Konets vechnosti (1987) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
The screenwriter read another book
NimanAxcan18 January 2024
Few movies do honor to the books, and this one is no exception, it distorts the story to adapt it to something totally different, at times it is very dense, and tries to fill with images and music unintelligible things. The effects technology of the time doesn't help much. Essential parts of the story were changed and details of technicism that confuse or remain as a nonsense, missing dialogues and details, to maintain the plot and the suspense of the real dilemma posed by Asimov. Many of the scenes lost the essence of conveying the main idea, a yawn. I hope that someday they reverse it into something better.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Does not seem to last an eternity
hte-trasme13 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I hadn't quite realized when I watched this how much of the original Isaac Asimov novel of The End of Eternity I'd forgotten since I read it as a child. I enjoyed it then, but I wasn't sure how it would hold up for an adult audience. This Soviet adaptation proves that if nothing else it at least films very well indeed. It actually made me wonder why this is the only filmed version as The End of Eternity seems perfectly suited for the screen, with an excellent and original science fiction idea behind the plot, and integral romance, and a theme of rebellion from the main character.

All three of these things are brought across very well, and the other reviewer on this site is right when he uses the word "moody" to describe it. The central setting of "Eternity" is excellently realized -- at the same time as it is futuristic, huge, and imposingly impressive, it is also dank, unsettling, and off-putting. Which is just the right vibe for this place to give off, having as it does exciting power which it is frightening and suffocating in the use of. Even the use of old-fashioned business suits in the futuristic set gives just the right slightly-off feeling.

The character of Harlan is build well through actions rather than words, which is right as he is established not to be an effusive person -- and this makes it the more effective when he rebels. And his falling for Noys is believable despite its quickness for the fact he has been established as having been so reserved an inexperienced.

The the resolution of the theme of Harlan's opposition to corrupt authority -- in which he runs off and decides on uncompromising individuality, is a surprising and powerful one.

Good writing and acting are easy to find here, but it's really most worthwhile as an occasionally out-there but always effective science- fiction mood piece. The musical underscoring is a big part of that, as well as darkened but futuristic sets, unusual camera angles, and more. Credit all round!
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Bright filming of Isak Azimov
andreygrachev28 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
First of all- this rare to find Soviet film stands apart from the many others sci fi movies of that time in the USSR. It deals with the idea, that some real people could get immoratlity by means of controlling the time periods inside the special lab-city called "Vechnost". They look like people but they are trained to work for Vechnost forever, as a part of its mechanism. They correct time holes,help people from other time to solve their problems by means of special mind- operating system.

Everyone from Vechnost is immortal and they live in a very futuristic looking like place in the center of time , but some periods of time blocked from them, so two engineers are sent to solve the problem.

As soon as The main character falls in love the operation goes wrong-this causes the destruction of the lab by people from some other time.

The woman turns out to be fake-love, a spy, who was sent to disorganize Vechnost .

Very moody and hypnotic film. I liked it more than "Solaris"
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very authentic
bluefox0131 October 2015
This is a very authentic Soviet TV adaptation of Isaac Asimov's novel "The End of Eternity", which in turn is one of the most impressive stories about time travel I read.

I remember watching it in East German TV in the mid 80's. It was in form of a short series and wasn't synchronized in German, only with subtitles, but nevertheless captivating.

Some years later I discovered the book by Asimov and noticed, that I know its story already...

There weren't so many TV and movie adaptations of science fiction stories produced in Eastern Europe before 1990, and this is definitely one of the best.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Near perfect cinematization of Asimov's brilliant novel The End of Eternity
pierrecurie-869216 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I first read Asimov's The End of Eternity over fifty years ago and have judged it to be the best science fiction story I have ever read. So it was with some trepidation that I watched Konets Vechnosti today. I knew the film was made in 1987, so I anticipated several problems: 1) The characters in the film would fall short of the expectation I had built up over fifty years from the book, which I have read many times; 2) The storyline in the film would be very different to that in the book; 3) The sets would fall short in visual and technical aspects (I mean, I expected relatively crude sets and dated computers, etc, common in seventies films).

As I watched the film, I began to realize that it is a SUPERB realization of the book. The actor playing Harlan fits the bill spot on: not too old, not too young. Superb casting. As for the character of Noys Lambent, which simply has to be a powerfully seductive woman according to the book, the actress playing her is iconic and is exactly as I have ever imagined she would be like. If you read the book, you will know that there has to be somewhat of a mismatch between Harlan and Lambent: he is not overly handsome and is totally inexperienced with women, she is devastatingly attractive and something of a society playgirl. Yet together, in the film, they are exactly matched in some mysterious way, as in the book.

The other actors in the film are very well cast, particularly the Finge character. The Twissell character seems to be less sympathetic in the film as in the book, but I suppose that's because Twissel's own crimes are confessed to in the book, whereas there was none of that in the film.

As for the sets, they were convincing, with a lot of good special effects.I did not think this was a cheap production, but a film with excellent standards alround.

All in all, the film makers have done a superb job here. highly enjoyable and to be recommended.

Spoiler Alert! The only slight quibble I have is with the ending of the film. In the book, Harlan ends up with Noys in the Twentieth century. In the film, he rejects her and walks off down a busy street. This left me wondering whether Noys ever really cared for him or whether she was just playing her part in the great conspiracy of the Hidden Centuries to destroy Eternity.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed