Fantômas (1947) Poster

(1947)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
After World War Two, How About A Nice Master Criminal?
boblipton8 October 2023
Fantomas (1947): Fantomas is dead, which is a relief to everyone. That includes detective Alexandre Rignault, who tracked him down in cooperation with reporter André Le Gall. It especially is a relief, to his daughter, Simone Signoret, who gets married to Le Gall. Except that wasn't the mayor who married them. The mayor was murdered by Fantomas (played by Marcel Herrand), who then married the happy pair, which means they are married. Plus he's got a death ray, which he will use to destroy Paris unless they give him One Billion.... Francs? Louises D'or? Pounds Sterling? Hong Kong Dollars?

It never really gets defined as the various plot threads get twisted together. Herrand only wears the Fantomas costume -- opera hat, cape, mask -- briefly for a few seconds, a couple of times, while he expresses disappointment with his daughter's soon-to-be-dead fiance -- talk about your fathers disapproving of their daughters' boyfriends! And most of his inions get shot by other minions. Talk about your labor unrest!

It was, of course, a famous silent serial directed by Louis Feuillade from a novel by Marcel Allain. With World War II over, Evil Geniuses were definitely trending downward in the marketplace of literary ideas, except for the occasional serio-comic offering of Arsene Lupin. Most of the thrills here are on the level of serials in the United States, but the production values are decent and first-time director Jean Sacha offers the thrills at a steady pace.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Once more with feeling for the Prince of Terror.
Mozjoukine18 April 2012
The FANTOMAS movies get weaker as they go. This one is out-classed by Feuillade and Fejos but it still shows a fair level of ambition and creams Jean Marais in 'Scope. There are a couple more also-rans.

Alexandre Rignault gets one of his biggest outings and Herrand was coming off his best role in ENFANTS DU PARADIS. However attention goes to Signoret at her most appealing, as the imperiled heroine who takes an active part in the action, blazing away with the pistol and taking the tyre iron to the laboratory fittings.

The old characters are re-assembled for new adventures on an adequate budget. There are multiple disguises, shoot-outs with Tommy guns (on single shot), a death ray in a truck, one of the earliest depictions of a helicopter, a mysterious HQ with a descending roof room - all the good stuff. The result is post war drab and not particularly exciting but it is an interesting part of the spectrum, the old Penny Dreadful now edging on for Diabolik & James Bond.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The 2011 version will certainly be better than this one!
JohnHowardReid9 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Copyright 1947 by Latino Consortium Cinéma. French release through Ciné Selection. Paris opening at both the Gaumont and the Aubert: 11 November 1947.

SYNOPSIS: Near as I could figure the silly plot, Fantomas wants a million in gold, otherwise a million Parisians will die. Fantomas demonstrates his power by assassinating a leading official (a judge? a minister? the director of the Sûreté? – I wasn't following the boring, penny-dreadful plot all that closely – and anyway it turns out that he didn't murder him after all).

COMMENT: Most disappointing. I don't know which of many displeasures I should highlight first, but I'll start with Simone Signoret. Don't bother to see this movie if, like me, you're a Signoret fan. Despite her top billing (only Herrand the bland is billed above her), her nondescript role is both pitifully small and decidedly dowdy. Mousy Simone is evenly matched with Herrand the bland, who is about as menacing as the tooth fairy. With little effort, Alexandre Rignault, can walk all over him. So there's the whole plot of the movie shot to pieces in the first ten minutes. I'll admit there's plenty of action, but what's the use of it? Rignault could lick a cream puff like Herrand with his legs bound together and both hands tied behind his back. In fact, Herrand gets my vote as the weakest movie villain of all time. So what else is there to say? The movie was made on a top budget, with set changes galore, real locations and lots of extras milling around, but it's a nothing film! I rate it 3/10 purely for its curiosity appeal.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not bad for 1947!
RodrigAndrisan8 May 2021
I wrote that "Fantomas" (1964) is a remake of this. But even this "Fantômas" (1947) is itself a remake of "Fantomas: The Man in Black" (1913) Juve contre Fantômas (original title), directed by Louis Feuillade. Feuillade made a few more Fantomas after that. Finally, you'll see Simone Signoret beautiful. Because here she's only 26 years old, in the other movies, when she's older, she's already fat, with a grumpy face and her voice thickened badly from tobacco.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not a ghost of an idea
dbdumonteil20 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This movie ,sadly,is the poorest of all Fantomas movies ,being thin,mean ,and lacking in any real positive energy.Of course Feuillade comes to mind ,but ,although his five movies are all much better than this poor thing,he too partly betrayed the writers.

Oddly,only Marcel Allain is credited here ,whereas the novels were co-written with Pierre Souvestre ;this is not great literature ,and certainly inferior to Maurice Leblanc's Arsene Lupin 's saga ,but it is quite entertaining.

Allain and the screenwriters took a lot of liberties with the novels:The idea of introducing fantomas's daughter is silly enough;and casting Simone Signoret is a colossal mistake:she can't be a romantic female young lead,and she'd be best employed as a villain (she did it masterfully in "Diaboliques" ).On the other hand,Marcel Herrand was a perfect choice:the part of Fantomas was tailor-made for him.

A desultory script does not help:the characters (Sonia Danidof,lady Beltham ) are haphazardly introduced and the movie looks like an average episode of VERY average TV series ;the only idea in the whole story is the room where you can get crushed between the floor and the ceiling;as they like it,they cannot refrain from imposing twice this so-called suspenseful gimmick.

Word to the Wise (if there is any of us left):do not bother with Fejos's 1932 version (a notch or two up the scale)and try and see Claude Chabrol's late early eighties ' TV miniseries ,with Helmut Berger as fascinating as Fantomas can be.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed