Those wicked Mormons are at it again, abducting innocent Danish girls and forcing them to go to Utah. Not sure why Mormons were regarded with such distrust back in the day, but their misdeeds make for an entertaining, if slightly hysterical, thriller here. It probably doesn't need to be 50 minutes long, but it does build to a lively final few scenes, and while it might look hokey today, there were few films like it back in 1911.
2 Reviews
Early exploitation film
leif-3828 December 2019
Before there was Hollywood, the world's film capitals were Rome and Copenhagen. 'Mormonens offer' ('A Victim of the Mormons', 1911) is one of the few surviving Danish films of this era. It tells the tale of a beautiful young woman who is kidnapped into an evil cult- namely the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (LDS).
1911 was the year of the 'Mormon Scare'. The LDS were proselytizing in the UK, Germany, and Scandinavia with considerable success, when Hans Peter Fleece, an LDS apostate, took to the lecture circuit- telling anyone who would listen that the Mormons kidnapped innocent young girls and forced them into polygamous marriage in Utah. It did not help when it became known that polygamous marriages were taking place in Utah (though none were LDS sanctioned). None less than Winston Churchill lead a Parliamentary investigation and found the kidnapping charges groundless.
Nordisk Film Kompagni had previous success making 'white slavery' films, so a movie about the Mormon Scare was a logical next step. 'A Victim of the Mormons' turned out to be an international success, playing in Utah despite the objections of the governor and the LDS church.
In this movie, a Mormon Svengali- Andrew Larson (played with presence by Valdemar Psilander)- seduces the naive Nina Gram (Clara Pontoppidan). The girl agrees to run away with him, but when she has second thoughts, Larson drugs her and ties her up. He absconds with her to Utah, where she receives sympathy only from Larson's wife. Nina's brother and fiancé follow Larson to Utah, where they try to rescue Nina. Deeds of derring-do follow in due course.
The one memorable scene is the baptism, in which Larson immerses a bevy of young girls into a huge font in an art noveau set. It is implied that after this rite, the girls will become sex slaves and that return is impossible. So we have pretty girls, seduction, drugs, kidnapping, pagan rites, and sex slavery. What's not to like? Nearly everything is implied, but audiences of 1911 would have been quite titillated.
Titillation is a drink served stronger today, and at any rate 'daring' invariably loses its luster with time. So what's left? In this case not much. The story is a rather dull melodrama, without mystery or ambiguity.
And 'A Victim of the Mormons' fails to transcend the limitations of the early medium. There is no subjective camera, no sense of personality, and we don't particularly sympathize with anyone. The actors came from world of the theater and with the exception of Psilander fail to carry a theatrical presence in a silent medium. The sets and compositions are professionally done, but except for the baptismal set less than artistic. Early movies are essentially moving tableux, which in this case proves stultifying.
Worst of all, 'A Victim of the Mormons' doesn't really have the histronic, out-of-control feel that makes flicks like 'Reefer Madness' of 'Narcotic' a lot of fun.
If you're a student of early film or LDS history, this film might be worth sitting through. Otherwise, don't bother.
1911 was the year of the 'Mormon Scare'. The LDS were proselytizing in the UK, Germany, and Scandinavia with considerable success, when Hans Peter Fleece, an LDS apostate, took to the lecture circuit- telling anyone who would listen that the Mormons kidnapped innocent young girls and forced them into polygamous marriage in Utah. It did not help when it became known that polygamous marriages were taking place in Utah (though none were LDS sanctioned). None less than Winston Churchill lead a Parliamentary investigation and found the kidnapping charges groundless.
Nordisk Film Kompagni had previous success making 'white slavery' films, so a movie about the Mormon Scare was a logical next step. 'A Victim of the Mormons' turned out to be an international success, playing in Utah despite the objections of the governor and the LDS church.
In this movie, a Mormon Svengali- Andrew Larson (played with presence by Valdemar Psilander)- seduces the naive Nina Gram (Clara Pontoppidan). The girl agrees to run away with him, but when she has second thoughts, Larson drugs her and ties her up. He absconds with her to Utah, where she receives sympathy only from Larson's wife. Nina's brother and fiancé follow Larson to Utah, where they try to rescue Nina. Deeds of derring-do follow in due course.
The one memorable scene is the baptism, in which Larson immerses a bevy of young girls into a huge font in an art noveau set. It is implied that after this rite, the girls will become sex slaves and that return is impossible. So we have pretty girls, seduction, drugs, kidnapping, pagan rites, and sex slavery. What's not to like? Nearly everything is implied, but audiences of 1911 would have been quite titillated.
Titillation is a drink served stronger today, and at any rate 'daring' invariably loses its luster with time. So what's left? In this case not much. The story is a rather dull melodrama, without mystery or ambiguity.
And 'A Victim of the Mormons' fails to transcend the limitations of the early medium. There is no subjective camera, no sense of personality, and we don't particularly sympathize with anyone. The actors came from world of the theater and with the exception of Psilander fail to carry a theatrical presence in a silent medium. The sets and compositions are professionally done, but except for the baptismal set less than artistic. Early movies are essentially moving tableux, which in this case proves stultifying.
Worst of all, 'A Victim of the Mormons' doesn't really have the histronic, out-of-control feel that makes flicks like 'Reefer Madness' of 'Narcotic' a lot of fun.
If you're a student of early film or LDS history, this film might be worth sitting through. Otherwise, don't bother.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
