Alakazam the Great (1960) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
32 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Great Chinese Literature (incognito)
Varlaam17 August 1998
I loved this movie in the 1960's when it used to play regularly on a television channel in Buffalo, New York. What a shock when I saw it recently! The dubbed American version is disjointed and pretty silly, but that's not the big surprise. It is clear from watching it now that the Japanese film underlying it is a retelling of part of the epic Chinese classic, The Journey to the West, written by Wu Cheng-En in the 16th century. In The Journey to the West -- the standard English translation is by Arthur Waley -- the monk Tripitaka is travelling to India seeking rare Buddhist scriptures, which were later housed in the Big Goose Pagoda still standing today in Xi'an, a city best-known to Westerners for its terracotta warriors. The monk has many adventures along the way, accompanied by his friends Sun Wu-Kong / Monkey (here called Alakazam) and Chu Pa-Kie / Pigsy. Throughout the Far East, these characters are known to everyone and are fixtures of popular culture. Hot-tempered, impetuous Monkey / Alakazam is the particular favourite of little boys of all ages. Watch this movie and try to guess what is actually going on in the Japanese film.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A good review
monkeygroin29 November 2002
I saw Alakazam first when I was quite young. I thought it was a good cartoon then and like it more now. It has a good moral to it and it's not made to sell toys like most cartoons are made to do now. Comparing it to todays cartoons is a bit silly since it was made over 40 years ago, the themes and characters are much different then the standard anime fluff we see now. I can't see anyone going wrong renting it and watching it with their family.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
only for nostalgia
tmdlw7 June 2005
I have been looking for this movie for years. I couldn't remember the title. I saw it on, I think, a Kukla, Fran, and Ollie Saturday Matinée show, circa 1975. As a kid, I was into Kimba and Speed Racer, so anything anime was good for me. I only remember that the guy monkey was very selfish and had to wear a gold band on his head for punishment, and the girl monkey traveled in a snow storm trying to help him. I didn't even realize the speaking voices were famous movie stars - why would I, I was only 10 or 11. Thanks to the previous writer (who hated it) for their comments, otherwise I would have never found it's title. Now the search is on to purchase it!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
RAW IMAGINATION IN AN EARLY JAPANESE-ANIMATED IMPORT
EL BUNCHO5 June 2002
Over the years, I have seen many reviews that have mercilessly slagged ALAKAZAM THE GREAT as a bad movie, and it even made it into the highly questionable book THE 50 WORST FILMS OF ALL TIME. The question I have is: did all of you who hate this movie see the same film that I did when I was a youngster? I have shown many children this film over the years and not one of them failed to enjoy it.

ALAKAZAM THE GREAT is loosely based on the Wu Cheng-En classic JOURNEY TO THE WEST, a landmark of Chinese epic literature, and tells the story of an arrogant monkey king who learns the secrets of magic and becomes a cosmic pain in the ass. After a brief rampage through the heavens, he is imprisoned by the gods and eventually sent on a pilgrimage to atone for his sins and learn humility. The monkey must escort a young prince (who is the son of the gods) through a series of insanely lethal adventures in a land teeming with demons and monsters of every description, picking up a couple of unusual traveling companions along the way (an anthropomorphic pig-man and a burrowing cannibal). Much magic and cartoon ass-whuppin' ensues, and despite the (mercifully brief) musical numbers, this film has raw imagination to spare. Fast-paced and fun, this is not the dud that some would lead you to believe. Give it a chance!
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
disjointed but rather charming children's movie
cherold7 March 2011
I'd be curious to know how close this is to the original. As it stands, this is a rather odd tale, very episodic, sometimes surreal and decidedly disjointed. The movie often fails to explain why things are happening, most notably in the beginning when the protagonist is supposed to go through a trail to become the animal king or the monkey king or whatever. Why *him* in particular? What is the point of the trail? Like much in the movie, such information is glossed over.

Still, it is all rather charming. Animals move in a cute way, the main characters are relatable in their stereotypical gender roles and there are some very interesting monsters that show up late in the movie. At the same time, there is something very odd, at least to my Western sensibility, with the odd mix of animals, deities and, incongruously, Hercules.

A lot of the reviews are by people who saw this movie as kids, and at first I thought I was going to be the exception, as it didn't look remotely familiar. But around halfway through or so I realized I had seen this movie. Not all of it, but at least twice I just found it on TV when I was very young. I may have only seen the last half hour.

The weird thing is, I am now 52 and I still thought of that bit of a movie I'd seen as a kid and wished I'd known what it was. I remember that little kid with the horn, I even remember specific moments with him (for some reason I connected with him more than the protagonist). I also remember having no clear idea of what was going on (it's hard to pick up the story from the last third of the movie, especially if you're a kid), but for some reason I found it very compelling. I remember thinking as a kid I'd like to see it again, and as I said before, I still thought of it from time to time as an adult.

I don't know what it is about this movie that is so compelling for kids, but I think there's something about it that is simple and direct and weird and fast-moving that is just very appealing to children. I disagree with the person here who said he didn't think today's kids would like it; I think there's just something very kid-friendly about this. (Although to be fair, the 60s was a terrible time for kid's cartoons and kid's movies in general, which may have lowered my standards.) Some people here are saying this is a terrible movie and the only reason anyone likes it is for nostalgia. I disagree. As I say, I never saw the first 45 minutes to an hour, so for that length there was no nostalgia component at all but I still thought it was really cute. Not great, but definitely entertaining. But I'll admit the main reason I'm glad I watched it is because it turned out to be a phantom memory of my childhood self, and I am so glad I found this at last.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Alakazam the Great ; Monkey See,Monkey Do
happipuppi1327 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
The other night I was tuned into the network known as THIS.

I was looking at what was coming up later and saw that this animated feature was going to be on. I decided to give it a look,since I'd never heard of it.

Well,it started and the first thing I found interesting was that singers Frankie Avalon ("Venus") & Dodie Stevens ("Tan Shoes & Pink Shoelaces" and Jonathan Winters,were going to be featured in voice roles. Another good reason to stay tuned.

Well,the story started about said Monkey "Alakazam",who when we meet him,seems to be afraid of,well "everything". His only way of ridding himself of this fear,is to take a challenge of diving head first from a great height into water. He finds some kind of city under the water but it doesn't seem to have anything to do with the plot later.

Shortly after this,since he was the only one brave (or stupid) enough to win at this feat,the rest of the monkeys now want him as their king. He becomes that but isn't mature enough to handle it.

He turns into a self centered,mean little tyrant. Even treating his best friend,possible girlfriend DeeDee in a very unfriendly way. He feels he's "all powerful". I felt DeeDee wasn't much of a character but more of a "weak female" throwback of the era.

He leaves behind the throne to meet Merlin the Magician to learn magic,by threatening to run off with Merlin's book of secrets. Merlin relents and naturally,Alakazam abuses his powers.

At this point and after,it kind of becomes scenarios in films,that I've seen before. With Merlin I was reminded of Fantasia & Mickey Mosue as Socerer's Apprentice. He & DeeDee could be Simba & Nala.

There's a volcanic explosion that spreads a stream of lava & which starts a forest fire (ala Bambi) with similar animals scurrying away.)

Ala,a pig (voice of Jonathan Winters),a prince (who's more in the way than anything) & a villain turned good,for reasons I can't figure,make a journey of many miles. Bothered most of the time by an "Imp" wit ha little horn on his head. (A wanna be demon,who hangs out in "the underworld". (Lord Of The Rings sojourn anyone?)

Ah...2 of them have magic powers and can fly on clouds,why don't they use those powers? In fact,it really makes no sense that they don't utilize them in more amazing ways. Safe to assume that's why we watch in the first place.

The songs are not at all memorable,although the song about our lead character is somewhat catchy,music-wise. The lyrics are forgettable,as they are with other songs.

I will say some things here were quite imaginative and even ahead of their time for a 1961 movie. Otherwise,I expected a bit more out of it. More magic,more to do for Jonathan Winters or even Frankie & Dodie.

Again,similar things that happened in other animated films being present here,made it kind of a been there/done that experience for me. 1977's "The Magic Pony" was dubbed from Russian (and made in the 1940s) an"understandable" for American audieences just like this was. I can say however that that film came out quite a lot better than this did.

5 Stars out of 10. Five stars,for some good imagination and animation.... 5 off for a lack of suspense & excitement and of course MAGIC. (END)
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Alakazam The Great - Egyptian Theatre
ssow11123 July 2008
how strange. I have remembered this title and the theater but little else. I must have been 8 years old when I saw it at the Egyptian Theatre on Hollywood Blvd. I don't know what I remember most, the movie or the theater. Until discovering these other comments today, I really had no idea why I remembered this movie so vividly. I had seen Disney animation classics around that time, like Bambi, but this one really sticks in my mind. Thanks you for the memory. I guess it probably appealed to me because I was an 8 year old active boy. Come to think of it, I am remembering seeing Bambi for the first and only time on a 16mm projector at someone's house, around the same age. The Egyptian Theatre is gone now, but it was one of those classic theatres right across the street from the Graumann's Chinese Theatre and CC Brown's ice cream parlor.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not quite as horrible as I'd assumed, but American-International should be ashamed of what they did to this film!
planktonrules14 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This film is one of the inclusions in Harry Medved's "The Fifty Worst Films of All Time" and seeing all the very positive reviews is odd in light of this. However, I noticed that MANY of the positive reviews are from people who saw it in their childhood and such after the fact reviews are of somewhat limited value. It is base on recollections almost 50 years old AND it's true that children are often not the best at discerning classics. Heck, when I was a kid, I thought cartoons like "Deputy Dog" and "Huckleberry Hound" were classics--little did I know. My advice is to see the film again and then ask yourself if kids today as well as their parents would enjoy this film? Another important thing to keep in mind is that this film is highly bastardized. When American-International bought this film from Japan, they literally cut the film apart and changed it so much that it's hard to adequately rate the film. Many times in the 60s, this studio bought films and cut and pasted them into "new films" by adding some American actors in short snippets. In this case, Frankie Avalon and several other "hip" voice actors were used, names were changed, story lines were changed and songs were added. My review is ONLY for the Americanized version.

Alakazam is a monkey and after passing a test, he becomes king of the animals. However, after a while, this new king shows himself to be a total jerk--arrogant and thoroughly unpleasant. In fact, he's so arrogant that he thinks he's smarter than humans (in some case, this could easily be true) and goes to Merlin the Magician to learn all he can. Naturally, he uses all this knowledge to make himself even more annoying and fat-headed. And so, of course, the rest of the film is about Alakazam learning humility through many trials and misfortunes brought about by his haughty manner. Fortunately for him, his good friend and sweetie, DeeDee, is on hand to assist him.

This all occurs in a portion of the film that is a magical land and it's a strange amalgam--with Merlin, Hercules, the McSnarl Brothers, various gods from Buddhism and Buddha himself! Apparently, it's very loosely based on a Chinese tale from the 12th century, "Journey to the West", though the story and structure are quite unlike live action versions of the tale that I have seen (such as "Pan Si Dong", though the characters are the same--the monkey king, pig and Xuánzàng). Merlin and Greek gods, naturally, were NOT part of the original Chinese tale! It's a shame, as the original story is a lot better than this confusing film.

As far as the technical aspects of the film go, it's pretty typical of animation from about 1960--and that's NOT a good thing. This was a new era for cartoons and simpler backgrounds, lower frame-rates and simpler drawings were the norm. For 1960 this looks pretty good. Compared to today or the golden age for cartoons (1940s-50s), however, it's pretty shabby. This is NOT to be confused with a Miyazaki film or Walt Disney!! Voice acting was decent--especially with Frankie Avalon doing a better than expected job. Oddly, however, Jonathan Winters has a great knack for voices, but his character sounded way too much like his Grandma Frickert--and that's pretty weird.

The story itself is probably very confusing for most kids and has too many splashy musical numbers. Perhaps Japanese kids were already familiar with the original story and the original version of the film might have stuck closer to it, though I think they, too, would have quickly tired of the musical interludes (like the one that occurs at about 70 minutes into the film). However, for a non-Chinese or Japanese audience, this film will probably be a bit strange. If the audience is people with some knowledge or appreciation for Asian culture, then the film would most likely be appreciated much more--especially if you can find it in its original form. Boy, would I love to see this in its original form with subtitles--it might have been a lot better and couldn't have been much worse!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beautiful Japanese Fantasy!
phillindholm28 April 2006
Like others on this site, I have warm memories of this film, having watched it since I was a child. American International did a fine job, in my opinion, of dubbing the picture. What makes their version of "Alakazam The Great" for me though, is the truly beautiful score by Les Baxter (an AIP regular) which perfectly complimented the visuals. A soundtrack album was released back in '61, which I found 35 years ago--at a thrift shop in excellent condition. HBO video released a widescreen videotape of the film about 10 years ago. They did a great job--wonderful picture and sound. Alas, it went out of print when the AIP package changed hands. MGM (now Sony) holds the rights. Hopefully, one day, they will release a DVD.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Speed Racer connection
richard-lee-9408613 February 2020
As I am writing this I am watching a beautiful widescreen presentation on Amazon Prime! Enjoyed this immensely growing up. Although Frankie Avalon is given top-billing for the American release (a marketing strategy), he only sings a short song not even a minute long! The speaking voice is Peter Fernanadez who is familiar to all Speed Racer fans as the voice of Speed himself. To this day no effort has been made to give Peter the credit he is due; he remains sadly un-credited.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A relic of animation's past not quite worth the time
silverketchup14 February 2015
As one of the first anime films to be released in the U.S., I only wish this film had been better. It's perfectly average in almost every way.

The story centers around a monkey named Alakazam. He's your annoyingly arrogant protagonist that learns humility. It plays like a typical East Asian legend. But events just sort of happen one after the other. He becomes a king for some reason, a quick and vague one minute montage and he knows magic, oh hey Buddha when did you get here? The animation is passable for the 1960s, though nothing special. I felt like the movie couldn't stay still. Something always has to be happening, and god forbid there be no noise for 2 seconds. This is supposedly a musical, but I won't call it that. There's about 5 or so "songs" that only last half a minute each. The dub is alright considering there isn't too much to work off here.

I wouldn't necessary call this a bad movie though. There's definitely some creative parts every now and then. Particularly some of the magic they use. I could see some children being fairly entertained by this. But it's not a film worth repeated viewings. It's easy to see how it didn't do very well in the U.S. A comparable film from this time would be The Sword in the Stone. It's a coming of age story with magic just like Alakazam and came out in 1963, but was executed much better. If you want a small snapshot of anime in the 1960s, then this isn't a terrible place to look.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Loved it as a child!
pragmatic526 July 2005
I agree with EL BUNCHO! I saw this movie at a Saturday afternoon matinée when I was about 11 years old and I loved it. At that time I had never seen animation that wasn't childish in nature. This movie has rather sophisticated themes and it was a real pleasure to watch a movie that was made for children but didn't talk down to them. I actually cared about the characters, something I can't say I ever really did with American animation. This was back when essentially the only film animation was coming out of Disney and Alakazam The Great had a totally different style that I really liked. It was also my first exposure to Japanese animation and created an interest in Japanese culture that I never had before I saw this movie. It opened my eyes to whole new worlds. I recommend it to anyone.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Early anime movie
icarpenter18 June 2018
So for the first time in decades I watched Alakazam the Great, a 1960 anime movie that I saw on TV several times in 1963-64 while living in California. I always have held it in some affection because of those memories. Now I notice that it is largely taken from the popular Chinese story, Journey to the West. Alakazam is Sun-Wukong, the Monkey King. Lulipopo is Sha Wujong or Sandy, and Sir Quigley Broken Bottom (voiced by Jonathan Winters) is Zhu Bajie or Pigsy.

These days I guess the main reasons to watch it are to see one of the very first anime movies to ever be shown in the US (even if it was a box office failure), to hear the singing of Frankie Avalon and to see how pervasive the archetypes of Journey to the West are in Asian art forms.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Alakazam the Great was an uneven telling of a Japanese tale as edited for American audiences
tavm15 August 2009
After years of reading about this movie in the book, "The Fifty Worst Films of All Time" and seeing it listed in the fancast.com row of movies available for viewing there, I finally decided to watch this having just found out about this movie's animation director Yasuji Mori on the Cartoon Brew site and his connection to current art-house favorite, animator Hayao Miyazaki. My overall view is, while it's not one of the worst movies I've ever seen, it is-at least in the English-dubbed, edited by American International version-a bit abrupt concerning scene changes not to mention those of characterization as well. And many of the songs are simply adequate though Lex Baxter's score is a nice alternative to whatever the original Japanese music was like. There's one funny scene I liked when the title character was playing drums in the cannibal's stomach and there's plenty of other entertaining instrumental sequences. It's also fun picking which voice is Jonathan Winters', Arnold Stang's, or Sterling Holloway's. And Frankie Avalon isn't too bad as the initially arrogant title character. And the final sequences are well done. But the whole thing was just uneven concerning pacing. Still, Alakazam the Great is worth a look for any animation buff out there.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
China's Monkey King makes it to the West
carolsco11 January 2000
This excellent Japanese animated fantasy is an adaptation of the old Chinese Legend of the Monkey King. Having seen the original Japanese version of this film, I don't have any problems with what American International did with this film, they have removed most of the religious references, but the story is still more or less intact, and AIP hired good talent for the voices.

The American score is by film music great Les Baxter, and this is probably the most symphonic score written for an animated film at the time of its U.S. release as Alakazam The Great. Gorgeous stuff, and the movie is lots of fun for both children and adults, who will enjoy a lot of humor added to keep parents awake.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Imaginative and cute animation, thanks to Japanese!
hooraychining19 August 2023
This movie is full of Japanese romantic imagination. They combine Chinese mythological stories with the character images of Athenian mythology, and in some plots, they use Hollywood style music and multicultural dance. This is a wonderful combination!

What makes me love the most is that this film retains the traditional Japanese animation style, classical beauty, and cuteness. The image of Sun Wukong and his girlfriend is extremely adorable, and the final outcome is that the male leading role returns to his family and lives happily with the female leading role which simply satisfies everyone's longing for a better life (of course, we know deep down that this is impossible). However, thank you to the Japanese filmmakers for their contributions in the 1960s. I watched it for the first time 63 years later and it was still very enjoyable. Thank you again!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Weird and unsettling film to a seven-year-old
rac70124 June 2020
For some reason long lost (other than he thought I'd enjoy it), my Father took me to see this film at a drive-in theater when I was seven years old. I remember it being very weird, surreal, and somewhat scary. As another reviewer wrote, it has been "indelibly burned...in my psyche all these years." Unsettling is the best word to describe it's effect on me as a child.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Like Mr. Hand said, "Am I *hallucinating* here?"
La Gremlin14 February 2001
I have a very crummy head cold this week. On Monday I was especially sick and so I took some medicine and fished through the back rows of my video collection for something to occupy myself while feeling miserable. I found several videos picked up years ago at various discount stores and figured I may as well give them a shot. They ended up being several lunatic fringe anime films that have completely changed my life, although in what manner I haven't quite decided yet.

Among these movies was a very innocuous looking feature called "Alakazam the Great". I was especially excited to see this one as I remember it had won (if that's the word) a Golden Turkey Award or some such. The cover image promised business involving kawii little snow monkeys and wizards. I popped it in the VCR and lay down on the couch, letting the cold medicine take effect.

"Saiyu-ki (Alakazam the Great)" is, without a doubt, the most unintentionally terrifying thing committed to film prior to the "Teletubbies".

What the heck is going on here? I think I counted at least eight different subplots. Characters aquire and loose magical powers as needed. Nasty demonic things made of hair, teeth, and scraps of "Hypercolor" T-shirt fabric lurk in the background. The art direction switches from a Japanese print look to a "Yellow Submarine" look to a "Pokemon" look to a "Speed Racer" look and back again. And somehow this whole thing revolves around a Ninja Monkey God whom you are going to want to kick in the head repeatedly.

I am giving "Alakazam" a 2 rating for it's parody value and it's as yet undiscovered worth as a "head" movie. Otherwise, forget it.
0 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Greatest Lost Animated Classic
shoalin15 March 2003
I fortunately as a child was able to see this film twice, and the memories have out-lasted many of those of the Disney classics that bombarded my adolescent senses at the same time. For years I have scoured video bins worldwide in an attempt to locate a copy of this long last classic, but as yet to no avail. This, in my opinion, is one of the greatest and most memorable animated films and stories presented to date (that is the US-dubbed and scored version, for I've never seen the original Japanese version). Great characters and animation, awesome moralistic and quasi-religious end messages, and a just plane fantastic story. The depth is nearly as great as that of the Lord of the Rings Trilogy. Putting aside all the lost cinema gems still kicking around the depths of my childhood memories, this is the one I would most like to revisit and share with the children of today.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Lost stars after seeing the original
Karaokephile28 August 2022
The story is disjointed and mostly makes no sense. That's because the original version was in a slightly different order and had a different plot. No Winny the Pooh narrator, because the story unfolds in a much more organic way, in the Japanese version. No cheesy and dated jokes. The Americanized version has WAY too much talking, because they keep trying to force in a story that isn't there. I vaguely recalled this movie from my childhood, so I rewatched it and thought "This is awful and doesn't make any sense" all the way through. So, out of curiosity, I watched the original with subtitles. "Ohh... Now, this one makes sense." Juxtaposing them minutes apart really makes the differences stand out and the English version is extremely disappointing compared to the original story. Granted, watching either as an adult is probably time wasted. I'm not sure which is more insulting; changing the story to "Westernize" it or changing the story because "uncultured, uncouth Westerners" could never get into a traditional Oriental story.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Me Too!!
thechoirman14 November 2007
I really did not want to vote on the movie, since I have not seen it since I was a kid. But, this movie was such a great movie to me as a kid, that almost 40 years later, I am trying to find it. If this was such a bad movie (according to the critic), there needs to be more of them made. The movie had classic good versus evil situations, was able to teach morals in a very entertaining manner, and was light and dark all at the same time. I can go so far as to say that it was the loyalty, friendship, and mercy exhibited by the lead character and his friends that indelibly burned this cartoon in my psyche all of these years. I too find that I had no idea that all of these famous stars were in the movie, but now that I know, when I finally get the movie again, I will have another reason to love it.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alakazam in Moritorium Hell
redbeard_nv1 May 2003
Although it's not the spectacle of the greatness of Japanese Anime, the Western release of Saiyu-ki was a testament to the early days of the art.

Alas, like so many classics of animation, such as Toei's "Gulliver's Travels Beyond The Moon (Gariba no uchu ryoko)" or Nelvana's "Rock & Rule", this film will never be seen again except on rare, pirated copies, for it has been cast into the pit of Moritorium Hell, where major video chains unceremoniously trash the remaining copies into a dumpster without the opportunity to purchase them to try to salvage history. This disgusting form of book burning for profits by the major studios that now run the major video rental chains, leading to the demise of the Mom & Pop stores of the past will be remembered as corporate greed at it's worst.

I hope there is a special Hell for these arrogant suits.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fantastic Fantasy
Beauceron17 February 2002
I can remember getting lost in this Movie when I was about 4 or 5 years old. It took me on a wonderful journey. I recommend this for any imaginative 4 to 12 year olds. This monkey is incredibly powerful and has a great lesson to learn about responsibility (ala, Peter Parker).
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Better Than You Might Expect
tigerdg31 August 2003
I remember seing this film when I was quite young, probably six or seven. For many years, I could remember several things about it, but not the name. With the help of an Internet movie buff, I figured out the title, got a copy and watched it again. It was every bit as good as I remembered it. The characters are well developed, interesting, and at times, quite humorous. The story was engaging and exciting. I can see now why it made such am impression on me. Much better, in my opinion that the more recent and more highly touted "Spirited Away," which, while I enjoyed it, I found dark and disturbing, and also devoid of point or meaning.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A gem from days gone by
davidaquarius26 March 2004
This movie, believe it or not, was shown yearly at my Catholic school's Christmas Festival. Christ the King Elementary would bring all the kids to the union hall to see Santa, get lots of candy, and see "Alakazam". Strange that a movie with such a non-Christian storyline would be seen in such a venue, but that just shows you the mind set of the '60's. I'm not sure if they purchased the 16mm or rented it, but for all these years, I have been searching for the video. Movies Unlimited had it in its catalog, but it was listed as 'unavailable' eBay had a few copies for sale but I was sceptical. We need to bring this title back from the void and allow our younger friends the opportunity to experience the lessons of 'Alakazam'.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed