"Hart to Hart" Death in the Slow Lane (TV Episode 1979) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
I accepted the absurdity and loved it, crank and all.
HilaryElizabeth931 March 2015
Jonathan is definitely all that, don't get me wrong, but in the end he's a boy that likes his toys, the toy in question an old King George-era car for Jennifer's birthday. Definitely a classic bonehead husband move with this gift for him rather than her; that's OK, I've been known to buy my husband plenty of shirts that are "for him" but that are my taste not his. Bonehead wife! Heh. Anyway, there's a ton to love about this episode right off the bat. I was laughing out loud more than a few times. The pounds vs. dollars tete-a-tete was very amusing, and then there's a ton of props and lines that made me squeal. The best line of the show and a sign of the times, when the dock foreman hands off this ridiculous car to Jennifer and says, "You're really gonna look terrific … sittin' in the gas lines. There's a lot of Jennifer-is-no-slouch'iness to this ep. She can fix her own damn sink, thank you very much, you can leave the driving to her, she'll open up the hood of a vintage car (as if she'll know what the hell she's looking at), and she'll go grease monkey like a pro. Then there's the corset she preens in. Awesome shot of her in that doorway. She looks so good without objectification. It's something out of Downton Abbey meets Penny Dreadful. Now one thing, I've worn a corset for a role in the past, and I can promise you, sitting on the ground in that thing is not easy. I'll bet you anything she had to be lowered and hoisted back up. The scene where the woman offers herself up to Jonathan is really good. He lets her down with a leading man sensitivity that calls for every single moment of closeup that was shot for it. Very much enjoyed the notes in the late Andra Akers's performance as a woman unabashedly attracted to Jonathan. The gratuitous low-speed car chase scene with champagne torpedoes is hysterically absurd, and I needed more of it until the shot of Jonathan giving up and running after the bad guy, since his legs would move faster than the car would. The mystery driving what this car is all about is a doozy, and when it was finally revealed I was really impressed. I was a bit disappointed with the kicker. For one thing, their bedroom doesn't appear set yet, as their bed has no headboard at all and a very weird painting above it that really just didn't fit. Of course, me watching these out of order, it's not like anyone knew that yet. The bigger deal is that Jennifer goes and gets herself a fur coat. It's not what William Holden would have wanted, and it's not what Jennifer would later be established to want. A big oops in the character development department. Holden had not yet died here, that's clear. I need to watch the fake fur episode again to see how this might be references (or not). Overall, the whole thing is silly in many ways, from the image of Max cranking a car to the costumed afternoon to the concept of what they resorted to in the end, but in the Hart universe it's really par for the course. So, I loved this one. Knocked it down a point for the fur coat.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Old vintage cars are worth killing for!!
coltras357 June 2022
Jeremy Brett stars in this rather unusual but interesting Hart to Hart mystery. And the mystery here is the car, and you don't know why an English couple ( Jeremy Brett and the lady playing his wife) are so desperate to get their hands on a car that Jonathan has bought for his wife's birthday; the fact that they are willing to kill for it makes you watch on and see why the car is special. Well, it is vintage and it has its appeal, and car enthusiasts would certainly lap this up. Not the best episode, but entertaining enough.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great Early Episode
aramis-112-80488023 January 2023
Jeremy Brett, who in a few years would become the consummate Sherlock Holmes, here plays a bad guy after a car Jonathan (Robert Wagner) buys in London for his wife.

Some interesting insights into the 1970s. Mrs. Hart, a writer, sticks a small slip of correction tape in her typewriter. I used those nasty things myself. They were drier, however, and less messy than Liquid Paper. They also mention "gas lines." Under liberal Republican Nixon and Democrat Carter domestic production of oil and gas was low and OPEC had the US in a hammerlock, lowering supply. Where use was particularly high, as in California ("LA is a great big freeway"), supplies were so low and prices so (comparatively) high drivers had to fill up on an even/odd system. When domestic production is low prices go up and the US is reliant on other countries.

So much for the 1970s. Bad clothes, bad music, bad hair and I was in high school. Too bad.

Jonathan buys a car Brett & Co. Badly want. Why?

It includes a car chase at 25 mph. I know, we saw the same sort of thing earlier on "Charlie's Angels" and later on "Remington Steele." But in this case they keep us guessing until the last few minutes about what it is, and when it comes, it's worth it.

Good performance by Brett. Enjoyable episode especially for anyone with an appreciation for vintage vehicles.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This episode holds up. I don't know why you're confused.
terrihofmann31 December 2015
Johnathan bought the car in London. It was shipped to the US. The other couple stated it was easier to let Hart transport the car for them then they would do what they had to to get the car back. Johnathan told Jennifer that he tried to contact the showroom but it was closed. Johnathan was going to call again later (7 hours) when the showroom reopened. Quite easily the fur coat could have been fake. Jennifer doesn't wear fur. The studio wardrobe probably has an expensive line of coats for actresses to wear and you can bank on fake most of the time. Also, did you forget they were acting? Did you know that though Jennifer eats meat and so on Stefanie Powers is a vegetarian and has been since she was a teen. Her step-father took her to a slaughterhouse so she could see that people give up their horses whether they are young or old, healthy or sick and they are sent to the slaughterhouse. He wanted her to learn that an animal you own is a lifetime commitment. She doesn't eat meat or where furs. That's her moral core. Watch With This Hart I thee Wed or Chamber Of Lost Harts. Max brings prime rib to the table. That doesn't mean she eats it.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Stupid episode!
wkozak22128 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This review has spoilers. I used to watch this series all the time. There were a lot of great episodes. This is the worst one, IMO. It is stupid. The only thing I liked was the car. However, for the car to be some unique tracking system is unbelievable. I could have written a better script.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
bubblegum TV
Brucey_D18 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I have -quite by accident- inflicted several episodes of Hart to Hart on myself recently and they all share some similarities, being that the plots are paper-thin to the extent that it feels like the running time could be cut in half and you wouldn't miss much, and you wouldn't need to be paying much attention to follow the plot even then. So it might have been just what some TV audiences wanted then (and now) but it isn't everyone's cup of tea by any means.

In this particular episode the 'trip to London' is established by using stock shots. In the 'London car showroom' the (clearly visible) traffic outside comprises various species of American cars and the odd VW, all driving on the wrong side of the road. About as convincing and believable as most of the 'Bridd-ish aggcents' (sic) in this episode. Or the car. Or the whole plot in fact.

So yeah, this is bubblegum TV at its best... or worst.... It makes Charlie's Angels look like serious dramatic work by comparison. Not for me, so 3/10.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
It's more than a car
abcs9925 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
A vintage car becomes the centerpiece of a mystery that doesn't reveal itself until nearly the end.

Jonathan has bought this car, but a couple is keenly interested in it for reasons unknown. Unfortunately, there are a couple of major holes in the storyline. The couple manages to find out the buyer's name (Jonathan), but didn't steal nor even attempt to take the car until it's been transported across the globe (to L.A.). In addition, only one attempt is made to contact the seller to ask why this car wasn't as expected, and the unsuccessful attempt is easily accepted.

In summary, the positives of this mystery are the delay of finding out what's so special about the car and the creativity behind what that is. The negatives are an absence of logic in two major ways.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed