When You Read This Letter (1953) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A French film that deals with rape...long before Hollywood would approach the topic.
planktonrules18 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I adore most of the films of writer/director Jean-Pierre Melville and consider him among the best, though often ignored, French directors. I've seen most of his films, many of which are gangster stories...and was thrilled that he was featured on the Criterion Channel. This gave me a chance to see the three films he made that I have not yet seen...none of which are gangster films.

When "Quand Tu Liras Cette Lettre" begins, a woman working towards becoming a full-fledged nun learns that her parents were killed and she needs to return home to care for her younger sister and the family business. She doesn't want to go, but knows she must. Upon her return to Cannes, the film introduces several characters that seem to have little to do with the Sisters....one of them is a vile lowlife who eventually rapes the younger sister. Her reaction is to write a suicide letter and drown herself. What's next? See the film.

The film is very brave for dealing with rape and sexuality....and in 1953, Hollywood would never have considered such a story. It is disappointing and very strange how this plays out in the movie. Part of this undoubtedly because it was1953 and rape was not treated the same way by society and the courts back in the day. See the film and see what I mean.

So is this any good? Well, the acting is very good...as is the direction. As for the story, there are some big surprises...particularly the ending. A strange film in so many ways...and with an ending that will have you guessing as to what exactly occurred.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Everyone Is A Psychopath Except Grandma and Grandpa, And Where Did They Get All That Gold?
boblipton9 September 2019
Novitiate Juliette Gréco is summoned from the nunnery when her parents are killed in a car crash. If she does not return to the stationery store and run it, her sister, Irene Galter will go to the grandparents' farm and the store will be sold. So she bows her head and accepts this as the will of G*d, or at least the scenarist. At the same time, Philippe Lemaire, mechanic, boxer, seducer of anything with hair longer than his, and budding socioopath, begins carrying on an affair with rich Yvonne Sanson, looking forward to enjoying her employment back in Brussels. He kills her by accident, trying to slaughter his accomplice, but the judge can't talk himself into having him arrested. No need! Here comes Miss Gréco, telling him that since he raped Miss Galter, who tried to commit suicide but failed, he is going to propose to her in front of their grandparents, and if ever she even suspects he doesn't love her, here's the gun to prove her sister does. And of course, he confesses he's actually in love with Miss Gréco, and insists she's in love with him, because reasons.

Got that? I was at the end of the movie and still didn't know who felt what about whom. Director Jean-Pierre Melville has Miss Gréco as frozen-faced as someone who's just had a botox injection. It's beautifully shot on the Riviera, and Miss Sanson drives an enormous Cadillac one-seat convertible, courtesy of what we are told is a psychopathic husband. Could Melville, working from some one else's script for whatever reason he had (money?) just hate everyone because he's too cool for all this?

Maybe. But then, someone would have to act sincere.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
When you read this letter....
dbdumonteil31 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This title is tailor made for a melodrama,which "Quand Tu Liras Cette Lettre" is ,no more,no less.No matter if it's JP Melville's third movie ,even if the precedent user,a connoisseur of the French cinema could find some of the director's permanent features.As for myself,I did not find any but I must confess Melville is not my cup of tea.

First thing to bear in mind is that the two leads,Philippe Lemaire and Juliette Greco,got married the very year of Melville's "oeuvre" ,the marriage only lasted three years.But seeing them together is pretty odd,considering the chanteuse's -for Greco was first a singer- role:she is thoroughly cast against type ,this actress known for a her parts of good time gals or delinquents -her real debut was Duvivier's "Au Royaume Des Cieux",Cocteau's "Orphée" does not count -.Another extraordinary thing for the audience of 1953 -who probably knew all about the two leads' relationship-is that it takes one hour (you read well) before they share a scene!And when they finally "meet" ,it's not what the audience is expecting.As Kinsayder wrote it,Greco uses an impassible almost frightening Bressonesque delivery and easily steals the show ,if there is something to steal.The users who saw Melville's "Leon Morin Pretre" will notice the similitude between Greco's and Emmanuelle Riva's acting in the 1961 effort.Lemaire plays a mechanic and a gigolo ,but his character is too underwritten to suggest the "tormented soul" Therese commends to God .Boyish Daniel Cauchy,who would be Paulo in "Bob Le Flambeur" ,the follow-up ,appears as a bellboy (who's also a crook).

A desultory script and a story close to Harlequin romance do not amount to much .Only Greco's portrayal in the second part is worth the price of admission;it's much more stunning if you've seen the actress in her other parts ("The roots of Heaven", " The Sun also rises" ,"Au Royaume Des Cieux","Maléfices" and the excellent made-for-TV "Belphégor") As for Philippe Lemaire ,his career was tragic:in the sixties ,he was only offered lousy supporting parts in Bernard Borderie's movies ("Angélique" and "Pardaillan" );by the eighties ,he had stopped playing.His come back in a small part in "Arsene Lupin " circa 2004 was short-lived:the same year,he threw himself under the metro (subway).
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting melodrama from Melville's early career
kinsayder10 November 2005
Max Trivet is a garage mechanic, boxer, thief and local gigolo. When his seduction of a young shop girl turns to rape, the girl's sister Thérèse, an ex-nun, plans her revenge. However, it appears that even the austere Thérèse may not be immune to his charms...

Many of the iconic Melville elements are present already in this early film: the big American cars, the scenes with night club dancers rehearsing their act, the long raincoat and hat which Max wears... The plot is more melodramatic than we would expect from the director's later work, but Melville complicates this with ambiguities that add considerably to the interest of the story: Max is portrayed as cruel and cynical, yet also sympathetic; while Thérèse, played by the singer Juliette Greco, is so cold and impassive it is hard to guess, even at the end of the film, what her feelings and intentions have been towards Max.

The use of music is very interesting in this movie, each of the main characters being given not just their own theme but their own instrument: an accordion for Max, a church organ for Thérèse, a harpsichord for her sister Denise, and a piano for the married woman whom Max seduces. There is some striking cinematography, too, notably in the scene on the beach at night, with Thérèse and Max appearing as silhouettes against the turbulent sea.
23 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Opening the letter.
morrison-dylan-fan23 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Listening to Bey Logan's audio commentary for John Woo's The Killer,I was intrigued to find out that Woo had been inspired by a director called Jean-Pierre Melville.Talking to a DVD seller,I found out that he had recently tracked down a near-forgotten Melville title,which led to me getting ready to open the letter.

The plot:

Learning of her mum and dads sudden death, Thérèse Voise decides to leave the security of the nunnery behind,so that she can take care of her young sister:Denise.With having spent a large part of her life in the church, Thérèse at first struggles to feel comfortable in society,until Denise gives Thérèse to run the family's small business.As the Voise's start to pick up the pieces in their lives,a local con artist called Max Trivet sets his sights on him and a friend conning a wealthy women out of her life savings.Riding on his bike to the women one day,Trivet runs into Denise.Despite only getting the chance to talk to Denise for a brief moment,Trivet decides that he must have Denise,and that he will get her in any way possible,even if it is against her will.

View on the film:

Initially keeping Max Trivet and Thérèse Voise's threads separate,the screenplay by Jacques Deval (who also co-stars) gradually crosses them over,and creates a sweeping melodrama with an arch Film Noir heart.Allowing the viewer to get taken in by the rogue charms of Trivet,Deval strikes the audience with a vicious attack,as Deval uses the rape of Denise to show the pitch-black heart at the centre of Trivet,and to also decay Denise & Thérèse sweeping melodrama life.Whilst the response to Denise rape is extremely disturbing, (if Thérèse had phoned the police,the second half would have been wrapped up in 5 minutes!)Deval gets the bleak heart of Trivet to slowly seep into the purity of Thérèse,which leads to and Thérèse,Denise and Trivet each destroying each other,emotionally and physically.

Giving Thérèse a saintly aura,director Jean-Pierre Melville and cinematographer Henri Alekan skilfully use depth of field to show the wall of safety which Thérèse believes she has built,which Meliville dissects with a brooding mood which is emphasised by Bernard Peiffer tingling score.Wrapping the audience round the devilish charms of Trivet,Melville and Alekan give Trivet's con act a slick,glossy appearance,which along with revealing the decadent society that Trivet creeps around in,also acts as a contrast to the vast,deep scope of sorrow in Denise and Thérèse's lives.

Carrying Thérèse anxiety of leaving the comfort of the church behind,the ravishing Juliette Gréco gives an extraordinary performance,as Gréco shows Thérèse purity to crack,when Thérèse starts to find Trivet alluring,but also sickened by what lays inside him.Lighting up the movie, Philippe Lemaire (who tragically killed himself in 2004) gives a tremendous performance as Max Trivet,with Lemaire showing a delicate skill in balancing Trivet playful, con artist behaviour,with the decayed,rotten heart buried deep within Trivet,which leads to this being a letter which you won't forget to open.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sister Nun
davidmvining25 April 2022
This seems to be one of the forgotten Melville films. As far as I can tell it has never had an American home video release, and it's unavailable on any streaming platform in the United States. I had to purchase a copy from France to get my hands on it. It's unfortunate, too, because this feels like the first Melville film. He'd made two films beforehand, but those were the works of almost any talented young French filmmaker from the era, not the work of the man who made Le Cercle Rouge or Le Samourai. Many of the motifs and visual markers of a Melville film are here in some of their earliest forms (the club set is straight out of Le Cercle Rouge). It's also Melville's first film that feels open and unconfined, unconstrained by a tiny budget, and is his most complex narrative to date. This is an accomplished work that more fans of the filmmaker should see.

A novitiate at a convent, Therese (Juliette Greco), is given the news of her parents' death in a car accident. She had entered the convent primarily as a way to secure her younger sister's dowry of the stationary shop her parents ran in Cannes, ensuring that it all went to her so that she could marry well. With their parents dead, Therese decides to leave the convent and manage the shop for her sister, Denise (Irene Galter), who is still a minor. At the same time, a young mechanic and boxer, Max (Philippe Lemaire), is a wayward soul who picks up women through his job and displaying his anatomy while boxing. Into his net comes Irene (Yvonne Sanson), a woman married to a wealthy madman (as she puts it), alone in Cannes and obviously attracted to the young boxer.

The two narratives coexist without much interaction for a while. Therese manages the shop and Denise, treating her more like her own child than sister. Max steadily seduces Irene until she seems to reject him, leading him to work with Biquet (Daniel Cauchy), a bellhop in the hotel, to sneak into her room to steal her jewels. When she wakes up during the robbery, Max dominates her and they enter a sexual relationship where she keeps him as her chauffeur. At the same time, Max runs into the pretty Denise on the street, rather aggressively hitting on her but coming up unsuccessful.

Things turn when Therese sends Denise on a series of errands, one of which is to go to Irene's hotel room and collect payment for some stationary they had sold her. Irene is not there, but Max is there, alone. The interaction goes from playful to violent, ending with Max raping Denise, leading Denise to write a letter to her sister with only vague references to what has happened (the opening line being source of the film's title) and a suicide attempt. Therese figures out what happened, and the second half of the film is a battle of wills between Therese and Max.

When Denise finally tells Therese what actually happened, she brings Max to the house and forces him to propose to her. This hard woman, almost a nun who seemed so sheltered from the world in her convent, completely dominates Max, forcing him into right action, but Max isn't a big fan of right action. He begins with what may be a fiction of professing his love to Therese in order to get under his skin, but the more time goes on, the more he seems convinced of the idea that he does love her. When the girls' grandparents give the engaged couple one hundred gold sols, Max swipes it but waits for Therese to follow, which she does.

The confrontation between the two on the beaches of Cannes is two things happening at once, and it's fascinating to watch. Being outside of the characters' heads (the first time in a Melville film that there is no voiceover), we watch these two speak but can't be sure if either of them are telling the truth. Max could have just run off with the money to join Biquet, who has run off to Morocco, but he did wait for Therese, stealing her passport in the process to, as he says, ensure that she won't accidentally forget it because he is convinced that she loves him too. She, locked in his arms like a lover, speaks plainly about how he cannot love and that she wishes years of torment upon him before God forgives him and brings Max into His grace. The finale is Max waiting at a nothing little station between Cannes and Marseilles for Therese after Therese sends Denise to their grandparents, shutting down the store, and getting on the train to Marseilles. Tension mounts as we are unsure of what happens, but Therese remains true to herself.

I've really enjoyed Melville's first two films, but this is something special. The host of characters, all going in their own directions for the first half of the film, never feels out of control. He's tightly in control of the narrative and the characters' movements within it. When things come together, it never feels arbitrary or artificial, the ground having been laid so strongly beforehand. On top of that, I feel like this is Melville's most accomplished film visually up to this point. La Silence de la Mer was mostly filmed adeptly in a small room, never flashy but also limited by the small space in which everything was set. Les Enfants Terribles expanded the visual scope a fair bit, especially in the mansion. However, in Quand tu liras cette letter, there's a visual confidence in terms of shot composition that feels like Melville becoming far more confident of his abilities, intentionally placing characters at specific points in the frame for subtextual and aesthetic reasons. It's a good looking picture, is what I'm saying.

Jean-Pierre Melville was steadily coming into his own artistically as he made his first few films, and this was the film that gave him enough financial success to be able to start his own small studio in Paris. That it's been all but forgotten in his filmography is a bit of a shame. I blame Gaumont for not really providing any American home video distribution. Surely someone like Kino would love to put this thing on disc. Not that I care, I have the French release and it's pretty.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Powerful story, full of atmosphere
Charlot4727 May 2012
Enjoyably melded here are two staples of 1940s cinema, the melodrama and the noir.

Not particularly complex, the characters are either good or evil. Max (Philippe Lemaire) and all the people he mixes with, even the unfortunate rich Irène (Yvonne Sanson) who he robs and murders, are bad. While the Voise family of big sister Thérèse (Juliette Gréco), little sister Denise (Irène Galter), and the grandparents are all virtuous.

Noir elements include dream logic, fateful encounters, a high sexual charge, dramatic irony, mixed motives, violence and death. Low life individuals hustle each other in the underworld of Cannes, shot in expressionist photography full of symbolism to evocative music.

There is even an inverted femme fatale in Thérèse. Though leaving her convent on the sudden death of her parents to take over the family shop and look after Denise, she is still a nun at heart. Max, forcibly engaged to Denise after raping her, sees the fierce black-clad Thérèse as a much greater prize. She, all woman despite her outward ferocity, cannot help being susceptible to his immense charm (the two actors were lovers in real life) but sublimates her feelings into a desire to save his lost soul. In a highly emblematic scene, when Max is burning some shop rubbish in the courtyard at night, her clothes catch fire and he smothers the flames by rolling her on the ground, baring her midriff. That, however, is as close as he ever gets to rolling her around with even less on.

A powerful story, full of atmosphere, told with twists and tension and well worth the 100 minutes to watch.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed