Man of a Thousand Faces (1957) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
53 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Cagney - Man Of A Thousand Parts
jpdoherty5 May 2009
MAN OF A THOUSAND FACES is one of Hollywood's better films about Hollywood! Produced by Universal International in 1957 it recounts the life and times of one of the silent screens most formidable icons - Lon Chaney. From an excellent Oscar nominated screenplay by R.Wright Cambell, Ben Roberts and Ivan Goff it was skillfully directed by Joseph Pevney. Peveny, himself a useful supporting player in such movies as "Body And Soul" (1947) and Fox's "Street With No Name (1948) directed some of Universal's biggest productions i.e. "Away All Boats" (1956), "Tammy & The Bachelor" (1957) and one of Erroll Flynn's last efforts "Istanbul" (1957). Playing the leading role in this marvellous biopic is James Cagney who gives an outstanding measured performance as Lon Chaney the strange tortured character actor of silent pictures who, ironically, died from throat cancer with the advent of the talkies.

Crisply photographed in black & white Cinemascope by the great Russell Metty ("Touch Of Evil") the picture conveys a strong sense of time and place. Expertly evoked is Vaudeville in the early part of the 20th Century where Chaney began as a song and dance man (Cagney delighting us with his special brand of hoofing) and early Hollywood where he became an extra at Universal Studios. Then with the help of his make-up box and his uncanny facility to alter his appearance - sometimes resulting in great pain - he soon became known as The Man Of A 1000 Faces.

Notable reconstructions of Chaney's creations are quite brilliantly achieved in the picture. Cagney excels as the cripple being cured in a reworking of Chaney's famous scene from "The Miracle Man" (1919)and the phantom being unmasked in "Phantom Of The Opera" (1925). But especially noteworthy is a re-staging of Chaney's "The Hunchback Of Notre Dame" (1923). Here Cagney is totally unrecognizable as he replicates Chaney's interpretation of Quasimodo being whipped on the punishment wheel in the village square. It is an intense moment in the picture and a remarkable achievement for Cagney the consummate actor! Little wonder that the great Orson Welles in the seventies declared that the screen's greatest actor was James Cagney!

Others in the cast of this splendid film are Dorothy Malone giving an excellent performance as the singer and Chaney's first wife Cleva Creighton, Jane Greer as his second wife, Jim Backus as his press agent and Robert Evens as the boy wonder of the motion picture business Irving Thalberg.

The picture also boasts a terrific music score by the underrated and now wholly forgotten film composer Frank Skinner (1897/1968). Skinner was composer in residence at Universal for many years and composed the music for some of their most prestigious productions such as "Tap Roots" (1948), "Magnificent Obsession" (1954), "Madame X" (1965) and "Shenandoah" (1965). "Man Of A 1000 Faces" was, however, his finest achievement! A soundtrack album of his music from the film - issued at the time of the picture's release - is now a much sought after recording!

A wonderful movie on DVD presented in a sharp black & white widescreen format that every collector will want to own if only for Cagney's amazing performance. His Lon Chaney is just as powerful and just as memorable as his George M. Cohan, Cody Jarret or Marty "The Gimp" Snyder!
25 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
There'll never be another Cagney!
olddiscs15 October 2001
I just this afternoon watched Man of 1000 Faces starring the magnificent!! James Cagney.... what a talent he was... & this is a fine film bio of another screen great, Lon Chaney, Sr.../ Cagney is wonderful and gives a tour de force performance... why he wasn't Oscar nominated for this I'll never Know???? I do not know how accurate a film bio this is... but its entertaining and moving.. Cagney is the reason for seeing this film,,,he is ably supported by Dorothy Malone, (who sometimes tends to overemote but is effective in this), Jane Greer, looks and acts wonderfully, Jim Backus, and a very young Roger Smith... Good makeup, interesting plot, and Cagney's at top form... (maybe his least appreciated role) My parents introduced me to movies early on... Dad favored Warner Bros. Mom, MGM, but what treats and talents I inherited fom both...Warners gave us Bogey, Bette,and Cagney....MGM, Garbo, Gable & Crawford,), we will never see talents such as these again... rent or buy Man of 1000 Faces 1957 !
22 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
At times rather inaccurate but still entertaining.
planktonrules30 August 2011
"Loosely based....". When I hear this about a bio-pic, it is a complete turnoff to me. I think some it was because I was a history teacher--and to me, history is sacred--you tell it exactly like it was. Yet, in so many Hollywood films, the truth isn't deemed interesting enough and they heavily embellish the picture. Thus is the story of Lon Chaney in "The Man of a Thousand Faces". While the main points are correct, Chaney's interesting life just wasn't interesting enough for the folks at Universal and they played fast and loose with some of the facts. I didn't like this--but must acknowledge that it was an entertaining story.

However, there is one other issue about the film about which I have a unique perspective. Like Chaney, I have a deaf family member--in my case, my daughter. And because of this, I can talk about a few things the average viewer wouldn't notice. When the people are using sign language in the film, they really are using sign language--though they do it a bit poorly. As a result, you can see that the parents of Chaney in the film are not natural signers--but I appreciate that they tried. One thing I did not appreciate, however, is that the film seemed to exploit Chaney's parents--creating problems that did not exist in real life. For example, when Chaney's first wife meets them, she has no idea they are deaf--but this was NOT the case in real life and it just felt cheap--like they were capitalizing on their deafness for the sake of a plot gimmick. That was pretty sad.

Aside from my complaints and observations, I still think this is a very good film. Just understand it all is heavily dramatized and you can take some of it with a grain of salt. Also, it was nice to see the silent comic Snub Pollard in a bit scene midway through the film.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A man for all faces
jotix10018 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
As biopics go, this 1957 film shows limited interest today. The legendary figure of Lon Chaney is examined by the same Hollywood where he went to make a legend out of his life. He was a giant in the world of silent films because of the disguises he created for the movies during his second career in the industry. Chaney was a man way ahead of himself as far as the creation of the special type of makeup he used for all the different characters he played.

Lon Chaney's roots were in vaudeville, where he also was greatly admired. However, his lucky break came not in the theater, but in the new industry of the moving pictures that was starting in California. Mr. Chaney was able to bring something new to those pictures that sparked the imagination of audiences in the many films he starred in. His association with the legendary Irving Thalberg helped cement his own status in the movie business.

His personal life though, was not a happy one. His first wife, the beautiful Cleva Creighton, showed she did not care from him and abandoned Lon and her young son without a second thought. Chaney received a big blow in the custody of the young son, Creighton, who was placed in an orphanage because he couldn't show means of support for the child. Being separated from his son Creighton was a big blow to the man who adored the young boy but couldn't get his custody until he made a name for himself in the film industry. His life with Hazel, his second wife, turned out to be a fine one without the ups and downs that affected his first one.

The main attraction for watching this film was James Cagney, an actor who always gave an honest performance. In here, though, he seems to be playing a variation on his own "Yankee Doodle Dandy" in the first segment devoted to his life as an entertainer in the theater. The other half, his arrival in the movies, is not as interesting as the beginning.

The film, directed by Joseph Pivney, doesn't break new ground in the way the narrative plays in the film. Dorothy Malone, who is seen as Cleva, has some interesting moments. Jane Greer is also effective as the sweet Hazel, the woman who always loved Chaney from afar.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A darned good entertainment!
mainlybigbands18 November 2004
An excellent story, well told in the manner of the era the film was made. This means the story telling was paramount - thank heavens no tedious digital effects.

So what the story was loosely based on Chaney's life. In the 2 hours or so the film ran it was not possible to tell the whole story. So they use shortcuts and invention - so what. I bet more than one person started to research Chaney and other stories from the silent era. Interest stimulated...... job done.

Rather like the Glenn Miller and Benny Goodman stories, same applies. How many started to appreciate the music, they knew nothing of the inaccuracies. They saw a good story and heard some interesting music, helped me to start listening to jazz and I am grateful.

You will never satisfy the 'expert'.
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Cagney triumph
bkoganbing18 July 2005
It was interesting to see the difference of opinion of previous reviewers of Man of a Thousand Faces. I fall into the category of loving this particular film. I think it was James Cagney's finest piece of thespianism. How he was overlooked in the Oscar sweepstakes for this performance is beyond me.

It's so far from anything Cagney had ever done before. And he got to use all his talents, acting and musical, as the beginning had Lon Chaney on the vaudeville stage doing his pantomime act.

Lon Chaney's was born to deaf mute parents and learned to sign to communicate with them. That led to his interest in pantomime, a stage career in vaudeville and finally silent movies.

The film plays fast and loose with the facts of Chaney's life, but I think it captures the spirit of the man who created for the silent screen so many tortured souls.

Dorothy Malone and Jane Greer play wives one and two. Dorothy Malone had just come off an Oscar the year before in Written on the Wind. This is a marvelous followup part for an actress that for ten years was thought as little more than ornamental. Jane Greer is also good as the wise and patient second wife who knows she's playing second fiddle to the relationship of father and son.

Universal was Chaney's home studio and the studio approached the making of this picture with reverence and care for it's first great star.
16 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Perhaps Cagney's finest performance in a mature role
AlsExGal12 November 2009
Cagney plays Lon Chaney in this film about the great imitator's life. Chaney himself was a very private person, preferring the quiet of hearth and home to the wild Hollywood night life. Hollywood was where he worked, not a way of life. In this way both he and the man who plays him (James Cagney) have much in common.

Cagney and Chaney looked totally different, yet Cagney makes this role work. In Cagney's biography "Cagney on Cagney", he admits that the story takes certain liberties with Chaney's life as most biopics do, but there are many actual events in Chaney's life that are in the movie. Chaney was indeed the child of two deaf mute parents - he got his gift for pantomime in communicating with them. His first marriage was a rocky one, just as the film portrays. Whether the trouble started over his first wife believing that their child would be deaf and being horrified by the possibility as is portrayed in the film I don't know, but given early 20th century attitudes toward disability it is entirely possible.

The film whether accurate or not, was a loving tribute to Chaney that was instrumental in a revival of interest in his films. I consider this to be possibly Cagney's best performance in a mature role with maybe the exception of 1956's "These Wilder Years", which is seldom televised nor on VHS or DVD.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Cagney against type! I love it!
downer-224 February 1999
Happened upon this on AMC one morning when home sick with a cold. Cagney immediately hooked me. It was interesting seeing such a powerful actor, who usually portrays physically powerful and often violent characters, in scenes of gentleness and sensitivity. Cagney apologizing; Cagney saying he was afraid; Cagney tenderly holding a child; Cagney dressed as a clown; as a woman. These are not the roles or behavior one expects when tuning in one of his movies. In the same way, physical violence was not a primary plot device in the movie; a refreshing change. To me Jim Baccus has always been Mr. McGoo. It was nice to see him throughout the movie in a good supporting role. I get the feeling his work as McGoo prevented him from getting solid roles. He appears as though he had more to offer. Does anyone else see a resemblance between Dorothy Malone in this movie and Sharon Stone today? I thought even her voice sounded like Stone's once or twice (or rather, Stone's sounds like Malone!). Malone did a good job, but I think Greer was even better. Greer's performance here makes me want to see more of her. All the important supporting roles are well played. Occasionally the film editing and/or writing jumps too quickly across too many years, but it is still able to be followed. I think the film succeeds because it made the "thousand faces" the backdrop to the life of the man and the difficulties he faced. The characters are real and you care about them. Today, Hollywood would probably do it the other way around, making the make-up the story and giving short-shrift to the people. This picture gives the viewer a marvelous bonus. We watch to learn about Chaney, and end up, underneath it all, getting Cagney, too!
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fine, sentimental favorite
praxistens27 February 2006
Saw this on the late show when I was 12 or 13: I was moved, even scared, by scenes with Miracle Man, Christmas dinner, Quasimodo, & especially with the legless man in the alley ("Pick me up & knock me down again!") We know now that LC, Sr., was less than pleasant to be around & that LC, Jr., grew up to be miserable. But this was an early introduction to what I'd heard of as "vaudeville," & the transitional sequences with Cagney as a film lot extra (with a real silent flick star Marjorie Rambeau, as Gert) were fast-paced & convincing. It was a fair cultural shock to see Jim Backus (as agent Locan) in a dramatic role, since until then I'd seen him only on sitcoms & as Mister Magoo.

I have it on tape & watch it maybe once a year & have seen Cagney & co-stars in other vehicles since then: especially Jane Greer in her unsavory "Out of the Past" role. Dorothy Malone (whom I knew only from "Peyton Place") was a great, underrated actress.

Yes, the ending is slow & shmaltzy, & it was hard to imagine even back then (I'd already seen scary LC, Jr., in the teleplay, The Ballad of Jubal Pickett) that Jr. was ever as handsome as Roger Smith. But if nothing else you can get a fictional behind-the-scenes account of the making of two great silents & cultural icons: Phantom of the Opera & Hunchback of Notre Dame.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Who Was Asleep in Oscarville? Cagnes Shines in Another Biopic****
edwagreen16 March 2006
What were the members of the Motion Picture Academy thinking when James Cagney was not nominated for his outstanding performance as Lon Chaney in 1957's "Man of A Thousand Faces."?

Cagney was at his best portraying the masquerade man whose personal life was such a heartbreak. This was certainly an outstanding follow-up after the wonderful "Love Me or Leave Me" two years before.

Fresh from her Oscar win for "Written on the Wind," Dorothy Malone pulled off another great performance.

Cagney's acting toward his deaf mute parents was a sight to behold. Celia Lovsky, a veteran Hollywood matron, was his loving mother. Her bold eyes spoke of the love that she could not blurt out due to deafness. Always a sympathetic woman, Lovsky was the real life live in girlfriend of actor Peter Lorre.

Who can forget Cagney during his terminal cancer scenes? Unbelievable.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cagney Lifts It.
JoeytheBrit26 August 2009
It's possible Jimmy Cagney couldn't resist the role of Lon Chaney here because of the opportunity it gave him to draw on his own stage and vaudeville experience to perform a couple of dance numbers. There's certainly nothing else about this film – a typical Hollywood biopic that pays only loose attention to historical fact – to explain why he accepted a part that he was clearly too old to play. Chaney was only 47 when he died, ten years younger than Cagney was when he filmed the role and was a rather gaunt figure whereas the middle-aged Cagney had a round face (although he appears to have slimmed down quite considerably for the part) and was noticeably short in stature. Despite these drawbacks, Cagney gives the best performance in the picture, and arguably his best post-Cody performance. Although Cagney was a thoughtful man he was also a dynamic character and the role calls upon him to rein in that natural dynamism to a large degree. Even though he manages this admirably, it's impossible for him to persuade us that he is the quiet man of few words that Chaney was. A passing reference is made to Chaney's quietness, but it plays no major part in the portrayal.

As with most Hollywood biopics, the writers select a couple of the more sensational aspects of their subjects life around which they then construct an overwrought melodrama that bears little resemblance to reality. Chaney's parents were both deaf and mute but I don't recall this causing a major rift between him and his first wife. There was also some concern that their child may inherit his grandparent's mute-deafness, but again I don't think it was the major crisis in Chaney and Cleva's relationship as it is here. I could be wrong, of course, but had only just completed reading a biography of Chaney's life when I happened upon this film. Cleva did destroy her singing voice when she attempted suicide – but she didn't attempt it on stage.

The film devotes most of its time to Chaney's personal life but does offer occasional glimpses into the film-making business. A few scenes that demonstrates the chaotic process of studio film-making in the very early days of Hollywood, when the absence of sound meant that several different genres of film could be shot alongside one another in an enclosed space, are quite interesting but, while we do see Cagney re-enacting a few famous Chaney scenes, the general impression is that his career is sidelined for much of the film.

Chaney died in 1931 (after making only one sound movie – a remake of his silent hit The Unholy Three). His premature death from lung cancer was the result of a lifetime of heavy smoking, but we never once see a cigarette in Cagney's hands. Even as late as the late-50s it seems that the studios were still portraying movie stars as Gods Amongst Us who could never be the instrument of their own demise. Here, Chaney develops a mysterious cough. It is never explained, but briefly described to an improbably handsome Creighton Chaney (who would metamorphose into Lon Chaney Jr.) as 'malignant' shortly before all personal and emotional problems are neatly resolved and dad can pass his famous make up box to son before ascending to the great studio in the sky.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"I've got a box full of faces Gert, a whole box full!"
classicsoncall17 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Sometimes it's best not to know too much about a subject if it's going to ruin your movie viewing experience. This picture is panned by a lot of the reviewers here because of the historical inaccuracies and Cagney's lack of resemblance to Lon Chaney. None of this however ruined my enjoyment of the picture, as Cagney does a superb job of recreating some of Chaney's famous silent film characters along with portraying the actor's conflicted private life. As a kid growing up in the Fifties, I never knew there was a Chaney 'Senior', and the only one I could relate to was the 'Wolf Man' Chaney from his horror films and later, his TV and movie Western roles.

For Cagney, this was a natural in more ways than one. One of the things the movie touches on is the major transition of moving pictures from the silent film era into the talkies. Cagney's portrayal shows how Chaney made the move from vaudeville into the silents in the first place, and later on into the new medium that film executive Irving Thalberg (Robert Evans) characterized as the 'bell tolling for silent pictures'. Cagney himself lived through the passing of these eras, starting out as a dancer and catching his very first break in talking pictures in 1930 with impressive performances in "Sinner's Holiday" and "Doorway to Hell".

The most emotional scenes in the picture deal with Chaney's personal life - the first meeting of Cleva Creighton (Dorothy Malone) with Chaney's deaf mute parents, the agonizing wait for the birth of their 'normal' baby, and Cleva's despondency over being sequestered from a life of her own outside the home. Later on the story delves into Creighton Chaney's newly discovered relationship with Cleva and the attendant conflict it creates with his father.

The one thing I would have handled differently I think most movie fans would agree with. By 1957 when this film came out, Lon Chaney Jr. was already a known commodity with his 1941 portrayal of the iconic Wolf Man character, followed by more monster portrayals and other homely characters like Lennie in 1939's "Of Mice and Men". Having not only a handsome but a stunningly handsome actor like Roger Smith portray the adult (Lon) Creighton Chaney was a major disconnect, so I have to remind myself to re-read my own first paragraph.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Different from the rest."
brogmiller10 March 2023
Throughout his years at Universal director Joseph Pevney did the best he could with some distinctly mediocre material but was occasionally assigned a more ambitious project and this bio of Lon Chaney certainly falls into that category. He was an obvious choice as he had started off as a song and dance man in Vaudeville where Chaney also performed until breaking into films.

Although seemingly miscast as the title character James Cagney more than compensates by bringing his charisma and customary intensity to the role as well as employing his trademark physicality. Also miscast but alas unable to compensate is Robert Evans as Irving Thalberg. Evans was a much better producer than he was an actor which would not be difficult based upon his lamentable performance here. The casting of handsome hunk Roger Smith as Lon Chaney Jr is bizarre to say the least. The women fare far better notably Dorothy Malone who impresses in the underwritten role of Chaney's wife who suffers from what is nowadays politely referred to as 'mental health issues' whilst the Viennese Celia Lovsky, once married to Peter Lorre, gives a standout performance as Chaney's mother.

Suffice to say that true to the traditions of Hollywoodland there are glaring biographical inaccuracies and fictions with an emphasis on the melodramatic. We are however treated to reproductions of three scenes from Chaney's films and Mr. Cagney is particularly impressive as the cripple in 'The Miracle Man'. The scenes from 'The Hunchback of Notre Dame' and 'Phantom of the Opera' do not work quite as well but this is down to Mr. Cagney's rather cherubic features being encased in Bud Westmore's immobile Halloween latex masks whereas Chaney's own make-ups comprising glues, adhesives and monofilament lines allowed for far greater facial flexibility.

The script by Cagney staples Ivan Goff and Ben Roberts is okay as far as it goes whilst an orchestration of Chopin's melancholic E flat prelude is especially effective.

In Thalberg's eulogy which opens the film he refers to Chaney as one of those artistes whose 'magic' sets them apart from the rest. That also applies in no uncertain terms to James Cagney.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
One Face Cagney Shouldn't Have Put On
ccthemovieman-122 May 2006
This is the biography of famous actor Lon Chaney, portrayed by the more- famous James Cagney. Normally, I like biographies and I am a big, big fan of Cagney....but this film turned me off fairly quickly, and I wish the "Yankee Doodle" man had turned down this role.

Dorothy Malone plays an awful, selfish woman who was Chaney's first wife. She is so annoying I lost interest in this story. The scenes where Malone freaked out over Lon's parents being deaf and dumb, and her subsequent tirades, plus Chaney apologizing for his parent's physical handicaps - come on!! - totally turned me off.

It also looked strange to see Cagney in his mid '50s playing a guy in his early '20s. Give me a break! That was poor casting if I ever saw it. What a disaster this film turned out to be. I prefer to remember Mr. Cagney for his great roles in the 1930s and 1940s.....not stinkers like this.
22 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
James Cagney's performance is outstanding
StanleyStrangelove22 April 2006
Other reviewers have knocked the film because it is not historically accurate and I can't dispute that. But for me, James Cagney's performance makes this a film that is a must-see. True, the film is short on depicting Lon Chaney's film characters and although we do get to see Cagney in makeup as the Hunchback of Notre Dame and The Phantom of the Opera, the scenes are extremely brief. Most of the film depicts Chaney's conflict with his first wife, wonderfully played by the stunning Dorothy Malone - whew, what a knockout!- and the stormy relationship with his son.

The film is a soap opera but Cagney is wonderful showing that he can play drama, comedy and even dance and mime.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Strong bio pic with standout performance by James Cagney
vincentlynch-moonoi10 May 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This was both a financial hit and a critically acclaimed performance by James Cagney, and I think the reason for that is that Cagney was so busy "being" Lon Chaney, that he stopped being Jimmy Cagney. Although nearing the end of his active film career, this is one of his finest roles.

First, this is a strong story. While all movie bio-pics take some liberties, it appears that this one remained closer to the real story than most. And a dramatic story it is. The script here moves the story along in a reasonable manner, not sensationalizing the apparent truth.

There are strong performances throughout, not just by Cagney. Dorothy Malone is particularly good here, although her role as Cagney's first wife is difficult to like. Jane Greer is also excellent as wife # 2. Jim Backus as the agent is also very good, and it's nice to be reminded about what a fine character actor he was before moving into television.

Rather than describe the plot, I would recommend you read the Wikipedia article about Lon Chaney, Sr. for background. It really will help you enjoy the film more.

Highly recommended for both the strong performances and a reminder of a notable silent screen actor.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Some people review without research..... Small Spoilers.....
JJC-318 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
From "DwightFry" Well, I'm afraid I've found the lemon.

Let's be honest: This is not a really bad movie. But only because of Cagney. His performance is a real tour-de-force, with him getting back to his roots as a dancer. We get to see the man we think of as Cody Jarrett and Tom Powers, doing funny clown routines, dancing, impersonating an old woman, and showing his warmer side. However, this is both good and bad, as Cagney does a great Cagney, but he never becomes the person he is supposed to be, that is, the legendary Lon Chaney. Apart from the the true facts of Chaney's life being ignored (a common thing in biopics), the terrible script, surprisingly Oscar-nominated, is standard soap opera at its worst, with too much melodrama and too little of what made Chaney great. "We get no insight on how he prepared his makeup, or on how painful to wear it frequently was." Given that, it's surprising a Chaney biopic was ever green-lighted, as his life, unlike that of so many movie stars, was mostly secretive to public opinion, and the few interesting anecdotes of him are not in the movie (Creighton being born half dead, and Lon getting him into icy water to revive him). And, even worse, a person that watches this movie without having seen any of Chaney's films, will dismiss these as phony and corny, and the makeups silly and badly done. The reconstructions of The Hunchback of Notre Dame and The Phantom of the Opera look like cheap Halloween masks made by a kid, which is in itself an insult to Chaney's meticulous makeup, and evidences only that short, broad Cagney didn't look like tall, thin Chaney the slightest, not even under heavy makeup (or masked, or whatever). Cagney is only Cagney, he's the Man of a Single Face, and a very recognizable one. If you're gonna make the mistake of casting a big star to play a well-known figure (another common biopic error, that way you only see the star and not the character), at least cast a big star who resembles said figure. Casting Cagney as Chaney is like casting Danny De Vito as James Stewart.

We DO get an insight as to his use of makeup and the pain it caused him. His instant creation of the Lascar's makeup is proof of that. And his portrayal of the deformed man in "The Miracle" and Quasimodo in "Hunchback" are proof of the pain. As far as the makeup is concerned they do not look cheap unless you try to compare them to current day makeup. And as far as Cagney being too short to play Chaney Lon was 5 ft 8 in and Cagney was 5 ft 7 in, not much of a difference at all.

Again if you are going to review at least get your facts straight!!!!! 10 of 10 for Jimmy and the movie -10 of 10 for DwightFry's poor critique!
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Redeemed as ever by Mr Cagney.
MOscarbradley12 July 2020
If the film displays all the pitfalls of the average Hollywood biopic, James Cagney's performance as Lon Chaney certainly doesn't; he's superb even if he was a bit too old for the part. "Man of a Thousand Faces" is a handsome, prestige production co-starring Dorothy Malone, fresh from her Oscar-winning success in "Written on the Wind", and Jane Greer as the two women Chaney married while Robert Evans pops up as a too baby-faced Irving G. Thalberg. Perhaps in this case it might have been better if the kid had stayed out of the picture.

If today it feels a little antiquated in its attitudes you have to remember it's set in the early years of the last century which were certainly not the most enlightened of times and it's probably at its best in recreating some of Chaney's more famous roles, (the Make-Up Department certainly deserved kudos). Unfortunately Joseph Pevney isn't the most imaginative of directors and ultimately it's just another addition in a long line of such biopics, no better, if no worse, than the rest.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
great old movie
scarlet44019 March 2001
I liked the movie because I love the actors in it. I think this movie represents true acting. In the early days of movies they didn't have all those special effects that movies today rely upon. Given the method of filming available at the time, the movie is outstanding. Watching the characters, knowing they are using all the acting skills they have available, makes me feel that many actors today couldn't compare.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The master of disguise !
Totally_Rad_Video29 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Wonderful biopic on film legend Lon Chaney. Played by early film great James Cagney. I love classic horror and enjoy learning about film history and those who pioneered the industry. Lon Chaney being one of them, is one who I still knew very little about. Though the film was loosely based upon his life. However, It still was able to capture some great highlights of his career and personal life. Lon Chaney's life was far from easy. Born to deaf parents, he struggled and was treated harshly as a youth. His adult life was riddled with tragedy in the midst of his success. His first wife , who he would have his first and only child with. Attempted suicide during the course of their rocky marriage. I was very moved by the great performances of the cast. In particular, James Cagney who's portrayal of Lon Chaney was phenomenal. Though Lon is remembered mostly for his horror performances, he was much more versatile and appeared in 157 films. Many which are now lost. A master and early pioneer as a makeup artist. Chaney's Phantom, now 93 years old, was beyond it's years and still genuinely terrifying today.

INSTAGRAM: @totally_rad_vhs
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Totally fictional biography of Lon Chaney...but still a good movie
preppy-36 February 2004
Loving (and fictional) tribute to Lon Chaney--actor and makeup artist who was in such classics as "Phantom of the Opera" and the "Hunchback of Notre Dame".

There are plenty of things wrong with this movie--James Cagney looks NOTHING like Lon Chaney--Chaney was tall and kind of mean-looking with a thin face; Cagney is short, pleasant-looking with a round face; GREAT liberties were taken with Chaney's real-life story (he was not the saint this movie paints him to be); the recreations of Phantom and Notre Dame just look silly; every show business cliché imaginable is shoe-horned into this and they totally ignore the fact that Chaney was actually pretty abusive to his son.

That aside...this IS a good movie.

It's well done and beautifully shot in wide screen and black and white; Dorothy Malone does wonders with an underwritten role; ditto for Jane Greer; the movies moves fairly quickly and is always absorbing (I was never bored) and Cagney is just great! His performance is flawless--very well-acted, convincing and sympathetic. He does try to recreate Chaney's roles--he's good but the guy is buried under tons of makeup and is VERY uncomfortable (it shows).

Still for a Hollywood biography this is pretty damn good. Just don't accept it for a minute as the gospel truth.

I'd love to know what Lon Chaney Jr. thought of this--or if he ever saw it!
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An amazing film!
BandSAboutMovies6 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Man of a Thousand Faces is an opportunity for James Cagney, a screen legend in his own right, to pay tribute to one of cinema's greatest icons, the irreplaceable silent cinema legend Lon Chaney.

For all his talent and success, Chaney's life was plagued by heartache. This movie covers every step of the actor's career, from vaudeville to Hollywood with all of the dark parts in between.

Director Joseph Pevney also got his start in vaudeville as a boy soprano before finding his way to the theater. He had a short career as a film actor before directing nearly 80 features and plenty of TV. He tied Marc Daniels for directing the largest number of Star Trek episodes, including "The Devil in the Dark, "Arena", "The City on the Edge of Forever", "Amok Time", "Journey to Babel" and "The Trouble with Tribbles."

Lon Chaney (Cagney) is a vaudeville actor looking for success, which means working for the famous comedy dup Kolb and Dill (Clarence Kolb plays himself in this, while Danny Beck plays his partner Max Dill). When his wife Cleva (Dorothy Malone, Constance MacKenzie from Peyton Place) is pregnant, she asks him to meet his family. He's reluctant to do so as his mother and father are both deaf and mute. He was probably right to do so, as Cleva overreacts, worried that her child will be a freak.

The good news is that Creighton is born and is normal, but Lon's and Cleva's marriage doesn't survive. She's back in the theater life and sleeping with a patron unbeknowst to Chaney, who keeps leaving his son in the care of his platonic friend Hazel Hastings (Jane Greer, Vivian Smythe Niles from Twin Peaks), who has her own issues with her ex-husband, who has grown bitter due to losing his legs. Cleva discovers Lon consoling Hazel and runs away. Days later, our protagonist is on stage in clown makeup when his wife enters and drinks a bottle of acid in front of the entire audience.

The scandal destroys Lon's career in vaudeville with the state taking young Creighton away from him. That's when he goes to Hollywood and begins working with Clarence Locan (Jim Backus).

Even though Lon starts as just an extra, his work ethic makes him a featured player in short order. He's then cast in The Miracle Man as a man who is dramatically able to walk again.

Despite the success of his career, Lon faces a rough life. Sure, Hazel comes back and marries him, leading to Creighton being able to move back, but his ex-wife also comes back, seeking to reunite with the son who believes that she is dead.

By 1930, Lon has lost his son and is suffering from cancer on the set of Teh Unholy Three. Of course, this being a Hollywood version of his life, he reconciles with his son and returns home to die, giving his son his makeup case, allowing him to become an actor.

There are a lot of great stories behind the actors in this film. For example, Marjorie Rambeau plays Gert, a woman who helps Chaney when he first gets to Hollywood. Rambeau started her showbiz career in Nome, Alaska, where her mother had taken her after a divorce. There, she dressed Marjorie as a boy to keep away drunken grown men as she played the banjo and sang in saloons. She made her Broadway debut in 1913 and was already a star within two years. Dorothy Parker was so moved by seeing her that she wrote this poem: "If all the tears you shed so lavishly / Were gathered, as they left each brimming eye. / And were collected in a crystal sea, / The envious ocean would curl up and dry- / So awful in its mightiness, that lake, / So fathomless, that clear and salty deep. / For, oh, it seems your gentle heart must break, / To see you weep."

Additionally, Rambeau was so famous that restaurants often courted her to eat at their establishments. One such place was Reuben's Restaurant and Delicatessen in New York City, which Rambeau attended late one night after a performance. The place was nearly out of food, so the sandwich they concocted for her was a mix of different ingredients that came to be known as the Rueben.

Man of a Thousand Faces was her final film role.

Creighton - later Lon Chaney Jr. - was played by Roger Smith, who starred on 77 Sunset Strip. He'd go on to become the manager for his wife Ann-Margaret, as well as writing and producing the Joe Namath movie C.C. and Company.

The studio doctor, Dr. J. Wilson Shields, was played by Jack Albertson, who of course would later play Grandpa Joe in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory and co-star with Freddie Prinze on Chico and the Man. He's also William G. Dobbs, the man behind everything in the astounding 1981 horror film Dead and Buried.

There's also a comedy pieight scene that features the last surviving member of the Keystone Kops, Hank Mann, as well as Australian vaudevillian Snub Pollard.

Finally, studio mogul Irving Thalberg was played by a man who would do very much the same in his second career, shaping much of the Hollywood of the 1970's. That's Robert Evans, selected by Thalberg's widow, actress Norma Shearer.

To be fair, not all of this movie is 100% accurate. Much of the movie was sanitzied and fictionalized. While it's true that Lon Chaney didn't want his son to be an actor, the truth is that Creighton was working at an L.A. water heater company at the time of his father's death. After that company failed, he started acting under his real name. He didn't take on the name Lon Chaney Jr. until 1935's A Scream In the Night.

Chaney was ashamed of taking on that name and was mostly a supporting actor until 1941's The Wolfman, the movie that changed his career forever, with roles in horror franchises like Inner Sanctum movies and having the distinction of being the only actor to play every one of the Universal monsters: the Wolf Man, Frankenstein's Monster, the Mummy and Count Dracula.

After watching this movie and learning about his life, it's easy to see why Chaney drank for his entire life. However, there are differenting stories about what he was really like.

Chaney was beloved and consider sweet by many, as he often befriended and protected young actors and older ones who were down on their luck. For example, William Farnum had once been the biggest silent actor in all of Hollywood. By The Mummy's Curse in 1944, he was a down on his luck bit player. However, Chaney demanded that Farnum be given his own chair and be treated with respect - or else he'd quit the movie.

However, he nearly murdered actor Frank Reicher on the set of The Mummy's Ghost and broke a vase over director Robert Siodmak's head (either during the making of Son of Dracula or Cobra Woman). Robert Stack would write later than the only monsters at Universal were the drunken team of Chaney and Broderick Crawford, who would often tear the studio to bits.

Back to the film - while Lon Sr. is shown dying at home, he really died in the hospital. And the makeup in this film differs greatly from the actual work Chaney did, that was based on using a minimum of makeup, while the pieces in Man of a Thousand Faces use full latex appliances from Bud Westmore*, who also created the Creature from the Black Lagoon and the makeup for Barbie.

*Thanks to Craig Edwards, who let me know "Bud Westmore had almost nothing to do with the design or creation of Creature from the Black Lagoon. That honor goes to Milicent Patrick."
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Biography, loosely based on the life of Lon Chaney, Sr.
AliciaM11049 February 2004
This is a favorite movie of mine. Mostly, because I am a fan of James Cagney's and thought his performance in this movie was excellent. In his autobiography, "Cagney By Cagney" Mr. Cagney told of many actual events in Mr. Chaney's life that were used in the picture and one in particular that was so sad they decided not to include it. Although loosely based on the life of Lon Chaney, Sr. I still felt the producers used enough actual events in Mr. Chaney's life to convey to the viewers what a truly talented man he was. Also, the tremendous challenges he faced being the son of deaf and mute parents. This is an excellent movie that stands up well through the years.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good film despite not factual and wrong casting for lead.
maxcellus4617 January 2006
Clarification: this IS a good film as far as entertainment goes. Cagney shows Hollywood that he was actually very much more than a gangster or just a song and dance man. He plays this for all it's worth but without going "over the top". The supporting cast is excellent and couldn't have been better. Now for the other side. This film, as with all others made having to deal with bios of famous people and actors, etc., is far from being totally factual. So, my question is, why didn't anyone consider going to the source, namely Creighton (Lon) Chaney Jr. and consulting with him about various aspects of his father's life? Creighton certainly was still very much alive and active in movies at this time and I'm sure he would have been happy and proud to help document his father's life for film. So what happened? We'll apparently never know. Why did the producer and director pick Cagney for this role? Yes, he was certainly much more than just capable of playing the part but physically he was short and stocky and bore no resemblance to Lon Chaney, even with the various makeups applied. I can possibly overlook that because every time I see this film, I forget that it's Cagney and I "get into" the story of Chaney's life. But, if any of you have ever read the several books on his life and career, you'll know that this picture falls fairly short of accuracy on several fronts. There was so much more that they could have covered in the film. BTW, Chaney made some of his key pictures at Universal such as "The Hunchback of Notre Dame" and "The Phantom of the Opera" but most of his films in the 1920's were actually made at MGM. Since this biopic was produced by Univerasl-Internationl, that fact was conveniently overlooked. A very good film to watch in any case and don't miss it.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A disgrace to Lon Chaney's legacy
DarthVoorhees7 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Man of a Thousand Faces is a film that positively reeks of Hollywood sap. It is quite obviously that the screenwriter took a look at a time line of Chaney's life and took out the major events only to write his own story. Jim Cagney stars as Lon Chaney,the man of a thousand faces. Chaney was a slender and tall man and Cagney was short and stubby.

Is the film accurate? No not at all. The screenwriters obviously took a look at main events in Chaney's life and fabricated it to match a story. Cagney is a legend but he is not right at all for the role. Chaney was a tall and slender man and Cagney is short and stubby.Lon Chaney Jr was not born in a hospital,he was born prematurely in Chaney's cabin in Oklahoma. The doctors were afraid the boy was still born,Chaney took his Axe and rushed Lon Jr to the lake,cut a hole in the winter ice and dunked him under. Cleva was 17 years old when Lon Jr was born.Chaney and his first wife Cleva had trouble finding work and were forced to travel the country with various theater groups searching for a job. Lonchaney.com's bio claims Lon Jr would steal sandwiches and money when the audience was not looking.The whole plot about Chaney having conflicts with his wife is silly. Lon Jr never left and he very much loved his father and would tour with him. Chaney had work but it was not until he starred in the Hunchback of Notre Dame did he gain the success he had. The make-up job was fantastic for the time and the uninformed movie goers thought that was Chaney's actual face. Also the movie glamorized his time at Universal,yes his two major films were produced there but most of his films were made for MGM. In fact Universal fired Chaney because he thought he deserved more money.The ending is the part that gets me the most. Yes Chaney was sick but he died in his sleep.He never would let his illness get to him,in fact he was planning on making a huge come back and moving into the talkies.Chaney Sr hated the idea of Lon Jr becoming an actor. He thought he needed a man's job and forced him to seek various odd jobs. Chaney Jr became an actor because he had a family to feed and he thought he could get work because he was Lon's son.

The life of a legend is poked and pulled at until it was turned into this. The Soundtrack is horrible as well,the music that plays when Chaney's mute parents are on screen is subtle racism to the deaf in my book. The movie is pathetic positively pathetic. Jim Cagney is an outstanding actor,but he should have never been offered this role. Chaney died at age 47,Cagney was all ready 57 years old when he began making the film.If you do the math the movie begins in 1905 when Chaney was 24 years old.We can't expect historical accuracy with every movie but as a fan of Chaney I felt insulted watching this piece of crap.You know Lon Chaney would suffer for his art,we need more people like him and less people who want to milk a story for a dollar
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed