**SPOILERS** Starts out with a pot shot at a Cougar that may or may not have connected; an unbelievable Puma pelt as a gift for Della, and a combative client who wants Perry's help in a sneaky oil-land deal. Enough, already? Nope. A missing gun, a partner in the deal (murdered) a Sado-Masochistic relationship between Perry's client and his secretary/girlfriend? A couple of cheating lovers, and a small pistol that is the key to the puzzle.
Here's where I have a problem. You knew I had one, didn't you? Paul takes the first pistol to his ballistics expert, who says yes, he'll test it, but if he finds it has been used in a crime, he'll have to turn the evidence over to the police/ D.A. Why bother using a guy like that? Besides, HOW is the lab guy supposed to know ANYTHING about the gun, except what Paul has brought him? How does HE have access to the city's crime lab results? Another reviewer stated that Phipps was trying to cheat Preston, but that's not true; he called Mike up, and said that things were going south, so he'd better get over to the well a.s.a.p. If he was gonna cheat him, he'd just have let it drop where it was; right in Mike's lap. He was on Mike's side (didn't get any credit for it either, did he? And people wonder why I have trust issues), and was murdered for it. Mentioned afterwards only as a victim, NOT a friend, SHAME.
It was good that Perry found an identical pistol whose serial numbers were NOT on the removable barrel. By switching them out in court, he wrecked the prosecution's case by pointing out a strong alternative to the court. THEN Paul's detective work showed up in Perry's theory about who REALLY committed the very first crime, and turned out to be a slithering snake in the grass.
As in other cases, the statement that "I didn't mean to kill him" will have no bearing on the prosecution's presentation for the court. He took the weapon with him, the killing was in furtherance of previous felonies; they'll reserve a nice seat in the gas chamber just for him. The sweet cheater he was involved with is gonna have to find another man to milk for a nice apartment, etc., and of course, there's a sniveling happy ending for the twisted involvement between Mike and Lydia.
Here's where I have a problem. You knew I had one, didn't you? Paul takes the first pistol to his ballistics expert, who says yes, he'll test it, but if he finds it has been used in a crime, he'll have to turn the evidence over to the police/ D.A. Why bother using a guy like that? Besides, HOW is the lab guy supposed to know ANYTHING about the gun, except what Paul has brought him? How does HE have access to the city's crime lab results? Another reviewer stated that Phipps was trying to cheat Preston, but that's not true; he called Mike up, and said that things were going south, so he'd better get over to the well a.s.a.p. If he was gonna cheat him, he'd just have let it drop where it was; right in Mike's lap. He was on Mike's side (didn't get any credit for it either, did he? And people wonder why I have trust issues), and was murdered for it. Mentioned afterwards only as a victim, NOT a friend, SHAME.
It was good that Perry found an identical pistol whose serial numbers were NOT on the removable barrel. By switching them out in court, he wrecked the prosecution's case by pointing out a strong alternative to the court. THEN Paul's detective work showed up in Perry's theory about who REALLY committed the very first crime, and turned out to be a slithering snake in the grass.
As in other cases, the statement that "I didn't mean to kill him" will have no bearing on the prosecution's presentation for the court. He took the weapon with him, the killing was in furtherance of previous felonies; they'll reserve a nice seat in the gas chamber just for him. The sweet cheater he was involved with is gonna have to find another man to milk for a nice apartment, etc., and of course, there's a sniveling happy ending for the twisted involvement between Mike and Lydia.