The Utopian Society (2003) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
American Twenty something slice of life, a bit slow
Marion889 September 2004
Nice cool bunch of young actors, colorful, playful good acting. Entertaining, sometimes a bit slow, but a slice of American twenty something life. The director could have cut a bit faster to the point. Some nice dialogs. I liked the Asian actor very much he has some real comedy talent. The director made the girls interesting and sexy without showing any flesh or being crass. A good point. I am looking forward to a bigger budget film by the same director with a producer who will oversee the editing. In the meantime this is worth watching on TV or DVD, you' ll be surprised by the overall quality of the movie and the acting. The indie world is coming up at last with good stuff, ie professional.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A Dystopian Film
MBunge26 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Errrruuuugh. That's the sound I made when I sat down to write this review and it's the closest I can come to expressing both my feelings toward and the quality of The Utopian Society. There are thousands and thousands of people toiling away in the lower reaches of show business, each thinking they're just as good as the biggest stars in entertainment. Every so often those strivers come together to make a film in the hopes of proving it to the world and, especially, the studios. What usually results is a movie like this which only proves that the closest they should come to stardom is valet parking Morgan Fairchild's car at the Washington Correspondents Dinner.

Despite all indications, like the DVD cover and it being listed on IMDb.com as a comedy, this is actually a drama. I actually think someone might be eligible for prosecution under truth-in-advertising laws because you can't even argue that The Utopian Society is a comedy. It's not just unfunny, and boy is it that, but it starts with serious-looking opening credits and never deviates from that tone. Sure, there's a couple of seconds here and there where pitiful attempts at humor occur, but there are also moments of laughs in films like Scarface, Terms of Endearment and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. That doesn't make them comedies, though all three of them are far funnier than this offal. Leatherface is like a combination of Jon Stewart and Jim Carey compared to The Utopian Society.

And I especially wouldn't advise any struggling actors to watch this thing. Malin Ackerman is one of the stars here and you might think seeing her in such humble beginnings and knowing she goes on to be in some major films would be encouraging. The problem with that is Ackerman is neither more talented nor all that more attractive than any other member of the cast. There's nothing here to indicate she would go on to any more success than the other actors, which only suggests the reasons why some performers rise and others don't are completely arbitrary and irrational.

The story is about 6 college students who have one night to finish a paper on creating a perfect civilization. Now, you might think that premise would have something to do with what happens in the movie, that the interactions of the characters and the conflicts and resolutions between them would be connected through analogy or metaphor with the idea of a Utopian society. You might think that, but you would be wrong. It's just a conceit to get these people stuck together for the length of this motion picture. As for these people, they are clichés straight out of the half-price cliché sale at Idiot Screenplays R' Us. There's the sorority bitch (Malin Ackerman), the hippie chick (Sam Doumit), the nerd (Kelvin Yu), the frat boy (Austin Nichols), the jock (Kristin Ariza) and the activist poseur (Mat Hostetler). And because they were half-price, each clichéd character has an equally clichéd secret about themselves that's supposed to make the other characters and the audience question their assumptions. The only question I have is how low are the IQs of writer Jason Preston and director John P. Aguirre.

This film is a bunch of talking in various cheap locations. Nothing of any interest is said and none of it is said in any interesting way. None of it looks any better than your average bad sitcom on Comedy Central. There's also no nudity, no profanity I can recall and the only supposedly adult subject matter in the story would have seemed tame in an Afterschool Special 25 years ago.

The Utopian Society is an abject failure in all ways. I don't understand how the people making it didn't give up before they were halfway through because there's no way they didn't see how badly it was turning out. If they did it because they wanted to be famous, they'd have been better off breaking into Paris Hilton's house. At least that might have gotten them a few minutes on E! News. And if you ever think about watching this film, you should go break into Paris Hilton's house. What you'll read on the wall of your cell will be more enjoyable, even if you're getting sodomized while reading it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Film Captures A Generation
Sean-P-Hale12 November 2013
This film speaks to a generation of 1990s and early 2000s kids. Everything from the music to the eclectic cast. I know that at college amongst my group of friends there were curiosities and stereotypes that had to be worked out in college and high school. This movie really portrays the first week at college getting to know a new group of people and looking at it through the minds of people from all different backgrounds who ended up in the same place. Great work. The director definitely had an eye for talent in casting Malin Akerman. The scene at the baseball field is one to be remembered. The visual aspect (as well as the dialogue) makes this movie one to remember.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Watchable little flick
sarahjwynter13 May 2004
A friend of mine got a copy of this from the director, since she's up for being in his next film. I was surprised I liked it as much as I did. I usually hate indie things. But although it got very after-school special toward the end, it was a very realistic account of college students and their personalities. The best part of the film was the chemistry between the actors. The actors appeared to work very well with each other and keeps you interested. Their dialogue is very natural and felt like college kids talking as opposed to so many TV shows who write teens who talk like adults. Getting sick of that. I have to recommend the flick. If it comes out on DVD, it's worth a rent.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Wonderful!!
gretchi5 April 2003
I've gotten the chance to see this movie at the Kindred International Film Festival in Columbia, Missouri on April 5th, 2003! I liked how the story was written. Seeing 6 different people getting together, to know more about each other and actually liking each other! It was funny as well! The 6 actors also did a great job!! I would recommend this movie to college students or anyone interested in this kind of movie, if its available to theaters/rent/buy!!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed