Possessed (1947) Poster

(1947)

User Reviews

Review this title
93 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The Ever Classic Crawford.
jpdoherty7 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
POSSESSED (1947) is a somewhat underrated Warner Bros.noir. With an excellent central performance from its star Joan Crawford this highly charged drama should be better thought of than it is and deserving of much more exposure. It is one of Crawford's best pictures so this overdue release on DVD is something of an event!

Crawford, fresh from winning an Acadamy Award for "Mildred Pierce" looked as if she was trying for another one here with her well measured portrayal of a neurotic private nurse in the employ of Raymond Massey. But she is unable to deal with the intensity and frustration of her unrequited love for a young engineer (Van Heflin). It all gets too much for her and she finally snaps culminating in a tragic final reel!

Crawford gives one of her great wide-eyed antagonistic performances with fine support from Van Heflin, Raymond Massey (in one of his more amiable roles), the ill-fated Geraldine Brookes (whose previous film for Warners just before this was as Errol Flynn's younger sister in "Cry Wolf") and Stanley Ridges as Crawford's psychiatrist.

From a cracking screenplay by Silvia Richards and Ranald McDougall (who also wrote "Mildred Pierce") the picture turned out to be a splendidly absorbing drama thanks to the smooth and solid direction by Curtiz Bernhardt, the stylish and sharp monochrome cinematography of Joseph Valentine, an effective score by the great Franz Waxman (featuring Schumann's rhapsodic "Carnaval - Opus 9" "played" by Van Heflin) and most of all to the outstanding performance of Miss Joan Crawford.

A nice package - extras include a ten minute featurette on the noir aspects of "Possessed", a good commentary by film historian Drew Casper and an excellent trailer.
41 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Joan at Warner's - she ROCKS
blanche-25 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
For the young Joan Crawford, MGM was the perfect studio. All that gloss, rags to riches, Gable, and gowns. But MGM had a hard time with actresses as they aged and the old formulas weren't working anymore - Shearer, Garbo, and Crawford being three such examples. The other two quit, but Joan went over to Warner Brothers and revived her career.

It was a good move. I love the Crawford films at Warner's. They were grand potboilers enlivened by her presence.

Possessed is post-war, and after the war, the new rage was psychology. This movie is full of it. I'm not sure the diagnosis and terminology is correct in the film, but in layman's term, Crawford plays a total whack job. As her story unfolds to a doctor, she's a nurse taking care of Raymond Massey's wife, and she's seeing Van Heflin on a casual basis. When she falls in love with him, Heflin announces he's restless because of the war and is taking off. And that's when Joan takes off - emotionally. She becomes completely obsessed with him, and this leads to hallucinations, hysteria, and finally a psychotic break. She has able assistance by Heflin, who pops in and out and gets involved with Crawford's stepdaughter (Crawford is now married to the widower Massey). When the movie begins, she's wandering the street saying "David," which is Heflin's name in the movie.

One of the posters suggested Tyrone Power for this role. I'm all for him in any movie, and it's true, the presence of a big star as David would have elevated the film to a grander status. As it is, it's an excellent vehicle for Crawford, who runs the gamut of emotions.

Raymond Massey is stoic and solid as Crawford's new husband, and the lovely Geraldine Brooks, who died too soon, plays the stepdaughter. Her youthful vivacity is in sharp contrast to Crawford's borderline insanity and makes for great watching. Heflin, as the object of all the possession obsession, is smooth and detached.

But make no mistake about it. This is Joan Crawford's show and she makes the most of it. The script will keep you interested, and you won't be able to take your eyes off of Joan descending into madness.
43 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
She was the original Fatal Attraction...
mark.waltz17 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
If Glenn Close's Alex Forrest had gotten the Joan Crawford treatment in the 1987 thriller "Fatal Attraction", we'd get more of an examination into her mind rather than the Alfred Hitchcock "Psycho" finale we were stuck with. You don't get any closer than Close with Joan Crawford as the ultimate psychopath, a woman of multiple emotional problems that make her a sad case to behold.

This was the second film called "Possessed" that Crawford made, and in each case, the word "possessed" had a different meaning. The 1931 film, her first chance to utilize her famous 1930's MGM glamor after several years as a jazz baby, had her being possessed by a man (Clark Gable), but here, "possessed" indicates the demons inserted into her mind which have made her the picture postcard for "Diary of a Mad White Woman". She's also a nurse, so there will be comparisons to Kathy Bates' character in "Misery" as well. She takes care of the equally mad heard but not seen wife of Raymond Massey, a doctor himself involved in his own hell. When she allegedly commits suicide, Crawford remains on, taking care of Massey's young son and fighting with his older daughter (Geraldine Brooks) whom Crawford eventually becomes convinced is taking away the love of her old flame, Van Heflin, who gave her the heeve-ho months before. Like any mental illness, it subsides for a while, and Crawford settles into a seemingly happy marriage with Massey, but then Heflin returns, and all of the demons start up all over again.

Yes, Crawford does go over the top in this one, but here, it is part of the character, having fits that seem to make no sense-at first. As you see what this woman is going through in a story told through flashback, you empathize with her. Crawford is first seen wearing no makeup roaming the streets of L.A. (in heels of course) and ends up in the hospital where her back story unfolds. Van Heflin is supposed to be the one to blame for her going "Berserk" but it really goes beyond that. He is not a villain, only a bit of a scoundrel, and he does let her down gently. Raymond Massey provides much tenderness as the man she admits she doesn't love when she agrees to marry him which shows his versatility considering all of the villains he's played. Geraldine Brooks allows us to see the kindness in her initially resentful daughter, only resorting to distrust of Crawford when it is pushed to that.

This is without a doubt Crawford's finest performance (closedly followed by "Humoresque"), more layered than her Oscar Winning role in "Mildred Pierce" and by allowing herself to show us what she looks like underneath all that pancake, Crawford proved she was an actress first and a star (a very close) second.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Insane possession
TheLittleSongbird3 December 2019
My main reasons for watching 'Possessed' were Joan Crawford, a great actress (one of the best of her day) responsible for some fine performances regardless of her off-screen personality, and the very intense and brave subject matter (although going overboard on the melodrama was always going to be a danger). Van Heflin and particularly Raymond Massey have done good performances elsewhere, and Franz Waxman penned some fine music scores.

'Possessed', what an attention grabbing title too that doesn't mislead thankfully, did disappoint me just a little, as it had all the ingredients to be great and even a classic. Mostly though 'Possessed' was a solid, good even, film, with a lot of things done excellently and executes its heavy and not easy to pull off subject more than laudably and actually very well even. Not everything is great but a lot of elements are extremely well done.

Am going to start with what could have been done better. The acting was fine on the whole, but Heflin's character is very one-dimensional and very difficult to find any kind of appeal. It is not a typical role for Heflin and to me he struggled and didn't look comfortable, more intensity and charm was needed and there was nowhere near enough of either. Stanley Ridges is better but a bit too neurotic for a character that should be sympathetic.

Some of the film does get a little too melodramatic, particularly in the middle where some of the psychology waffles a little too self-indulgently and if Waxman's score was a little more subtle at times that would have helped.

Crawford however is superb in a role tailor-made for her, the more intense moments are incredibly bone-chilling without feeling too over-played. Geraldine Brooks, who really shines and this was just her film debut, is the other cast standout and Massey makes the most out of an underwritten role and is really quite good.

The photography is excellent throughout, especially clever and very atmospheric in the point of view shots. Waxman's score could have done with more subtlety, but it is sumptuously orchestrated and quite haunting. The direction is at ease with the subject and has the right amount of tension without on the most part over-heating it. The story is not always perfect but it is still gripping from beginning to end, the mental illness element is handled with tact but also in a way that is both quite frightening and moving and it's suspenseful. The first act in particular is terrific.

In conclusion, solid if falling slightly short of bigger potential. 7/10
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Crawford excels in compelling drama
twanurit10 February 2006
Before "Play Misty For Me" (1971) and "Fatal Attraction" (1987), comes this story of a nurse (Joan Crawford) who's attached to a man (Van Heflin), who eventually finds her too possessive and breaks it off, but she can not let him go. When they meet again at her employer's (Raymond Massey) residence, she wants to resume the relationship, saying its awful for a woman to lie down at night and not be able to sleep, but he still won't take her back. She eventually accepts widower Massey's marriage proposal, explaining that it's terrible for a woman to be unwanted, although she's not in love with him. Eventually, Massey's daughter Geraldine Brooks starts to date Heflin, further complicating matters, and putting Crawford over the edge. Script, photography, direction, music are exemplary, the 4 leads are memorable, but Crawford is particularly riveting. Her first breakdown (at Massey's waterfront mansion) with Heflin might be considered over-the-top 40s style acting (pre-Method), but she delivers it beautifully, her face and expressions a towering display of emotion and angst. It's a performance that Crawford must have pulled from her own life experiences to achieve such rising momentum. No wonder actor Cliff Robertson (her co-star in "Autumn Leaves - 1956) once stated in a documentary that she's "a damned good actress."
39 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Impressive performance by mentally ill (?) Crawford
Panamint10 August 2015
Several doctors in this film speculate that Ms. Crawford's character might be suffering from mental illness. Are they right or wrong? This is a big question to be answered in "Possessed" because it seems that somebody here could be BERSERK and might even be a candidate for a STRAIGHTJACKET!

I am a little disappointed that there isn't as much plot-based drama in this film as in MILDRED PIERCE. Mildred Pierce has drama consistently built into the plot whereas this film has a lot of Crawford engaging in dramatics and neuroses rather than more active drama. However this is a more psychologically oriented film (not a noir) and Crawford's acting is believable and solid. Raymond Massey does a good job in the Walter Pidgeon role (or is it Walter Pidgeon in the Raymond Massey role?) You also get a polished jewel of a performance by Stanley Ridges.

Basically a soap opera with a well-done psychology theme, "Possessed" will probably hold your attention due to Crawford's excellent performance. This film is an impressive accomplishment for her.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A woman in love
jotix10029 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Never underestimate a woman in love. Such seems to be the message of "Possessed", a film that was obviously tailor made for its star, Joan Crawford. As directed by Curtis Bernhardt, this film will not bore the fans of the genre, or its star.

If you haven't seen the film, maybe you should stop reading here.

"Possessed" presents us Louise Howell, a nurse, for the ailing Mrs. Graham, a wealthy recluse. Louise's charge is a woman from hell. When this woman dies under mysterious circumstances, it appears to herald the end of Louise's employment. Prior to that, we see Louise during a tryst with a neighbor of the Grahams, David Sutton. They have had an affair and David decides to end it, much to Louise's chagrin.

Dean Graham, the rich widower, asks Louise to stay after his wife's death. Will a marriage proposal be too far behind? Well, Dean proposes and Louise accepts. Her life is transformed from mediocrity into a life of luxury. The only sour point in Louise's new found happiness is Carol Graham, the daughter of the dead woman who blames Louise for the accident and death of her mother.

Will Louise find happiness with Dean? Will David see how much Louise loves him and come back to her? Will Carol and Louise ever be friends? Those are the questions that will be answered in the movie, not by this observer. The film is involving, although having seen some of these melodramas prepares us for all possible answers.

Joan Crawford does an impressive job as Louise. This woman gave the star one of her best characters ever. She goes through a range of emotions right before our eyes. Van Heflin, on the other hand, doesn't seem to have been the obvious choice for David, although he was an excellent actor, but in this movie doesn't have much to do. Raymond Massey, as Dean, is enormously appealing. He shows us a Dean who is a generous man. A young Geraldine Brooks makes a good impression as Carol the girl that is deprived of her mother at an early age.

"Possessed" is a wonderful film. It will not disappoint the fans of this genre.
28 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another Great Performance by Crawford
Michael_Elliott26 January 2014
Possessed (1947)

*** (out of 4)

Joan Crawford's incredible performance is the highlight of this thriller. In the film she plays Louise Howell, a woman who begins to suffer a mental breakdown after the man (Van Heflin) she loves walks away from her. Even though she marries another man (Raymond Massey) the stress of the other one leaving her just causes her mind to collapse. It's very important to point out the fact that this film was released thirteen years before Alfred Hitchcock's PSYCHO and I say that because of how much credit that film gets when it comes to looking at mental illness. Viewing POSSESSED today it's easy to see where the film is going as it is quite predictable and there's no question that some of the mental illness terms are out of date. With that said, for the most part this is a fairly good thriller that manages to keep your attention thanks in large part to the terrific cast. I'm not sure what else can be said about Crawford but there's no question that she was on quite a row at Warner. First with MILDRED PIERCE then HUMORESQUE and finally POSSESSED, the actress was really pushing herself and it made for three incredible performances. What's so amazing about her performance here is how many different personalities she manages to play. This character goes through all sorts of mental "issues" and I really loved the various ways Crawford brought them to the screen. It could be as simple as someone turning their back on her or someone telling her that they're not in love. There are several scenes where she's imagining things happening to her and Crawford is just flawless. It certainly doesn't help that Heflin is perfect as the snake and Massey is also extremely good as the supporting husband. Geraldine Brooks also deserves a lot of credit for her wonderful supporting performance as the step-daughter. Director Curtis Bernhardt brings a lot of style and atmosphere to the film and there's also some wonderful cinematography that helps. Again, the film is quite predictable but this doesn't take away the fun or the brilliant work by Crawford.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Laying the Grounds for an Insanity Defense
bkoganbing16 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Possessed, the second of two films with that title made by Joan Crawford, is typical Forties soap opera and probably would be forgotten today if it weren't for Crawford's performance. As she runs through a whole gamut of emotions exponentially, you will be glued to your seat.

A seemingly normal woman on the outside, Crawford's got a whole lot of issues. She's being dumped by younger boy friend Van Heflin and she won't call it a day.

Heflin's professional association with Raymond Massey doesn't help matters. Crawford works as a nurse for Massey's invalid wife and when the wife dies, Crawford excepts Massey's marriage proposal.

Joan is so conflicted here. By now she realizes Heflin is a no good love 'em and leave 'em rat, but she still pines for him. And jealousy is working here too, because Heflin has taken a shine to Massey's daughter Geraldine Brooks.

It's an extraordinary job by Crawford. Rage, jealousy, unrequited love, she shows them all and at the same time. No wonder she got her second Oscar nomination. She lost however to Loretta Young in The Farmer's Daughter.

Heflin is good, but if this had been made at 20th Century Fox, his role would have been perfect for Tyrone Power. What a classic Possessed would then have been.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great Crawford, Great Soap-Noir.
nycritic11 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Obssessive love affairs have been a Hollywood staple for years upon years now with varying degrees of success, and here the formula wins. Joan Crawford, fresh out of her Oscar win in MILDRED PIERCE, acts the hell out of her role as the ill-fated Louise Howell, a former nurse who has collapsed in the middle of a street moaning "David... David.... " The thing is, she is an unknown person in a strange town and a team of psychiatrists try to find out the reason behind her madness.

POSSESSED is a good, soapy yarn told in flashback with some nice twists and turns, directed quite well by Curtis Bernhardt who gives the movie a moody noir feel, and while at times Louise's character can be quite unsympathetic, going from possessive to manic to moody (and more so once "David," played by Van Heflin, re-enters her life), there's a certain sorrowfulness about her inability to start again with her own life as a married woman, and thankfully Crawford is able to convey this perfectly. One powerful sequence which shows how great an actress (as opposed to star) she would have become if given true roles and a chance to emote while expressing little is the fantasy sequence where she imagines she has killed her step-daughter (Geraldine Brooks). Brooks has been going steady with Heflin and Crawford, not over him yet, is seething. When she confronts her, there is a struggle, secrets are revealed, and down the stairs goes Brooks. Then Crawford realizes this never happened, but to see her cruel eyes staring out from a face that looks tortured and evil and demented all at once as she waits for Brooks is chilling and the best thing in the movie.

The only flaw in the film is the need to explain Crawford's descent into schizophrenia at the end: it recalls the same procedure Hitchcock would adopt for PSYCHO. Madness is always best when left undiagnosed, but then it was deemed necessary, and this robs the film of what might have been a perfect ending: Crawford screaming "David! David! David...!" over and over again. Definitely one to seek and watch.
42 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
We all go a little crazy sometimes
utgard1424 January 2014
Joan Crawford turns in one of her best performances as a mentally disturbed woman in love with Van Heflin but married to Raymond Massey. She's found wandering the streets at the start of the film. At the hospital, she tells the film's story to doctors through a series of flashbacks. After winning an Oscar for Mildred Pierce, it seems obvious Joan wanted badly to win another. So she followed a formula that is still being followed by actors today. If you want to be recognized by your peers, play someone with an alcohol or drug problem (Humoresque -- check!) or play someone who is mentally ill (Possessed -- check!). Joan did receive an Oscar nomination for this role but didn't win.

The rest of the cast is fine. Raymond Massey is solid as her husband but it isn't one of his better roles. Geraldine Brooks is lovely in her film debut. Van Heflin plays the object of Joan's obsession. He's a thoroughly unlikable character. Heflin does fine in the part but I couldn't help wondering if the movie expected me to feel sympathy for this guy or what because he was a jerk and a cradle robber. The film is a little overlong and drags a little in the middle when Joan is acting her most normal. This is not related to Joan's other movie titled Possessed from 1931. That film was a soaper with Clark Gable.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An ending I can root for!...
AlsExGal24 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
... because by the time Joan Crawford does away with Van Heflin's character at the end, the main thing I was afraid of was that she would stop with only one bullet. What a contemptible cad he played!

This was one of those post war films trying to get scientifically to the bottom of mental illness, specifically Louise's (Joan Crawford), when she is picked up on a city street catatonic and looking for David - that would be Van Heflin's character. But this film is not all test tubes and therapy. There's plenty of melodrama to keep the viewer interested.

Through flashbacks you see that David and Louise were having an affair, and that Louise fell deeply in love with David, the piano playing construction engineer who says he has wanderlust because of the war. He breaks it off with her because he says she is smothering him, but it's just not that he doesn't want to get married, it's just that he doesn't want to marry her.

But does David take Louise's pain seriously and give her time and room to heal? Nope. He shows zero consideration and goes down the next day and gets a job from Louise's employer. Makes fun of her pain and is constantly popping in and out of her life via his employment. When she marries her employer, the wealthy Mr. Graham, David invites himself to the wedding, says snide things to Louise, hangs around the house, and gets involved with and ultimately engaged to Louise's new twenty year old stepdaughter. David is 35. So the man that Louise has always loved will be her son-in-law? No wonder she goes insane.

Louise starts seeing and hearing things. Starts thinking that she has killed people only to realize it was a hallucination. So did she really kill David or just wish that she did? Watch and find out.

This film had great atmosphere and Joan is in fine form as a woman who is losing her mind. Would it have ever happened if David hadn't hit her so hard emotionally? Who knows. Massey is good as Dean Graham, a stern presence as always, but believe it or not he and Joan as newlyweds kicking up their heels on a ballroom floor is actually believable. Geraldine Brooks is good as Carol - daughter of Dean Graham. She plays it somewhat snobby and acts like, well, a twenty year old girl. Not 16. Not 25. So seldom did a production code era film get a college age girl's character and maturity just right. This is one of those times.

It's too bad Joan spent so many years at MGM being put into bad roles often in bad films and not more years at Warner Brothers, a studio that knew how to put her in roles that played to her strengths. This is one of my favorite Joan Crawford films. I'd recommend it.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nutty as a fruitcake
BILLYBOY-108 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Here's loony tunes Joanie being all "I love you" to Van Heflin who is being all "get lost" and she just can't let go....ever....I just watched "The Two Mrs. Carrolls" where Bogart plays a murderous psychopath so this movie was appropriate. Whereas Bogie ends up killing one wife and almost another, here we have Joanie in love with one man( Heflin) and marrying another after she confesses to killing his first wife...or did she...or maybe not...oh, well, she's nuts so we don't really know. Whenever she's is around Heflin each time he shows up in the flick, she goes into uber overdrive schitzo. Finally she does go off the deep end and murders Heflin as he is about to go off to marry her husbands daughter. Ouch. So somehow she manages to make it from back east to L.A. then to the hospital Psych ward, where we do all these flashbacks. Finally, alls well that ends stupid and its THE END. The movie has more holes than a sieve but whenever Joanie goes ga-ga her close-up are worth the price of admission.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
More Soap Opera Then Noir
Corr288 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Classified by many as film noir, this one plays more like an overly dramatic melodrama and soap opera IMHO. Joan Crawford plays an unstable woman who slowly slips into madness after being rejected by Van Heflin. To make matters worse, Heflin is now dating Crawford's step daughter following Joan's rebound marriage to Raymond Massey. Sounds pretty sappy, and, it really is.

I did like the performances of both Heflin and Massey but for whatever reason, I couldn't really take Crawford seriously in this one and found her role to be hammy and over the top. A lot of folks praise this movie and Joan's work but it must have slipped right by me. I didn't find it all that entertaining but it definitely was atmospheric in spots.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Joan Suffers Again
harry-7630 January 2003
Just what does Van Heflin's David have the makes Joan Crawford's Louise go literally mad for him?

Doesn't appear to be that much in the looks department. Perhaps just that special touch that signals, "either you've got it or you haven't."

Whatever the case, Louise pleads, cajoles, rants and raves for David the entire film. What does our David do?--merely tell Louise the truth: that he's simply not in love with her.

Granted, David's rather flippant, self-absorbed and bored, but that's his prerogative. Instead of accepting this and moving on with her life, Louise insists on minding David's old business and clinging to bygone days.

All this "to-do," when a simple scan of a Dale Carnegie text might have solved the problem.

Louise does have her supporters: young stepdaughter Carol and aging hubbie Dean do what they can to bolster Louise's confidence. Since Geraldine Brooks and Raymond Massey portray these respective roles, there's sure to be strong convictions expressed.

Made just two years after her Oscar-winning turn in "Mildred Pierce," Crawford is in her mature mettle here. Although the same title was used for a Crawford film 16 years earlier, the similarity is in name only.

"Possessed" allows Joan to suffer royally and she does, pulling out all the schizophrenic stops to slam this one home. Since no one reels better than Crawford, it's an engaging performance in an engrossing film.
20 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Crawford slowly goes insane
kyle_furr6 March 2004
This movie has nothing to do with the 1931 version that also Joan Crawford. It's more along the lines of The Snake Pit. It stars out with Joan Crawford walking the streets in a trance-like state and she keeps on repeating the name David. She's sent to the mental ward at the hospital and the movie goes in flashback to show how she ended up like this. The flashback stars with Joan Crawford wanting to marry Van Heflin but he just wants to break the relationship off. She never gets over it and goes to work as a nurse taking care of Raymond Massey's wife. Pretty soon, they find his wife's body in the lake but they don't know if it was an accident or suicide. Raymond Massey asks Crawford to marry him but she's still in love with Heflin, who is working with Massey. She agrees but Massey's daughter doesn't like her and she slowly stars to go insane. I guess this is one of the first movies that deals with mental illness.
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Stuck on you
sol-kay26 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
****SPOILERS**** Looking like a combination homeless bag lady and something that the cat dragged in Louise Howell,Joan Crawford, aimlessly walks the streets of Los Angeles asking and looking for just one thing, the only word that comes out of her mouth, David! Taken to the city's municipal hospital Louise, admitted as a Jane Doe, is declared by the head of psychiatry Dr. Harvey Willard, Stanley Ridge, as suffering from a complete mental breakdown and put under strong medication to bring her both mind and memory back to normal.

It's when Louise is being treated with mind altering and psychotic drugs that she remembers what brought her to this state of insanity and it had to do with her former lover confirmed bachelor and swinging construction engineer and part time piano player David Sutton,Van Heflin, the David that Louis was asking for at the beginning of the movie. Louise and David had a hot and sizzling relationship going between them but David felt that it was getting a bit out of hand and wanted to put the breaks on it. This decision on David's part has Louise go off her nut to the point of almost losing both her composer, when David was around, and her ability to look after her and Davids employers Dean Graham's, Raymond Massey, very ill wife Pauline whom Louise, a licensed nurse, was taking care off.

Davids hold on Louise is so strong that it totally warps her mind having the love sick woman go into fits of anger and self pity over his treatment of her by wanting to have nothing to do with Louise. It's during this time that Pauline ends up jumping into a nearby lake drowning herself with a mind numbed and guilty conscience Louise feeling responsible for Pauline's death or suicide. while Louise is so stuck up on David she doesn't realize that her boss Mr. Graham has fallen madly in love with her and out of the clear blue sky proposes marriage to a totally surprised Louise.

You would have thought that Dean Graham marrying Louise, who grudgingly accepted his proposal, would have straightened her out but it only has the reversed effects with Louise's step daughter Carol, Gerldine Brooks, coming into the picture and into her life. At first Carol was anything but affectionate to her step-mother Louise feeling that she was having an affair with her father Dean Graham behind her mothers back which lead her to kill herself. It took Carol's father Dean to straighten her out on her mothers, and his wife's, tragic death in him being present when she took that one step beyond off the rock and into the lake drowning herself. Louise at the time was nowhere in sight being that it was her day off from her job as Pauline's nurse. It's also told by Carol's father that Pauline was very sick and what she thought or said, about him and Louise having an affair, was just wild and unfounded thoughts that she conjured up in her both sick and confused mind.

It's just when it seemed that Louise had her life straightened out with David gone out of it and Carol accepting her as her mother that things really took a downward turn with David unexpectedly showing up again. Stung by the love bug David, back from his job for Mr. Graham in Canada,has gotten really hot for Carol, some 15 years is Junior, and this is something that Louise just wont take lying down or standing up. Louise in trying to split Carol up from David has her turn against her with Carol and David scheduled to tie the knot as soon as possible to just stick it to her intrusive and annoying step-mother.

Getting nowhere with Carol in trying to maligned David in what a two-timing rat he is, which is a total lie, Lousie then goes on to confront David threatening to blow him away, with her handgun, if he goes through with his marriage to Carol. David a bit too sure of himself and thinking that Louise won't go through with it calls Louise's bluff which turned out to be the very last thing that he ever did!

Back to the present and in the hospital Louise is now in a total vegetable with her mind completely gone. Dean summoned to his wife's bedside can only hope that she'll recover even if she has to face justice in David's untimely death which she'll very probably get off on an insanity defense. Dr. Willard tells a grieving Dean Graham that his wife has a very good chance to recover and that he'll take a personal interest in seeing to it and do everything possible to make it happen.

We can only hope with the great advances in mental therapy, since 1947 when the movie "Possessed" was made, and psychiatric studies that what Dr. Willard told Dean Graham turned out to be true.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Pure brilliance...a Gothic wonderland
panquin26 April 2006
This movie takes the smoldering talents of Joan Crawford and lets them burn the screen down, right before your eyes...she's utterly convincing as a fairly demented "possessed" lover, torn to pieces by hideous dysfunction. The lowest of lows, and not many highs...

Mildred Pierce laid the template down; Possessed fills the template and makes it its own. What I personally love is the "Hollywood Gothic" aspect, the redolence of that: every frame is steeped in it, every moment is cradled in its embrace. One of those movies that you watch, mouth agape, and whisper to yourself, "Christ, the aesthetics...was the world ever really like that?" Apparently so.

Oh, and for the record - it was a better world.
36 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Psycho Deluxe - Joan Crawford - Possessed
arthur_tafero9 July 2021
If you enjoy watching crazy, then this film is for you. No actress in the history of film ever did crazy as well as Crawford. Olivia DeHaviland tried in The Snake Pit and did a very good job, but she was not naturally psychotic, like Crawford was in real life. This was not really a role for Crawford; it was more like a catharsis. This was a psycho-horror film way before its time and before pyscho-horror became quite popular. Crawford was never really that sexy or good-looking compared to other actresses of her era, but she firmly believed she was. Variety wrote an article on her as one of the leading box office "poison" actresses of the era, and their article was well-founded. She was just not an attractive actress, and none of her love scenes were believable for most observers. Despite these drawbacks, watching her in a film was like watching a fifty car pileup on the freeway; you just couldnt take your eyes off of it. You knew it was horrible, but you watched anyway. That is what watching Crawford in these psycho-dramas was like for many observers. You just could not wait for her to go off the deep end. Fun to watch.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
excellent movie; gets better every time you watch it.
mdonahue825 August 2006
i love this movie. it's classic film-noir. the storyline is superb. all of the characters are compelling to watch. Joan Crawford truly does an excellent job in the role. there is a darkness in many of the scenes that adds to the feel of the movie;you feel as if you're right there on the scene. Joan's performance was academy-award worthy.the movie gives you the feel of the 1940's...the dress, the furniture, the cars; even the hospital-medical atmosphere and thinking of the times. the architecture of the homes and waterfront cabin speak of a time when things were built with detail, style, and authentic woods. the movie totally takes you back in time, and i know i can watch it again and again.this movie should always be kept available. as good a performance as Mildred pierce; in the film-noir aspect possessed exceeds Mildred pierce; for film-noir, story and acting it get,s a 10! you just have to believe that she eventually recovers from her illness and goes on happily married to that gem of a husband she had.
31 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Freaudian symbolism gets mired in uneven story telling
movieman-20012 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
"Possessed" (1947) is one of Joan Crawford's last great outings as the grand dame of Warner Brothers, in a film so deeply disturbing that even today it tends to hold an audience spellbound in its neurotic tension. After a woman is found wandering the streets and collapses inside a diner, muttering the name 'David' she is rushed to a psychiatric hospital for evaluation. Of course, you just know this is going to end sadly.

Crawford plays Louise Howell, nurse to an ailing wealthy recluse. At the same time, she's taken up romantically with the neighbor, David Sutton (Van Helfin). But David recognizes something odd about Louise, something tragic and flawed and oh, so mentally unstable that it scares him into calling the whole affair off – much to Louise's dismay and chagrin. When Louise's elderly charge suddenly dies under mysterious circumstances, Dean Graham (Raymond Massey), the rich widower, asks her to stay on. This, of course, eventually leads to Louise becoming Dean's wife. However, Louise's happiness as the newly christened socialite of the realm is threatened by Dean's daughter, Carol (Geraldine Brooks) who blames – or perhaps intuitively suspects that the death of her mother was no accident.

What is particularly shocking about this film is the way in which director, Curtis Bernhardt baits his audience with snippets of murderous intent that are played out for maximum effect and then, later exposed as merely the ravenously dangerous thoughts of the film's protagonist. Yet, if Louise can't discern between what is real and what she imagines out of thin air, then how can we, as an audience? Crawford's performance as Louise is impressive to say the very least. Most convincingly she deteriorates from a congenial heroine to dangerous psychotic before our very eyes.

Warner's DVD transfer is not up to snuff. The gray scale has been rendered with deep solid blacks and the maximum amount of detail presented even in the darkest scenes. But there's way too much film grain in many scenes and some severe water damage about 48 minutes into the film (that lasts for less than a minute but gives the illusion of a cluster of fire flies darting about the screen). The audio is mono but cleaned up. Extras include Drew Casper's audio commentary that is spooky in its own right, as well as a featurette proclaiming "Possessed" as the quintessential film noir – the latter is a bone of contention for this reviewer. Although "Possessed" is a fine example of film noir story-telling, it pales to "Mildred Pierce" as far as Crawford film noir vehicles go.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Muddled, yet entertaining (if slightly unbelievable) drama
Night Must Fall26 July 2002
Another coup for Joan Crawford, 1947's Possessed (Joan co-starred with Clark Gable in a 1938 film of the same name), sees the star in a great vehicle in which to show off her many dramatic talents.

The hospital scenes are a bit over the top, and Stanley Ridges plays the psychiatric doctor a bit too eagerly. I half expected him to start wringing his hands with an Igor-type `yes, master – I think it's working, master' look on his face every time one of the drugs he gave Joan Crawford began taking effect. Ridges' performance is earnest, but his approach made me giggle more than once.

What's good about the film is its insight into issues regarding mental illness and its compassionate, non-exploitative exploration of the subject matter. This is accomplished in spite of Ridges' misguided portrayal of Dr. Willard, and due in large part to Crawford's brave, unglamorous portrayal of patient Louise Graham.

On the whole, Possessed is a very entertaining film that left me wanting to know what would happen next.

I think the death of Dean Graham's first wife is rushed and a bit muddled. Her character should have been actually introduced (even in one brief scene) rather than merely heard or talked about in flashback. Instead, there is just a big jump right into the marriage of Dean and Louise. This lack of transition really annoys me, although I can't exactly pinpoint why – I guess the whole thing just feels rushed.

Conveniently appearing and re-appearing on the scene is architect David Sutton, always around to throw Louise into a tizzy, as she cannot seem to get over the fact that he has broken off their relationship. It's difficult to understand David's appeal, as his character is extremely smarmy and smug, and he has no socially redeeming values whatsoever. To illustrate this, he shows up un-invited to Dean and Louise's wedding reception for the free food and drink. Ultimately, Dean's daughter Carol falls for him. Why, ladies??

If one can get past this implausible plot thread and take the story at face value, this is when the film really takes off, and Crawford's neurosis/psychosis picks up speed. The film improves greatly from here, and the plot advances nicely.

CAST/PERFORMANCES: Joan Crawford (Louise Howell Graham) – Crawford's transformation from personally neurotic, yet mild, unobtrusive caregiver to scheming, paranoid, jealous, unstable woman scorned is fairly believable, given the plot. I adore her voice, and the circumstances of the script, her role, and therefore her dialog really allow Crawford to express herself well, and she is a treat to hear as well as watch, as usual.

Raymond Massey (Dean Graham) – Massey is such a natural actor that I always adore his performances, and here is just wonderful. I love the scene where he dances with Crawford – watch as he forgets himself and sticks his tongue partway out with the effort of the dance. That, his quoting Bugs Bunny and his very tender, heartfelt scenes with Joan (his Dean Graham character is so sweet and patient) are a standout. I think it was a good casting choice to go with Massey, as his self-effacing nature is perfect for this role.

Van Heflin (David Sutton) – Despite the character's flaws (a very difficult role to play), in the actor's capable hands, it is done well. In his inimitable style and voice inflection, Heflin has the best line in the film, which he delivers offhandedly while pacing the floor: `I'm sorry, Louise – I seldom hit a woman, but if you don't leave me alone, I'll wind up kicking babies.'

Geraldine Brooks (Carol Graham) – a lovely actress, who I am sure I've seen in other films, as her name sounds familiar. She‘s very good as Carol, and gives a lively and strong performance as Massey's daughter. Her reaction to her mom's death and to Crawford's motives for marrying her father are very believable.

A good cast, interesting plot, and decent execution make for a fine film noir.
19 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This civilisation is a worse disease than heart trouble or tuberculosis, and we can't escape it.
hitchcockthelegend2 November 2012
Possessed is directed by Curtis Bernhardt and adapted to screenplay by Silvia Richards and Ranald MacDougall from a story by Rita Weiman. It stars Joan Crawford, Van Heflin, Raynond Massey and Geraldine Brooks. Music is by Franz Waxman and cinematography by Joseph Valentine.

After wandering around the streets of Los Angeles in a daze, Louise Howell (Crawford) collapses in a diner and admitted to hospital. From there, prompted under medication, she begins to reveal a rather sad story...

Film begins with quite a kick, a dazed looking Crawford, stripped of make-up, wanders around a ghostly looking Los Angeles uttering the name David. Once she enters the hospital, we switch to flashback mode and the makers unfurl a noir tale of mental illness, oneirism, hopeless love and death. German director Bernhardt (Conflict/High Wall) and his cinematographer Valentine (Shadow of a Doubt/Sleep, My Love) deal in expressionistic methods to enhance the story. Light and shadows often marry up to Louise's fractured state of mind, motif association flits in and out of the plotting and there's some striking imagery used; such as a body dragged from a lake and Louise framed in a rain speckled window.

The lines of reality are impressively blurred, ensuring the viewers remain in a state of not ever being sure of what is real. There's a deft disorientation about the production, where fatalism looms large and sadness is all too evident in our troubled femme protagonist. Principal cast performances are of a high standard, with Crawford (Academy Award Nominated) leading the way with one of those wide eyed turns that perfectly treads the thin line between fraught and tender. While laid over the top is a score from Waxman that emphasises the key segments of poor Louise's mental disintegration. But what of the story in itself? The rhyme or reason for such murky melodramatics dressed up neatly in noir clobber?

Story is pretty much wrapped around the notion that a romantic obsession sends Louise Howell on the downward spiral. Since we know next to nothing about the relationship between Louise and David Sutton (Heflin), or why Sutton is the sly and antagonistic way he is, it's a big hole in character formation. As is the death of Dean Graham's (Massey) wife, or in fact the sudden shift of Dean Graham becoming husband to one Louise Howell. The film looks terrific on a noir level, and Crawford engrosses greatly from start to finish, but it only seems to exist for these two reasons, all else is on the outer edges of the frame looking in. A shame because there is much to like and be involved with here. 7.5/10
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Tiresome Vehicle for Joan Crawford
evanston_dad13 July 2015
"Possessed" was included among TCM's "Summer of Darkness" series celebrating film noir, but it really doesn't belong to that genre. It's instead one of those rather tiresome "women's pictures" from the 1940s and 50s, melodramas that usually had some talented actress swooning over some leading man or other. In this one, it's Joan Crawford so obsessed with lover Van Heflin that she literally goes crazy when he breaks off their affair and she instead marries dutiful but dull Raymond Massey. Crawford is much more fun when she's taking charge, not weeping and wailing, and though she tries her best, she can't make much of this thankless character or director Curtis Bernhardt's utter lack of recognizable style.

Still, she managed to somehow snag an Academy Award nomination for Best Actress for her performance.

Grade: C
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed