Early Spring (1956) Poster

(1956)

User Reviews

Review this title
20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Ozu's negative take on the "corporatization" of private life
kerpan18 May 2003
Soshun aka Early Spring (Yasujiro OZU, 1956)

This was made after a more than two-year gap following his preceding film, "Tokyo Story" (during which period he spent a lot of time working on a film that was to be directed by Kinuyo Tanaka -- which had become bogged down by all sorts of business politics). Ozu re-visits the world of the young "salaryman" for the first time since the 30s -- and doesn't particularly like what he finds. Ozu looks at the corrosive impact of the transition to a corporation-centered existence on white collar working men.

Shoji Sugiyama (Ryo IKEBE) and Masako (Ckikage AWASHIMA) have been married around 7 or 8 years, but are childless (their only son having died several years earlier). Shoji has shifted his focus to his career and pretty much disregards his wife (or at least takes her very much for granted). After Shoji becomes involved in dalliance with a co-worker, Chiyo, better known as "Goldfish" (Keiko Kishi), Masako decides she's had enough...

This film is one of Ozu's most earnest. While there are some touches of humor (for instance, Shoji's reunion with his army buddies, after which he is followed home by two of them), the overall tone is serious. Kumeko Urabe provides some earthy practicality as Masako's mother (now a noodle shop vendor -- unclear what she did prior to her husband's death years before) and Chishu Ryu (as Shoji's mentor, in business exile in the boondocks -- but not entirely regretting it) provides quasi-paternal guidance.

This film teaches a message Japan largely ignored, business relationships are not an adequate substitute for family ties. With the recent recognition (in Japan) of the phenomenon of "death by overwork", the message of the film might be considered especially timely.
32 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Early Spring (1956)
SnakesOnAnAfricanPlain12 December 2011
Early Spring came between Ozu's incredible masterpieces Tokyo Story and Tokyo Twilight. No surprise then, that it kind of falls flat in places. It's by no means a bad film, but it adds a bit too much complexity, making the focus confusing at points. The film starts as a comment on the salary man. The opening scenes are both funny and sad, as we see the empty streets of Japan gradually fill with men and women in white shirts. They all come together at the subway station, and then we see two men in an office building looking down at the madness below. These are the kind of details one must love about Ozu. It is all represented there on the screen, and without many words we know what is going on. As the film continues we see the workers on their breaks and finally arranging a weekend trip. On this trip is where the real story begins. A young married man named Shoji is attracted to a young girl nicknamed "Goldfish". They are unable to hide their attraction, as their colleagues start spreading rumors and noticing the smiles between the two. Eventually they give into their temptation. It's the effects after this betrayal that are the key focus. The young girl is surprised that she develops emotions, while Shoji is instantly ashamed of himself. His guilt soon grows, and he avoids his wife. Because of this his wife begins to suspect he is cheating on her. The film shows how destructive guilt can be. As Shoji tries to keep his mind off the affair, he ends up forgetting the anniversary of his son's death. The film is too long for its material. There simply isn't enough going on in the middle, and too much at the beginning and end. What it does offer is Ozu's look at relationships without the arrangement of a marriage. Instead, this shows the hard work and commitment a marriage takes. A theme that was handled a lot more competently and economically in his next feature.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Ten Years After World War II, Modern Japanese Life Takes Shape
brendastern20 April 2008
"Early Spring" is one of the lesser-known Ozu films, but it is worth watching to complete his view of post-war Japan, and the complexities of returning to daily life. When "Early Spring" was released, Japan was two years into its independence from American occupying forces. Tokyo and other major cities were rebuilding. Lives were getting back to some kind of order -- and with that, the challenges of dealing with a group think society also were present.

The relationships in this movie show the influence traditional Japan still held on modern life. The closeness of the wife and her mother; the courtesy that the husband shows the mother in law, even as he simply drops his clothes to the floor for his wife to pick up; the traditional house with few conveniences. For anyone interested in Japanese cuisine, the preparation of oden (a kind of winter stew) is a textbook lesson, but it also weaves in with the plot.

"Early Spring" lacks the humor and grace of "Early Summer" and it is not as masterful as "Tokyo Story" but it offers an interesting look at the lives of the young salarymen and office girls, at a time when Japan's post-war culture was solidifying. It would be interesting to see a remake, because Japanese life has changed, and yet has remained much the same.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Early Spring: The Promise of Happiness
palmiro8 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Early spring is a time to renew one's hopes, to believe once again that happiness is possible. Sometimes that hope takes the form of betrayal: an extra-marital affair may appear to be the answer to a life that is insufferably routinized and devoid of the thrill of adventure. The "salaryman" (in the US: "white-collar worker") is someone especially vulnerable: he enters the corporation filled with hope for his future, but, we are told, he soon discovers only disillusionment and "dissatisfaction" (a word that surfaces throughout the film). There are, of course, the blandishments of Japan's new consumer society: Note the presence of posters advertising foreign destinations throughout the film (Paris, Colombia, Finland); and note the reference to the withering of the plum trees (Japan's own) on a rich man's estate while bouganvilleas (a foreign import) thrive. But there's little to indicate that Ozu thinks these foreign bagatelles can bring happiness. Indeed, the film has a spareness about it, reflecting a world that has yet to become hopelessly cluttered with objects, which is, as we know too well, the other (the American) solution to dissatisfaction and disillusionment in human relationships and work. Each character tries to shape a life of work and relationships into something satisfying, but there's no simple formula to be found here for happiness in the modern world. There is only the dignity (or lack of dignity) of each individual in their attempt to find happiness. Ozu has brought to life characters who never gush in emotion, who don't even touch one another in the most intimate of reunions (the final husband and wife scene), and whose very restraint makes us feel all the more strongly about them. We feel honored to have shared a part of their lives.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lacking The Director's Usual Quiet Magic, But Will Worthwhile
museumofdave3 March 2013
I consider Yasujiro Ozu one of the worlds most significant and distinctive directors, a man who eschews false dazzle in favor of examining the human condition, human relationships; most of his films are quietly incisive portraits of people coming to conclusions and making decisions which will permanently affect their lives. Ozu imparts subtlety to his characters, his sense of time and place are impeccable, and his respect for his characters unparalleled. All of that said, I think that Early Spring is one of his least effective--one easily sees the point he makes about corporate behavior and marital infidelity, but this one, rather than quietly contemplative, struck me as merely slow. The characters too often lack any redeeming qualities, and yet we are apparently supposed to care about them for more than two hours, difficult when there is so little to work with--Early Spring is certainly not a stinker, by any means, but for me, a lesser Ozu, and if you want to start with something more characteristic, begin with either version of Floating Weeds, or with his masterpiece, Tokyo Story.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Another Ozu masterpiece: Salary-man's midlife crisis
bobbie-1612 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Ozu's genius is to examine universal human dilemmas (tension with aging parents in Tokyo Story; mid-life crisis and boredom with the routines of job and marriage in Early Spring) in a way that is firmly rooted in a specific time and place--Japan in the post-war period. We learn much about Japanese life in the early years of the boom: the look of homes and offices, the way people commemorate the happy and sad events of their lives, how people eat in a noodle shop, a dying man's way of facing death, playing mah-jong, the switch from western to Japanese clothing for different moods and times of day. The camera moves hardly at all and records everything carefully and beautifully, almost like an ethnographic documentary, from its location near the level of a tatami mat. The vistas of office corridors and train lines are breathtaking, not boring. The plot is both moving and slow-moving, a lyrical and thoughtful Japanese version of The Seven Year Itch (married salary worker tempted by flirtatious fellow commuter). Ozu makes traditional values seem convincing and necessary--he doesn't hit us over the head with family loyalty but portrays it as an essential part of life that the protagonist ultimately embraces voluntarily and with full understanding of its meaning, though not without a sense of loss and resignation. Only a filmmaker of Ozu's stature could make me tearful with joy at the sight of a brickyard!
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Work takes its toll
tasgal24 May 2005
The cover of the DVD I rented gave away too much of the plot. I'll try to avoid doing this. The characters in "Early Spring" talk explicitly about jobs and families, so I'll take that as a cue to do the same.

"Early Spring" feels rough -- mostly drab scenery, stark conflicts, and direct behavior. The movie begins with a long stretch of static scene-setting, and then abruptly becomes event-rich. I won't detail the plot, but will say that it and the characters and their actions are completely believable. Nothing is exaggerated or simplified to artificially enhance the drama or make a point.

Many of the characters are recent arrivals to the middle class, thanks to jobs on lower rungs of corporate offices. Business and personal lives are realistically interconnected, which is rare in movies. (Exceptions that come to mind are "The Sopranos," "The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz," and movies by the Dardenne brothers.) Even when there is a collegial work atmosphere, the jobs can be punishing. The people don't fail to appreciate the benefits, and memories of poverty are fresh enough to keep them from romanticizing the alternatives. Orwell wrote that Dickens pointed to problems of capitalism, but offered no systematic program to fix them, and that the latter may be depth rather than shallowness. You could say the same about Ozu. "Early Spring" ends, not unlike Chekhov's "The Duel" and "Uncle Vanya," with resignation to circumstances, but also rebuilding and a sense of the redemptive value of work.
15 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Smart and easy flowing
alansabljakovic-3904428 December 2019
I don't have much to say about this other than this movie is brilliant. Dialogue is brilliant, acting is brilliant and the way camera is positioned is brilliant. You can feel the tension, the heat, the smell of the town. I guess I really love Ozu movies.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very good but a lesser Ozu vehicle
planktonrules22 July 2009
I have seen quite a few of Yasujiro Ozu's films and while I enjoyed this film, it is not among his best--mostly because of its sluggish pacing. If the film had about 20 minutes cut from it, I really think it would have worked better. Now I am not against long films--provided they merit the additional time. This is one of the few Ozu films I had to force myself to finish, as I found it hard to concentrate on what was occurring--a first for one of his films.

The film is set in a Japanese company where there are lots of lower to mid-level drones doing their jobs. The theme, at times, is that no matter how hard you work and devote yourself to your job, you will one day die...and most likely not appreciated or sufficiently recompensed for your hard work. A depressing view, to be sure, as the film was apparently trying to make a point about alienation during the industrial age (a common theme in Ozu films).

In addition to this theme, there is another plot involving one of the workers having an affair with a co-worker. What actually made this pretty interesting and poignant is that the man's marriage was already in trouble, as their son had died several years ago (as a small child) and the couple became distant in the aftermath. Also interesting is the reaction of the man's co-workers when they think they've discovered the affair (though they still aren't sure). The men all seem to condemn them very quickly and say this is disruptive to the company. BUT, they also later sound incredibly envious of the couple! Additionally, instead of confronting both of them, they only invite in the woman---an interesting double standard.

Overall, the film is typical in style to what you'd expect from an Ozu film. The camera remains stationary and slightly lower than the actors and there are no lens movements. Instead, scenes change by cuts, not by a roving camera. Also, the film's subjects are the countless lower-level white collar workers. Atypical is the film's slow pace (slow even for Ozu) as well as the subject matter--adultery is not something he talked about often.

So is it worth seeing? Well, anything by Ozu is worth seeing as far as I am concerned. Just don't expect quite the same magic and poignant moments like you'd find in such classics as FLOATING WEEDS or LATE SPRING.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Something more worth than money
pggirasole24 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The first impression I had of this masterpiece of Ozu's production was a both nostalgic and familiar one. However, this is not a feeling of an old and ended passed time but the somehow sad premonition of the society we still live in.

At the beginning Sugiyama couple wake up with an alarm and the wife starts her duties while the man is going to get the train bound for Tokyo. And the train itself, that opens this movie, gives us the idea of a time no more natural but subjugated to work and money. Another thing that suggests this mood is the job of the main character of this story, Mr. Sugiyama. He works in a busy and big office in Tokyo as salary man. He is nothing without a company that can provide him a sum of money to live. A salary. We can understand it when Sugiyama speaks to two of his former comrades that are artisans, that's to say people still making something tangible. More simple minded but also less stressed and unconscious of the future. The Japanese salary men, especially in this movie filmed soon after the WWII, seem young students without concerns. They eat near the imperial palace as in school trip and they organize a day-trip to sea, a noodle party and, this the main point of the movie, romance between them. The romance that so develops between Sugiyama and Kingyo, the young and single female secretary of the company the main character works in, is the symbol of a new generation. People far from house, without material skills and less practical and patient. As children of a new future. The one made by train, timetables, offices, papers and ties we, as well as Japan, nowadays live in. The betrayed wife of Sugiyama, after her discovery of the relation of the husband, decide to leave him in order to make him concern. However, after the solicitations by her mother and the old colleague of his husband decide to come back to him, transferred in Okayama for three years. This shows how the maybe old fashioned and domestic patience can resolve things in order "to not make them more difficult than they are" as the mother of Mrs Sugiyama says. Because as the colleague suggest "these are proofs that can enforce the couple and not make it end". At the end the couple decide to stay together after all happened in a town of offices and business but no patience and warmth. Not as in their final destination Okayama. A city below chimneys and so more practical but also more traditional and patient.

Ozu seems to say us that the patience that helped Japanese people during war and natural disasters, the one which the foreigners still today admire the most, can be blown away if the practical and stoic spirit loses the strength in front of a crazy rush for money. The money itself the samurai of old Japan despised.

This movie so can be read as the warning of an father in front of a son that is going to became adult and the leader of a new generation. We have a sort of Tokyo Story without the two old parents as main characters. However, also here, the wise and elder helps the younger. The gloomy smoker mother and the humble smiling colleague.

Japan should have seen this movie more before the bubble era, the crazy consumer tendencies and today lack of identity among many of its people. That time was early spring but now we are already in full summer.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Thoughtful but slow-paced chronicle of repercussions of extra-martial affair
Turfseer11 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This is another 'slice of life' film from famed Japanese director Yasujirô Ozu. The protagonist is Shoji Sugiyama, a late 30s 'salary man' (white collar office worker), who lives in Tokyo with his devoted wife, Masako. The couple had a child who died (for unknown reasons) and they now appear to resign themselves to being a childless couple for the rest of their marriage.

Ozu spends a good deal of time also focusing on Sugi's colleagues at the office. One major theme is dissatisfaction. There is little chance that any of the workers have a chance to advance to a higher position and all seem to agree that it's very difficult making ends meet on such a low salary. Prospects for retirement are even more dim, given the virtually non-existent retirement benefits. Nonetheless, the workers try to make the best of their drab and routine lives by engaging in communal activities such as 'noodle parties' and trips to the beach.

It's on one such trip to the beach, when Sugi gets to know a younger office worker, 'Goldfish', played by Keiko Kishi (the super attractive Kishi can be seen in middle age in the acclaimed 1983 film, 'The Makioka Sisters'). She aggressively goes after Sugi and they end up having a brief affair. The rest of the film focuses on the conflict between Sugi and Masako, after she gets wind of the affair, and how they eventually resolve the conflict.

Ozu wisely does not simply focus on the conflict between the two principals, but also brings in other characters, that depict the wider canvas of the community. Two strong scenes come to the mind: first, after Sugi's get together with some war veteran buddies, he invites two of them home and in perhaps the film's most comic scene, the two make fools of themselves, as they are completely intoxicated; a later more dramatic scene, features the male office workers castigating Goldfish, for her rumored affair with Sugi. What's interesting about this scene is how Goldfish steadfastly denies any involvement with Sugi, despite our knowledge to the contrary.

The major problem with 'Early Spring' is its slow pace. It's a good half hour before the break into the second act, the aforementioned extra-marital affair, actually occurs. Ozu also throws in a seemingly unnecessary sub-plot of the dying co-worker, Miura. Is the point to introduce the more universal theme of the 'fragility of life' or to suggest that this particular officer worker was freed from the shackles of a lifetime of drudgery as a devoted 'salary man'? Whatever the case, it simply is dragged out and goes on for much too long.

While Sugi and Goldfish's affair may have been risqué for its time, the resolution is markedly more staid. After Goldfish gives up on 'stalking' Sugi (she has a number of 'meltdowns' in front of Sugi, when it's clear he's no longer interested in her), eventually she shakes his hand at a farewell party and now has given up on the idea of pursuing him.

As for Masako, against her mother's advice, she decides to leave Sugi, to teach him a lesson. Eventually, after Sugi is transferred to a provincial town, she takes her mother's advice to 'not make things worse' and joins him there and agrees with him, to 'start over'. If only more couples in America were willing to follow Sugi and Masako's course of action, martial disputes that occur here, might have better resolutions.

I ended up watching 'Early Spring' a second time and found it more absorbing upon second viewing. Nonetheless, this is a film that still needed quite a bit of judicious editing. The running time of 145 minutes is way too long for a film that could have been 45 minutes shorter.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The second layer of this film is about changing work ethic in Japan
frankde-jong24 April 2022
"Early spring" is a film from the latter part of the career of Yasujiro Ozu. Normally the age of the lead character develops in line with the age of Ozu himself. With a lead character in its early 30s "Early spring" is an exception.

The films of Yasujiro Ozu are all about family relations. An extramarital relationship, as in "Early spring", is very rare and for Ozu rather daring (how innocent it may seem to us in todays eyes).

Both exceptions may well have something to do with a rivalry between the two Japanese studios Shochiku (the studio of Ozu) and Daiei, were Shuchiko was losing ground to Daiei.

More unexpected to me was the negative tone about office work in the movie. At the beginning of the movie we see clerks travelling to their office and the emphasis is laid on their massiveness and anonymity. Later in the film some office clerks are talking to each other and confess that their work is rather dull and only the game of mahjong after work is done is giving them some fun. Last but not least at the end of the film some older colleages advise the lead character not to put all his cards on his career. His mentor even says that it is more important to be loyal to your wife than to your employer, because the last mentioned loyalty is bound to be unreciprocal. Al this is a far cry from what I thought to know about work ethic during Japanese reconstruction. As a faithfull chronicler of the Japanese middle class post World War II Ozu probably sensed the changing cultue correctly.

The technique and form of Ozu is, as always, impeccable. The tranquil pace, the intermediate shots without characters and the careful composition of the images in the characteristic low camera angle Ozu style. All this is in no way inferior to "Tokyo story" (1953), his more well known masterpiece from 3 years earlier.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
No Wonder Japan Lost The War
cutterccbaxter14 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I think Early Spring would make a good double feature with Billy Wilder's The Apartment. They both have their characters working in the same stifling and soul killing corporate world of the post-war era. Characters in Early Spring and The Apartment have extramarital affairs - Wilder plays this up more than Ozu. The characters drink alcohol and smoke a lot - Ozu, however, out does Wilder with the cigarette smoking. Both movies feature game playing as well as the consumption of Asian food. Pills are used for suicide attempts, although only the Early Spring character is successful. Auld Lang Syne is sang near the end of both films.

Despite the grim happenings in Early Spring and The Apartment, both end on a hopeful note.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Ozu's Focus on Society
Naoufel_Boucetta1 November 2020
Following his 1953's "Tokyo Story" Ozu continued in "Early Spring" his observation and examination of the family theme by looking at the issues that generates from the switch between personal and professional obligations. With his cinematography from the first to the last frame Ozu focuses on small details such as the daily routines to display the tensions the main character endure between his home and the office. And ends it as always with an optimistic conclusion. A fine film by Yasujiro.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Far from passionless spring
TheLittleSongbird23 April 2020
Had seen a few of Yasujiro Ozu's films some time ago, and was blown away by them, but never got around to seeing his whole filmography. With a lot of time on my hands for obvious reasons, after being on a roll watching a number of foreign films recently it occurred to me by chance not long after a friend raved seeing 'Tokyo Story' that there was much more to see of his films. So decided to do so, and am still kicking myself as to how it took me so long to watch and review the ones not yet seen.

Of which 'Early Spring' was one of them on both counts. It is not one of his most critically acclaimed films, despite being positively reviewed it has never as can be recalled been on "the best of Ozu" lists, but (as cliched as this sounds) even when Ozu was not at his best he was still worth watching. Bad films of his were extremely rare in my view. 'Early Spring' is a long way from being one of his best, it is not on the same level as 'Tokyo Story' and 'An Autumn Afternoon' (am not trying to be unfair here). Yet it still manages to be a very good film indeed.

'Early Spring' is not perfect. Will agree with those that say that the film can be too slow. Ozu's pacing in his films does tend to be deliberate, but even for his deliberate pacing there were times where the pace here in 'Early Spring' was too on the sluggish side.

Not helped by that the story is very slight, Ozu's films don't have complex plots and are not known for them but there were times here where the plotting veers on non-existent.

This is going to sound to others that to me 'Early Spring' was a bad films. Have actually said already very clearly that it isn't. Ozu's direction is typically meticulous and always assured and sensitive, this was the sort of film that he excelled in and that can be seen here. Though other films do it even better. It looks good too, the settings are not elaborate as such and any outdoor scenes are used sparingly but the clever and beautifully framed photography is striking. As is the gentle in mood score that goes for the emotional core without over-emphasising.

It is beautifully written as a film, lucid, sincere and always rings true. The story is slight and could have done with a quieter touch and a tighter pace, but it has a humanity and compelling realism to it and it was very interesting to see Ozu tackling a theme he didn't usually have in his films. There are characters in other Ozu films that are easier to get behind and more richly developed, but they are still interesting and don't ring false. They are compellingly acted too, especially from Ozu regular Chishu Ryu bringing his usual dignity.

Overall, very good. 8/10
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A little long, but still quite good
Jeremy_Urquhart20 March 2023
Another character-focused drama from Yasujiro Ozu, and while I don't think it's among his very best, I still found plenty to like here.

It's mainly about a married couple who've been through some tough times, and I believe are in their mid to late 30s. The husband begins feeling interested in a young woman, but it doesn't play out the way you might expect; it feels a whole lot more real, and without melodrama.

I feel like the film as a whole tries to capture those final few confusing years before middle age definitively starts. It's not something I can relate to wholeheartedly, but give me 10 years and a rewatch of this and we'll see.

145 minutes felt a little long, but it's still well-made and has rewarding moments for patient viewers. There are always a couple of sections (sometimes more) in an Ozu film that take me off guard emotionally, often by a character expressing some kind of surprisingly profound personal insight. It's those key scenes or even just seconds of film that always stick in mind, and make Ozu a continually engaging filmmaker to watch, even if his films sometimes feel a little slow and overlong (not always 100% in a bad way!)
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ozu's handful take on working class issues is more about adjustments than ethics and encouragement.
SAMTHEBESTEST14 February 2021
Soshun / Early Spring (1956) : Brief Review -

Ozu's handful take on working class issues is more about adjustments than ethics and encouragement. Soshun is another fine film from Yasujiro Ozu who is master in handling such stories based on small parts life but it definitely lacks the walling and hardness. A young man and his wife struggle within the confines of their passionless relationship while he has an extramarital romance. The film is about three things, one is passionless married life, two is corporate office issues faced by working class post World War and third is unethical Extramarital affair. Usually, we see Ozu handling one story at a time and giving full justice to it but here he gets three stories and that's why couldn't give full justice to any of them. In numerical analysis i would say he gives 70% justice to each story and those remaining 30% is what we didn't expect from him. The bigger problem is, it doesn't have any inspiring and encouraging ending which might have given hope to be better in life, rather it is about getting yourself adjusted with the wrongs. I don't see how a wife can really manage to live with the husband after knowing his affair or could it be really possible even in imagination? The better side of the film is it's non-narrative nature just like other Ozu films. You can't blame him much because he doesn't choose narratives, instead he chooses just a small part from a life and brings it to the silver screen. One can't deny Ozu's master storytelling here and for that he deserves Full Marks. Enough about Ozu, actually Soshun is a much better film because of its actors. I mean watching every actor performing seamless even after weakened storyline is such a great thing, no? The cinematography in Ozu films never disappoints and Soshun is no difference. Yet another triumph for the artist behind the camera. In simple words, it's Very Good and that's the best i can say.

RATING - 7/10*

By - #samthebestest
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Left Elbow Index
eldino3324 December 2009
Seeing this film is more like looking at a photo album than watching a movie. Characters seem to walk in and out of set scenes, speaking while in the set, and then it is on to the next photo. Some concession need be made for a black and white film from 1956 and for the style of Yasujiro Ozo, yet this approach to film making seems to destroy the continuity of the film. For example, one jumps from tones of Japanese industrial society (340,000 office workers in one city) to hiking on a highway to sitting and drinking tea. This may in fact be the thread of industrial postWWII Japan, but it seems not the fabric. The result appears to be a lack of a coherent Japanese identity, for costumes and jobs appear not to be enough to transcend the disruptive nature of the editing. Ozu is the master of the set scene, but the editing appears disjointed rather than cohesive. There also seems to be a dependence on American stage production rather than Japanese movie making. One cannot help be see a relation between this film and the stage plays of Tennessee Williams and of Arthur Miller. I seem to get the feeling I am watching a Japanese docu-melodrama in Italian neo-realism. I half expect to see Burt Lancaster leap into one of the scenes. The Left Elbow Index considers seven variables of film--acting, film continuity, character development, dialogue, production sets, and plot. The acting is average since there seems to be little more to do than sit and talk. The film continuity is also rated as average, despite the what seems to be disjointed action and time. The character development and plot need help. There is little verbo-robots can become, and the plot of infidelity in marriage seems always to follow the same course, with minor personal variations. The production sets are rated average since in black and white most sets are simply degrees of gray. Average is the rating given to the dialogue. It is functional but appears to lack insight. The best line is "Babies come quicker than raises." The artistry rates average, again color would help, as it does in Ozu's THE END OF SUMMER. The overall LEI average is 3.83, raised to 4 in tribute to Ozu's reputation, which equates to a 6 on the IMDb scale. I recommend the film, it is worth watching as an integral part of film history, keeping in mind that the best of Japanese films have not yet arrived in 1956.
3 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The hard brushstroke
chaos-rampant6 March 2014
Okay, so we expect a certain clarity from cinema about the conundrums of life. In Ozu this appears in a combination of things. The spatiotemporal eye is empty, grounded, it's a dispassionate awareness that sets the room for life to play out. It's more than realism, it's a way of creating realization about the point things are more sensibly viewed from.

Narrative then is a matter of having something to view. Here several things blend. Officework for the salaryman in the audience. War reminiscence. A marriage grown distant to illustrate the tension in the home. So each of these threads poses an aspect of life, the idea is that life also extends a bit in this or that direction. This is the opportunity to create that realization that in the first place informs the passage of time.

It's not that things were better in the old days, this is never the point in his films. Viewers who miss this are stuck with a sentimental uncle. It's that things are not different, that slightly changed the same conundrums repeat: salarymen are not more distinguished than the old craftsmen, husbands will stray as before and so on. In the same swoop it creates both melancholy and a certain kind of relief.

Ozu is quaint then in this sense of being content by the way life envelops and figures itself out, letting the drama peter out as a way of saying it was never worth being caught in. This was most elegantly seen in Early Summer in the girl's spontaneous decision one night to marry. Here the wife in the end makes her choice to follow her husband in his transfer, not because anything has been solved, but because it is now seen to not matter.

But he removes the self from the camera only to put it back in the characters. This is a great and difficult balance that to my mind he only accomplished once or twice, how little to show and say. There's no precise answer, just different brushstrokes to try. Push with a little more force and it becomes a moral smudge, push less and maybe there won't be an intelligible trace.

Ozu traces faintly the turmoil but too hard the worldly lesson, it seems every minor character is encountered to offer advice at some point. It defeats the whole point of a world that is not yet figured.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed