Bright Leaf (1950) Poster

(1950)

User Reviews

Review this title
33 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Unusual Drama In An Unusual Setting.
jpdoherty3 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Produced in 1950 by Henry Blanke for Warner Brothers BRIGHT LEAF is set in the tobacco growing region of the American South at the turn of the 20th. Century. A highly charged drama - BRIGHT LEAF is about ambition, love and loss and retribution and was expertly directed by the prolific Michael Curtiz. Based on the novel by Foster Fitz-Simons it was splendidly written for the screen by Ranald MacDougall ("Mildred Peirce") from which emerged a sparkling, and at times, spontaneous script. Its balmy Southern setting looked great thanks to the smart Art Direction by Stanley Fleischer, the crisp Monochrome Cinematography of Karl Freund and the atmospheric music by the always wonderful Victor Young.

Gary Cooper is Brant Royle who returns to his home in the South after some years. He rides into Kingsmont where years before his family was dispossessed, humiliated and forced out at the hands of wealthy tobacco tycoon Major Singleton (Donald Crisp). Now he's back and intends to exact some sort of vengeance on the irascible and acerbic Major. Low on funds ("I own a good horse - I own a good suit of clothes and I have $40 in my pocket") he meets up with an old flame - the attractive Sonia Kovac (Lauren Bacall) who runs a "boarding house for young ladies" and persuades her to back him in a business venture in establishing a new idea of a cigarette making machine. The enterprise is a runaway success and almost overnight Royle - along with his partners Sonia and Chris Malley (Jack Carson) - becomes a millionaire to the chagrin of the Major. Royle had always loved the Major's unobtainable and distant daughter Margaret (Patricia Neal) and makes plans now to marry her. This - together with Royle's on going presence in Kingsmont, his phenomenal business success and a pistol duel between them that goes wrong - drives the Major to take his own life. Later Margaret does agree to marry him but only with the sole purpose to destroy Brant Royle and obtain retribution for the death of her father. The picture ends with Royle financially ruined and a well executed climactic sequence which sees the opulent Singleton mansion going up in flames. With Sonia also turning him down Brant Royle rides out of Kingsmont on the same road he entered in the hope of finding contentment elsewhere.

One of the great aspects of BRIGHT LEAF is the stunning score by the great (and cigar chomping) Victor Young! Normally a Warner picture like this would have a score by the studio's resident composer Max Steiner. But Steiner was over committed on other projects and suggested his friend Victor Young write the music. Young accepted the assignment and turned in one of his finest scores. The Main Title is a sprawling and sweeping theme for full orchestra! A ravishing piece with the strings, upward yearning, climbing to their topmost register. There is also a gorgeous plaintive melody for the Lauren Bacall character, a brilliantly exciting cue for a montage of the cigarette machine as it spews out thousands of cigarettes and a frantic cue near the end for the magnificent house fire. The music from BRIGHT LEAF is high on the list of admirers of Young's scores!

BRIGHT LEAF is an engrossing and engaging story and has smooth performances throughout. Cooper is particularly good as is Bacall but Neal's southern nasally drawl is a bit grating at times. And in a rare unsympathetic role Donal Crisp is excellent as the Major. Curiously cigarette smoking is somewhat glorified in the picture and viewing the film today - some sixty years after it was made and when the smoking habit is increasingly taboo - it now seems a little perverse!

Classic line from BRIGHT LEAF...........

Jack Carson to Lauren Bacall when she bail's him out of jail.......

"Maam! I consider you a rare gem in the diadem of womanhood".
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Two High Maintenance Southern Women
bkoganbing23 May 2010
I think that Warner Brothers liked the performance that Gary Cooper gave in Edna Ferber's Saratoga Trunk which was released under their auspices a few years earlier. So when Cooper signs with Warner Brothers, Bright Leaf which is about the tobacco industry which has an Ferber like quality to it seemed perfect for him.

It didn't turn out that unfortunately. Brant Royle may be the most unsympathetic character Gary Cooper who was THE archetypal screen hero ever played. He's come back to his home which is in a valley in the tobacco growing country of North Carolina looking for vengeance on Donald Crisp the tobacco baron who ruined his father. All he has as the family heir is a closed factory. But when Crisp refuses to take an interest in Jeff Corey's new cigarette rolling machine, Cooper latches on to Corey and with medicine show doctor Jack Carson to sell the product, the three form a partnership.

Lauren Bacall who runs the town's house of joy with Gladys George helps kick start the firm with a financial investment. She likes Cooper well enough, but he's got eyes on Patricia Neal who is Crisp's daughter. Neal is a southern to the manor born heiress like Bette Davis in Jezebel and Vivien Leigh in Gone With The Wind. Those are high maintenance women and Cooper finds out just how high maintenance she is before the film concludes.

Though this is a Gary Cooper film, the female co-stars really steal this film from the men. Neal and Bacall are whom you watch and remember from Bright Leaf and of course Gladys George who is never bad in anything.

Though Bright Leaf is about a typical Edna Ferber empire builder the ending is anything like what you would find in a Ferber novel. Bright Leaf is a bit too melodramatic for my taste, but fans of the stars should find it good.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Shallow script but magnificent production values!
JohnHowardReid27 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Producer: Henry Blanke. Copyright 16 June 1950 by Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc. New York opening at the Strand: 16 June 1950. U.S. release: 1 July 1950. U.K. release: 2 July 1951. Australian release: 20 September 1951.

SYNOPSIS: In a Southern state in the late nineteenth century, the possession of a cigarette manufacturing machine brings a tenant farmer's son into control of a tobacco empire.

COMMENT: Here's another film that doesn't deserve its poor reputation. The reason for this downgrading is of course that Hollywood was producing so many fine films in this period, the level of craftsmanship in a less-than-outstanding offering tended to be overlooked.

Mind you, Bright Leaf has all the makings of "grade A" romance: best-selling novel, period setting, sweeping backgrounds, self-willed characters, illicit romance. The difficulty is that despite some persuasive (Cooper, Bacall, Carson, Crisp) and indeed fiery (Patricia Neal) acting, the people in this saga remain stubbornly one-dimensional.

This fault is compounded by the tact that their particular traits are almost all unlikable. Royle's is a morose, vengeful figure at the center of an unlovely group of robber barons, con artists and connivers. Even Lauren Bacall's sweet eagerness is flawed by her profession and her hopeless love is so obviously foredoomed, it robs the script of a fair degree of romantic suspense. Crisp has a meaty part for once - and he makes the most of it - even though his character too is patently a mere pawn in the author's telegraphed chess game. It is Patricia Neal who excels, bringing such fire and vengeful malice to her role as to divert our attention momentarily from the mere mechanics of the plot.

Whatever the shallowness of the script, it has been most appealingly dressed up in full regalia. The Warner Brothers have outfitted it in their finest production values: Karl Freund's crisply grey-toned deep-focus photography, Victor Young's atmospheric score, Stanley Fleischer's enormously vistaed sets. Director Michael Curtiz is in his element with such big-budget props. The action and crowd scenes are handled with his usual power. If the more intimate episodes lack the same conviction, it is not for want of dramatic skill, simply the fact that the script is often so stubbornly synthetic.

Some of the support players are afforded excellent opportunities: Elizabeth Patterson is nicely cast as an independent-minded aunt, Jeff Corey is rightly long-suffering as a put-upon Yankee, Chick Chandler makes an amazingly sing-song auctioneer, while James Griffith limns an obsequious clerk to perfection. If the entertainment of the whole falls somewhat short of the sum of the parts, Bright Leaf is still one of the classier, flying high films of the year. Who can resist Cooper's Brant Royle, a truly tragic figure played with such assurance and conviction? (In many ways it's a typical role - well within the actor's range - but nowadays it has the fresh appeal of unfamiliarity.)
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Coop and the tobacco industry
guilfisher-116 August 2005
This 1950 film starred Gary Cooper, Lauren Bacall and Patricia Neal in the leading roles and brought drama within the tobacco industry, although in the 50s it was okay to smoke. Doubt this film could make it this day and age.

Interesting to see real-life lovers Cooper and Neal tear up the scenery with their love scenes. Cooper seemed a bit on the reserved side even though he was out for revenge. But, that's Coop. He's a master of do nothing on the screen and manages to hold his own. Spencer Tracy is another one of those dynamic actors. Here he plots to take over the tobacco industry from a man (splendidly played by that veteran character actor of distinction, Donald Crisp) who in the past had run him out of town for kissing his daughter (yes, just kissing) played by the lovely Patricia Neal.

In the meantime Coop courts long time girl friend, Lauren Bacall, somewhat miscast in this, for money to start up a cigarette making factory invented by Jeff Corey, another great actor. Lauren doesn't look her best in this. How can we forget all those marvelous Bogart/Bacall films with her slinky hair and sultry body. In this her hair is up and curled and her gowns of the period don't look good on her. Bring Baby back. She doesn't have the chemistry with Cooper as she did with Bogart. And obviously the chemistry was flying with Neal and Cooper instead.

Also in the cast are Jack Carson, in a small and not so well written role that wasted this fine actor. Gladys George (remember her in MADAME X) was also wasted in a thankless role.

However, it's fine drama of the time and good to see the stars playing out their roles.

I prefer to remember Coop in such films as SERGEANT YORK, FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS, SARATOGA TRUNK, FOUNTAINHEAD, HIGH NOON and ALONG CAME JONES.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mildred Pierce with role reversals
fcline-579-76278913 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a fan of Michael Curtiz and his seminal film, "Mildred Pierce", so I couldn't help comparing the story/plot of "Bright Leaf" to Mildred Pierce, which was a well-received Curtiz film from 1945 - five years previous to the release of Bright Leaf.

The following is my comparison: Mildred Pierce is a woman from humble stock who is spurned by her unfaithful husband and her class-conscious daughter. Mildred determines to prove her worth by obtaining wealth and thereby purchasing both her position in society and the affections of her daughter. Success comes in the form of a chain of popular restaurants. Acceptance into higher society eludes Mildred as her snobbish daughter continues to ridicule Mildred and she is then double-crossed by her business partner/lover, society playboy Monte Barragan. Mildred loses everything for which she worked so hard; her wealth, social status, daughter, lover, etc.

In the film "Bright Leaf", Brant Royle is the son of a poor tobacco farmer who was pushed out of business by the family of Margaret Singleton (played by Patricia Neal), the boyhood crush of Brant Royle. Brant determines to prove his worth and gain revenge on the Singleton family by obtaining wealth and thereby driving Major Singleton out of business. Revenge eludes Brant Royle; however, as he is double-crossed by his business partner/lover, Margaret Singleton. Brant loses everything for which he worked so hard; his wealth, social status, lover, etc.

Although Bright Leaf is not a one-for-one plot-mirror of Mildred Pierce, the similarities to me were startling. Mildred is clearly the better film, in my opinion, due to the more likable and sympathetic main character. Mildred was motivated by a needy sort of "love" for her daughter, while Brant was motivated by a desire for revenge.

The audience is left with sympathy for Mildred who was a victim of the selfish people around her. The audience must; however, place the blame of Brant's demise squarely on his own shoulders, for as Douglas Horton once said, "While seeking revenge, dig two graves - one for yourself".
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Okay historical melodrama about the tobacco industry.
otter8 March 1999
Gary Cooper plays Brant Royle, a guy from the wrong side of the tracks who sets out to conquer the cigarette market at the turn of the century, whatever the cost. He's pitted against the Southern Aristocracy who've owned the market for generations. His only ally is Lauren Bacall, as the town "bad girl", but that doesn't stop him from pursuing the daughter of his worst enemy: Patricia Neal as the cool embodiment of aristocracy.

It's fairly heavy going through most of the film. There is some technical stuff about the tobacco business, but mostly it's about Royle's emotional conflicts: Love vs. social climbing; his conscience vs his business sense; what to do when achieving your dreams isn't enough; loyalty vs expedience; etc. It's all rather slow and humorless, not at all gripping.

Cooper is a good enough actor to keep you watching through all this even though his character is basically unlikeable, but Patricia Neal is the best reason to watch the film. The best moments of the film, the only ones that make it worth watching, are when she drops the icy mask of aristocratic poise and reveals her true character and motivations. That part it genuinely gripping. Bacall is likeable, but doesn't make an equal impact, and doesn't really seem to belong there. Perhaps it's because she looks terrible in the period wardrobe (19th century clothes were not designed for tall, skinny women).

It's also historically interesting to see a movie about the tobacco industry made before they found out about nicotine causing cancer. Nobody seems to think cigarettes are anything but a harmless indulgence and a cash cow.
18 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Freudian "Southern" similar in aspects to "Western" "The Furies"
mark.waltz28 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Powerful tobacco king Donald Crisp is angered when Gary Cooper, the son of a man whose property Crisp took away from him, returns to his home town after a seven year absence, more prosperous, but like "Wuthering Height's" Heathcliff, determined to even the score. It happens that Crisp's beautiful daughter, Patricia Neal, once had her eye on Cooper, but the ruthless father made his displeasure clear by destroying any chance they had of being together by running Cooper out of town. Now back to settle his late uncle's estate, Cooper becomes involved in a plan to mass-market cigarettes with the help of the man who invented the cigarette rolling machine. Town madame Lauren Bacall loans Cooper the money to patent the machine, and before you can say, "Do you have a light?", Cooper has totally taken over the tobacco market, virtually wiping Crisp out, and driving the man to a desperate act of revenge.

When first seen, Cooper is a determined man, not totally consumed with revenge, but as he gets more power, he becomes just as bad (possibly even worse) than Crisp ever was. He uses the two women in his life, particularly Bacall, whose obvious whorehouse is disguised as a boarding house occupied by her large amount of cousins. Neal and Bacall sadly do not share any scenes, but after being in the background for a quarter of the earlier part of the film, suddenly emerge in strong character studies. Neal, in particular, has a particularly triumphant juicy moment that reveals everything we know has been building up inside this spoiled beauty. Like "The Furies", Neal defies her powerful father, but the father/daughter relationship is obviously stronger than any love match could be. Fortunately, unlike "The Furies'" Wendell Corey, "Bright Leaf" (which is actually the name of the plantation that Cooper ends up in control of), Cooper is a stronger and more magnetic actor. With the real-life love affair between Cooper and Neal going on during this and the magnificent "The Fountainhead", they show more on-screen sparks than Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor had in most of their films.

The one sour note in this film is the presence of Jack Carson as the medicine man who ends up being Cooper's partner. He really seems to have no reason for being here other than to give box-office name to a film, that with Cooper, Neal, and Bacall really didn't need it. Donald Crisp, who played a wealthy steel mill owner of a sympathetic nature in "The Valley of Decision" just five years before this, gets to add some delicious ruthlessness. In comparing Crisp and Neal's relationship to "The Furies'" Walter Huston and Barbara Stanwyck, you will notice some similarities as I mentioned. Then, in smaller roles, are Elizabeth Patterson and Gladys George as Neal and Bacall's confidantes. They do respectable work as usual. This is modern Greek tragedy at its finest, and a rare chance to see Cooper playing a very unsympathetic character. The ending is very satisfactory, both a typical Hollywood finale and a moral lesson as well.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
cigarette anyone?
RanchoTuVu20 August 2015
Brant Royle (Gary Cooper) returns to what was once his father's tobacco farm before Major James Singleton (Donald Crisp) bought the father out in a foreclosure in his bid at concentrating all the prime tobacco land under his ownership. The film boils down to a contest between Crisp's Old South and Cooper's New South over the invention of the machine by Jeff Corey as John Barton that enables the mass manufacture of cigarettes, a direct challenge to the cigar industry, which occurs as the nineteenth century recedes into the twentieth. In on the initial investment in what would become the cigarette craze are Lauren Bacall as what appeared to be a higher class prostitute and Jack Carson as a traveling con-man. Patricia Neal as Singleton's only daughter is the most memorable part in the film which seems to want to come down on Cooper's side but turns him into a raving capitalist monopolist who always had a desire for Neal and another desire to get even with her father, which leads to pretty high dose of melodrama.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"I don't need you...I don't need anyone!"
planktonrules19 September 2016
The subject matter of this film, the tobacco industry, is a subject that makes this a bit dated. Back in 1950, it worked fine up on the big screen but today some might see these folks as mass murderers.

When the movie begins, Brant Royle (Gary Cooper) arrives back in his home town in North Carolina. He's been gone for many years and he's back to settle his uncle's estate. However, the local tobacco czar, the Major (Donald Crisp), has decided that Brant is not welcome and makes it very clear. But, around the same time, a smart inventor (Jeff Corey) approaches Brant with an automated cigarette rolling machine. Soon, Brant is rich and slowly the Major and his old money are being driven into the ground.

At the same time, one woman loves Brant and another completely cold and indifferent. So, naturally he ignores the nice woman (Lauren Bacall) and chases the nasty one...the Major's daughter (Patricia Neal). Why does he want this cold, conniving and annoying woman? Perhaps he wants to do to her what he metaphorically wants to do to the Major...who knows?

Eventually, Brant is able to get everything he wants...wealth, power and the girl. However, in the process he becomes a heartless, nasty jerk-face. He also manages to destroy the good will of his friends and is eventually left an empty man. What's next? See the film.

In many ways, this reminds me of previous films like "Citizen Kane", "Honky Tonk" and "Edward, My Son"...three films about guys who do anything in order to gain power and yet lose everything that's really important in the process. It's a timeless morality tale and the more you watch, the more you are just waiting to see the mighty fall due to their own awfulness and arrogance. Fortunately, it does end a bit differently...there isn't exactly a 'Rosebud' moment.

Overall, an interesting and well acted epic from Warner Brothers. Better than I expected...mostly because occasionally the script caught me by surprise...and in good ways.

By the way, Lauren Bacall's character is described as running a 'boarding house' but she clearly is a madame with a stable full of prostitutes when the film begins. I found these euphemisms a bit funny but understand that this was all done to comply with the rigid Production Code.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Leaves of a cigarette all rolled together.
thejcowboy2217 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
A turn of the Century twist with another Cooper, O'Neal romance. NOT!!! Don't let that stop you at the Gates of the Singleton Plantation. Gary Cooper,(Brandt Royle) the last of his families line,a wannabee businessman meets Northerner Mr. Barton with a cigarette rolling machine that could make them millions. Enter Bordello owner Sonia, (Lauren Bacall) who has feelings for Mr. Royle. Royle needs money to start up his cigarette business but Sonia knows all to well that she's being used as his love interest. This movie is not about the money or the success that it brings. This movie shows how old fashioned ways, traditions and family hatred get in the way of just about everything. Cooper does a fine job of transforming from a humble upstart to a drunken self absorbed entrepreneur. In my opinion Lauren Bacall could have played Patricia Neal's role but the casting dept had other ideas. The supporting cast does a fine job of holding the story together. Donald Crisp as the irascible old school Tobacco King and Jack Carson who starts out a down on his luck charlatan running a medicine show at the beginning of the story into a well polished boardroom businessman at movie's end. Does this movie teach us to love our superficial business world or should we search for our true passions instead? This question haunts the masses for centuries and this movie may or may not give us the answers but you will be entertained by an all star cast.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Romance and cigarettes...the cheapest habits in America
moonspinner5517 December 2010
Stultified costume drama from Warners, weakly directed by Michael Curtiz and uneasily cast. In the South during 1894, with the waning tobacco industry being led only by the cigar, a kicked-around tobacco farmer looking for respect teams with an eager inventor and a confidence man to make the cigarette the most readily-available form of smoking, open to anyone with a few cents. Playing loosely with the facts surrounding the real-life rivalry between tobacco tycoons Washington Duke and George McElwee, the film is undone by smoke-screen romance and a jumbled, stuffy narrative--not to mention by Gary Cooper's leaden performance in the lead. Cooper, consistently in a foul mood, sits atop his horse looking down at everyone, so why would disreputable bad-girl Lauren Bacall or Patricia Neal, the trouble-loving daughter of the Major--Cooper's rival--even give him the time of day? Jeff Corey trumps them all as Mr. Barton, the brains behind the scheme that makes everybody rich; Donald Crisp is also solid (as usual) as the Major. Technical aspects well up to par, but the characters are a dreary lot. ** from ****
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
the best of Cooper
btmarnold24 July 2006
I too have seen this movie many times & whenever possible. I have seen nearly every Gary Cooper movie. This is by far his best performance! The combination of star power, story and character interplay is flawless. If you have never seen a Cooper movie, see this one first. I'm also a huge fan of Donald Crisp. Again, a tremendous performance (though a slight step back of How Green Was My Valley). Never been a big Patricia Neal fan but, again, a great performance. Just another great job by Bacall. This is nearly in the EPIC category as movies go. Somewhat loosely based on the history of the tobacco industry/progression, it chronicles the rise in popularity & proliferation of cigarettes. This is truly a hidden gem that most movie fans are unaware of, but should be. And if that weren't enough, it was directed by the great Michael Curtiz.
19 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Big southern drama that falls flat
blanche-226 August 2010
"Bright Leaf" is a 1950 Warner Brothers southern extravaganza starring Gary Cooper, Lauren Bacall, Patricia Neal, and Jack Carson.

Gary Cooper is Brant Royle, who in 1894 returns to his southern town of Kingsmont, where his family was driven out of the tobacco market by Major Singleton (Donald Crisp). Royle has returned to get his revenge and reinstate the family name in the area. There are two women in his life: a madam, Sonia (Lauren Bacall) and Singleton's beautiful daughter Margaret (Patricia Neal).

With the help of Sonia, Royle buys into a machine that actually rolls cigarettes, which drives down the cost of producing them. He eventually takes over nearly the entire tobacco industry. But Royle won't be happy until he has brought Major Singleton to his knees and marries Margaret. But in his determination to get what he wants, he loses even more.

The moral of "Bright Leaf" is two-fold: Beware of what you want; and big talent won't really help a mediocre movie. The novel was probably inspired by "Gone with the Wind," but the quality of the story - in the film, at least - doesn't come close. There are two likable characters - Sonia and Carson's role of Chris. The rest of the main characters are odious.

Patricia Neal and Gary Cooper were in the midst of their passionate affair, but the relationship between the characters they play is pretty frosty. Given their romance, perhaps the Bacall role would have been better for Neal. Bacall took this job to finish off her contract with Warners. She's good, but her character isn't really fleshed out. Cooper is a great presence, but he has a difficult job because the character is not sympathetic. Also, I suspect that at age 50, the character was supposed to be younger. Neal is beautiful, and her performance has some real bite.

All in all, not up to the talents on screen.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"Why don't you stop acting like a woman?"
utgard1425 August 2014
Southern melodrama that has Gary Cooper seeking revenge on tobacco plantation owner Donald Crisp, who ran his family out of town years before. Tawdry stuff with ample amounts of unintended comedy, mostly from the poor Southern accents. Last film from great cinematographer Karl Freund. After this he would work strictly in television for the rest of his career. It's a good looking movie, if nothing else. Also the last movie on Lauren Bacall's contract with Warner Bros., where she had been since her debut. She's the best part of this. Coop is fine, I guess. Patricia Neal, an actress I've never fully gotten the appeal of, is awful here. Bacall out and Neal in surely was a sign of the times at Warner Bros. and pretty much the industry as a whole. The movie stars they were making from this point on just weren't as glamorous as before. Not a lot of likable characters in this one. Aside from Bacall, there's Jack Carson. Everybody else is a villain or villain-approximate.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Drawn out and boring
Mikel38 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Yes, this movie has some good actors and one of the best directors ever. However it still doesn't work for me. It drags (no cigarette pun intended) on and on. Finally I was left with the feeling I had just wasted a good hour and a half. Lauren Bacall is beautiful as always but seems out of place here. And it's hard to believe any sane man would shun her for Neal. Coop at 49 is way to old to be playing the young maverick he is supposed to be. Patricia Neal is young and wide eyed but not nearly as attractive as Bacall whom we are expected to believe is second best. The other actors are also good, but sadly they don't have much to work with. This film is predictable from the start. The ending is telegraphed well in advance and contains no surprises. It's one of those films where nobody gets the girl or the guy.

I find it hard to believe it's been rated here as highly as it is. If you love Coop or any of the other fine actors in this there are countless better films to see them in.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pretty good average film
vincentlynch-moonoi24 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I want to begin by countering a few comments in other reviews: 1. That Gary Cooper is too old for the part. Really? Why? Mature people don't have a romantic life (and BTW, it's mentioned that he's been away a long time)? 49 is too old to become a businessman? In reality, it's more likely a mature man who has learned some lessons in life will see how to begin a business. And, he needs to be a son's age to Singleton (Donald Crisp). Nope. Age works fine here.

2. That this film is inspired by "Gone With The Wind". Why? Because it takes place in the South (30-some years after the war)? Because in one line the Civil War is mentioned? This film could have just as easily taken place in New England where tobacco was also grown, and that would have had nothing to do with GWTW. Any film that has anything remotely to do with the Civil War is not related to GWTW. And later in the film it is 1900.

3. One reviewer said "The Fountainhead" (Cooper's and Neal's previous film pairing) was unwatchable. Really? Yes, it failed at the box office. But critics have taken a new look at the film, and many have given it rather positive reviews. On Rotten Tomatoes, that film gets an 83% rating, which is darned good.

Let's face it...some of the negativity about this film is because it is about tobacco. Times have changed. When this film came out, smoking was quite popular, cigarette commercials were about to be the major sponsors of many television shows, and no one thought much of anything about smoking being dangerous to health.

Are there problems with the plot here? I don't really think so. It's rather simple, really. A man whose father was defeated by the local big shot comes back and -- for several reasons -- goes up against the local (and now old) big shot. Not that uncommon a concept. He romances the old man's daughter, making the old man hate him even more. Rather logical, and sets up a second conflict for the main characters. Meanwhile he can't stay away from a not so upright woman in the town, but can't be serious about her, either. Pretty common behavior. And it all comes down to revenge upon revenge, a jilted lover, and suicide.

Now in terms of the acting, let's start with Cooper. Cooper pretty much plays Cooper. Someone suggested Kirk Douglas could have played the role better. Actually, I agree. But then it would have been a very different movie, even if everything else had remained the same. Cooper does fine here, and Cooper does what Cooper always did.

Lauren Bacall was fine here, also, and I say that as a person who is not a fan. Her role as a hard-as-nails madam turned wealthy stock holder is quite tasty. It's Patricia Neal that seemed quite out of place to me...until the end...when we see what her character is really all about.

In terms of Jack Carson, he plays the best friend who can't get the girl. It works. Donald Crisp is perfect (wasn't he always?) as the old "major" from another era who is fighting the younger generation.

Don't get me wrong. It's not a "great" film. Pretty standard, in fact. But good and dependable entertainment...providing you stop seeing things that aren't there. And frankly, to those who dislike the film, frankly I don't give...oops, back to GWTW.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An Uncompelling Story of Sad Characters
atlasmb16 August 2015
Gary Cooper and Patricia Neal starred in 1949's "The Fountainhead", an adaptation of Ayn Rand's novel about an architect who refused to sacrifice his integrity or principles. A year later, the same two starred in this film, "Bright Leaf", a period piece in which Cooper plays a damaged man who becomes successful in the tobacco industry. In "The Fountainhead", Cooper is a strong man of principle, but he is probably the weakest part of that film, perhaps because he did not understand the film (as he himself admitted), perhaps because the role did not suit him. I think Cooper better understood his role in "Bright Leaf". His character, Brant Royle, feels more authentic. But Royle is not a man of principle. He is a caricature--the uncaring, destructive capitalist. He is a man with a chip on his shoulder and as far from a man of principle as one can get.

"Bright Leaf" actually has more in common with the movie "Giant", in which Rock Hudson and James Dean play warring oilmen. But "Giant' is a much better film. Cooper, like Hudson, is headstrong. And Dean's character is like Brant Royle--a man with a chip on his shoulder, who only wants payback for perceived slights. But "Giant" is a bright and shining production, where "Bright Leaf" is a dingy film of sordid intents.

There is a bright moment in "Bright Leaf"--near the end of the film, when Royle discovers the true intentions of his wife, Margaret. In that scene, Patricia Neal virtually glows as she burns with the intensity of her revealed emotions.

But otherwise, this film is only as compelling as a grudge match between two self-absorbed and boring factions. It's not the director's fault; the writing defines these characters and drives them. It's not a horrible film, but it falls short of "The Fountainhead", which--even with the miscasting of Cooper--contains a striking story of principles.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Vengeance valley
jhkp16 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Bright Leaf is a relatively absorbing story of a man who comes home to tobacco country in the late 1800s and goes into the cigarette manufacturing business.

Gary Cooper plays that man, Brant Royle, whose raison d'etre is to get back at a tobacco tycoon who dispossessed his family years before. Coop is really not the type for this sort of role. He plays it well enough, but it's easy to picture other actors who were much more suited to it.

Royle is involved with two women, a tobacco heiress who's a bit sadomasochistic (Patricia Neal), and a down to earth lady of the evening (Lauren Bacall, in her last film under her original Warner contract). There's a business partner he isn't very good to (Jack Carson), the father-in-law who hates him for various reasons (Donald Crisp), and the smart Northerner whose cigarette-making machine sets Brant up in business (Jeff Corey). Elizabeth Patterson (as Neal's Aunt Tabby) and Gladys George are in it too.

Bright Leaf manages to hold the interest, but it's something of a potboiler. There's something tired about it (maybe it's Cooper. He was 50-ish and still playing a youngish man). It's not the finest hour of anyone in the cast (though Crisp is impressive). Nonetheless, director Michael Curtiz does a lot with the material. The atmosphere is well done. The action and movement, the use of bit players, as well as extras, is the work of a highly talented craftsman. Watch closely as various scenes unfold (Cooper riding into the town - Kingsmont - for the first time, for example - with all the activity swirling around him). It's incredibly fine work.

The production values - cinematography (Karl Freund), costumes, sets, music (Victor Young) are top of the line.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Tobacco Industry Early On
gavin69427 June 2013
In 1894, Brant Royle (Gary Cooper) shocks the aristocratic tobacco growers of Kingsmont by planning to mass-produce cigarettes.

I found the comments from the old woman that "everybody's doing it" and that smoking is "very fashionable" rather humorous. I feel that in 1950, this sort of sentiment could be taken seriously rather than as the anti-smoking rhetoric it became later.

Overall, the film did not hold my interest. This was more my fault than the fault of the film, because there is nothing bad about Michael Curtiz's directing or Gary Cooper's acting. Perhaps someday I shall give it another try. I was hoping to see some ground-breaking cinematography from Karl Freund, but that simply did not happen.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Apparently this did not resonate with post war audiences...
AlsExGal29 April 2023
... and fortunately I am not a post-war audience because I liked it a great deal.

It's got a pretty familiar outline among melodramas - a man run out of town (Gary Cooper as Brant Royale) by the local king of tobacco Major James Singleton (Donald Crisp), decides to get revenge by backing the development of a cigarette manufacturing machine and grinding Singleton to financial dust. All the while he is entranced by Singleton's daughter Margaret (Patricia Neal), a bloodless creature, while ignoring the girl who has loved him all along, the true blue Sonia (Lauren Bacall).

Its charm is in its casting. Never has Gary Cooper played somebody so unlikeable and so far from the heroic characters he typically played such as Alvin York and Will Kane - the latter character being one he hadn't even portrayed yet. Lauren Bacall balked at playing both the proprietor of a bawdy house AND having a southern accent. The screenwriters thus made her Polish, I guess to explain her rather mild New York accent in a North Carolina setting???

Patricial Neal is a standout. Throughout the piece she moves and stands stiffly, appearing as a mannequin or a music box dancer, only smiling - also stiffly - when she can think of some kind of trouble she can cause. Thus even in movement she is in sharp contrast to straight shooter Sonia. Finally there is Jack Carson - he's a patent medicine salesman who Brant cavalierly makes a partner at the beginning of his entreprises, and he turns out to be a loyal friend. This is something I've noticed about director Michael Curtiz - He certainly knew how to give good roles to and get good performances out of Warner Brothers contract player Jack Carson.

I'd recommend this one. I think it has redeemed itself over time from being the "doomed masterpiece" it was once called.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good movie but depressing
deexsocalygal10 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The movie is about a poor man who idolizes the rich family in town. All he wants is to have a house like theirs & to marry the rich man's daughter. He spends his entire life making a living off tobacco in such a way that ruins the rich man's life. After that to add worse to wear he marries his daughter. He's a horrible person. There's nothing to like about him. The story is very very depressing watching him gain wealth by hurting & ruining other people.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Dismal story, dismal conflicts, unappealing characters...
Doylenf3 April 2013
Surprised I am that some reviewers here really liked this overwrought melodrama about the tobacco industry and one man's rise to power because he has the vision to see how cigarettes could come from machines.

Gary Cooper has the most unsympathetic role of his career as a stormy man caught between conflicted love with two women--Patricia Neal, headstrong and rich, and Lauren Bacall, the madam of a brothel. There's a suggestion of GWTW in these characters, but too much of the dialog resorts to confrontational moments that are never resolved.

Most of the hatred comes from Patricia Neal's dad, Donald Crisp, who from the very start of the film wishes Gary Cooper would drop dead. It takes up too much of the film with the love/hate relationships between Cooper, Neal and Bacall getting the most footage.

But in the end, with these unsympathetic characters chewing up the scenery with all their vitriol, the overall feeling is a waste of time. None of the relationships evolve smoothly, not even at the conclusion.

Summing up: No wonder the film is so little known today. The saving grace is an interesting score by Victor Young.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Daddy's girl financially ruins husband she blames for her father's suicide
weezeralfalfa11 July 2018
Warning: Spoilers
In 1950, when this film was released, tobacco smoking, mainly involving cigarettes, was considered a necessity by the majority of American men, and minority of women. The advantages were considered to trump various disadvantages, including increasing evidence of significant health risks, such as lung cancer. Thus, the men responsible for inventing a machine that rolled and packaged cigarettes were considered heroes for much reducing the cost of cigarettes. That's what this film is about. Ironically, Patricia Neal, one of the stars would die of lung cancer, and Gary Cooper, another star, would die at the relatively young age of 60 from a cancer that eventually went to his lungs. Many of the movie stars of this era died prematurely of lung cancer, or other maladies, in which smoking was later proven to be a significant risk factor......Revenge is the primary motivation for much of the action. We have Brant Royle's(Gary Cooper) strong motivation to eventually bring local tobacco magnet Major Singleton to his knees for running Brant's family out of the area some years go. Now , Brant returns, ostensibly to settle his uncle's estate, but also with the mind to ruin Singleton, and marry his daughter. He hopes to accomplish this by commercializing a machine that rolls tobacco into cigarettes and packages them, thus making cigarettes much cheaper than the cigars that Singleton champions. After Brant's success, Singleton wants to extract revenge by challenging Brant in a formal duel. Brant declines, citing laws that prohibit such duels, and stating that they are a waste of human life. Singleton calls him a yellow-bellied coward, but Brant won't change his mind. Singleton threatens that he will shoot Brant , in any case. And, he does, but a compromise shot that only wounds Brant. He then retires to his buggy and shoots himself. In effect, Brant won the duel, completing his revenge against Singleton.,,......John Barton(Jeff Corey),who invented the cigarette machine, extracted revenge for Brant's eventual belittling of his role in the company, going to Detroit to take part in the automobile revolution......Most shockingly, Singleton's daughter, Margaret, accepted Brant's marriage proposal mainly to extract revenge for bankrupting her family and being the cause of her father's suicide. She did this by engineering anti-monopoly lawsuits, and by selling the many shares of the company that Brant had entrusted her with. ...... There's the romantic triangle between Margaret, Brant, and Sonia(Lauren Bacall). Sonia was a more lovable person than the aristocratic Margaret. She loaned Brant the money to start his business. However, she suffered the indignity of being the madame of a bordello, disguised as a rooming house. Brant made the wrong choice of social position over love. After Margaret left him, he tried to return to Sonia, but she said that all the things she used to love about him had vanished.......I question why Barton resorted to someone like Brant , with no capital of his own, to commercialize his machine? Surely, there were plenty of wealthy men who could see the financial gain. Also, Brant's choice of con-man Chris Malley(Jack Carson) as a business partner is curious. Chris was a mere patent medicine peddler when Brant met him. He became rather skilled in running parts off the company.......I much enjoyed this obscure gem, shown on the TCM channel........Note that Cooper and Neal had also stared in a film the previous year, and had an ongoing affair......Director Michael Curtiz also had directed the previous acclaimed "Mildred Pierce", the screenplay of which has many similarities to this film.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
solid revenge tragedy
SnoopyStyle10 July 2018
It's 1894. Brant Royle (Gary Cooper) has returned to Kingsmont seeking revenge. His late father's tobacco business was destroyed by Maj. James Singleton (Donald Crisp). Brant encounters Margaret Jane Singleton (Patricia Neal). Margaret mischievously stirs up trouble with her protective father leading a confrontation with Brant. Connecticut Yankee John Barton is in town trying to sell his plans for a cigarette-making machine. Brant doesn't have the money but with his former lover madam Sonia Kovac (Lauren Bacall), he hopes to make the machine to drive Singleton out of business.

This is a nice love triangle. They have good conflicts which heat up their relationships. Cooper's nice guy persona allows his revenge to be sweetened. Otherwise, this could have been too bitter for the general public. It allows one to stay with him even as he is corrupted by greed and power. He takes a dark turn and it's great. This is a tragedy of epic Grecian nature. Brant's ending is poetic. The ending for Malley and Sonia should be that they join up with Barton starting up an automobile company in Detroit. Also, Neal and Bacall may be better off switching their roles. Bacall is a perfect femme fatale and Neal is naturally grounded. It's a bit of against type casting. Overall, this is solid tragedy done well.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Light 'Em if you got 'em..but now there's a warning label..
Xjayhawker2 April 2013
This is one of those should I watch this or not? Much has been made of the score..trust me..it's OK..but it does'nt soar or enrich the movie in any way..and what may be a good thing..there are large portions which are left alone..with only dialog to drive it..this is a movie where you have to take the good with the bad to get through it..like cough medicine..the star here is Gary cooper who does a good turn in this as a sleep walker..I do not know how he envisioned playing this role, , but he shows very little emotion..that's not acting..that's just taking up space on a stage..likewise Patricia Neal ..if only a little less so..the good? Lauren Bacall and Jack Carson who manage to steal their parts while on screen..Donald Crisp, as Patricia Neal's father..steady..as always in everything he's in..James Griffith as a southern book keeper working for Cooper plays a part unlike anything else he's ever done..usually someone on the dark side..other reviews have given you plot..I'm just giving performance reviews..a bit talky and slow..the direction by Michael Curtiz of Errol Flynn's films seems off his game..otherwise, why would it drag? The story..one that's been told a thousand times over ..revenge and mis-placed desire..there's no love lost here..it's revenge and more revenge ..and a climax you can see coming ..an ending that leaves you a little empty..another Cooper/Neal pairing from an earlier talky film..The Fountainhead..another unwatchable outing..Sorry..the good with the bad..COOP..how could you?
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed