I watched Babi Buta Yang Ingin Terbang last week in the Amsterdam Filmmuseum, and found it a somewhat unbalanced but still interesting movie. It is a real art-house movie, more in the style of (Chinese) directors Hou Hsiao Hsien and Tsai Ming-liang than a more mainstream product like (Javanese) Garin Nugroho's Daun di Atas Bantal, which is probably the internationally best known Indonesian movie of the last couple of years. Babi Buta has many long shots and the connection between the various scenes is not always clear.
This fits nicely with the search for identity, the theme of the movie. Man is not busy with his identity 24 hours a day, so it can be presented in a fragmented (or as the director stated "kaleidoscopic") way in a movie. The people portrayed in the movie are mainly ethnic Indonesians of Chinese descent. Quite a few books have been written about the position of Indonesia's ethnic Chinese, a minority that has been relatively successful economically, but also stands somewhat aside from mainstream society. Former President Soeharto used Chinese businessmen as business partners for his ever more corrupt government, which did not reflect nicely on other Chinese. Soeharto also repressed Chinese culture in the aftermath of the chaos at the end of Soekarno's regime, when Chinese were suspected of being godless communists who collaborated with the People's Republic of China.
The Chinese in this movie are not extremely successful. They live in a rather gritty area near the centre of Surabaya, and interact with the people of Malay stock surrounding them. This is sometimes tough and sometimes an opportunity (e.g. when one of the character announces to convert to Islam, so he can marry more women).
Not all parts of the movie were equally clear to me. I missed the fact that the young girl's friend was a Menadonese instead of a Chinese (and who is beaten up for "being Chinese") completely. Equally, the reason for the blind dentist to get sodomised was beyond me (and the scene caused about 30 % of the viewers to leave the theatre). If you read the director's description on his website or the synopsis here on IMDb beforehand, a lot of the scenes do make more sense, but I feel that a movie should speak for itself.
The link with Chinese culture is limited to firecrackers. The Christian televangelists are also quite popular among a certain segment of Indonesian Chinese society. Basically these people's lives are presented as they are, there is very little true analysis of causes or ideas for solutions.
So indeed you get a kaleidoscopic view of a certain segment of ethnic Chinese people in Indonesia. The camera work is excellent. The movie has a raw sense of humour, as you can find among younger Indonesians. The actors were a bit flat-charactered sometimes, but others were okay. Nowhere however did the movie reach the subtlety of a Hou Hsiao Hsien's movie.
This fits nicely with the search for identity, the theme of the movie. Man is not busy with his identity 24 hours a day, so it can be presented in a fragmented (or as the director stated "kaleidoscopic") way in a movie. The people portrayed in the movie are mainly ethnic Indonesians of Chinese descent. Quite a few books have been written about the position of Indonesia's ethnic Chinese, a minority that has been relatively successful economically, but also stands somewhat aside from mainstream society. Former President Soeharto used Chinese businessmen as business partners for his ever more corrupt government, which did not reflect nicely on other Chinese. Soeharto also repressed Chinese culture in the aftermath of the chaos at the end of Soekarno's regime, when Chinese were suspected of being godless communists who collaborated with the People's Republic of China.
The Chinese in this movie are not extremely successful. They live in a rather gritty area near the centre of Surabaya, and interact with the people of Malay stock surrounding them. This is sometimes tough and sometimes an opportunity (e.g. when one of the character announces to convert to Islam, so he can marry more women).
Not all parts of the movie were equally clear to me. I missed the fact that the young girl's friend was a Menadonese instead of a Chinese (and who is beaten up for "being Chinese") completely. Equally, the reason for the blind dentist to get sodomised was beyond me (and the scene caused about 30 % of the viewers to leave the theatre). If you read the director's description on his website or the synopsis here on IMDb beforehand, a lot of the scenes do make more sense, but I feel that a movie should speak for itself.
The link with Chinese culture is limited to firecrackers. The Christian televangelists are also quite popular among a certain segment of Indonesian Chinese society. Basically these people's lives are presented as they are, there is very little true analysis of causes or ideas for solutions.
So indeed you get a kaleidoscopic view of a certain segment of ethnic Chinese people in Indonesia. The camera work is excellent. The movie has a raw sense of humour, as you can find among younger Indonesians. The actors were a bit flat-charactered sometimes, but others were okay. Nowhere however did the movie reach the subtlety of a Hou Hsiao Hsien's movie.