Song of the Vampire (Video 2003) Poster

(2003 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Pretty Lame. See Subspecies for Denice Duff at her best instead.
JohnnyLarocque15 November 2005
I love vampire films, but this one had nothing new to add to the genre. On top of being painfully low budget, the boom mic dips into every other scene. Why wasn't this caught in editing? The story is predictable and awkwardly slow paced. The vampire, who is supposed to be a good guy, takes some peoples lives without a second thought. It doesn't really make any sense.

To be honest, I got this movie on DVD because I am a huge fan of Denice Duff's work on the Subspecies series. In Subspecies, she's hauntingly beautiful, and was the perfect vampire. I was hungry to see more of her. In this film however, she is not a vampire, and her character is pretty weak. She does have one love scene which is unfortunately PG-13.

Pretty lame overall. I'd recommend skipping this movie and picking up Subspecies instead.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Denice Duff should've stayed IN FRONT of the camera!
ravenlord66625 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The first thing I have to point out is that all the comments you're about to read come from someone who ADORES vampire movies,especially those which stemmed from Fullmoon/Ted Nicolaou.So when I found out about Vampire Resurrection and the fact that Denice Duff was involved in both the directing and acting side,I was quite enthusiastic about seeing it.Finding it was not an easy task, but I sometimes wish I'd never found it! Why?... Well, V.R is not the most intriguing and breathtaking vampire flick I've ever seen.Unlike the Subspecies series or Vampire Journals,it does not really have a dark side and the setting is too usual for my taste.I mean,could one ever compare scenes shot in Romania by the ruins of a castle to those filmed in an ordinary American city??? I don't think so! This movie is also pretty frail plotwise and seems to be too heavy on romance.I watched it in stages...The beginning is but a copy of Vampire Journals (one of the few strong points). Most of the movie bores me,but the scenes where hardly any words are said ,when the main theme is playing and Caroline and her Vampire lover move around in the mist are simply magical!!! However,this is not enough to make me adore the film.I'm basically disappointed,I have to admit....

SPOILER: When Caroline goes to visit her Aunt to run away from the threat of her husband,the most unforgivable thing occurs.When she comes to the kitchen and her aunt is preparing breakfast,watch the top of the screen! A microphone keeps appearing there, and, needless to say, this ruined the movie once and for all for me. The directing is simply unprofessional,and for someone like me,looking for a means of escaping reality and delving into a vampiric world of dreams, nothing could be worse than such a mistake!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Sub-Subspecies
BandSAboutMovies25 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Also known as Vampire Resurrection and appearing as "From the Grave" on the I, Vampire remix anthology, Song of the Vampire not only stars Subspecies heroine Denice Duff, but was directed by her as well.

You may be forgiven if you think it fits into the adventures of Radu Vladislas, but it only uses footage from the third movie. Instead, we meet Jonathan, a man who had to sacrifice his own soul and become a vampire in order to find his true love.

Meanwhile, a beautiful young woman, Victoria Thorn (Denice, of coure) dreams of a past time when she had a great love who was Jonathan. Their souls are forever intertwined, as they say at Hot Topic. Will she become a vampire for him?

Man, what favors or blackmail did they have on Geoffrey Lewis to get him to show up in this movie? I know actors have to work, but wow. And Julie Michaels from Point Break and Roadhouse? Is this the most stars a Full Moon movie has had?

Also - the boom mic shows up repeatedly and I could not be happy to see it getting work.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lifetime channel flick for vampires and lonely women
Dr. Gore23 July 2003
Warning: Spoilers
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*

Somebody get the Lifetime Channel on the phone. I have found a movie for their midnight time slot. "Vampire Resurrection" AKA "Song of the Vampire" is a vampire flick made by women for women. No guys allowed! Yet I watched it anyway. Sigh. Why didn't it come with a warning on the front? "UNROMANTIC MEN STAY OUT! TRUE LOVE AFFIRMATION INSIDE!" Another fraud perpetrated in the name of horror movies. When will the madness end?

This was a hard movie to find on the IMDb. I had to track it down. It just came out on video as "Vampire Resurrection" but that title isn't even listed as one of the "Song of the Vampire's" aliases. The name Denice Duff was knocking around in my head so it was through her that I found this disaster. She is the director and star of this movie. I also recall seeing her name listed as the producer as well although she's not listed on the IMDb as such. What I'm saying is: It's all Duffs' fault.

So Duff wanted to make a romantic movie with a vampire. That's what she did. Is it a horror movie? BWA-HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Sorry. I'm back. The answer is no. Heck no. This is a chick flick pretending to be a horror movie. ONCE AGAIN, the horror genre is used as a way to rope in the suckers to get them to rent a non-horror movie. Why do filmmakers continually use and abuse the horror genre to make their non-horror flicks? "Vampire Resurrection" is another slap in my face.

There is nothing worth seeing here. It's a cheap looking romance with a vampire falling for the poor abused woman. These kinds of movies are churned out by the dozen for the Lifetime Channel. That's where this movie belongs. The target audience for this fraud are women searching for their true love from amongst the undead. None of them will ever see it of course since the video box cover has blood dripping from a vampire's fang. The only flies that web will snatch are B-movie horror fans.

It's a fraud. It's no good.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Umm... okaaay?
kardosma6 June 2020
The story was a little bit different(ish) to your normal Vamp stuff, and while I generally like amusing cheapy horror movies, sometimes you find yourself focusing in on one or two weird things and just unable to ignore them. Had that problem with this one, sadly. Two things I couldn't get past were the ghastly love song (please, either cast people who can sing or dub it in) and the s l o o o w way most of the characters spoke. They kind of sound like they'd all been sedated... it was so odd! The only one that didn't sound like was the abusive husband (well, and the parole officer).

Oh - and people seemed excessively stupid... the dialogue felt as though half the time people were working off different pages in the script (which is entirely possible if you've been sedated, I guess. hehe).

So, yeah. If those things don't bother you, give it a watch I suppose? There are definitely worse things out there.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
cobbled together with love
dr_foreman22 June 2004
"Song of the Vampire" is one of those movies that took years to complete, not because it's a vast and elaborate undertaking, but because it was stitched together on a tiny budget, probably in the production team's spare time. Rest assured that there are bloopers and signs of amateurism aplenty. But if you're reading this, you're probably already a low budget horror fan, so no doubt you're used to production values that aren't exactly blockbuster-level.

What really matters is the story, and in this case, it holds together pretty well. The basic premise is older than the hills; a vampire returns from his grave to seek a lost love. But there's some unique elements in the mix, including a very sympathetic heroine who is stalked by a psycho ex-boyfriend. Other commentators have complained that the domestic drama drags the movie down to a "chick-flick, Lifetime special of the week" level, but hey, I think it works. It's cool to get a female director's perspective on horror, and I find it annoying that so many male viewers are quick to dismiss a story that isn't as drenched in testosterone as something they would produce.

The directing is solid, considering that Denise "Subspecies" Duff wasn't working with decent cameras or lighting equipment. On the DVD commentary, she cheerfully admits that many of the props were obtained from Wal-Mart! But she's a very good photographer, and she knows how to frame interesting shots and inject a bit of mood here and there. Her work certainly eclipses much of what Full Moon did - with a lot more money - during the early 1990s. The only really amateurish parts are the action scenes; the gore is pretty convincing, but the slow-mo and synthesized suspense music are silly.

No doubt the people who will work to track this movie down are the same people it was made for. So you'll probably like it, you wacked-horror buff. Just be prepared for a movie that's less violent and OTT than "Subspecies," and a bit more grounded in the real world. Well, the real world, plus one hammy vampire.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The "Chick Flick" elements make it a good date movie
hocfocprod29 November 2005
Overall I thought this was pretty good movie. I'll admit, I like Denice Duff, but her contributions to the cinematography on this were outstanding.

As far as being a bit of a "Chick Flick", I agree that it had its moments, but it had some good violence and humor too. Enough of a mix that I was able to watch it with my wife. Usually when I watch indie horror she curls up with a book or just takes a nap.

The acting was solid and for the most part the production values are good. I suspect a larger budget would have allowed for dailies that would have caught that mic, but alas, catching it in post makes it near impossible to re-shoot on a low budget, especially once they realized how difficult cutting in the video footage would have been. (I think 24p HD would be a great choice for the sequel and solve a lot of problems) A movie worth a watch for vampire fans or fans of Denice Duff (she's easy on the eyes). Love the credit about the slipper as well.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
...As IF Dark Shadows,was given Third Chance for Success !
guestar5710 July 2001
" Atmosphere,Real Romance,and a Likable/Familiar cast.Whatever Denice Duff,James Horan and Ron Ford do next-Count me in the audience.Please make a sequel,and Denise become a creature of the night IN IT !!!"
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rough edges but promising
angelynx-214 September 2003
Anyone who's read my Subspecies reviews knows I'm a big fan of those films and of the work of Denise Duff, so I was really looking forward to the arrival of this project. Well, I have to say it's not great, but I'm willing to cut Duff some slack; it shows a lot of style for a first project, she's clearly been a careful student during her projects with Full Moon, and I'll definitely be interested in any further directing work by her.

Though at FM she only worked on the Subspecies series, this movie seems more influenced by FM's other, more Gothic vampire epic "Vampire Journals", with James Horan as Jonathan almost a dead-ringer (sorry) for that film's Jonathan Morris as Ash (hmm, name coincidence?). Good-guy vampire Jonathan, whose lover Caroline died in his arms at the hand of a jealous husband, seeks her reincarnation and finds her as modern-day Victoria Thorn (Duff). No doubt Victoria is the one: she's not only been having nightmares of Caroline's death using the exact same footage we see in Jonathan's flashbacks, but she also has a jealous husband, this one a murderous psycho who's just gotten out of jail and serves gruesome notice that he has no plans to respect the judge's restraining order. --You can see exactly where this is going to go, but it's fun to watch it get there. Duff knows how to sell a vampire film: she wants to make a Gothic romance, but also knows you have to toss in some gore and nudity to keep the stake-and-slash crowd happy, and manages a fair (though not ideal) balance of the two elements. It's also a kick to spot the little Subspecies homages tossed in here and there, like the documentary on "Prince Vladislas of Romania" and the Nicolaou's Used & Antique Books shop. --The pacing's slow, some of the acting is dire (especially: Duff really should have reined in Mr. Thorn's teeth-gnashing psychotics), there are some awful lighting/scene matching glitches, and the token attempt at historical backstory is so lame it made me cringe (excuse me? crossbows and voodoo priestesses only 100 years ago? That's 1903!) But overall I enjoyed it; Horan and Duff are likeable and convincing in the leads, there are some nice visuals, and I'd call it well worth the time of any fan of Full Moon's vampire tales. I congratulate Duff on getting this project on the shelves and hope she will direct again in this vein (--sorry, couldn't resist).

(p.s.--I *loved* the careful note in the end-credits assuring the viewer that the role of "dead cat" was played by a slipper.)
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad at all.
chet1926 January 2004
Ok, someone else pointed out the goofs. I did see the microphone dip in about 10 different times, but I didn't see the stage hand. Other than that, this movie held me for one original reason: I see as many vampire movies as possible, and this is the first one that I remember where the woman fell for the vampire BUT she wanted to remain mortal. They've been dating for several nights--him vampire and she human-- and that's how she wanted to keep it. Whenever a woman "gives" herself to a vampire and willingly becomes one herself, it never works out. Denice's character was smarter than that. I'm also not a fan of "good-guy" vampires, but Jonathon is a rare exception. No, he's not good when he killed cops and the innocent old gardener, but it was classy of him to spare Aunt Z 3 times for his lover's sake. Orville from Every Which Way but Loose throws in some comic relief, and makes the film good in my view. So laugh at Geoffrey and all the boom-mikes hanging down, but enjoy the rest !
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
'Dreamy delicious Denice Duff directs her beautifully blood-thirsty B-Movie debut with exuberant efficiency!'
Weirdling_Wolf5 April 2022
"...I love you, I just don't want to be like you!...if you damned my soul, I would hate you forever!!!!" - Victoria.

This low budget, yet surprisingly fun, campy-vampy bloodsucker is clearly inspired by B-maestro Ted Nicolaou's creepy Gothic DTV classic 'Vampire Journals', with supreme scream dream Denice Duff also having shone no less brightly in Nicolaou's immortal cult horror classic 'Subspecies 2', and as the demonstratively capable director/star of 'Vampire Resurrection', the estimable Duff is 'mostly' successful at maintaining the altogether tricky balance between blackly comedic B-Movie buffoonery, bodice-ripping Gothic Romance, and blood-slaked, moonlit Anne Rice vamping about! Duff's tantalizingly toothsome noughties Nosferatu neck-biter 'Vampire Resurrection' is of a suitably full-blooded vampire vintage, whereby handsome, Byronic, love-lorn Jonathan (James Horan) awakens from a disorientating 100 year slumber in order to seek out his unsuspecting soulmate Victoria (Denice Duff), Jonathan's earnest search for love being fraught with misadventure since Victoria's sadistic, on-parole ex-husband Marty (Frank Bruyenbroek) has darker, far less romantic intentions for the increasingly beleaguered Victoria!

While aesthetically hindered by a meagre budget, ardent B-Vampire fangs should still find much grisly Gothic goodness to sink their terror-teeth into, with the refined aristocratic performance from James Horan as Victoria's deathly pale, earnest vampire paramour tormented by a lover's warm heart, being sympathetically complemented by another beguiling performance by the exquisite and always engaging Denice Duff. Perhaps no undiscovered horror classic, 'Vampire Resurrection' is well worth the effort to dig up, as what the likable indie-feature lacks in expensive Hollywood gloss is generously compensated with its D. I. Y charm, inspired use of lo-fi practical FX, laudably brisk pacing, and the lively, uniformly committed performances of a quality cast effectively makes for a darkly romantic midnight movie, and pretty darn essential viewing for fans of the delectable Denice Duff.

'There's much more than buxom young Victoria's life at stake in Denice Duff's bodice-rippingly righteous boudoir bloodbath 'Vampire Resurrection' - Goosey Lucy / Buxom Bloodfiends.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nice directorial debut from Denice Duff
Katatonia4 July 2003
This was a surprisingly good vampire film. If you like Denice in the Subspecies movies you will not be disappointed. She did an admirable job of both Director and lead Actress. It has the feel of a mid-1990's Full Moon picture, dark and gothic. A nice twist away from the standard script that one would expect. The romance is heavy in the plot, but I think it worked quite well. Geoffrey Lewis plays a memorable and often funny role as the mortician/coroner. The performance by James Horan as the sole Vampire was amazing...he reminded me very much of Jonathon Morris in "Vampire Journals" directed by Ted Nicolaou.

Song of The Vampire has been released on DVD as "Vampire Resurrection" from Shadow Entertainment. It contains over 30 minutes of Deleted & Extended scenes, Bloopers, Trailers, Photo montage, and full-length commentary by Denice Duff ... what more could you possibly ask for?!?!!!
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Nice Denice Duff effort and Vampire Entry from Full Moon / Shadow Entertainment
radioactivesound6 March 2022
Nice low budget Denice Duff directorial debut and competent vampire effort all around for the most part.

Geoffrey Lewis was nice to see in a low budget effort like this too, and his small part adds some well-timed comedy relief to the effort that was a bit refreshing also.

I didn't feel this overly felt like a chick-flick as some complained about. Maybe it had more of a women's touch in the overall plot, but it wasn't overtly strong or annoying, and I think anybody can easily enjoy it equally.

There were definitely some weaknesses to the film here and there but for what was admitted to being a low-budget effort, a lot seems to have been done with little.

There are a couple questions in the direction of the plot as it goes along involving the ex-husband after Victoria being a bit contrived at one or two points for sure.

Some of the other additions of a bit of humor just timed right or at the right amount and some of the other likable cast members like Duff, Lewis, Horan, O'connor, and even some of the others make the film easily above average and worth a look.

It has been retitled and is currently on release as Vampire Resurrection and can still be ordered directly from Full Moon Direct as of this writing which is how I got it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good idea that need better editing.
chrome_angel3 January 2004
Warning: Spoilers
First off, the idea behind the plot was interesting, to say the least, and I commend the acting of Denice Duff (Victoria/Caroline)and James Horan (Jonathan), but I haven't seen bloopers this bad since I last saw "Mitchell".

**SPOILER ALERT**

(Note: I reference specific parts of the DVD for clarity, so everyone can check these for themselves.)

The Good: The acting was actually pretty darn good by all involved, and the Story idea is a good one with potential. However some fine tweaking would've worked out some of the inconsistencies, like where's the back story behind Johnathan and Caroline? It wasn't until later that we are lead to believe that the guy who pops through the front door is the jealous abusive husband, but who is to say? For all we know, it could've been the landlord coming to collect severely late rent. Only the Shadow knows. Basically, it's rife with possibilities that were never seen.

The Bad: Please tell me that I wasn't the only one to see the stage hand on the bottom right of the screen, sitting against the closet door in Chapter 18 (00:58:35),and the boom mike obviously hovering overhead in Chapter 13 (00:36:51 to 00:37:25) which almost hit Marilyn O'Connor (Aunt Zerelda) on top of the head (00:37:20)! Plus, would it have killed you people to get a stable mobile tripod, and use less MTV cut scenes !?!? I started to get motion sickness!

The Ugly: I'm glad that I didn't pay full price to see it in a theater, but I feel like I got robbed on the rental fee due to the fact that I was in the mood for what looked like, according to the box, a decent vampire flick, but instead a got a candidate for Joel, Tom Servo, and Crow on Mystery Science Theater 3k (I love those guys!). It was just another example of false truth in advertising.

**END SPOILER ALERT**

Basically, If you're looking for a vampire film with a comical side, pick this up, but if you want a good dramatic vampire film, get something else.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed