User Reviews

While filming an 80's horror movie called 'Hot Blooded', the director is brutally murdered and the leading lady is scarred as she survives the attack and manages to kill murderer. After all of this, the production is abandoned and the stock reels are left to gather dust. So a group of filmmakers decide to pick up where the film left off even though they're warned by people to keep away from the film, as the last person who was interested in the flick turned up dead in the cinema while watching the film. From this it's labelled as a cursed production. Not taking these warnings seriously the crew goes ahead with the production and they get the original star of the movie to return from Hollywood to reprise her role, but not as the daughter but the mother. But again the murders start occurring with the cast and crew getting butchered by an unknown figure dressed up as the film's killer.

Look what 'Scream' started! Hey, I enjoy those films, but mostly everything else that followed on afterwards were annoying and pointless excuses. During this stage the sub-genre came back with vengeance, but it wasn't much of a good thing as they were mostly unsuccessful and unoriginal attempts, where they followed the derivative pattern of the Scream franchise. 'Cut' which is an independent Australian take on the textbook slasher genre is purely shonky garbage that lacks basically everything and shamelessly knocks off every other slasher flick. But you know what, I found it a cheesy delight. Yeah, It's gawd awful and highly forgettable, but it's a bit of ala good cheap fun while it lasted. Although I did hate it when I originally came across it, but the second time around I knew what I was getting myself into and it worked better for it. It was just like helping myself to a nice slice cheesecake again, but this time it wasn't so sweet.

The film came out around the same time as 'Scream 3' and 'Urban Legends: The Final Cut' did, which all three follow the same structure of using a movie within a movie. 'Scream 3' is obviously the strongest of the three, but I would actually watch this trash over Urban Legends: The Final Cut. Though, it did seem more of a throwback to the 80's slashers than that of one of Scream's bastard offspring. Pretty much the film is given b-grade treatment and that shows up in the script and performances. The dialog is truly unimaginative and hardly comes up with any surprises and suspense. While, the performances are pure mockery and Molly Ringwald takes the crown for it. She plays the wash-up actress returning to finish the cursed flick and I had good fun with her laughably ridiculous send-up performance. She provides the bite here and nails it down perfectly. The rest were mostly recognizable Australian TV stars (that's if you're an Australian) with a ravishing Jessica Napier leading the cast with the likes of Stephen Curry and Frank Roberts. Also pop singer (and supposed actress) Kylie Minogue makes a cameo appearance in the opening just to be hacked up! Nice. These teens mostly followed the formula of horny and dim-witted kids that have nothing better to do but to be killed. Sometimes it feels like they just waiting in queue, because they have no real substance to be there.

The plot starts off rather interestingly, then heads into a mystery phase where red herrings pop up, but then it makes a sudden u-turn where it becomes a somewhat satire on the horror genre. Simply it's rather choppy and when it comes to the explanation for all of this madness I was kind of left thinking… oh my. This when it tries to twist back onto itself in a clever manner, but sadly it falls along way. But don't you just love an opening ending. Also it sports some pop culture references and a self referential, tongue-in-cheek approach. Predictability makes its way in rather early and the jokes can become over-stated at times, but it knows that by poking fun at itself quite a bit. The atmosphere looses a bit of edge because of the humour taking away the bleakness, but still the isolated grand old mansion where they are filming has some neat touches that added 'some' spookiness. The cinema scene is done rather nicely too.

Now, now we know we want gore and nudity when watching this type of flick, but sadly there's no nudity to be found and the gore is pretty standard, if lacking but it's more then decent for such low-budget flick. There are one or two creative deaths, but the rest are systematic. The killer wasn't bad but when he spoke it kind of hurt it I thought, well the smart-ass attitude didn't sit well with me. Another notes of the production which were dire ranged from the cut-away editing, out-of-place soundtrack and Kimble Rendall's direction lacked execution and was pretty careless, but these contributing factors pull together to add some sort of sheer entertainment to all of this badness.

The imagination matches the budget that's for sure, but heck this lousy slasher wasn't trying to be anything else. Pure schlock that's slightly amusing!

I first saw this in a theater with my dad in the year 2k.

Cant recollect whether it was Sterling theatre, Regal or Eros cos all are situated in South Mumbai.

To be honest, i enjoyed the movie then but aft revisiting it recently, i found it to be dull n dumb.

The movie has dumb dialogues.

First a woman tells the killer to attack her to distract but when the killer comes close, she tells him to stay away as if the killer will listen to her.

A fella gets impaled by a water tap is way too ridiculous.

The effects are lousy n the rubber mask is way too obvious.

I dont kno why Kylie Minogue agreed to star in in this movie.

The movie has no tension n suspense n the kills ain't scary or gruesome.

Cut opened today in Australia and I went to see it after waiting ages for it to be released.

After the movie finished, I was a little disappointed but now when I think about it, it actually was a good movie. I thought it wasn't as good as Scream but way better than Scream 2, Scream 2 had very little blood or violence which made it very weak but Cut is amazing ecause it gets away with displaying so much blood. It takes a while for the movie to get into the action, but when it does that's when it starts to get interesting. Australian horror movies usually aren't very good (anyone remember Body Melt and Out of The Body?) but Cut is very enjoyable.

Even though the story doesn't make a lot of sense when all is revealed and the ending stinks, Cut is a lot of fun when it comes to the death scenes (which is what people are going to see this for anyway) they are very creative and gross and very hilarious.

When Cut comes to threatres near you, go see it. It won't make much sense, but it will be fun.

Cut doesn't restrain the blood, it's not disturbing, it's intended to be funny, and it is.

The cast and crew of the horror flick Hot Blooded are learning first hand what it means to be stalked by a masked killer. When the director is viciously murdered on set in 1985, the production is shut down and the film locked away, incomplete. But every time the footage is screened, somebody dies...Fourteen years later, a group of enthusiastic film students decide to finish Hot Blooded. After shooting commences on the eerie film location, the students start to disappear one by one. Now, they just have to finish the film before it finishes them.

Cut is a fairly decent horror flick with a good plot made in 2000. The acting is good with Molly Ringwald leading the way. Jessica Napier does a good job as the films co-leading lady. There is some gore with this slasher flick, and the special effects done on the face of the killer is pretty well done. The killers mask is creepy (sort of resembles the mask from another slasher movie "Final Stab"). Cut is a movie every horror fan should look into. It isn't John Carpenter's Halloween, but Cut is certainly better than quite a few horror flicks made in recent years.

I've had this Cut on my shelve for ages and I just wasted 83mins watching it. I love low budget horror but this just doesn't have anything good I can talk about other than K. Minigoues in it. Story's not bad but the acting, the so called comedy aspect, the special effects are just poor and boring. As for a children's horror film it's passable just, but for a adult it's a pass never again thanks

I loved every minute of it! I saw the Movie in Cologne,Germany. It was shown in the Fantasy Film Festival. The crowd there were fabulous taking the time to enjoy this spiffing movie. Alot of laughs and good fun!!! The rest of the story you can read from the other commentary, I just wanted to say that its worth the time and effort if you love nutty horror movies.

Remember when this movie first came out in the theaters and the posters & commercials pathetically advertised Kylie Minogue's name in giant letters; even bigger than the actual title? It was just hilarious to see that her role in "Cut" was nothing more than an extended cameo, and thank God she didn't sing one of her dull songs! Mrs. Minogue exclusively appears in the prologue of the story, as the female director of a slasher horror movie that needs to be aborted because the killer-character takes his job a little too serious. Some people die and "Hot Blooded" suddenly becomes a cursed project. Twelve years later, an assembly of ambitious film-students intends to complete the film and they even manage to re-cast the original female lead (Molly Ringwald). Of course, the ingeniously masked killer returns as well and finishes off the new crew one by one. "Cut" is an generally watchable new-age horror film (at least it's better than "Scream", "Urband Legend" or "I know what you did Last Summer"), but it remains pretty dumb and very clichéd. The opening sequences are pleasing, with a neat film-within-film structure and Hollywood inside-jokes, but then the whole thing quickly gets predictable and very déjà-vu. The death scenes are unimaginative and there's very little tension all together. The last half hour and especially the climax (as in: revelation of the killer's identity) are extremely disappointing and very, VERY stupid. Molly Ringwald is very good in her role as pretentious B-movie starlet but she doesn't get much help from the mediocre rest of the cast. "Cut" fits right in with the recent revival of typical 80's slashers, but they're nowhere near as shocking, bloody or nihilistic as they used to be.

This film was made and cast from my home town. I remember the fuss about it and the whole hullabaloo about the fact Molly Ringwald was in town...

Storyline...

Essentially 20 years after a film was "laid to rest" without being finished, a group of film students set out to complete it - with dire consequences. It would seem someone does not want the film completed.

The storyline is flimsy. One has to remember that this is a comedy and therefore has to be taken a little tounge in cheek, but it had no real oomph. The characters are mostly transperant and the little info that you recieve about them you just don't care about, it seems irrelevant. It is weird hearing Kylie's accent as Australian again and nice to see a kid I went to school with in a starring role. But that doesn't redeem the film at all. Goodness knows why the makers thought they would get in Molly Ringwald. Perhaps due to the nature of the film (it sort of pays homage to 80s films / bad horror films)but really an Aussie actor would have done just fine.

As far as casting is concerned a lot of the acting seemed constipated. Some of these kids (especially the two main chics - they played "director" and "producer") looked like they were trying to act. That is never a good look. Also, the shots had a rough feel about them. Over lit perhaps? Just not as smooth as one is used to.

The killer. Lord. Could it be less frightening? There are some shock factors though, and a couple of gross scenes. I did like the film, but it was not great. It went for 90 minutes but could have gone for less. Perhaps if they had tightened the script it would have been better. They had a lot of characters get killed - but no real build up to them getting slayed. Maybe if they had killed less people and actually concentrated on a scary atmosphere it would have been better.

Now I know it is a comedy and elements were funny. Or so unbelieveable they were funny. But I am not convinced.

LM.

The idea of a film crew being butchered while shooting a horror film has been done before (in the obscure 1986 flick "Return To Horror High", and probably some other time even before that). The idea of teens making "hip" references to other horror films of the past has been done before (in "Scream"). And so on...Yet, "Cut" is overall an entertaining movie, and if you don't pay more than a dollar to see it, you'll get your money's worth. In the first 20 minutes in particular the filmmakers seem to be onto something different, but then the movie gets increasingly derivative. Still, the special effects are good and Molly Ringwald is perfectly cast as the washed-up ex-B-movie queen. (**1/2)

Good movie to watch for the slasher scenes and the murderous plot the movie deals with horrifying scenes.

It isn't the worst film ever made, the actors aren't apalling and the script and director are not completely inept.

It isn't the best film ever made, the actors aren't excellent and the script and director are not completely brilliant.

It falls somewhere in the middle. A fun somewhere. An enjoyable, well constructed somewhere.

No need to say "don't take it seriously" or "so bad its good" or "it wasn't scary". None of these comments are relevant.

Cut has atmosphere. It's that atmosphere which is actually very unique, and the one really original aspect of the movie, which personally is what makes the film, for me.

A horror movie is being shot and things aren't going well. It's about a masked killer. The director tells off the killer in front of the cast and crew. He goes crazy and kills two people. He's killed himself and the film is never finished. Twelve years later a bunch of film students decide to try and finish it--but there's a curse. People who try and finish it are killed themselves. The students ignore that. Guess what happens next?

The plot is old hat but this isn't bad...for what it is (a low budget slasher film). It's well-made with a young and fairly talented young cast. No one is great but no one is terrible either. It also avoids the obligatory (and needless) female nude scenes. It moves quickly, the gore is nice and bloody and the script doesn't insult your intelligence. Also Molly Ringwald is in this having the time of her life playing a bitchy faded actress.

No great shakes but not bad at all. I give it a 7.

Cut tries to be like most post-Scream slashers tried to be, a spoof of the horror genre that tried to be clever by referencing other famous horror movies. Now, I am not bagging 'Scream,' as I think 'Scream' is a very good horror movie that does a great job of blending horror and comedy. Cut fails on most levels. It has its moments but overall it just does not work out, not even as a "so bad it's good" movie, just a below average one.

The first five minutes or so are OK and set the story fairly well, apart from the fact that Kylie Minogue can't really act, and ironically she gets her tongue out, go figure. Go forward some time and a group of film students want to finish her film off, which is apparently cursed. And, as you have probably predicted, one by one the cast and crew are slowly picked off by a masked madman.

Unoriginal plot, poor acting and a predictable ending are a few of the elements that follow. There is plenty of referencing in the film, everything from 'Scream' to 'The Texas Chain Saw Massacre.' This isn't smart either, it feels as though the director wanted to feel smart and cool by mentioning other famous horror flicks ala Scream. For a slasher there is minimal gore and no nudity, which is a huge negative when it comes to a slasher that has not got a whole lot going for it. Really, I should be supporting this movie because I'm Australian and we're not as good when it comes to horror (we do have our gems, though) but Cut is definitely not one of them.

However, it did keep me watching for the 90 minutes or so, so that is something good at least. I would not recommend this to anyone apart from hardcore slasher fans, who may be able to appreciate what this film is trying to aim for, but if you are looking for a good movie, stay away.

2/5

Everyone in this movie tells Raffy Carruthers how talented she is, what a great director she'll one day turn out to be, etc. I think they're just being nice. Even Kimble Rendall, who directed this film, shows more talent than she does. "The next Jane Campion", they call her; and, even apart from the fact that they're both over-rated, the two have SO much in common. They both direct movies. They're both women. They're both Australian. (Well, give or take.)

Yep: it's one of those films in which a character is deemed to be brilliant, and we just have to swallow hard and accept it. But I'll say this for Carruthers: she's cute. -And fascinating. No, really. Here are some thoughts on her lack of talent:

(1) Part of a director's talent lies in dealing with people. Why is Carruthers so phenomenally bad at getting her crew to even take notice of her? So as to make it easier for everyone to wander off the set and get killed, I expect.

(2) Why is this one of the most unconvincing depictions of a movie set I have ever seen? After all, it must have been filmed on a REAL movie set. How could they get it wrong? If Rendall's set was half as much of an under-staffed shambles it's a wonder he completed his film at all.

(3) Carruthers - the fictional director - has set herself the task of creating a brand new 1980s horror flick. Fat chance. I doubt it can be done these days. I suspect that Rendall - the actual, and more talented, director - set himself the same task, realised it couldn't be done, and settled for (sigh) knowing parody instead. Of course, it's not ENOUGH of a parody to work as a parody. As soon as the cast and crew set foot in the isolated mansion the film just spends most of its time doing badly what 1980s horror films did ... well, less badly.

(4) And yet, and yet ... the film opens with not a parody but an honest-to-goodness pastiche of 80s horror, starring (this is too good to be true) Molly Ringwald. This pastiche is much better than anything that follows. (It's a bad sign when you find yourself wishing you were watching the movie-within-the-movie, rather than the movie.) Yet it, too, was filmed in the late 1990s. Perhaps it IS still possible to make 1980s horror. You just have to drop the knowing parody stuff and MEAN it.

(5) I'd never once wondered what 1980s teen horror would be like if all the characters had Australian accents, but now I know. And strangely, I'm glad I know. A need I never knew I had has been fulfilled.

A bunch of film students are allowed to finish off a Hollywood project . Does this actually happen in real life ? If there`s any film students out there who have been allowed to does this can you let me know please ? Oh and the Hollywood exec is called Jerry ? Yeah right , that means Michael Bay would be directing and not some blonde bimbo film student

Have I got across the point this movie is not credible ? Good . That`s not why I hated CUT . The reason I hated it is because it`s a SCREAM clone that thinks it`s being clever when it`s anything but clever . The first 30 minutes are taken up with red herring scenes where you think someone`s been murdered , but they`re not . This happens several times and it really p*ssed me off because I could see these false death scenes coming a mile off and you will too so no spoilers alerts .

Did I like anything about this movie ? Hmmm no . Oh tell a lie , the bad guy is dressed up like a cross between a cenobite and an auton from DOCTOR WHO , oh and at least it wasn`t directed by Vitor Salva . There that`s all the positive praise I`m giving to a film featuring a lot of teens being stalked and slashed by a knife wielding maniac .

A student filmmaker enlists a B-grade actress (a delectably diva-ish MOLLY RINGWALD!) to complete the horror film that her mother (a dreadfully dull Kylie Minogue!) tried to make 12 years ago. It's a curious plot choice to say the least, as any Aussie horror fan knows that the genre is sadly lacking in women directors. The film has a curse on it, because Molly had to kill some psycho murderer on the original set. But she's back, because she needs the exposure. Unfortunately, the curse is still there and people start dying on the "set." Cut is an Aussie attempt at the modern "slasher," but unfortunately it doesn't bring anything new or exciting to the table. In fact, it rips half of Wes Craven's 90s filmography. Lots of film-world name-dropping a la "Scream" (except it's Aussie name-dropping--Jane Campion...see how this isn't as funny) and lots of "is this real or is this a movie" a la "New Nightmare." The editing is bad, the music is annoying, the effects are laughable, almost everything is bad about this. Fortunately, the film can have a sense of humor: at one point, a well-dressed girl in the movie crew says to the owner of the house they are filming at: "Don't worry, we'll treat your house as if it were our own," to which he responds, "that doesn't mean anything to me, you look like you live in a dump!" Ha! And Molly's ridiculous one-liners were enough to not regret renting this one. "You got any diet coke in here?" (as she rides in the film professor's car) and "Does anyone know where I can buy any tofu?" (the first thing she mutters on the set) and "Where the hell is my agent?" (oh wait, that's what I was thinking for her.)

(2000) Cut HORROR

Low budget Australian production film starring Molly Ringwald playing an actress, Vanessa Turnbill starring in a slasher film while at the same time, much of the cast and crew are getting themselves slashed up themselves by a person wearing a mask. This is another one of those films where the slasher is always smarter than the victims themselves, which if they ever act like that in real life, maybe they deserved to get killed after all! Real life pop singer, Kylie Minogue also has a small cameo in this film playing the film's director. A low grade movie Italians have often done so often.

I can see where this one can be called the Australian "Scream." Kind of has the same feel as these new "slasher" movies. The story's kinda weak, but if you're expectations are low, than this should prove entertaining. It was refreshing, too to actually see some of the bloody stuff, instead of all these cheezy "cut-away" murders lately. I thought the acting was pretty decent, but the killer's identity is pretty flimsy, not really explained too well. Overall though, I was pleasantly entertained by a new "b-movie" that I found to be much better than a lot of theatrical horror out there lately....6/10

God knows why this movie had a theatrical run in France when

it's no much better than most direct-to-video fare. Maybe the

Gérardmer film festival did it ? Anyway this movie is just a

"Scream" wanabee - even the "director" is made up to look like

Neve Campbell - borrowing also from the interesting "Mute

Witness" and everything you might throw in. But… well, actually,

it kept me entertained where "Urban Legend" was just irritating

and "Idlme Hands" too obvious. Actually its own cheesiness, the

fact that everybody tries so hard and acts as if they have just

discovered the worst clichés in horror film, that made it.

Everybody mentions the crude production quality, but I guess it

would have worked less if it had the glossy look of "Urban

Legend". Anyway, one might draw an interesting parallel between

the numerous Halloween clone, ridiculed in "Scream", and the

nowadays "Scream" emulators who are far from having the

perspective of Wes Craven. This movie kept me entertained and

amused, if not scared, but I would hardly recommend it to

anyone. No doubt it is already rentabilized through video al

I saw this movie with a bunch of friends and although only two of us walked out of the cinema thinking how cool it was, the others just laughed and commented on how stupid it was. Well that was because it isn't supposed to be taken so seriously, basically it is a a movie that mocks horror flicks and does a damn good job.. There seems to be another movie coming out like that too, umm... Scary Movie?? Well this is Aussie, and original!!! Jessica Napier does a surperb performance and Sarah Kants has a definate bright future in acting! I hope to see more of them. Molly Ringwald was a good move, and Kylie was an even better move. The Impossible Princess was Queen of the screen!! I recommend seeing this flick, as you'll be guessing until the very end the connection with Raffy, Hilary and The movie that never got finished 20 years ago.

I do like Australian horror movies, I'm surprised that I had not already seen this one. Don't think it had a UK DVD release so I got a copy on good old VHS. Not a great deal of plot here, but this is a slasher movie so that is quite normal. This one is about the making - or rather completion - of a slasher movie called Hot Blooded (sounds more like a porno to me!), that filming had ceased on back in that great slasher decade, the 1980's. Naturally people start getting killed, one by one... Not a bad film to be fair, the acting was OK, there are some gory deaths with a high enough kill count plus we get a body melt scene. Molly Ringwold, who appeared in several iconic 80's movies, adds a bit to the retro feel, but sadly Kylie Minogue has nothing more than a cameo, despite her name being highly billed. Scream is a too obvious influence, in fact it gets name checked, whilst Freddie Krueger too is here in pretty much all but name. Does build to a fun finale, certainly no classic but enjoyable enough.

Seen Australia's most atrocious film WOLF CREEK? If you have and somehow you mistakenly manage to see some of CUT you will be more horrified to see the same three producers names from that film having a misogynist bonding and practice session making this vicious drivel as well. It is one thing to be keen to make a seriously creepy thriller (eg: BREAKDOWN or THE original VANISHING)..... it is another thing to be a lame brain Tarantino wannabee who chooses to put distressing imagery of beautiful women being mutilated on a movie screen posing as interesting drama. Someone or three in the Australian movie industry seems to like to want to make films depicting gruesome female killings and if you care to look at the production credits of both CUT and WOLF CREEK you can see the same three names. How sad and pathetic. We have a terrible social blight common to many countries which is violence against women. With these two awful films we can see two clear examples of Australian film makers who promote the creation of vicious imagery depicting brutal death behavior towards women as a piece of passive entertainment for the impressive multiplex teens. And they pay themselves a lot for this creepy activity. One Tarantino is blight enough. To see an industry spawn the disgusting misogynistic viciousness of Eli Roth (HOSTEL) and Rob Zombie (DEVILS REJECTS) is the real axis of evil. To see this cancer spread to Australian cinema production via CUT and WOLF CREEK is more than the thin edge of the bloodstained shovel. It sadly proves that money filming cruelty is a keen topic among the untalented destructive few buying their way to fame via imitating Tarantino and those vicious Industry disciples. What is CUT about? Mutilating imagery of Molly Ringwald and Kylie Minogue, two of the world's most beautiful women. How is it done? With Garden tools. The fellers who wanted to put that on a movie screen (along with WOLF CREEK's violent depravity imagery) have advertised their private interests clearly with the matching credits of both these films. Some men must really hate beautiful women because of the power their attractiveness has over them..... and perhaps retaliate by making films such as all those listed in this comment. It is called snuff fantasy.