"Legend of the Seeker" Home (TV Episode 2009) Poster

(TV Series)

(2009)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
It's called "occultation".
qatmom21 February 2009
When a planet or star is temporarily obscured by the moon, occultation of that planet or star by the moon is said to have occurred. What can NEVER occur is for a planet or star to appear IN FRONT of the moon in the shadowed portion of the moon, only to disappear behind the portion of the moon in sunlight.

Which is what happened in this episode. And every time it did, I was reminded that the writers and anyone else who saw this script failed to see a problem with something they should have known about by the age of 12 or much earlier. The moon doesn't shrink in size and regrow as it goes through its phases--we see the portion lit by sunlight. No star or planet can possibly pass between a planet and its moon without disastrous effects. Planets, even a smaller Mercury-sized one would have cataclysmic gravitational effects, and stars, even the smallest white dwarfs, even more so--and this episode had THREE such objects posed between the planet and the moon.

Here's the place where someone will tell me this is fantasy, and ANYTHING goes in fantasy. Wrong. Fantasy writing, good fantasy writing, changes some of the rules but not all the rules of existence, and then develops the story from there. Deus ex machina is not dragged out as needed except by the very sloppy. You do not make up the rules as you go along unless you are an amateur.

We live in a world dependent upon a complex network of communications satellites, and yet, there would seem to be scant understanding of basic--very basic--essentials of space science. Every time the three or fewer stars were shown vanishing behind a crescent moon, I was reminded of the uninformed nature of what had to be dozens of people, I was startled right out of the story and again left wondering how something so basic could have slipped past so many people. Good writing does not jolt one back to reality.

By the way, it's a clip show.
13 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Don't Listen
fox_lmfslj27 February 2009
Don't listen to them. What a base underestimation of humanity to assume people might believe stars can move in front of the moon. Besides the inferiority complex required to harbor such a thought, it IS pointless to argue physics in a fantasy realm and you can't get out of it just by admitting it. Look, magic does not exist, nor do the strange gods and pantheons that often place immortalized heroes in the heavens as the stars themselves. Please. What a poor reason not to like the episode.

Granted, it's a "clip show." So what. Whatever the business plan was for the show it included spending a lot on special effects and fight cinematography and planned on doing a lot of walking in the woods to compensate. The story is awesome, the acting is fine. Let them have their clip show. If you're like me and watched the show over the course of a couple months or more then it's not so bad to be reminded of earlier episodes.

Other than that, you're probably in the wrong genre. Go watch The Biggest Loser.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A 1 hour recap
rinse200322 February 2009
Probably the weakest of all the episodes. Nothing really happens except the seeker goes into a sort of trance,reverts to his pre-seeker days (at least in thought) and conveniently proceeds to narrate the whole story- so-far in a series of flashbacks. How he is brought back to reality is the rest of story.

If you have been watching the series from the beginning this episode does not move the plot forward at all. If you just got hooked, it will help you catch up in just one sitting!

...And that is where my review should have ended. But just as the producers have to stitch their little vignettes with a wafer thin plot so it can qualify as an episode, I have to bring it up to 10 lines to qualify as a review.
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed