Asterix in America (1994) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Asterix' charm killed off by a cheap attempt to copy Disney...
ElMaruecan8223 April 2016
So... "Asterix Conquers America"? Yeah right, I'm not sure that playing the Disney card will help Asterix to conquer America. Way to go, dear writers, if that's the first Asterix movie an American watches, be sure it'll be the last, too.

Indeed, you'll have more fun in any five minutes you take from "Asterix and Cleopatra" or "The Twelve Tasks" than one hour of this film. And lacking fun, or wit, is the one weakness an Asterix film can't afford. The most blatant case was the first "Asterix the Gaul" that took itself a bit seriously at the beginning, but give it a break, it was the first. This one had six movies to take inspiration from, four decades of existence, characters rooted in French Pop-Culture and more than anything, 25 albums, from which to copy paste any script.

And they still screwed it up, by adapting a book, but what a loose adaptation. The film is based on an adventure written by René Goscinny where our two heroes accidentally land in America after a misleading fishing trip (when you tell Obelix to throw the net, be sure you asked him to attach it first). The discovery of a new territory, weird but edible gobble-gobble creatures and then the first interactions (or attempts to) with the Natives was a source of countless gags and subtle anachronisms, culminating (that's the word) with a wonderful visual reference to the Statue of Liberty. And it even had a great third act in Viking territory. Some Asterix films borrowed plots from many books, but there was enough potential in "The Great Crossing".

But somewhere the writers only took America as a setting, a plot parenthesis in a rather dull and empty plot. Was it just because they really meant to conquer the American market? Or they knew Disney's "Pocahontas" will create a new interest toward Native-related films and bring some extra viewers? There's nothing substantial in the way the Natives participate to the story, which isn't saying much since the story, itself, is rather weak. Basically, the Romans kidnap the Druid Getafix because he's the one who makes the magic potion. If you pay attention, this is exactly the same set-up than the last Asterix "The Big Fight", the film even recycles the same characters and a few images, but that's not an issue, the problem is with the set-up.

The film starts in the most incongruous way, with a view on space and a progressive close-up on Earth, shown as flat as a pizza, to illustrate how the Ancients conceived the form of our planet. It's integral to the plot since, instead of putting the Druid in jail, they want to throw him at the end of the Earth. Why not? But as much as the pizza joke was funny, the film insisted so much on the Italian stereotypes that it proves one thing: either the writers never read an Asterix story or the film was mostly targeted for a German audience. After six films, never had a centurion spoke like Tony from "Lady and the Tramp" or punctuated his sentences with 'bella' and 'al dente'. That was annoying but the worst was still the big-lipped villain. Did they try to make a new Stromboli? He looked nothing like a character Uderzo (of Italian background) would draw. I don't know if I'm the only one, but the sight of that guy really turned me off.

To the story now, we have the obligatory fish-fight scene to introduce the Gallic village, fish isn't fresh but Getafix needs some for the magic potion. He sends Asterix and Obelix, gets kidnapped, but don't worry, less than ten minutes after, they'll all find themselves together in the fishing boat, landing in future America. What follows is a series of cute moments, so dry in gags, that you really don't know where this is going. The film turns into Disney-like stuff, Gauls meet Natives, even love, discover customs and sing together (and what songs!). Since the film had to fill the second act, they needed a secondary villain, the Chief sorcerer filled the box, he poisons Obelix who turns crazy (and we've got to wait for him to be cured) then kidnaps the druid and asks him to make the magic potion. The next scene is revealing of the writers' amateurship.

Getafix gives the sorcerer the recipe, naturally, he fooled him, the sorcerer hits a rock and hurts his hand. So, no growing barber or crazy effects, he didn't even think of making him sleep, he just made him angry, so angry he pulls a knife, then Getafix cries for help, well shouldn't have he anticipated that before? Basically, he did something unfunny that didn't even make sense. And this is symptomatic of the movie, you shouldn't try to focus on the plot very much, just follow the story and enjoy perhaps its one redeeming quality. Thankfully, the drawers gratified our eyes with the sexiest animated Native girl, the only superlative the film deserves. Seriously, she looks like Naomi Campbell and makes Pocahontas looks like her raccoon.

This girl was like the only significant Native of female persuasion, and no one would complain, with her vertiginous cleavage and a body honored by a few subliminal shots. Speaking of my experience, I was in my teen years when I first saw the film and I never expected a character from an Asterix film to turn me on, well, I guess that compensated for the big-lipped fatso. The Native girl, finally cures Obelix from his brief amnesia and says our friends goodbye, during a farewell song that tries too much again, what did they expect? An Oscar nomination? Anyway, our heroes come back to Gaul, and basically, the third act is just the climactic sequence of "The Big Fight"… a big fight. Great.

If that adventure proved them the Earth wasn't flat, this is sure how the film fell.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Passable and bemusing seventh renditíon of the famous comic books from the imaginative Rene Goscinny and Albert Uderzo
ma-cortes9 March 2019
Asterix and Obelix are once more called upon to lay waste the Roman Legionnaires lifted from the wonderful drawings and sympathetic text by Rene Goscinny and Albert Uderzo's comic books . It is 50 bc and the Roman have just invaded Gaul and Julius Caesar has beset the region . But one little village of plucky Gauls faces off the invaders by whatever means , and especially with aid of a replete magic cauldron brewed by the powerful druid, and giving an extreme strenght . Again our friends in action , from the Gaul wars the French Village of Asterix and Obelix is still holding out supplier Getafix's recipe for their magic potion , when he is kidnapped , catapult them over the edge of the flat Earth , straight into the pipe-smoking clutches of Native Americans.

The ordinary fórmula for this seventh installment is still basically the same : the usual battles between The Gaul people and Roman military , along with a good-natured punch-up ,heavy rescue-adventure with Roman puns for adults . Of course , there appears the unfortunate pirates in distress , as always .The animation and drawings are pretty nice and while it is low on the musical count it all rushes by too fast to notice . There is also some marvelous scenes when Asterix , Obelix singing and dancing along with the Indian tribe . Apart from some questionable editing and the use of slightly watered-down colors the movie stays true to original characters . Youngsters no doubt enjoy it , but true buffs may prefer to stick with the pun-ridden books

This aceptable outing was preceded by several cartoon movies , such as : ¨Asterix the Gaul¨ (1967) , ¨The Twelve Tasks of Asterix¨ (1976) , ¨Asterix in Britain¨ (1986) , ¨Asterix and the big fight¨(1989) ,¨Asterix in America¨(1998) , ¨Asterix and the Vikings¨(2006) . And various live-action movies as : ¨Asterix vs. Caesar¨ directed by Claude Zidi with Christian Clavier , Gerard Depardieu , Robert Benigni , Laetitia Casta , Arielle Dombasle . ¨Asterix and Cleopatra¨ by Alain Chabat with Monica Belucci , Jamel Debbouze , Claude Rich , Marina Fois , Gérard Darmon . ¨Asterix and the Olympic Games¨ by Frederic Forrestier with Clovis Cornillac , Santiago Segura, Monica Cruz , Jean Pierre Castaldi and Janel Debouzze . ¨Astérix and Obélix : On Her Majesty's Secret Service¨ (2012) by Laurent Tirard with Gérard Depardieu , Edouard Baer, Guillaume Gallienne , Vincent Lacoste , Catherine Deneuve , Charlotte Le Bonn. And subsequently two 3D entries : ¨The Mansions of the Gods¨ (2014) in computer generator that dealt with a Caesar's plan to absorb the villagers into Roman culture by having an estate built next to the village to start a new Roman colony and ¨Asterix and the secret of the magic potion¨(2018) by Alexandre Astier and Louis Clichy . The film will appeal to Asterix and Obelix fans , it's a funny entertaining for kids , grown-ups and nostalgics .
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Average Asterix
bazmitch2325 October 2014
I remember watching this flick as a kid, so last night I took a trip down memory lane by watching it on Youtube.

The first two acts were great, but the third one sucks. The finale was rushed. Normally the climax of a film is meant to action packed and entertaining. Here, it just flies by and you don't care.

I didn't buy the relationship between Obelix and the Indian girl. The scene where they say goodbye is meant to be sad, but we feel nothing because we only had one scene of them together. Maybe if they had more scenes, that goodbye scene would work properly.

Craig Charles is miscast as Asterix. When you see Asterix, do you think to yourself "Dave Lister should play him"?

The guy playing Obelix works though. But the star of the movie is Christopher Biggins' villain. He's such a kiss ass, yet his plan works. And Chris had fun camping it up.

I liked the Oxford/Camberidge joke and the Romans forming into a pie and slicing a piece. That joke was well done.

The CGI sucks and it's not a film that'll grab you. It doesn't leave you with the urge to watch it again.

Worth watching if you like Asterix, but its not as good as The Twelve Tasks Of Asterix which is my fave Asterix movie.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good animation but has no wit or character of the books
bob the moo18 April 2002
Knowing that the Druid Getafix is only one of the mighty Gauls capable of brewing the magic potion, the Romans plan to kidnap him and throw him over the edge of the world (the world, of course being flat). The Romans carry out their plan but are pursued by Asterix and Obelix. However when the edge of the world comes Asterix and Obelix don't find death – they find America and must search for Getafix before their village runs low on potion and is overrun.

In terms of story, this film takes one of the weak Asterix books and deviates from it – big mistake! The Asterix books are generally so good that to try and improve or change them for film is a bad move. The story is OK for kids though – even faithful it's pretty simple – however what it loses is the wit of the books. There are a few good lines early on, but most of this is slapstick that doesn't please anyone but young kids.

The animation is great compared to other Asterix films – this uses some nice visual tricks, the best being the opening shot of the globe that turns out to be flat and only Europe! The voices are also pretty good – Craig Charles is a pretty good Asterix once you get used to his scouse accent. Howard Lewis is not a great Obelix – but at least he isn't playing him like a fool. However Christopher Biggins is poor and the support characters are weak. Surprisingly for a mid-90's film, this is full of racist stereotypes – from rubber lipped blacks, to `ging-gang-gooley' speaking Indians.

The poor characterization also infects the main characters – for example the relationship between Asterix and Obelix is usually affectionate but here they bicker all the time and don't come across as friends.

Overall this film gets the animation just right and the voices are pretty good. It's just a real shame that the film then gets the characters, the story and the comedy very wrong. Still, it's good enough for kids.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A bit further away from the original movies/books, but still fun for the most part
Horst_In_Translation7 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
"Asterix in America" is a co-production between Germany, France and Spain from 1994, so this film is already over 25 years old now. The language is a wild mix of English, French and German as you can see here on imdb, but I personally watched the German dub. You can find the name of the title character in the title here and yep, we got another Asterix film at our hands this time. The French impact that is usually to these films is not too massive here anymore either. I am saying this because it was much more French in the past. One thing that hasn't changed is that the running time is really not massive at all and with its 85 minutes this is already a movie that is a bit longer than some of the old and really short films. The director is Gerhard Hahn and he seems to be German or at least he has worked on many, many German(-language) projects over the years, whcih is another change compared to the all-French approach with old films. Hahn is also one of the many writers credited here. These also includes Goscinny again, even if he died a long time before this movie, and Uderzo who lived until very recently. And I am not hesitant to call this duo icons of French literature, even if they may not have the reputation of Balzac, Hugo etc. Shows you how much I like the adventures about these Gauls. Also on board once again here is Pierre Tchernia, who has had a long history with Asterix and the gang too. It's certainly the Americans' loss that these books and characters are not really famous at all in America. I am saying this mostly of course because that is where the action takes place in this movie, but that is also nothing unusual because it's almost always about the Gauls meeting new people, usually from regions that are pretty far away, but I will elaborate a bit on the story later on fur sure. As for the voice cast, I guess they did a fine job overall. I did not watch the original language here, so I cannot comment on Carel, but yeah he is also as much of an icon as they come, so no doubts that he delivered once more. He, just like Uderzo, died pretty recently. May they rest in peace.

So yeah, this film here is in America and as we know that these stories take place during the days of the Roman Empire, this was a long, long time before America got discovered. So you could say it was the gauls who first got there and ironically Caesar can even be thanked for that. Or Caesar's plan to have them lose their druid and as a consequence he end sup in that region of the world that we know as America today. References about Indians living there and turkey of course were good enough, even if I felt a bit sad for the turkeys being killed and eaten, but hey everybody as they please. They basically face the same fate like boars do in Gaul you could say and I am sure they are always happy when Obelix is not around. The film is linked closely to characters basically being thrown off the cliff of the planet you could say. Another interesting inclusion because everybody here still thinks that the planet is actually not round, but a disk. We know it's the only real fear for the Gauls that the skies might come down, crash down and smash everybody and everything beyond them, but being thrown of the face of the earth is probably not too far behind. Still they are courageous enough to follow the Romans, well the fella in charge of dealing with the druid that is because it was really his plan to do all that and he leads Caesar there. But it does make sense because they realized in previous films that the Gauls could be invincinble Gods (oh wait, chronologically they did not think so yet), so it's not an option to kill the druid. Luckily because this takes us to a whole new world. The Indian squaw was pretty cute and I liked her a lot. So did Obelix and she is much better than Falbala if you ask me. At the same time, the druid and our heroes show the Indians some of their own magic, which results in them making an enemy there, but in the end the medicine man basically bows down to them as well and realizes he is not worthy, so he is not the villain. That one would be Caesar here who is as close as it gets to defeating the Gauls this time or maybe the real villain is Caesar's henchman. Kinda funny when he appoints him.

One thing that can be said is that this film is visually different compared to the Asterix you know I suppose. The animation is really 90s. The old retro style is gone (although now in 2021 you can even call it retro as well already), the one from the very old films and the characters do not look as chubby yet as they did in the new movies. Maybe that change in terms of visuals is one reason why not too many people loved this film here. As you can see from the imdb rating. I personally think a 6 out of 10 is pretty accurate and I never really planned on giving it more or less than that, which also means though that my positive recommendation was never in doubt either. Which is a good thing. I will just do some brainstorming here for the rest of the review and talk a bit about the stuff I liked or stuff where I think it could have been handled better. As for the latter, I would maybe mention Obelix. I mean sure he has a lot of screen time, but his material and impact on the story here is not as good or funny as I would have wanted it to be. Asterix is cool no doubt about it, but the (un)sung hero is always Obelix for me. Always has been and always will be and that was the case a long time before Depardieu started portraying the character. The very best thing about this film is maybe the music. Bonnie Tyler's song when they have to leave again is one that easily stays in your head and ears. It was actually a fairly sad farewell scene and I definitely wanted there that they stay a little longer. Or take some of the Indians (especially the girl) with them, which never really was an option though and that is a good thing because of realism components. And there are two other pretty amazing tunes in here, one of those on the reggae side and yeah what can I say: The music is just super catchy, truly magnificent soundtrack and that one I would have given an 8 out of 10. If not more. All three songs are on my MP3 player of course.

The ending then is typical Asterix again back at home. They arrive in their village and they have rescued the druid, but all the villagers are gone. Well, the singer is still there and he tells them that luckily (never in doubt!) the villagers did not get killed, but only got arrested and led away. So a little wit is needed and this is where Asterix comes in charge and can show us why his name is always mentioned (first) in the titles. They find the prisoners and sneak in the magic potion, so they can free themselves and knock everybody out (the Romans that is) and return hom to their village and all is basically the way it was before as it is always the case with these movies, namely with the Gauls sitting together and eating. But this is no negative criticism. On the contrary. If the story choices they make are interesting enough, realistic enough and (especially here) entertaining enough, then I am all for it and I think I was nicely entertained here from beginning to end. The quality is stedy throughout the movie and there were no segments that I found boring or uninspired. Maybe the medicine man did not do too much for me, but it was still alright and good enough overall. The one thing you always find in these films are the known themes and inclusions and running gags from the book like how the Gauls love to fight, sometimes (or actually most of the time) even over pretty unimportant issues and the next brawl is happening so quickly. Foul fish is a common subject there and this discussion frequently results in the entire village joining in on the occasion. Well, except the druid who is too old, Asterix who is too smart and Obelix who is too strong you could say. The frequently simply watch the action. But for example their leader also likes to be in the middle of a good fight. Another running gag would be the singer who really should not be called like that because absolutely everybody finds his voice abysmal. There's many others like Obelix being absolutely insatiable when it comes to food.

With Caesar here the thing I remember the most and what I found the funniest was perhaps how he manages to get out of this mess in the end. Like he is definitely not a dumb man and knows how to sneak out unharmed and he won't be punched by anybody, even if Obelix would really love to do so. It also shows how he said something like "nobody's home" that the Gauls are the simple folks because they do not understand that somebody saying this automatically also means somebody is there, but it's okay. Would honestly not have been too fitting either to see Julius being knocked out by anybody. He is needed in future films anyway and the constant humiliation he gets from the Gauls is already enough this way too with how he simply cannot conquer their village and never will. Luckily because otherwise we would not be getting all these good or even amazing movies. This one here falls into the category of the former all in all. I think it is a pretty decent movie and recommend checking it out, but it is not one of my favorites and also not really close to those three or so films that I enjoy way more than this one here. So it's probably not the very best choice to start with if you have never heard of Asterix, but if you know you like him, then you should watch it at some point. I am not sure I ever read the book, but if I did, then it was a long time ago and I cannot really talk about differences and similarities between this film and the original literary work. But that is not a problem at all. The film works on its own and it is absolutely not neecssary to have read the book or any of the other books this is based on. That's it now. Oh yes, the shot and music when they see America for the first time is awesome too.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The weakest of the animated Asterix-films
t_atzmueller16 November 2014
Somehow it just has never quiet worked out to translate the "Asterix"-comics to the big screen. For one, the graphic novels always had an appeal for both young and old. More than being your average, "funny comic-book adventures", "Asterix" contained insight and informative, valuable facts on cultural references, language and history. Not all of those would reveal themselves to the adolescent reader, but appealed to the older crowd (generally the parents). Indeed, I dare say that the Latin which most of kids from my times learned came straight out of "Asterix".

The cartoons on the other hand, perhaps with exception of the first two films, "Asterix the Gaul" and "Asterix and Cleopatra" (that caught the essence of the first album) and the psychedelic "Twelve Tasks of Asterix", clearly catered to an adolescent audience. Combining various story lines from the comics, the wit and cultural and political references were mostly been replaced with juvenile jokes and slapstick.

Generally most of the Asterix-films are an amalgamation of various comics. In the case of "Asterix conquers America" the story sticks pretty close to "Asterix and the Big Crossing" (but excluding the meetings between the two Gauls with the "actual" discoverers of America, namely a bunch of Danish Vikings). The visuals are okay if you prefer computer-animations over hand-drawings (which I don't), but lack the richness in details that was typical in the graphic novels. However, the gags and jokes are so infantile and predicable, that I doubt it will raise many laughs even during a screening of some children's channel. If you never liked the cartoons, give it a miss and stick to the comics. If you enjoyed the early cartoons, it still is one of the weakest of the whole series.

To those who criticize that there are some genitalia visible in the film, I'll let you in on a secret: We all have them, we've all seen them and very little ill has come from this fact. Only dirty minds think dirty things.

3 from 10 points
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It's like watching your laundry go through the spin cycle, there's a lot of movement, you can hear something, but it doesn't matter.
maxmages21 September 2022
This movie is a double edged sword for me, the animation is a bit better here. However, the film is so meaningless and irrelevant.

The character design isn't anything special either. This sausage-lipped senator just looks like a real typical cartoon henchman and Cesar doesn't look like a human in this film, but like the typical cardboard villain who also laughs devilishly and rubs his hands. Make plans. All of this has nothing to do with Asterix as I got to know it The other audio track is the Schwörerdeutsch dub, everyone's talking, hip-hop slang and jive, that's such a weird idea.

But there are worse things. What I find worse is that the film gets really boring in the middle because nothing happens. The thing with the Indians could be interesting, especially since they don't understand the language, but nothing is done about it either. It's such an unpredictable, run-of-the-mill cartoon. The one that just doesn't exist.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Fun! (for a Saturday afternoon)
dcldan27 December 2005
Well that's a film for kids, that is clear! However, that not means that Asterix in America is boring. The story is simple, but results convincing and entertains, which is its intention. The quality of the draws is not very good (I didn't expect them to be good, either) but the film doesn't try to result impressive. The only intention of the film is to make some laughs and to pass a good time, and, if you are not very exigent and you try to relax and smile, it is very possible that you enjoy this film. Of course it is not a masterpiece, but it has any intention of being it! Just relax and try not to be very critic, nothing more...
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fun Film
Truman-1513 May 2000
Asterix (Craig Charles of Red Dwarf Fame) and Obelix are on a Journey to America to save their beloved druid Getafix.

Along the way he encounters all kinds of trouble from Indians to Animals. Some other great visuals, accompanied by a Great Soundtrack this is a Fun Film. Great Stuff.
10 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A cheap shot
lycochnain24 May 2020
The story isn't necessarily that bad, but it's disserved by a very poor quality production and realisation. The animation is erratic, with entire sequences copy-pasted from greater Astérix movies or even recent disney's of the time, adding a constant "deja vu" which distracts from the story. Still pleasant for kids but not much for the amateurs of Astérix or good animation. The songs are just insufferable and out of place.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Constant mild racism 😕
Ckn481 February 2021
Gets a 5 for being Astrix Looses 5 for the constant mild racism Ive been a fan of Astrix when I was introduced to it in France as a kid. The comics and cartoons were so much fun. I don't know if I was too young to see the racism or if I never actually watched this particular cartoon.

I would say please be aware of this before choosing to watch it. Maybe the others are more like I remember.
1 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
For Children?
the_silver_angel_1326 October 2012
Although I had never heard of the character "Asterix", I decided to chance the classic cartoon. Upon watching, and reading the synopsis of the film, I clearly understood the "effect" it reasonably portrayed. However, I also realized that within this film, there is clearly a nude scene of male genitalia! (The man had his pants down. *Also noted in a recent post in the message board.*) I myself was just as surprised. As an adult, I laugh at "hidden jokes" a lot of cartoons insinuate and even word around what should be "adult humor". However, this is flat out unrighteous! They may have gotten away with that in the 70s, but "new age" cartoons can only give fart jokes and bare-bum shots! (Including their resort to subliminal messages for the older generations watching along.) Rated 2/5 due to the distasteful display of a crotch-shot, but short framed enough that most (luckily) don't catch-- sorry kids.
1 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
good movie
Andreashoekman13 March 2006
i have seen it when i was 6 years old and I'm 16 now and i still love this movie also the part Astrix sings :) its real funny and good movie :) i love Asterix and Obelix and this 1 i real love bu and has allot of funny parts and animation's is very good and.this movie is soooo good u don't even now i love this movie its very funny and have's on the end a soft spot that obelix need too leave from the idians and u will see what i mean if u wachts it and its very funny movie i love the movie don't no real what too say about it but if u have the chance just watches it ;):) so i give it a 10 maybe not all of u too that but its a good funny movie about Asterix and Obelix just shame that is dost had come for comics :(

so in totally good movie funny moments and a very good animation's en the songs in the movie is very very good and believe me i now it this movie is good wy it never comons on DVD don't ask wy but have fun with this movie and remebere ASTERIX AND OBELIX RULZ
6 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed