Barracuda (1997)

8/10

AngusHaynes8 June 2004

I caught the beginning of this movie late one night while flicking channels and found myself unable to stop watching the story revolves around a young man who moves in to an apartment with his pregnant girlfriend. Across the hall from him lives an old man who invites him over for dinner, however the young man declines several times before finally conceding. He joins the old man for dinner, and quickly discovers that the old man is insane (he sits a mannequin at the dinner table, telling the young man that it's his wife). When he tries to leave however, the old man knocks him unconscious and locks him in a secret compartment. The rest of the film details the efforts of the young man to keep his sanity and escape, and the ever-increasing cruelty of the old man.

Overall, I really enjoyed the film. The level of cruelty served out by the lonely old man is bone-chilling, but even so you can't help but feel a little sorry for the old man as all he really wants is some company.

**** out of *****

5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

6/10

More Polanskian than Hitchcockian.

dbdumonteil3 February 2002

Beware of neighbors!That's Rosemary's story,and that's the tenant's story,two great Polanski films.The camera tricks recall the Pole's style too.

"Barracuda" could have been filmed stage drama,since we do not go out of Rochefort's flat,but the director manages to give a cinematographic feel to it.Clement's character is not that much original however:he is akin to Norman Bates and Chabrol's hero in "les fantômes du chapelier"(1982).He has a fixation on Fred Astaire,and sometimes it's difficult to see the connection with what he does.When he captures and confines Luc,it works and it's suspenseful ,but superficially.That's what's it's not really Hitchcockian:in the Master's greatest movies,the Freudian mother rules (see "notorious","strangers on a train","psycho","the birds" "Marnie")What's lacking here is Clement's psychology:why does he do that?because he wants a son?because his solitude has become too unbearable?because,he's grown embittered ?because he's a frustrated gay?Except for his tastes for musicals,and his wife's death,we know absolutely nothing from Clement and it takes all Jean Rochefort's talent to make it credible.Guillaume Canet is very efficient too,and it was not an easy task to play opposite to such a veteran.

"Barracuda" is no masterpiece,but it's an interesting movie for suspense buffs ,and ,in spite of an unsatisfying ending, it'll give you a good share of scares.And if a new neighbor invites you in,think twice....

7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

8/10

Luc's nightmarish experience grabs you from the start.

raymond-156 June 2000

This is a film that begins so quietly one might be tempted to discard it. But, hang on for a few more minutes and you'll be rewarded by an intriguing and exciting story of a young man caught up in the fantasies of a psychopath, an elderly man who lives alone with a plastic replica of his deceased wife. It's a well-acted piece that holds you in its grip right to the end. It's almost a duologue with Luc (Gillaume Canet) and Clement (JEAN Rochefort) playing a series of "cat and mouse" scenes. All the other players have bit parts. Chained first to a bathroom washbasin and then to a steel post in his "own" room, Luc is at the mercy of fiendish Clement, a strange man with a troubled mind and one who likes to dance like Fred Astaire. Luc of course is constantly struggling to escape and he uses every ruse under the sun including a psychological approach. The director in quite a few scenes uses an interesting technique which is new to me. First we see the outcome of a situation played as Luc imagines it could be and then the script cuts to the real situation which is often frustrating and hopeless with no possible solution. Be warned some of the scenes are violent. The old man is pretty active with a fire extinguisher as a lethal weapon and equally at ease with a hyperdermic. Whether you believe the story or not, I can tell you it seems quite possible as one gets caught up in the action. If there's a message in the film, it's this: Never accept dinner appointments from strangers!

4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

I can't believe anyone could find this movie boring!

39 Steps26 August 1999

In another review of this film the writer claimed the film was boring, where as upon seeing the film I was very impressed that the film sustained my interest for the full length, despite the fact that is was all set in the one apartment.

It was very well acted and made, and the the story and ideas were incredible.

Abandon any ideals that this film is boring, as it is one of the most interesting films I have ever seen.

(and that includes 'Psycho')

4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

7/10

Love thy neighbour.

brogmiller14 February 2022

This impressive debut feature from Philippe Haim is a stylish realisation of one of our worst nightmares, that of being trapped and at the mercy of a lunatic.

Just as Kathy Bates was inspired casting as Annie Wilkes in Rob Reiner's similarly themed 'Misery' so Haim has the great good fortune to have secured the services of veteran Jean Rochefort as Monsieur Clément. The character is a monster to be sure but as one would expect from this superlative artiste he has succeeded in arousing our sympathy. We do not know the source of his particular brand of insanity and are left to conjecture whether it be caused by protracted solitude, excessive loneliness or the desperate need for love. Some have detected a hint of homoeroticism but that of course is down to the individual viewer.

Guillaume Canet plays the hapless victim and one cannot fail to sympathise with the physical pain, mental torture and all-round debasement that he is obliged to endure.

The director's own score together with excellent art/production design, an all pervading sense of claustrophobia, touches of black humour and the dynamic between the two principles combine to make this piece eminently watchable.

1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

9/10

Terrific story

PHM16 February 2003

I advise to all the people who could see this film to do not miss it. The story gives a very good character for Jean Rochefort and the best that Guillaume Canet has ever had. I prefer to dont say anything about the story of the movie, the surprise will be greater !

4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

1/10

Very bad movie

please-nospam18 June 2006

I am sad to have to comment this French movie, but : Guillaume Canet is bad as actor and bad as director, everyone knows that here in France. Jean Rochefort is a well-known good actor: why did he accept to act in this crap??? Only for money i suppose. Director Philippe Haim heavily underlines every action with a heavy music of composer Philippe Haim. Splash splash splash... Poor screenplay (the idea is not bad, but his treatment is boring), poor, even ridiculous French dialogs, heavy and pompous staging, please avoid this very bad movie. This is not French cinema, just a bad taste farcical "grand-guignol" waste of time and energy.

2 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

2/10

I was happy when I left the cinema awake...

wiebii2 March 1999

First the positive aspects to start with: excellent acting of the actors; interesting precipice between atmosphere and music in the background; really interesting story BUT: This film is just made boring and it can not entertain a wide range of people. And that should be the main character of a movie.

1 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

The spider and the fly.

greg-23314 January 2001

This is a rather creepy black comedy about madness and deceit. After seeing this film you won't be so trusting. It makes me think of that saying '"come into my parlour" said the spider to the fly.'

The story begins in an apartment occupied by an eccentric old man named Clement. On nearly every wall of the apartment are portraits of Fred Astaire. It soon becomes clear that Clement is a mentally unbalanced recluse living in a fantasy world.

Luc is a young cartoonist who has just moved into an apartment across the hallway. With grand plans to sail around the world and start a family, Luc's life is normal and happy until he makes a fatal mistake. He runs into his elderly neighbour and agrees to meet his "wife".

"Barracuda" follows Luc's plight as he becomes the unwilling "son" of Clement. The film is quite engrossing as we see how Luc tries to escape from his tap-dancing captor. We see what goes on in Clement's mind as he has conversations with Fred Astaire, and get some insight of his lonely, empty life.

"Barracuda" has some chilling moments. It might seem far-fetched, but it's entertaining nevertheless. Although if you watched it over and over again you can imagine the story losing its suspense.

One of the things I like best about the film is the dance music. It's quite catchy. Beware of your neighbours.

4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

4/10

Lost in style

Horst_In_Translation22 April 2016

Warning: Spoilers

"Barracuda" is a French 90-minute movie from almost 20 years ago that stars 2 of the country's most successful actors of their respective generations: Jean Rochefort and Guillaume Canet. It is the story of a mentally disturbed man, who imprisons a neighbor and makes friends with him (at least from his perspective) to fight his loneliness. The writer and director is Philippe Haïm, but there are several co-writers as well. The language here is listed as German, but even if Germany is listed as one of the producing countries I have some doubts about it. With Haïm's nationality and the backgrounds of the two lead actors and almost all supporting actors, this looks like a French film to me.

Anyway, I believe the movie started nicely. It was a good watch in the first half and seeing Rochefort let out all the insanity was nice. The clown scenes were pretty much substantial in describing the film's quality. They work for a while in displaying the main character's madness and delusion, but at some point in the second half it just becomes repetitive and uninteresting. Also instead of showing us the edge-of-seat attempts of Canet's character in trying to get away, they turn it more and more into a bizarre character study that has nothing to do with reality anymore. The plot becomes fairly ridiculous quickly in the filmmaker's attempt to add some new nuances to his work. I found it very disappointing how the plot developed the longer the film went. This should have stayed a psychological thriller and not have become the oddity it turned into. Sucks to see as Haïm had two great actors to work with, but once again a bad script destroys an excellent premise. This time by going 100% style over substance. I do not recommend the watch.

0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

User Reviews

See also

Opinion

Details

Storyline

Did You Know?

Photo & Video

Related Items

User Lists

Recently Viewed