(1999)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Totally clueless, obviously made by a overly religious, poker-playing, Quentin-Tarantino wannabe
zelwood1 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Totally ridiculous. If you know anything about poker, you will find it absolutely appalling but also entertaining because it is so clueless. The nerd who made this movie is obviously very religious and knows slightly about the game of poker, but I doubt he's ever played above 3-6. (I think he also knows nothing of golf.) Where to start. I've seen better productions in the Intro to Film class I took freshmen year of film school. The actors to watch in this movie are Queen Momma, Scotty Nguyen, and the loser who can never win at poker. Everyone else is as wooden as they come, like bad porn actors.

*Spoiler* The man the movie starts with in the opening sequence is the only reason the film got made. He is a railbird who doesn't play poker and never has a line of dialogue, but the actor is the man who obviously paid for the movie. I can't think of a more useless waste of money than this man shelling out for this pointless production. It's fitting that he had such a useless role.

There's very little poker in this movie. Most of the time is spent on useless side characters whose plots aren't resolved in the slightest. Queen Momma does have a show-stealing scene where she throws her loser boyfriend through a window and tries to shoot his brains out. Also the nameless Arabs in the convenience store also give brilliant performances when they debate whether to beat up or kill an older lady who robs them. Their subtle performances are easily among the film's highlights. It makes you wonder why they bothered getting all these white people to play the leads.

In conclusion, complete nonsense. Plan 9 from Outer Space has slightly more coherency. If you play poker though you might want to have a laugh. Also if you're Christian you might enjoy some of the heavy-handed religious conversation that pepper the movie like pointless pepper. I hate movies made by religious people. Especially ones who think they know something about things they know nothing about. It's sad that Jennifer Harman and Scotty Nguyen got involved in this travesty as I can't help but think less of them. They must be envious of Johnny Chan for getting in Rounders.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The big blind??? More like the big grind to sit through this...
peteg88888 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
As a poker enthusiast I was looking forward to seeing this movie - Especially as it had Scotty Nyugen in it.

Basically, Scotty Nyugens short spots in this film are all it has going for it.

The characters are unlikeable and annoying, the soundtrack is awful and the plot, well, there isn't one.

I honestly got a headache and found myself reading the barcode number on the DVD box after twenty minutes I was THAT bored. Its actually ashame that Nyugen was in this movie as otherwise I wouldn't have wasted $16 buying it off Ebay.

Take it from me - AVOID like 7 2 offsuit!!! Dire. :(
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The big bust!
bellypaul25 July 2007
The writer/director of this film obviously doesn't know anything about film. I think the DP on this project was tied up and replaced with a monkey, because every seen was either too dark or had the hotter hot spots than the sun.

The story was awful, the characters were very one dimensional. For someone to have said that this film was made for poker fans and not film fans, that someone is kidding their self (it was probably the writer/director). No poker fan in this world likes this movie. Even your money man hates this project. To go into a casino and play a few hands doesn't give you the experience to write about poker. Keep your day job. And if it's playing poker, then you must be hurt'n.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horrible Horrible Horrible
Mustang9227 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
It takes a lot for me to rate a movie 1 Star out of 10. This was one. Horrible storyline -- i.e., what storyline? Horrible writing, acting, directing, and soundtrack. This has got to be the worst movie scored in history. Music under every frickin' scene that I watched and no theme or through line to the music. It stuck out like a bleeding thumb. Not sore thumb, but a BLEEDING thumb. One scene would have a guitar lick under it, then the next scene would have some weird attempt at comedy elements to accentuate the weird guy talking to the railbird, then something total different the next scene. What???? And newsflash to the filmmaker: Not every frickin' scene in a movie has to have music under it.

I could only get through about 27 minutes. I couldn't take it anymore. I then fast forwarded it to the scenes Jennifer Harman and Scotty Nguyen were in, since I was curious to see the rest of what they did. They're not actors, so don't expect much. Yes, Scotty will act at the poker table, but acting at the poker table is not the same as acting in film. All that said, he was one of the better "actors" in this so-called movie. For the little he had to do.

I'm an avid poker player myself, and this movie bored me to tears... nothing here for poker players to enjoy. Someone in one of the few comments here said this is a documentary. LOL. No, it's not. It's a lame and unclear story, with ill-defined characters, and weaved together in the worst way. Oh... and the editors of this trash should be shot. The only saving grace for me was that this movie only claimed 35 minutes of my life.

The back of the DVD case says the filmmaker wrote this between hands at a poker table. Clearly. The disjointedness confirms that. And this is quoted as a selling point on the case?? LOL.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Target Audience Only!
rob-174817 November 2006
This movie's target audience is poker players. It's not for people interested in cinema in general, simply curious about poker, or even non-poker playing gamblers. The movie would not make much sense to anyone but poker players.

This movie does not have high production values, excellent cinematography or music, or inspired sets. The direction is actually surprisingly good, considering that this a very low budget, independent, special interest film. It will only appeal to it's true target audience, to whom the story and the characters are the main attraction.

Do not be mislead by the aggregate rating... it should get the lowest rating from those to whom the movie was not targeted... and many of those people to whom the movie was not targeted saw it and graciously provided their (negative) opinion... a correct one from their point of view.

So, if you are a poker player, this movie will definitely appeal to you. If you are not, it definitely will not.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The nuts
Toni-Ruotsalainen8 August 2007
I don't get why people wouldn't like this movie.I think this is one of the funniest movies I've seen in a long time. Okay, it's cheap and the music sucks. But this is a documentary about poker. And poker is about the people. And this movie does a great job depicting types of people hanging around card clubs. In my opinion The Big Blind is the best movie out there to capture the essence of poker.

And I think it is an outrage that such a pile of monkey feces as "All-in" has more points than this piece of poker film history. This is hands down the best made poker documentary out there.

Four aces out of a deck of cards.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed