The Upturned Glass (1947) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
37 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
a doctor investigates his lover's death.
blanche-214 October 2018
A prominent neurosurgeon (James Mason) investigates the death of his lover (Rosamund John) in "The Upturned Glass" from 1947.

Mason plays Dr. Michael Joyce, an unhappily married man. He tells his students the story of a doctor who, after helping a young girl regain her sight, falls in love with the girl's mother, Emma (Rosamund John). Her husband is away; they decide never to see one another again.

Soon after, he learns that Emma has fallen out a window to her death. Michael doesn't believe it's suicide and sets out to find the killer. One way he does this is by getting close to her sister-in-law (Pamela Kellino).

Kellino in reality was Mason's wife, Pamela Mason, who co-wrote an excellent script. It has the perfect British atmosphere - dark, foggy, and mysterious. Kellino's role (no surprise) is an especially good one, that of a mean-spirited, uncaring woman interested only in money. Mason is terrific.

Highly recommended. An absorbing film.
17 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Atmospheric Brit film noir with James Mason in top form
adrian-4376720 March 2019
World War II had ended only about 18 months before THE UPTURNED GLASS was made but the only connection with that historic marker is an US Army truck and its driver asking for directions, toward the film's end.

Given the known scarcity of goods and any luxuries at the time, it is remarkable that this film posts such sumptuous surroundings and well dressed persons, all contributing to a highly atmospheric effort. I find it particularly interesting that Michael Joyce, a name that the medical doctor/criminology lecturer played by James Mason gives himself at the start, doubles up as voiceover narrator for more than half of the movie, to the point where his spoken plans actually merge with temporal reality. It makes for an arresting array of viewpoints and narrative twists, which only add to the film's dark density.

Ann Stephens plays the little girl who he saves from blindness, and her mother, Emma, played by Rosamund John, in time becomes his love interest, but it is a forbidden relationship, as she is married. In a film where voice tones and glances tell more than any amount of words, one rapidly senses that falling in love disrupts Joyce's ordered life. The fact that he suggests to Emma that something needs to be done so that she and he can be together, can be interpreted in various ways: does he mean that elopement is the solution? Divorce for Emma? Or murdering her husband, perhaps? The answer is never obtained, because that is also the last they see of each other.

Clearly, from a moral standpoint the world of the 1940s was far more limiting than today's and any of those options would have carried a high cost for all involved, whether it be in emotional, professional, social, or status terms.

Thus, Joyce faces the upturned glass, a mirror to his rapidly changing circumstances and disintegrating soul.

Pamela Kellino, Mason's wife at the time, deserves plaudits for helping with a riveting script, and she plays the part of Kate Howard, Emma's sister in law, with eyes bordering on madness, eyes which make significant suggestions to her niece and overtures to Joyce. She is the main suspect in Emma's death, and she makes no apologies for her debt problems or her desire to place her niece in bordering school and away from her immediate responsibilities. (I would have liked to see Emma's husband, and know more about what he felt for his wife and his daughter but, alas, he never surfaces).

Backed by wonderful B&W photography, one watches Joyce lose his dispassionate approach to professional matters and take on the self-appointed responsibility of judging the person he blames for Emma's death. The scene in which he dispatches Kate in the same way that the latter had allegedly dealt with Emma is exceedingly well done, with a great touch provided by the key that she drops from the window, before falling, leaving Joyce locked in the place where he committed the crime.

Perhaps the film should have ended there. It might have been only just over 1 hour long, but it would have been a masterpiece of economy and quality in every department.

Unfortunately, as happens in real life, there is an option and Joyce forces his way out of the room, thereby launching a chain of events leading to his predictable demise, as in the 1940s crime had to be punished, if not by human justice then by divine or some other fate, including your own hand.

Crucially, Joyce drops the possibility of fleeing and possibly saving his skin when he decides to save another little girl, who was knocked down by a car. To that end, he operates on her and at the decisive moment he asks a fellow doctor to get an instrument from the vehicle where he is hiding Howard's body. He has the option of abandoning the operation and preventing his colleague finding the body, but he is too much of a professional for that.

Both one student and his fellow doctor rate him paranoiac, but my feeling is that Joyce has seen his soul in the upturned glass and he knows that he cannot live with it.

The ending seems a little bit pat but by then I had watched a very good film, reflecting highly competent direction, superlative acting by Mason and Kellino, exquisite photography and an arresting script.

I recommend it to anyone interested in British films in general, and British film noir in particular. It is a precursor to such landmark noirs as Carol Reed's THE ODD MAN OUT (UK 1948) and THE THIRD MAN (UK 1949).
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A very good film but the longer it runs, the more the plot starts to fall apart.
planktonrules16 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Up until about 80-90% of the way though the film, I was very impressed by "The Upturned Glass". It was an interesting thriller that was unique and worth seeing. However, towards the end, the film seemed more hastily written and a bit dumb--especially when the murder occurred.

James Mason plays a neurologist who is well-known for his great lectures. In a hall packed with students, he tells the story of a patient who murdered but was NOT mentally imbalanced. While he changes the names of the characters, the film audience can see that the story is about Mason himself--he will eventually kill someone. The story explains all the events leading up to it. Then you learn that he has NOT yet killed but wanted, in a crazy way, to tell others about his plan before executing it. All this is quite good. However, when he then executes the plan, it's amazingly sloppy and he makes many mistakes. I didn't like this but at least the film in the end redeemed itself with a dandy ending. In many ways, this is almost like a British version of noir. Interesting and worth seeing.

By the way, look for the scene with the 'American' soldier. His accent was TERRIBLE and he clearly sounded like a Brit trying to sound American. I assume in American-made films, we Yanks must sound the same way when we portray Brits!
23 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"No, he was perfectly sane. As sane as I am"
ackstasis6 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
In 'The Upturned Glass (1947),' Mason stars as a prominent neurosurgeon giving a lecture on criminology. He offers the case study of Michael Joyce, an upright British gentleman – considered perfectly sane by the good doctor – who is driven to commit murder by "his own ethical convictions." The film's first half is a slow, steady narrative build up, but the final act is perfectly suspenseful. Our poor protagonist, having just committed the ultimate crime, has a ridiculous time trying to dispose of the body without detection– in the classic noir mould, one inconvenient encounter after another!

Michael Joyce (whom we learn is none other than the lecturer himself) has convinced himself that, unlike most common thugs, he has a superior moralistic justification for committing murder. 'The Upturned Glass' was released four years after the close of WWII, and was likely intended as a critique of state-sanctioned (that is, "justified") mass murder; Mason, the film's producer, was famously a conscientious objector during the war, a view which caused much consternation among his family.

To keep you guessing, there are also a few red herrings that Hitchcock would have loved – and this is three years before 'Stage Fright (1950)' wrote the book on red herrings. However, the film ends on a definite moralistic note, suggesting the lengths to which one will go to maintain the delusion of sanity, and questioning whether it is even possible for a sane person to commit murder. Even the impromptu saving of a young girl with brain injuries does not offset a murder already committed, and Michael Joyce dies by his own hand. I couldn't help feeling that Joyce, and perhaps the film, were taking the easy way out.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Today I Sat In Judgement"
bkoganbing29 October 2011
James Mason in one of his last British films before accepting that contract with MGM and leaving for America plays a doctor who may have become too detached from life. A prominent brain surgeon he accepts the case of young Ann Stephens whose eyesight he saves with a delicate operation. In the process he falls in love with Ann's mother Rosamund John.

Both Mason and John are separated from their respective spouses and we never meet either of them in The Upturned Glass. But their relationship contains a mixture of guilt for both of them. Shortly after they end things, Mason hears that John falls to her death in her own home.

Mason had already met Pamela Kellino and formed a bad opinion of her almost immediately. She's Rosamund's sister-in-law and Stephen's aunt and she's a selfish materialistic woman, a regular Cruela DeVille in real life. She's easy too hate and Mason courts her to get close.

The film is told about 2/3 of the way in flashback as Mason lectures to a university class on the atypical murderer, the sane and logical one which he naturally takes himself to be. The rest of the film is a revealing portrayal of how Mason should be seen.

The Upturned Glass is a nice bit of melodramatic noir with Mason really carrying this film. His perfect performance makes The Upturned Glass seem far better than it really is.
32 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Wicked Lady
richardchatten12 September 2020
James Mason's final Gainsborough melodrama before packing his bags and leaving for Hollywood is a good-looking psychodrama produced and written by it's stars, sleekly crafted by it's director (with whom Mason had already established a good working relationship a few years earlier) and with a flavourful score by Bernard Stevens.

The inscrutable title is the result of a last minute change from a film about the Brontes to a replacement retaining the title but substituting an entirely different plot.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
the upturned glass
manderstoke6 May 2014
One of the earlier reviewers suggested that the film takes "the easy way out." I partially agree, but think that the real reason for the disappointing finale was the censors. They, in their moral righteousness, did their very best to ruin any number of UK and American films. In this case, the ending makes little sense. Otherwise, a very satisfying early addition to the film noir genre. The photography and pacing are perfect and carry the bleak mood. A minor quibble is that the notion of the lovers breaking off wasn't totally credible, but then, perhaps it was a different moral universe in the 1940s. Mason, as always, is excellent to the point that the viewer cannot take his eyes off of him (not that one would want to). Pamela is a hateful character, as from all reports, she was in real life.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Brit Noir
mevolve31 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
It's almost parody, when you are immersed into a dark, forbidding noir world -- populated by proper English gentry. But THE UPTURNED GLASS is a superior crime piece, with a distinctive English taint. That taint being, essentially, the story of a respected brain-surgeon with a very staid life of drawing room seclusion and introspection -- read, the image/stereotype of the ideal British "gentleman" -- who chooses to exit his world of detached observation, to exact justice in a personal matter. In a nutshell: James Mason plays a brain surgeon, who recounts in a lecture, an incident of crime to a university class. In flashback, we see his affair with a married woman (Rosamund John) after treating his daughter, and their mutual breaking off of the engagement. Later, when she "falls from a window," Mason suspects murder. We see the details of his plan to revenge himself on his lover's sister (Pamela Mason), and everything goes exactly as planned. But when it comes to actually committing the act, it does not go so smoothly.... Brefini O'Rourke and Mason engage in an interesting debate at the close of the movie, that lays out the pertinent moral dilemma (as well as the significance of the title): Do we do what is right because it is right, or do we do it because of personal gain, flaws, obsessions, etc.? A theme which would be echoed later, and very closely to THE UPTURNED GLASS's method (and much more horrificly), in both versions of THE VANISHING. Mason ends this movie, on the edge of the cliffs over Dover beach, where there lies "no certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain," as Matthew Arnold sees it: Mason ends his long day of murder and things gone terribly awry in blind ignorance, alone and -- as the camera does not even pick up his final fall or his broken body -- forgotten, lost. Mason and his wife (who co-produced and co-wrote respectively) were experimenting with structure in THE UPTURNED GLASS; the result is an interesting story that feels to be told in two parts. It takes its time to build (ever a British trait), but once the story gets going, it is relentless in its tension; especially during the twenty-minute or so sequence where Jason Mason attempts to escape with Pamela Mason's body. Though it's a green and pleasant land we are moving through here, the camera's eye chooses only to see it through a lens darkly, and starkly: an empty house of shadows, a chapel that is all but a ruin of shadows, fog-lit moorish wastes, the good doctor's own living quarters practically infested with shadows itself. James Mason is phenomenal, taking a role where he is ever so slightly detached from whatever scene is at hand. Paranoia seems to be part and parcel of his make-up, and often throughout the movie, it appears as if we are often seeing events as *he* sees them: students asking questions, party-hosts with probing eyes, a good country doctor staring at you through his spectacles -- every one of them might be doing more than just looking at you, they might very well be looking *through* you... probing you, inspecting, judging. We never know if his lover really *was* murdered in the end, or if she jumped volunatarily, or if it really were simply an accident after all. Mason's scheme doesn't allow, or worry, about that at all: his is an inchoate vengeance, directed at nobody in particular, not even fate, really. Pamela Mason is simply the most readily available target for a fatal flaw, as was the poor girls that book-end the movie: the nameless, faceless one hit by the lorry at the end, or the young daughter a victim of a brain-splinter at the beginning. In the sudden climax of THE UPTURNED GLASS, no one knows anything for sure -- not love, not hate, and hardly anything like certainty... we are all just rocks, washed up on an empty beach, "where ignorant armies clash by night...."
34 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great thriller, lukewarm ending
HotToastyRag3 July 2018
The Upturned Glass is really good, up until the ending, so if you like suspenseful, tense thrillers and don't mind lukewarm endings, rent it during your next movie night with the girls. It's not the best movie to rent with your sweetie pie, since you'll spend the entire time sighing over James Mason!

James stars as a brain surgeon and professor. He tells a story to his students about how, in theory, someone can get away with murder. Of course, the story is much more than a hypothetical, and soon the audience is treated to the wonderful world of flashbacks. In the past, James Mason operated on a young girl and fell in love with her mother, Rosamund John. They're both married, and after a tearful goodbye, they agree not to see each other anymore. Then, the unthinkable happens. . .

James's at-the-time wife Pamela Mason costars as Rosamund's sister-in-law, and it's always fun to see the Masons acting together. Pamela plays a great "bad girl," doesn't she? If you like James Mason, this is a great movie to watch, since he's the hero with a bit of a villainous streak hiding underneath. Plus, since so often his handsomeness was ignored by Hollywood, it's nice to see him as a romantic lead!
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Doctor James Mason involved in a difficult jealousy drama with two women, one his mistress, the other her sister-in-law.
clanciai23 February 2015
This is a very unusual and intelligent thriller, like most thrillers involving doctors usually are. It is the first of James Mason's very few own productions and features his own wife, Pamela Mason, here Pamela Kellino, as the second of the two ladies he is involved with, both of them leading to disaster. The intrigue cleverly leads astray at times while at the same time it sharpens as the doctor (James Mason) finds his own case constantly more crucial. He stages a kind of mock trial with himself by giving a lecture at the medical theatre with all rows filled with young attentive students, and one student almost sees through his show and sharpens his case even further. Is he in control or is he not? Has he the right to judge what's right or wrong or has he not? The film poses many questions, and the questioning becomes increasingly more critical, until in the end he is faced with the final trial as a doctor, when an emergency calls on him to perform one more brain surgery. It's the doctor who assists him who puts him to the final test, and these scenes are the most interesting and important in the film. James Mason as the doctor has no other choice than to be consistent with his own argument and conclude his own case after having received an understated sentence by his elderly colleague. It's a remarkable film, not for its direction, which could have been better, but for its very thought-provoking story with the presentation of a case which not even doctors could in any possible way be called upon to give a fair judgement of. The tragedy of this case is that James Mason, one of the best actors ever, a constantly brooding romantic hero, more Hamletian than Byronic, has no other choice, which probably no one could reasonably disagree with.

In addition, you can't help recognizing some details here from other, later films, that boast its influence, especially Hitchcock's "Vertigo", displaying the identical problem of a man's involvement in two women related with each other, Hitchcock much developing the theme to an equally crucial crisis but in another direction, while the very vertigo scenes Hitchcock must have got the idea of from here.

It should also be noted, that John Monaghan, the script writer, appears as an extra (the truck driver), He made some similar appearances in some films, but this is the only film he wrote, with Mrs Mason as co-script writer. The intrigue with its complications and arguments is so psychologically interesting, that you find more in it each time you see it. For that reason, in spite of its flaws, I will give it a full 10.
20 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Introspective piece
Leofwine_draca4 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
THE UPTURNED GLASS is another interesting psychological character study from an introspective era of British cinema. Here it's the turn of James Mason as a top surgeon who begins a doomed relationship with a woman who apparently dies due to suicide. He's not about to let the matter rest, and when he discovers somebody responsible, he makes it his mission to deliver revenge. It's a slow-moving and rather atmospheric little piece that keeps you unsettled by not being sure where it's going; the ending in particular is intense. Mason gives an excellent performance of depth and subtlety and is ably supported by a game cast.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Calculated Insanity
appealing_talent29 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
A very fine neurosurgeon, impeccably portrayed by James Mason, who teaches criminology as a sideline, recounts a certain case study to a class during a lecture. The case deals with a man he deems to be sane, but who commits murder to avenge a murder. Mason, who has honed his great gift to heal, as a way of replacing the human connection his personal life lacks, has become detached and somewhat obsessive in his perspectives, as a result. Although he doesn't reveal it, to the undergraduates, we discover through the course of his story that he is the protagonist in the example he's presenting. He renders the murder as having been smoothly and successfully carried out, however we learn immediately thereafter that it actually has not yet been accomplished.

Mason's skillfully controlled persona, as the neurosurgeon, is letter perfect and one gets the feeling that his assumptions regarding the way in which a guilt ridden former lady love died are most probably true. Although an inquest rules it as an accidental fall, gossipy detractors place the blame on the woman's, self-centered, opportunistic sister-in-law, who has much to gain financially by the woman's death. Mason's doctor character feels compelled, out of vanity, to justify his revenge to the unwitting students and then sets out to put the final segment of the plot into action.

Murphy's law and irony prevail causing the retaliation to not come off nearly as seamlessly as planned. Moreover, while looking for a place to dispose of his murder victim's body Mason meets up with another more sardonic doctor, whom he's forced to give a ride to and is subsequently obliged to assist. Mason operates on and saves a young patient's life, only to be castigated and labeled, as mad, by the other doctor for his motives. The other doctor, who at one point is asked to fetch a medical supply from Mason's car, discovers the camouflaged body of his victim in the back seat but, without turning Mason in, rather asserts a moral dilemma, which figuratively then literally pushes Mason over the edge.

The title of the film comes into play in the form of an analogy the other doctor makes to a glass precariously perched to fall, crack and break, comparing it to Mason's unsound mind. Mason gets the point and abruptly does a swan dive over an abyss, into the sea. We are left to ponder whether it was a consequence of being faced with his monumental conceit, or hypocritical notion of altruism, that ultimately causes his undoing.

The noir aspects of its film techniques aside, this is a brilliant character study and Mason's superb achievement, alone, in creating a complex, sympathetic murderer makes the movie well worth viewing.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Eyes Have It
writers_reign6 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
James Mason and Pamela Kellino were clearly eager to push boundaries and function as fully creative personnel rather than just actors. Having met whilst shooting I Met A Murderer in 1939 when Pamela Ostrer was still married to Roy Kellino, embarked on an affair and subsequently married it's more than possible that The Upturned Glass was something of an in-joke given that in the film Mason does meet Kellino's character who is, in fact, a murderer and given that Mason produced and Kellino penned the screenplay the nod to the earlier film is inescapable. It's a film that means well and its earnestness is to be applauded even if it doesn't quite come off but a definite E for Effort.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Murder is not easy, and getting away with it is, well, murder!
mark.waltz7 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
As a popular British criminologist, James Mason tells a class full of intrigued students about a supposedly sane man who plotted murder over revenge. Over the first hour, the writers present a very intriguing case involving a doctor who saves a young girl on the operating table then falls in love with her mother. He plots revenge when the young woman dies mysteriously after falling out of a second story window in her house. All is fine for the first two thirds of the movie until the true crime comes to light and a plethora of incidents occur that take the screenplay all over the place. While the movie is beautifully filmed and is interesting throughout, the last 15 minutes of the movie take a lot of dramatic license in wrapping the story up. Mason is mesmerizing as always, but the title really has nothing to do with the plot. For film noir fans, there are many elements there of that genre, including some dark and moody photography and a femme fatal that will go down as one of the most unlikable in film history.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Well-structured But Gets A Bit Cluttered
Handlinghandel20 April 2006
In this suspenseful movie, we meet James Mason as he lectures about crime to a group of students. He is an eminent neurologist. In flashback, we learn of the girl whose eyesight he's saved. In the course of doing this, he fell in hove with her mother.

It's a murder-mystery; so that's as much plot as I'll give. Pamela Mason is appropriately unappealing as the woman's nosy sister-in-law. Mason, one of my favorite actors, is very good.

As a suspense movie -- a noir, of sorts -- it is excellent. It positions itself as more, unfortunately. Initially, it's intriguing to realize that the central figure in the case history Mason's reciting is himself. But there are red herrings. More distracting, there is philosophizing -- not to mention a most unsatisfactory final scene.
18 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Throw it away
AAdaSC28 August 2017
That's the advice that doctor Brefni O'Rorke (Dr Farrell) gives to surgeon James Mason (Joyce) when giving an analogy comparing insanity to an upturned glass balancing on a mantelpiece. So, that's exactly what Mason does! The film is told in flashback as Mason narrates a lecture to students on the topic of the criminal mind. He presents a case of a sane man committing murder. It's no revelation to the film audience that he is recounting his own story. What is interesting in this technique is that we realize he hasn't actually carried out the act and we then find ourselves in real time at the end of the lecture as he goes ahead with his plan after what can be seen as his confession to the students.

The root of his problem is a love affair with Rosamund Wright (Emma) which cannot be. The ending of the relationship coincides with some tragic news and Mason then turns to Pamela Mason (Kate) to discover the truth and exact revenge. The real events of the tragedy are never fully confirmed and so Mason's actions are very suspect. Is he insane? He certainly seems to be acting on a whim. Pamela Mason is excellent in her role and certainly had me rooting for her. I'm not sure this was the intention, though!

The young girl whose sight Mason saves at the beginning of the film is played by Ann Stephens who died aged 35 in 1966. I can't find any details on how she died. Can anyone help on this? It would be interesting to know. She delivers some amusing dialogue about not liking her hair and Pamela Mason's dialogue regarding her is flippantly wonderful – I'll send her boarding – ha ha. The best of us have all spent time boarding as a child. As for the film's title, I still don't know what an upturned glass means? Which way?
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A clever plot; James Mason as an unsympathetic protagonist; and Pamela Kellino nearly steals the movie
Terrell-48 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The Upturned Glass was directed by Lawrence Huntington, co-produced by the star, James Mason, and co-written and also starred Mason's wife at the time, Pamela Kellino. It's a psychological study of murder and starts promisingly with a clever set-up. It then leads us on with flashbacks and moody, first person narration. Unfortunately, it ends with the clear impression that the writers created a clever plot but forgot to make the lead sympathetic.

We're in a medical school lecture hall and students are crowding in to hear a tall, dark man who looks like James Mason give a lecture on The Psychology of Crime. "Now we come to that much more interesting phenomenon," he tells the students, "the sane criminal…the man who is prepared to pursue his own ethical convictions to the point of murder." He proposes to tell the story of a preeminent surgeon, so dedicated he has no friends and little social life, a cool customer, indeed. The lecturer gives this man a fictitious name, Michael Joyce. And as he speaks, the flashback starts…

…with Michael Joyce examining the young daughter of a woman whose husband we never meet. Michael Joyce looks just like the lecturer. Is the lecturer telling us his own story? It would be a neat twist if he were. In this tale of irony and obsession, Joyce saves the eyesight of the child and he and the mother, equally lonely, start a relationship that can only lead to her divorcing her husband. Instead, it leads to murder, one of which is carefully planned. "This was a murder conceived in perfect sanity and faultlessly carried out," the lecturer tells his students. But now we realize this all might be a flashback…or a clever man's flash- forward…or perhaps nothing more than a lecture. Pamela Kellino gives a remarkable portrait of a woman who is smart, coquettish, selfish and thoroughly unlikable. She nearly steals the picture from Mason.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A top flight British noir with the great James Mason.
AlsExGal5 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I'm putting a spoiler warning on this because you might feel it is somewhat spoiled. I do take careful pains not to give the best parts away.

I often wonder why James Mason isn't better remembered. I guess it is because he played so many gray or outright sinister characters in his career. He really was "the odd man out" career wise.

Here he plays a man giving a lecture in criminology on "sane" criminals. He tells the story of a brain surgeon who is permanently and unhappily married to his wife from whom he has been separated for years. And then one day into his cold therapeutic life comes a woman with a child who is going blind. Her maternal devotion touches him, as everything about her is different from his own estranged wife. He operates on the girl and says for the first time he feels nervous about it, because for the first time he is personally invested in a patient.

The girl recovers and he and the woman begin to spend time together outside the professional arena. They end the relationship when they both realize neither could ever be free - she is married too - and she especially doesn't want anything to negatively impact her only daughter. And then comes word that the woman has died by falling out of an upper story window in her home. The man investigates and realizes that her death was neither an accident nor straight up suicide, but that the guilty party could never be brought to justice under British law. So he plots a course to murder the person responsible which comes off without a hitch with the police never suspecting it even was a murder.

From the dramatization I have never seen such a cooperative murder victim. And then you realize that is because the murder has not happened yet. I'll let you watch and find out what really does happen and how it actually does happen.

I will say this much - at one point the murderer gives himself away because he takes it upon himself to help someone he did not have to help. He saves a life. The other person involved who finds him out calls him insane. But this other person is coldly indifferent to whether the person who is saved lives or dies. He was perfectly willing to let the person who lived just die, and advises the murderer to let it go too. Who is the worse person?

Produced by as well as starring James Mason, this one, produced outside the range of the American production code of the time, is worth seeing. Highly recommended. With Mason's own wife as the villainess.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
thriller about revenge and the consequences of revenge
myriamlenys29 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This is very much a movie of two halves. The first part, leading up to the murder and its immediate aftermath, is stellar : taut, original, suspenseful. The second part, which represents a sudden change of tone, is less good. Still, it remains very watchable, mainly for its superb performance by James Mason as a broken-hearted loner driven to extremes by the loss of his one true love.

The first half boasts a very original idea : a would-be murderer, who is a respected teacher and brain surgeon, giving a lecture in which he describes his own dark path towards murder. (For clarity's sake, he's hiding his own identity by speaking about "an anonymous patient".) So why is the man speaking about his plans ? Does he hope that someone will stop him, analyze him, praise him, denounce him ? Is he just thinking out loud ? Strengthening his own resolve ? Enjoying a twisted sense of power ? Multiple interpretations can apply...
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A doctor dispenses death and healing with blind impartiality.
hitchcockthelegend4 April 2012
The Upturned Glass is directed by Lawrence Huntington and written by John Monaghan and Pamela Kellino. It stars James Mason, Rosamund John, Pamela Kellino, Ann Stephens, Morland Graham and Brefni O'Rorke. Music is by Bernard Stevens and cinematography by Reginald H. Wyer. Plot finds Mason as Michael, a brilliant surgeon who falls in love with Emma Wright (John), the mother of a young girl whose eyesight he saves. Trouble is that Emma is married to a man who works overseas a lot and it's a relationship that ultimately has to end. When word comes that Emma has been tragically killed after falling out of a top floor window at her home, Michael decides to investigate further. It's an investigation that leads Michael down very dark roads.....

What a time to go buy a house, you must be demented!

One of the last British films Mason made before leaving for America to work contractually for MGM, The Upturned Glass is a Hitchcockian like thriller that's tinted with a film noir edge. With Mason co-producing and his then wife, Kellino, co-starring and co-writing, it was very much a personal project. The film finds the "Mason's" experimenting with a flashback structure that is in turn covered by a Mason narration. Always easy to follow, the picture does however shy away from offering up easy answers, purposely leaving some things tantalisingly dangling in the air. It also retains a murder mystery interest before diving head first into that of a study of a psychological break down. There's some devilment in the narrative, even a bit of cheeky daring that shows its hand once Mason's lecture that opens the film is seen in the light it was meant to be.

Today I sat in judgement.

With Wyer's photography dealing in shadows and smoky lenses, and Huntington showing a keen eye for atmospheric composition during scenes involving the empty house and the village chapel, there's enough visual treats for the film noir crowd to feast on. Into the equation as well is the vagaries of fate, a theme so prominent in the great noir pictures of the past, the outcome of this picture is defined by a decision Michael makes, the irony of which is as snappy as a crocodile. The finale has been lamented by others due to its suddeness, to that I have to say they missed the point, it's suitably cold and closes the picture perfectly. The title has even been called into question, some even saying it has nothing to do with the film or is unfitting? It all fits during the best period of dialogue between Michael and Dr. Farrell (O'Rorke)! I do believe this is a film worthy of reappraisal by a more genre compliant audience.

It's not overtly film noir, but the blood line is there, and with Mason on simply irresistible form this is highly recommended to fans of noir and Hitchcockian flavoured black and whites. 7.5/10 MPI's Region 1 DVD is a decent print, some snap and pop from time to time on the edges, and the sound mix is always audible if not pristine throughout.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Over The Edge
malcolmgsw12 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This film was released at the height of the interest in psychological thrillers.the film starts up quite slowly works up to a crescendo and then rather falls flat at the end.It is nevertheless an intriguing film in many ways.Mason has it fixed in his mind just how easy it would be to kill Kellino.However the reality is that it turns into a violent struggle with him ending up strangling her then tossing her out the window.This rather anticipates the scene in Hitchcock's Torn Curtain with the gruesome killing of the Stasi agent.One wonders if Mason wished he had gone through with the actual deed bearing in mind his acrimonious divorce from Kellino a few years later!There is mention of an upturned glass but its meaning is never properly explained.At the end Mason commits suicide by leaping off a cliff.This is incorrect for 2 reasons.Firstly nowhere in the description of Paranoia,is there an indication that the symptoms include suicidal tendencies.Also there are no chalk cliffs near Portsmouth.One final point.I wonder if the American censors office asked for a change of endings.They would not sanction a suicide by a criminal as they considered it a mortal sin.Also they insisted on moral compensating values ie the villain must pay for his sins.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Pamela Kellino Shines as Thoroughly Nasty Character!!!
kidboots31 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
It really irritated British critics when James Mason went to Hollywood at the end of the 1940s. British films had improved during the war and no star was more highly regarded than Mason. He was just hitting his stride with "They Were Sisters" and "The Seventh Veil" when, fed up with the dominance of J. Arthur Rank, he and his wife left for Hollywood. Not before "The Upturned Glass" which he also produced, a moody thriller directed by Lawrence Huntington who, the year before, had also directed the noirish "Wanted for Murder".

Mason plays a criminology lecturer who starts to tell his "agog" students a story of what happens when sane, normal people commit murder. Brilliant surgeon Michael Joyce (also Mason) meets Emma (the beautiful Rosamund John) when he successfully operates on her daughter to bring back her vision. Emma's husband is away for long periods of time and she and Michael, just by spending time together, find they have a lot in common, even though they decide to break off their affair. Time passes and the next time Michael hears of her it is to do with her death: she has fallen out of a top storey window. Her husband is distraught, her sister-in-law less so, in fact she can't wipe the smile off her face. Pamela Kellino is just marvellous in the role - she is dislikable from the start with her constant smirk and really irritating manner of speaking. Michael has never liked her and when he goes to the inquest he is convinced something is going on: young Ann is nervous in the witness box and is given an imperceptible sign from Kate that she is not to tell of the real events that led to her mother's death.

Up to now the movie had been a conventional British crime thriller but the psychological intricacies start when Michael puts into play a plan to find out the truth. He (however distastefully) starts to romance Kate who through her own ego cannot see that he is only half heartedly pursuing her. The angle of the camera also has Miss Kellino as the main focus for the audience so you almost see her through Michael's eyes.

Of course Michael believes he is sane and sensible but when when, towards the end of the movie, he has an encounter with a completely disillusioned and mercenary doctor, that doctor feels that his overly compassionate nature is likened to an upturned glass precariously placed to fall and break, aligning him with people of unsound mind. All paving the way to a very unsatisfying ending, taking the easy way out.

Pamela Kellino happened to be James Mason's real life wife at the time of this movie.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Potentially Great Noir; Cat and Mouse - The Upturned Glass
arthur_tafero22 January 2021
James Mason is a consummate actor. He always made you believe every word of whatever character he played. This role was no exception. You thoroughly bought into his character of a lover who will go to any lengths to gain vengeance for the murder of his beloved. This film contains one of the greatest prolonged sequences of cat and mouse techniques in film. That is what gets the film rated above average. The ending is extremely unsatisfying, in my opinion, is anti-climatic and unjustified. But then again, life is incongruent. A film to be savored, despite its fatal flaw.

True story from 1948. This film and another "Dark Passage" were playing at a second run theater on 42nd Street, when a terrible storm blew off three letters off of the marquee. Two letters from The Upturned Glass, and one letter from Dark Passage. Attendance for the evening show increased by 300% over the afternoon matinee.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Fatalistic
jromanbaker14 March 2020
This is a fatalistic and morbid film and one which no doubt made necessary the X certificate which was brought in in the UK in 1951. There were quite a few others of this kind after WW2 and English films which followed the later certificate were often much more extreme than anything coming out of the US. ' Horrors of the Black Museum ' and ' The Camp on Blood Island ' are an example and the horrors in this scenario preceded the way for them. The fatalism after the war no doubt made these films acceptable, and as for ' The Upturned Glass ' it was one of the nastiest of its kind. I do not recommend it for children, or sensitive people and I disliked it immensely. Of course worst films are made today, but somehow these films were darker and for no other reason than to fulfil the possible need for masochism in people after the war. The response to masochism, or the need for a pain of suffering endured by the Blitz and other deprivations and no way of escaping one's fate can make an audience feel it is ordinary and will continue forever. This is where the sadistic film steps in to fill that void. The US did not have the fear of a bomb obliterating both the house and its occupants and therein lies the difference perhaps between the two countries film output. I give it a 3 for James Mason and Rosamund John ( a fine actress ) but she is not seen enough in the film. Enough has been said here revealing the plot, but unlike some reviewers the pessimism at the end was not contrived but inevitable.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the better James Mason films that finds him examining the criminal mind and its motivation.
cgvsluis20 March 2024
I am not the biggest James Mason fan, but this may be my favorite of his films that I have seen thus far. He plays the famous British surgical neurologist Michael Joyce. Aloof and all business it is a bit of a surprise when he falls in love with a patient's mother. The patient is a young girl who has been loosing her eyesight. Once Dr. Joyce has restored her daughter's eyesight the three start going on outings together. You see Emma Wright (Rosamund John) is also very alone, with her husband away overseas working.

The entire story is told as a case study to a college classroom where Michael Joyce is lecturing about the topic of the criminal mind. He presents a case of a sane man committing murder.

It's not long before you come to understand that the case study is about him, but what is more of a surprise is that the murder portion has yet to take place.

This was an interesting tool to use to tell the story and one I enjoyed tremendously. James Mason's real life wife Pamela plays the nosy, money grubbing sister-in-law. Hats off to her too because she plays a truly hateful character very well.

This is a recommendation from me for fans of crime noir. I think you will find this an enjoyable little take.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed