery, and a policeman was killed. He is alone in court, only supported by Icey (Joan Loring) his girl friend [Fallon had his eye on her too, which is why Whitney suspects Fallon's plans for the robbery - that he may be setting Lorre up.] The prosecutor (Arthur Shields, in one of his good performances again) rips apart Fallon's defense (he set up a fake alibi). Fallon makes a deal to save himself at Lorre's expense, and Lorre is sentenced to death, while Fallon will get a prison sentence. Earlier we saw Lorre signal Loring and Whitney not to come forward, when the police had arrested him. Our sympathies remain with Lorre. So when Whitney turns avenger, and throws a knife into Fallon (despite Fallon's police escort), we cheer on the doomed avenger. Lorre is cleared by the dying man, and released...in time to learn that Corncracker is the favorite in the race. He heads for Chrystal's apartment and the denoument of this tragic comedy.

Who are the three strangers? Usually Fitzgerald, Lorre, and Greenstreet are considered the strangers, whose weird fates are at the center of the film's twists and turns. But if one studies the film everyones fortunes go up and down. Alan Napier is looking forward to getting rid of this incubus wife of his with Riordan. He confronts and tells off Chrystal, and gets injured as a result. Then Riordan is convinced to break up with Napier (they were planning to leave on their honeymoon on a Belladon liner, tying their part of this fictional world with Arbutny's). At the end, Napier heads for a final confrontation (possibly a deadly one) with Fitzgerald, only to find someone has beaten him to it (his slight look of satisfaction when he finds this out is a minor treasure). Rosalind Ivans nuttiness seems pathetic to the audience, until the audience sees how it enables her to be protected for her own benefit. The two clerks of Greenstreet are treated like dirt and called fools, but they get a day off and he is the real fool. Fallon, the head of the gang, hires a barrister and pays for an alibi of sorts, only to watch his perjured witness torn apart by Arthur Shields. He is forced to make a cowardly deal (at Lorre's expense) to save his own life. Only he is universally despised now (even his guard dislikes him), and within seconds his life is taken by an avenging former gang member. Peter Witney was at large (thanks to Lorre's sacrifice), but avenges Lorre by killing Fallon. As a result (in a moving moment) Lorre and Loring see Witney in police custody, realizing he's doomed now for killing Fallon. If anything, the film may concentrate on Fitzgerald, Greenstreet, and Lorre, but fate is universal, and all of us get affected one way or another (by nature and each other). The most blessed ones among us just don't know our future, nor (if they are wise) seek to know it or totally control it.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Three Strangers (1946)
MartinTeller3 January 2012
A woman entices two strangers to her home to fulfill an unusual Chinese prophecy, granting a wish... in this case, a horse race ticket that they hope to be a winner. With a screenplay by John Huston and appearances by Lorre and Greenstreet, and a figurine as a major plot device, you might expect a MALTESE FALCON retread. But this is a very different story. I hesitate to call it noir, although it does have some of the visual stylization and explores some of man's darker impulses. But it's really more of a triptych character study. The three represent different moral stances: Fitzgerald is conniving and ruthless, Greenstreet does something wrong but at least has enough decency to be conflicted about it, and Lorre is simply a carefree drunk who trusts the wrong people. I didn't count the minutes, but it felt like Lorre got the most screen time, and deservedly so. I don't know if I've ever seen a better performance from him, certainly not a more likable one. He's a charming character with a thoughtful outlook on life. His story also has the benefit of wonderful turns by Peter Whitney and especially Joan Lorring, a very appealing actress I've never seen before, but I'm delighted to see appears in a few more noirs I intended to see. Greenstreet's and Fitzgerald's plot threads are interesting as well, and the way all they come together and resolve at the end is satisfying. It's a quirky film with a very good script, quite fulfilling.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It doesn't make a lot of sense and it's overly sensational...but it is also entertaining.
planktonrules25 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This is a "turn off your brain and enjoy" film. In other words, if you think through how silly the plot is, you'll most likely grow tired of the film and fail to see it to the end. However, if you can suppress that urge, then you might just find the whole thing quite enjoyable.

The film begins with Geraldine Fitzgerald finding two strangers (Sydney Greenstreet and Peter Lorre) and convincing them to come to her apartment (it's not THAT kind of film--relax). There, she tells them a strange tale that some Chinese goddess can grant wishes if three strangers all simultaneously wish for the exact same thing at the stroke of midnight (yeah, right). They all decide to wish for a winning sweepstakes ticket. In the meantime, they'll write up an agreement to share the proceeds equally. Then, after that's concluded, they all say a silent prayer to the goddess at midnight.

Upon leaving, the film then shows the lives of all three characters--all of which turn out to be very screwed up indeed. Fitzgerald turns out to be a vindictive Borderline Personality who delights in making her estranged husband miserable. You assume that sooner or later he would kill her because her actions are so pointless and mean. Peter Lorre is hiding out with another man, as they are implicated for murder. However, Lorre DIDN'T commit the crime--he's just an alcoholic who was with the wrong people at the wrong time. Finally, Greenstreet is a supposedly reputable solicitor (sort of like a lawyer who does not do criminal law, for those other Americans out there). However, he's really begun playing in the stock markets with his client's trust fund and throughout the film this problem gets worse and worse.

Actually, all three of the stories are quite compelling and I really wish the film had found some other way to string them all together other than the silly goddess plot device. I also liked how all three characters came back together at the end of the tale. But the whole wishing on a Buddhist statue at midnight angle just made my head hurt. With a bit of a re-write this could have been an exceptional film. As it is, it's goofy and strange but quite intriguing if you can slog through the silly stuff.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
engrossing fare
blanche-229 June 2005
"Three Strangers" has long been a favorite film of mine, with its fascinating reference to the statue of the goddess Kwan Yin, who, in Chinese legend, opens her eyes and grants a wish to three strangers on the Chinese New Year. Geraldine Fitzgerald, Sydney Greenstreet, and Peter Lorre are the above-mentioned strangers, each with an agenda that can be easily pursued by money. So the wish is that their sweepstakes ticket win, and the agreement is that it then be entered into the horse race that follows.

Geraldine Fitzgerald's character seems sympathetic, but she reveals herself as quite obsessive and delusional as the film progresses. Greenstreet plays a crooked solicitor, and Lorre portrays a small time criminal - he's the most sympathetic character and, to my mind, gives the most memorable performance.

The film asks the question - did the meeting of the three strangers change their lives, or did events proceed as they would have? This is an unusual, absorbing, and entertaining film. I highly recommend it.
51 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
strong opening
SnoopyStyle21 November 2021
Crystal Shackleford (Geraldine Fitzgerald) invites two strangers, Jerome K. Arbutny (Sydney Greenstreet) and Johnny West (Peter Lorre), to her apartment on the night of Chinese New Year in 1938. She has an idol of Kwan Yin and tells them that it would grant them a wish to three people who are strangers to each other. They decide to share a sweepstakes ticket.

This is a very strong opening. It drives a hook right into the audience but the hook slowly slips out. The three characters don't have enough time to build chemistry before scattering to the winds. What would have been stronger is to have them go on a quest together for the night. They could remain strangers until each one of their issues is reveal but with the others present in this way. As it stands, the movie loses my attention as each one of their stories are explained. I try to stay with one story when another story takes over. I just kept waiting for them to reunite. I do have to give this full marks for imaginative story writing and great acting.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
In The Hope Of Fortune Coming Their Way
bkoganbing16 January 2009
The time is 1938 London before the World War. A woman of mystery, Geraldine Fitzgerald, invites two perfect strangers played by Peter Lorre and Sydney Greenstreet up to her apartment. She's a believer in the ancient Chinese god of Kwan Lin and it's said that if Three Strangers wish on that deity and their's is the same wish it will be granted. In this case the wish is money and it's in the form of a sweepstakes ticket that Peter Lorre has purchased and who gives two thirds away to Fitzgerald and Greenstreet in the hope of fortune coming their way.

After this we see a glimpse of the lives of the three people. Lorre is a petty criminal who's gotten himself into a beautiful jackpot being accused of a murder that he didn't commit. Fitzgerald is a shrewish wife who stays married to an unhappy Alan Napier who just wants to be free to marry Marjorie Riordan. This is a harbinger of a role that Fitzgerald really perfected a dozen years later in Ten North Frederick. As for Greenstreet, he's a solicitor, an attorney of no great significance in the legal profession, an English version of a man whose name I was once threatened with named Abe Hecht. It's now become a synonym for cheap shysters with me. Anyway Greenstreet's the trustee of an estate he's been dipping into. He wants to make a financial killing real bad because he thinks that money will buy him respectability which he craves like nothing else.

The film is like a 90 minute version of a Twilight Zone episode, but that's not a putdown because some really classic stuff was done on that program. The script was written by Howard Koch and John Huston and directed by Jean Negulesco. I'm surprised Huston did not want to direct this one himself, but Jean Negulesco got some of the best performances that members of the cast ever gave on screen, especially from the three leads.

Notice no really big movie names are in this cast, no leading men screen legends. That may have been an asset to the film because it concentrates on the story and the characters created. The ironic fates of all three of the sweepstakes ticket sharers could have come right out of the imaginative mind of Rod Serling. And Peter Lorre is actually allowed a little romance in a movie. That alone makes Three Strangers absolutely priceless.

Three Strangers is a B picture gem, one of those low budget sleepers that Hollywood puts out to great critical acclaim that turn a profit because of the low budget. And this review is dedicated to that attorney Abe Hecht whom I never met and to his idiot brother-in-law Morris Stetch who threatened me with him back in 1979. To see if Greenstreet obtains the status of a Clarence Darrow and rises from Abe Hechtdom, don't miss Three Strangers.
25 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Don't Ever Get Mixed Up With a Chinese Goddess . . .
boscofl3 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The 1946 Warner Brothers film "Three Strangers" is an offbeat yarn written by John Huston. The narrative illustrates his favorite theme that he beat to death for nearly 50 years in cinemas: the pursuit of riches will end in disaster. The story begins with Crystal Shackleford combing the foggy streets of London on the eve of Chinese New Year for two people to create the triumvirate indicated by the title. She returns to her flat with Jerome K Arbutny and John West and explains her plan: to make a wish in front of the bronze statue of the Chinese Goddess of good fortune, Kwan Yin, at the stroke of midnight. Supposedly if their intentions are pure the goddess will open her eyes and grant a wish to three strangers at that moment. Unfortunately a convenient gust of wind blows through the room and extinguishes the lone candle illuminating the room, making it impossible to see if the statue's eyes open. The men leave and quickly forget about their experience but soon forces align to alter their destinies . . .

The bulk of the film follows the characters after they go their separate ways and reveals their dilemmas before reuniting them for the conclusion. West is easily the most likable of the trio; he's a pleasant alcoholic that unwittingly got mixed up in a robbery gone wrong. Peter Lorre essays this role and effortlessly becomes the heart of the film. In portraying a man with minimal ambition and an easy-going nature Lorre proves his versatility in a welcome break from devious roles. He leaves the histrionics to Geraldine Fitzgerald and Sydney Greenstreet in their interpretations of Crystal and Arbutny, respectively. These folks are pretty despicable characters.

Crystal is estranged from her husband David and hopes to win him back. Unfortunately for her he is in love with another woman and unfortunately for him Crystal has no intention of letting him go. As the deranged wife Miss Fitzgerald turns in a marvelously creepy performance. Most of the time she comes across as sweet but occasionally lapses into brief frenzies of lunacy when challenged. Miss Fitzgerald underplays beautifully most of the time but when she cuts loose you absolutely believe her husband's warning to his lover that Mrs Shackleford is "dangerous." A truly chilling performance.

Arbutny is an ambitious solicitor who commits the mistake of stock market speculation with someone else's money. Needless to say his plan backfires and he is left desperately scrambling to avoid humiliation, ruin, and prison. Sydney Greenstreet does a wonderful job in this role. At first he is his typically cool film self but as his life turns sideways he begins to unravel before engaging in a complete emotional meltdown. Greenstreet is spectacular down the stretch and his scenes at the finale with Lorre and Miss Fitzgerald crackle with tension.

While the three leads dominate the film there are a few other noteworthy performances. Joan Lorring and Peter Whitney score as Lorre's companions; Miss Lorring for her touching devotion to Lorre and Whitney for his mania regarding "squealers". Alan Napier, two decades before becoming Batman's loyal manservant Alfred, lends class as David Shackleford. He is the very picture of an English gentleman attempting to do the right thing before being driven to extreme measures by his crazy wife.

The movie itself has a heavy noir influence with plenty of foggy night scenes, claustrophobic rooms, and prison cells. Jean Negulesco conveys a fine atmosphere of disaster and handles the ironic denouement with aplomb. The first 20 minutes are particularly intriguing and give the audience a rooting interest in finding out what happens to these "Three Strangers." All in all this film is worth a look.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Quality movie.
Boba_Fett113816 October 2007
This is one fine made movie. It has a greatly written script and a top-notch cast. It sounds like a cliché of course but it's a real shame that movies like these aren't being made and written anymore. At least not on such a commercially large scale and with such fine big name actors in it. Movies like this aren't made anymore simply because movies like this don't really sell, unless they are being made exceptionally good. It's not really a film-noir, although the movie certainly shows similarities to the atmosphere and the story also shows noir tendencies. The movie in the end is perhaps a bit too 'light' to consider it a real film-noir, also because it features quite an amount of subtle black comedy. The story is solidly constructed and focuses on three different characters and plot-lines that of course are all still connected to each other. The fine script was written by Hollywood legend John Huston. It features lots of deeper themes such as greed and jealousy. You really start to care about the characters and their problems. Something that isn't too common for a '40's genre movie. It's not always an easy movie to watch and follow so make sure you watch this movie with a clear head. The dialog might be a bit overlong by todays standards but its so fine written and delivered by the actors that you tend to look past this. The movie gets really carried by the three main characters, that equally share the screen time. I was especially impressed by Sydney Greenstreet, which also might due to the fact that he had the best- or at least most credible plot line. Peter Lorre also played a great role and gave a fine performance. Geraldine Fitzgerald was definitely the least of the three actors and she tended to overact a bit in some of the dramatic sequences. But overall her role was also really a solid one and it says something about the quality of the acting from Lorre and Greenstreet to say that Fitzgerald gave the lesser performance of the movie. Alan Napier also plays a small role. Oh man, it really seems to be that this guy is in about every 'old' movie that I watch lately. Napier received his most fame for playing the butler Alfred in the Adam West "Batman" series from the '60's. The editing of the movie was also surprisingly good and fast. Instead of long single camera sequences, the movie cuts back and forth between different camera positions in the same sequence rapidly. It gives the story speed and helps to keep you interest even during the more slow and dull moments of the movie. The fine little musical score was from acclaimed composer Adolph Deutsch, whose music suited this movie and its atmosphere really well. It's a fine good old fashioned quality movie, made with limited resources but with fine experts involved. 8/10
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Excellent 1946 Film
whpratt112 March 2008
Geraldine Fitzgerald, (Crystal Shackleford) strolls down a London street and manages to recruit two strangers named Jerome K. Arbutny, (Sydney Greenstreet) and Johnny West, (Peter Lorre) to her apartment in order to celebrate a Chinese New Year. Crystal has a statue in her apartment named the goddess Kwan Yin which will open her eyes and grant wishes to the three strangers which involves a sweepstakes ticket. The two strangers have some very dark secrets and Jerome Arbutny is a crooked solicitor who steals money from trust funds and Johnny West is a small time criminal who loves to drink all the time. Crystal is a woman who has a husband who just plain left her and found another woman and then he is asking her for a divorce, but Crystal will not give him a divorce. If you liked seeing these actors in previous films you will enjoy viewing this film which is very mysterious with very dark secrets. Enjoy.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Strange tale of fortune, misfortune and fate
PudgyPandaMan11 February 2009
"It has always been man's desire to invent idols on whom he can place the responsibility for his own actions. Perhaps these three strangers in this story, whose lives have really nothing to do with each other, would never have met except for a very ancient idol: the Chinese goddess, Kwan Yin. And perhaps their separate stories might have been different except for what happened that night. And then again, perhaps not." (OPENING TITLE SCREEN)

And so begins THREE STRANGERS. It sounded interesting enough.

But in the end, I didn't particularly care for this film. That mostly stems from the fact that it's based on the lives of selfish, self-absorbed people looking to change their fortunes.

It looks rather low budget as nothing really impressed me with the sets or the cinematography. The acting was adequate, but ultimately couldn't overcome the problem for me with the characters in general.

Mostly, it was a film full of unlikeable people - with the exception of Peter Lorre's character. He was the least offensive of the three main characters although still a drunken crook - but he seemed less harmful.

In the end, I couldn't have cared less what happened with any of the people in this film. I think the premise could have been interesting - the idea of 3 people's lives intertwined because of a winning lottery ticket. But ultimately, it failed to deliver.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A handsomely mounted, ironic thriller devoid of emotional resonance
bmacv27 April 2003
Why is Three Strangers, a 1946 movie, set in the London in 1938? There's nothing in the story that links it to a particular time. But in 1938, Britain had yet to be drawn into the long and arduous war to come, when gallantry and self-sacrifice were the orders of the day. The characters in Three Strangers are mirthlessly ungallant and single-mindedly self-absorbed; relegating them to the fool's paradise of the year before all hell broke loose was a diplomatic courtesy.

But a movie centered around three unappealing characters presents another, more immediate problem: The problems they bring on themselves do not compel much sympathy. The movie opens before midnight as the Chinese New Year is about to strike. Geraldine Fitzgerald has been trolling the streets to bring two strangers (Sydney Greenstreet and Peter Lorre) back to her flat. Her quest is not sexual but ritualistic: The Chinese goddess of fortune, a statue of whom graces her drawing room, requires the gathering of three persons unknown to one another before she will grant her annual wish. When all the conditions and codicils have been duly haggled over, the three agree to wish for a winning sweepstakes ticket.

Then they part ways to return to their separate hells. The grasping, manipulative Fitzgerald has driven away her husband, who returns from Canada with a young woman he wants to marry. The avaricious Greenstreet, a solicitor, has been plundering his clients' accounts to speculate in stocks. The alcoholic Lorre (by default the least offensive of the trio) finds himself on death row for a policeman's murder committed by one of his low-life friends who framed him. Their individual stories unfold and, in ironies reminiscent of de Maupassant or O. Henry, ultimately reconverge. As expected, Jean Negulesco directs handsomely but can't overcome the emotional vacuum in John Huston's script: The fates of these three strangers leave us cold.
27 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
WEIRD TRIP INTO THE NOIR...!
masonfisk29 July 2020
A 1946 film noir featuring Sydney Greenstreet, Peter Lorre & Geraldine Fitzgerald. All three meet up in the beginning of the film to go in on a future horse race hoping to win the big payday. Why these three we never find out but each is in their own desperate straits that a windfall w/this much potential can be life altering. Lorre, hanging around the lower echelons of the British criminal underworld, has a youngish girlfriend & is always one step ahead of the rent collector but when an associate is implicated in a murder & his girl is a witness, the noose of implication rests squarely around his neck. Greenstreet is an investment banker who has co-opted a widowed dowager's funds into a high risk/high cash scheme which soon comes crumbling around his ears where marriage to the woman may be a possibility. Fitzgerald is caught in a one sided marriage to Alan Napier (Alfred from TV's Batman) who already has eyes for another but she holds out demented hope she can sway his love back to her. All of these mini & melodramas culminate on the day of the race where Greenstreet is so keen to take care of his money problems, he's already offered the sale of his stake in the ticket to someone who will make him flush but Fitzgerald is adamant they collect the prize as a unit which makes him commit a fatal decision. More O. Henry than out & out noir, this collision of morals really gets going in the last third but one wonders what if their horse lost? Co-written by John Huston, whose directing debut The Maltese Falcon carries some of the same plot elements (& some of the cast as well), is still vital for the nightmarish yarn it weaves.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's Good....
byron-11626 March 2020
It's Always a joy to watch Sydney Greenstreet and Peter Lorre, and they both are in top form in THREE STRANGERS. It's a Pretty good story by John Huston. A must for film noir lovers
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
So close...but no cigar...Karma will get you every time
nomoons1110 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I read the back story on this film and how long they wanted to make it....Along with the top "A-list" stars they wanted for it and for the life of me...I can't see them in this. Who they chose was dead perfect.

Two men follow a beautiful woman to her apartment but for her...it was by design. She shows the men a Chinese goddess of fortune and at a certain time of the the year, if 3 strangers all wish on it then it will come true. Peter Lorre plays an aloof crook who doesn't care if he gets caught or not. He's just chillin' the whole time through this. He decides that he has a lottery ticket for a horse race in his pocket and that they should wish on that to win. If they do it's 30,000 pounds to the winner. Split 3 ways that's 10,000 each. The real story is the stories of each of the 3 strangers lives outside that wish they made upon the Chinese goddess of fortune. Peter Lorre is a crook who's hiding out with one of his accomplices waiting for another crook to get out of jail. He's on trial for murder and they sit and wait for him to get free. Sydney Greenstreet is a sheister estate lawyer who funnels his clients funds into stocks and what not and he chooses a wrong stock and loses the money in the process. He needs this lottery ticket for a horse race to win. Geraldine Fitzgerald plays a shifty no-good wife of a prominent official who's in the marriage for all the wrong reasons. He's left her a long time previous but she wants to make up with her husband for all her wrongs but she only wants to so no other woman will have him. She knows he can't get a divorce without her consent so he's stuck and she pulls the strings. Problem is that she needs money and this ticket could help her out.

This is a really winding story of 3 losers who if they would just do one thing right in their life then Karma would probably help them out. As it stands though, these are 3 people who deserve their fates because they created them.

A really creative idea for a story and really well done. A great ending you see coming but it's still good any how. All 3 leads were cast perfectly for what this film has to offer. Give this one a shot and wait for the ending to see what Karma is all about.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Interesting black comedy about greed in a movie rich with detail and atmosphere.
tjonasgreen4 April 2004
A very literate script by John Huston and Howard Koch makes this one worth seeing. Only after the initial intriguing premise is set in motion do we discover to our amusement that all the characters we've become interested in are fairly despicable, particularly Geraldine Fitzgerald as a sociopath and nymphomaniac. With the unusually well observed character details provided by the script and the use of many supporting and bit actors one hasn't seen in lots of other pictures, THREE STRANGERS really has something of the atmosphere of London in 1938 rather than of London-via-Hollywood.

And make no mistake: Despite good direction by Jean Negulesco, John Huston's cynicism, pessimism and misogyny are evident everywhere, and that alone makes this unusual in a '40s picture. Like MALTESE FALCON it is a black comedy about greed, but it has no big stars, no glamor, and only the sliest, cruelest humor. Add the perfectly judged performances of everyone in this film, and it adds up to a neglected near-classic, one that seemed to predict the funnier and more elegant KIND HEARTS AND CORONETS.

As the real star of the film, Peter Lorre is wonderfully wry and quite lovable as one of life's eternal losers. Sydney Greenstreet often played nasty men deliciously but here he takes his character's weakness and pettiness much further than usual, and his scenes of escalating madness are very effective. Geraldine Fitzgerald's portrait of an amoral seductress is different than what she usually played at Warners, and should be considered some kind of '40s milestone in the depiction of depraved women alongside Gene Tierney in LEAVE HER TO HEAVEN and Agnes Moorehead in DARK PASSAGE. She's aided by some very form-fitting Milo Anderson gowns, one of which, a pleated satin negligee, was recycled in black for Patricia Neal in THE FOUNTAINHEAD a few years later. It looks great in both incarnations. In smaller parts Peter Whitney makes an impression as a soft-hearted (and homosexual?) crony of Lorre's, and Rosalind Ivan is memorable as a dotty widow who is much shrewder than she appears. Finally, the casting of Fitzgerald, Marjorie Riordan and Joan Lorring (who looks like a young Irene Selznick) is curious: all three young women have prominent noses, darkly painted lips and very dark, shoulder-length hair which is styled similarly. And as each character descends in economic scale, her looks are heavier and plainer. Another comment on how fickle fortune can be? Anne Sharp's comment below that the characters are meant to illustrate the dark forces that enabled WWII is interesting and valuable.

By the way, the print shown on TCM is rather dim, sketchy and full of harsh contrasts so it's hard to judge what the film was actually meant to look like. Whoever now owns the Warner Bros. library should strike a pristine version of this one.
29 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Three strangers, one idol and one sweep stake ticket. Bad mix.
hitchcockthelegend8 February 2014
Three Strangers is directed by Jean Negulesco and written by John Huston and Howard Koch. It stars Sydney Greenstreet, Peter Lorre and Geraldine Fitzgerald. Music is by Adolph Deutsch and cinematography by Arthur Edeson.

A tricky movie in structure as it constantly shifts between three character arcs to lead us to its resolution. Plot finds Crystal (Fitzgerald) luring Johnny (Lorre) and Arbutny (Greenstreet) to her apartment to make a wish in front of a Chinese idol known as Kwan Yin. It's believed that Kwan Yin will bring a wish true if requested by three strangers at midnight. They mutually agree on purchasing a lottery ticket and vow to split the winnings evenly. Naturally things don't go as planned…

The key issue here is that the three characters are tainted by their weaknesses, so as greed, paranoia, bad luck and jealousy grips their respective lives, Kwan Yin deals them the cards they deserve. Negulesco and his writers give the actors meaty parts, thrusting the characters into a world of embezzlement, murder, imprisonment and alcoholism. The vagaries of fate shows its hand as well, and with Edeson's black and white photography cosying up to the thematics, pic rounds out as a thriller cum drama with added mysticism for good measure.

Huston's noir shadings are evident, and since it was written before it, this makes for a good appetiser to The Maltese Falcon. Good fun to be had here and the final outcome for our three strangers doesn't disappoint either. 7.5/10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Triple Threat
Ron Oliver23 September 2004
THREE STRANGERS stake their future fortunes on the whims of Kwan Yin, an ancient Chinese goddess.

The original story behind this tidy little thriller was originally conceived by John Huston as a sequel to THE MALTESE FALCON (1941). That not proving possible, it was shaped into its present form with help from the writer Howard Koch and turned over to the noted director Jean Negulesco.

The film stars Sydney Greenstreet & Peter Lorre in one of their several pairings. Greenstreet, huge and implacable, plays a desperately duplicitous solicitor. Spooky-eyed Lorre, who gets to play a rare romantic role, is a petty criminal on the lam from the police. Their actual screen time together is sparse, but they make the most of it--the nervous little fellow playing perfectly off of the rumbling fat man. Greenstreet, especially, overacts magnificently, descending into melancholia and, eventually, madness, to the delight of the viewer.

Geraldine Fitzgerald is pure vixen as the third member of the trio, a woman so consumed by jealousy, and obsessed with the supposed powers of the goddess Kwan Yin, that she has ceased being influenced by natural love & affection. Every man's nightmare, she is unadulterated malice.

The supporting cast includes the sprightly Joan Lorring as Lorre's loyal girlfriend; Alan Napier as Fitzgerald's estranged husband; Rosalind Ivan as a widowed dowager still in communication with her deceased husband; Arthur Shields as a stern prosecutor; and the always competent Doris Lloyd as Lorre's slovenly landlady.

Movie mavens will recognize an unbilled Ian Wolfe as a London barrister.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Three Strangers, three stories
AlsExGal18 November 2021
Alfred Hitchcock was interested in directing this, and I can see why. Because it plays out like three intertwined episodes of Alfred Hitchcock Presents.

Crystal Shackleford (Geraldine Fitzgerald) lures two strangers, solicitor Jerome K. Arbutny (Sydney Greenstreet) and drunkard Johnny West (Peter Lorre) to her London home on Chinese New Year in 1938 because of her belief that if three strangers make the same wish to an idol of Kwan Yin, Chinese goddess of fortune and destiny, the wish will be granted.

They must not know each other's names until after the wish is made, and she has thought this out and believes that the only common wish they could make is for money. So they wish for a sweepstakes ticket to come in, and they all sign their names to it. Crystal says that part of the bargain is that if the ticket wins they will bet it all on the ensuing horserace. Well of course they agree to this, because they don't really think anything will come of it anyways. So they go their own way having thought this episode nothing more than somewhat amusing.

Johnny is mixed up in a robbery that turned to murder even though he was just the look-out and drunk and did not really know what was going on.

Arbutny has embezzled money from a client's estate and the investment goes south, with him having insufficient funds to avoid disgrace and jail.

Crystal wants her husband back, but he is in love with somebody else and is adamant about wanting a divorce. She seems obsessed with winning more than she is in love.

Now I can see how Arbutny's problem would be solved by money. But as for Johnny and Crystal - no amount of money could get them what they want. And it's a strange film where Peter Lorre plays the most well adjusted character, somewhat resigned to whatever fate he gets as destiny.

Then the paths of these three people converge again and the whole thing ends quite ironically. If you are looking for Greenstreet and Lorre together, they really are not for the vast majority of the film, but it still plays to their strengths and I'd recommend it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"We are but strangers on this moving globe; it's not for us to tarry long."
jzappa21 April 2010
With its low-key black and white cinematography, hard-boiled characters of profound weakness and an almost cheerfully subversive story, Jean Negulesco's Three Strangers is undiluted nostalgia of an urbane and cunning variety. Never so far away from rationality that it is an altogether unique yet unmistakably theatrical parable, it makes a shadowy and alluring potboiler, reaching some moments of pure magnetism in a handful of its crucial sequences.

The script by John Huston and his friend Howard Koch is masterful in structure. The film begins in the shadows and fog of the London streets as Geraldine Fitzgerald coaxes two strangers, Sydney Greenstreet's caricatured attorney Jerome K. Arbutney and Peter Lorre's charismatic and cultivated alcoholic Johnny West to her London pad on Chinese New Year at the hand of her doctrine that if three strangers make the same wish to an idol of the Chinese goddess of fortune and destiny, the wish will be fulfilled. Because money will make their dreams come true, the three gamble on a sweepstakes ticket for the Grand National horse race together and concur that they will not sell the ticket if it is selected, and will hold onto it until the race is run. Fitzgerald would use the money to attempt to win her alienated husband back, Arbutny to lay the groundwork for his appointment to the esteemed Barrister's Club, and Johnny to purchase a bar as his home.

After this single, taut, spare and graceful expository dialogue scene, the plot strands of the three strangers are unraveled, demystifying who we began to believe they were in the initial scene. Greenstreet insatiably and uproariously overplays as Arbutney, who we learn has looted a trust fund. Lorre is seamlessly graceful as the drunk who becomes enmeshed in a murder of which he's not guilty, while Fitzgerald is astonishing as a manipulative and truly unpredictable woman, a femme fatale of the highest caliber.

Undeservedly obscure and overlooked, Three Strangers is about the human desire to look to gods and idols to resolve our problems, only to be driven into worse new ones. Mostly owing to the performances and the cynical manipulation of the noir plot, the film resolves as kind of a black comedy. It is an admirable and deftly executed variation on the hopeless and acerbic atmosphere of the film noir. In noir, characters are corrupt fall guys of the universe, brimming with existential distress, just like us all. Why not find a chuckle or two in it?
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
3 bad people get nothing
jellopuke21 July 2020
This is a solid and well made movie about 3 bad people who all go through bad lives after making a pact to share the winnings of a lottery ticket. There are no characters to root for but a nice dark ending that makes this a fun watch. Lorre gets a chance to play something other than a bad guy and does a good job. Hardly a classic, but worth tracking down.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Unlikable, downbeat characters highlight this fateful tale of fortune gone awry
Turfseer11 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Had it been written in the 50s, Three Strangers might have been perfect as an episode on Alfred Hitchcock Presents. The story features just the kind of dour characters involved in foul play coupled with an offbeat "twist" ending of the fateful variety which the "Master of Suspense" was drawn to.

Surprisingly the script was written by film luminary John Huston. It's set in pre-War Britain in 1938 and is highlighted by an implausible opening in which an unhinged woman Crystal Shackleford (Geraldine Fitzgerald) invites two strangers off the street into her apartment, an alcoholic intellectual Johnny West (Peter Lorre) and crooked solicitor Jerome Arbutny (Sidney Greenstreet). The two are not exactly youngsters looking for a score but nonetheless accept Mrs. Shackleford's invitation.

The wacky and vengeful Mrs. Shackleford has a small Chinese idol, Kwan Yi, sitting on her mantelpiece and believes this Chinese Goddess of fortune and destiny will bring everyone in attendance good luck. So she proposes everyone go in on a sweepstakes ticket for the Grand National horse race she's already purchased. The way it works is that you select a horse in the race and if your ticket is drawn, then you have the opportunity of winning a large amount of money if your horse wins. If you have one of the tickets that's selected, then you can either sell the ticket before the race for a price for more than you paid for it, or take a gamble and win a fortune if your horse comes in.

Mrs. Shackleford, West and Arbutny all agree to go partners and sign the ticket making it official. The story then veers off covering the separate fates of each principal. The problem here is that at least two of the characters here (Mrs. Shackleford and Arbutny) are thoroughly unlikable and West only proves to be slightly sympathetic.

Mrs. Shackleford's story is that she's obsessed with her ex-husband who is now going out with another woman whom he met in Canada. Mrs. Shackleford won't grant him a divorce and she ends up meeting the girlfriend, lying to her that she's reconciled with her husband and is now pregnant. The girlfriend dumps the husband and returns to Canada much to the husband's chagrin.

Arbutny is just as despicable as Mrs. Shackleford as he's been embezzling funds from an eccentric woman who lives in his building and now becomes desperate after blowing most of her funds playing the stock market. West initially appears to be in a worse position than the other two. He's arrested for murder despite only being an innocent witness to the crime. Suffice it to say West is cleared due to a deathbed confession of the actual murderer, after he's stabbed to death by an accomplice on a train while he's being transported to prison.

Arbutny is on the verge of shooting himself when he learns that miraculously Mrs. Shackleford's sweepstakes ticket has been selected, with the favorite coming up in the Grand National race later that day. He runs over and demands that Mrs. Shackleford give up the ticket so he can sell it and obtain funds to pay off his debts. West arrives at Mrs. Shackleford's only to watch in horror as Arbutny bludgeons her with a vase resulting in her death. Sure enough Mrs. Shackleford's horse wins the Grand National but West tells Arbutny that he will have to destroy the ticket since it would implicate them both in Mrs. Shackleford's murder.

Arbutny goes mad, ranting on the street, confessing to the murder while West burns the ticket at a pub but joined by his girlfriend who had been pulling for him all along. Mr. Shackleford intending to murder her, finds her dead in her apartment and immediately leaves the scene.

The irony of course is that the two unlikable characters get their just desserts; had they trusted Crystal's Chinese goddess, they would have been home scot-free.

Good screenplays need to have characters that have some sort of charisma, whether they're good or evil. Unfortunately Fitzgerald and Greenstreet are saddled with parts that ensure you will not care for their characters-this is especially true of Fitzgerald's role in which she appears to be a stereotype of a maniacal femme fatale. Lorre's part isn't much better as he's a downbeat alcohol until luck intervenes toward the denouement.

Had John Huston crafted more sympathetic, multi-dimensional characters, Three Strangers might have ended up as a much more inviting potboiler.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed