Ringer (TV Series 2011–2012) Poster

(2011–2012)

User Reviews

Review this title
62 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
"Ringer" is solid
chrisksc21 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
After the second episode, I've developed more confidence in this series. The pilot made me very skeptical, particularly the poorly rendered CGI screens and typical broken family situations. As we approach the end of the pilot, serious conflict begins to unravel as Bridget adopts Siobhan's identity.

The second episode simply got me wanting more. Bridget is gradually digging herself a deeper hole even though she's trying to be responsible and accountable for once in her life. If the second episode is an indication of the rest of the series, I foresee an intense, gripping, scandalous season ahead as Siobhan's scheme unravels.

I just hope the viewers will give it a chance.
31 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A pretty good show.
rayrodgpa20 September 2011
Don't judge the show on the Pilot alone. Even though the pilot is not very good and hard to watch, trust me, it really does get better. The script improves,the characters develop a little more, there are no more horribly cheesy green screens, there are less close-ups, there is more background information, and the acting improved, especially Sarah Michelle Gellar's acting.

Plus, there is a little twist in the plot that I did not understand after viewing the pilot. So what I am saying here is don't lose hope, because if you give up due to the pilot then I feel sorry for you, you are missing out on a pretty good show.
89 out of 112 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I'm a fan
vinbjorn29 October 2011
What I love about Gellar's new series is the way it slowly evolves each episode, revealing a new layer to the rich tapestry of it's characters. Just when you think you're figuring out the motivations (and trajectory) of a character you find out something new and you're given a new perspective.

One thing this series is not is predictable. The only time I could understand the CGI criticism was during the boat scene where the two sisters (both played by Gellar) were meant to be on an open air boat hurtling across the ocean but could be heard speaking softly over a baldly rendered ocean background. Apart from that the brief CGI scenes shared by the two were flawless. Could this scene be a stylistic approach? It looks as it should, it sounds as it should, but something is 'not right'. Reality has been altered and manipulated. Then again maybe it just comes down to budgeting and time constraints but personally I would like to believe in the former.

Gellar plays the two sisters with subtlety. After all she's playing twins who share mannerisms yet are completely different people. Gellar is acting one character who's acting as another... but she pulls it off. The banter about her 'not ageing well' is rubbish. Talk about unrealistic expectations. I would like to see who's sitting behind the keyboard.

8 Stars so far.
35 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
What kind of sane person cancels a series like that?!
cjonesas22 February 2020
A fresh, suspenseful, intriguing series with myriads of superb actors and actresses in it.

A series with a wonderful script and plot keeping you on the edge of your seat throughout the episodes.

A series where Sarah Michelle Gellar shines in it and outdoes herself.

A true one-season gem where words don't do it justice.

Watch it and make your own judgement. Not only you won't be disappointed, but you would most probably join other fans in praising it, while coping with the dismay and anger of losing it.

This show deserved at least 2 seasons and a proper, stellar ending.
23 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The pilot is "meh" but if you stick with it, by episode 3 and 4 you'll be so glad you did.
engagedtoprecious1 November 2011
After seeing the pilot episode, I wasn't quite sure what to think. It wasn't awful, but it didn't outright grab me and make me think "I have to watch next week", either. But I decided to give it time to develop, and around episode three I was very grateful I had not given up on it, because currently episode seven just aired and it's one of the best shows I've watched in a long time. Boy, does it improve. The only other show I've been this interested in this season is "American Horror Story."

The plot really starts to come together by episode three, the performances improve every week as the actors settle more into their characters, and the writing and twists just keep getting better and better. This is definitely one show that improves as it goes on. Currently there are so many interesting plot threads and potential outcomes that it's like one big juicy mystery/thriller/soap opera that, by the end of episode four, keeps you riveted and wanting more when the credits roll. It helps that the writers also use the time-honored but catchy tradition of ending every episode with a cliffhanger, ala "Alias" and "True Blood." The cliffhangers for the past few episodes have been nothing short of fantastic and if the show keeps going at this pace, it's going to be one of the most addicting dramas I've seen in a long time. The writers manage to blend the mixture of drama and crime thriller perfectly so it never feels like you're watching too much of either. And as for the double-crosses and the twists, I haven't seen this much insanity since "Dynasty" or "Melrose Place." Every week so far has had at least one "WTF!" moment.

So, in short, if you watched the pilot and it turned you off, please give it another chance because I promise it gets better as it goes along and by episode four you will be HOOKED. And for those who haven't given it a chance yet, you don't know what you're missing out on. Make it through the first two episodes and pretty soon you'll be very glad you did. The plot is currently truly intriguing and there are so many ways it could go each week and it always leaves you guessing. The show is playing all of its cards right and really got it together quickly to become one of the best new shows this season. I, for one, can't wait for Tuesdays.
30 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Beautiful and great concept. But sloppy.
sid19962 October 2011
After watching the three first episodes, I'd thought I would write a short (p)review. The pilot is basically used to set up the premise, and while it lacks the beautiful polish of the following episodes, it really kick-start the series. And I can forgive the few shortcomings of the pilot.

The following two episodes were beautifully produced (if that's right word) and Sarah Michelle Gellar is perfect in her role. The series also have that hard-to-put-your-finger-on-and-even-harder-to-achieve feeling. I kind of got a "Cruel Intentions" vibe. But just as with Sarah Michelle Gellar, it's a more mature and confident feeling. It's really great.

There's, in my humble opinion, just one flaw with "Ringer". But it's a flaw that could potentially ruin everything. The problem is that while the concept is great, Sarah Michelle Gellar is perfect and the production has that great feeling, the writing seems very sloppy. There are so many inconsistencies and plot holes that I get frustrated. The problem is basically limited to the thriller part of the writing, almost as if that writing was forced in by accountants rather than delivered by the writers.

And if it continues down this path, I think it's going to backfire and ruin everything. This is, of course, only my speculations, but I think that the thriller writing must up to par with the rest. Whether it be a problem caused by money counters or that the "thriller writers" are too junior or have to little resources. Otherwise I think that this series will collapse, and that would really be a shame.
42 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
No Season 2 ? ? ? ?
z_laja1312 November 2014
This is absolute cracker. This show is great, smart and most important very, very underrated. My favorite shows are "Revenge", "The Americans", "Blacklist", "Hostages", "The Lying Game", and "Ringer" is beaten only by Revenge, but Revenge is something special, 72 (at this time) episodes on HIGHEST LEVEL.

Sarah play twin sisters, but she's great. After 3-4 episodes, I without any doubt known who is Bridgett and who is Siobahn. All cast GREAT, really great acting. Story is strong and this show is never slow or boring.

This review is only because, I can't believe there is NO second season. Please make second season, this show deserved that.
19 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ringer
zephyr-12322 March 2012
I was truly looking forward to a Sarah Michelle Gellar vehicle because I was a big Buffy fan but I've been having problems "getting into" this show. Actually, I wish she would consider doing some made-for-TV movies. I read that she has difficulty choosing projects because she seeks out characters that are unique or eccentric in some way which is smart but there are some made-for-TV movies and characters that are unique and interesting and I gotta assume she's been offered some of them. I don't understand why she hasn't done more of that since Buffy.

Basically, Ringer is about twin sisters (both played by Gellar), one (Bridget) who is being pursued by some underworld drug dealer who wants her dead and the other (Siobhan) who is in an unhappy marriage with a wealthy man. Siobhan fakes her death on a boat with Bridget and Bridget decides to assume Siobhan's life in order to hide from Bodaway (the drug dealer).

What ensues is a hodgepodge of deceits, betrayals, lies and twists that various characters participate in. It seems like almost every single character on the show is deceitful and self absorbed in one way or another. This is one of the main things that bothers me about the show. True, there are many more successful shows out there with similar characterization of lies and deceit (Lost comes to mind) but those shows are successful because the characters while being this way are also lovable or warm in some way that the audience can empathize and care about what happens to them. There's just something cold and calculating about all the characters on this show which makes it difficult to connect with them. Bridget is the only character that is marginally likable and even though I have been watching every episode for this season, I still haven't felt that connection with the characters yet.

Another problem I have with the show is the constant twists and turns. Not that I don't like twists and turns but it's feeling more and more like the twists are the only thing the writers are trying to use to keep you watching. It's just that they have thrown so many in that the show has become inundated with them until it has become too predictable and distracting from what should be the heart of the story lines--the people (whom I cannot find anything to truly care about with any of them). I do intend to watch to the end of the season (just to see how it all finally plays out) and hope that it doesn't get bumped before the last few eps air but even if it were to run into another season (which with the ratings it's not looking so good) I wouldn't be back to see it.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Intense, Mysterious Fun
lilcproductions12 November 2012
This show will keep you on your toes. You need to see every episode or you will miss crucial plot twists. But it's worth it!

I have to disagree 100% with the negative reviews of the show. The acting, wardrobe, sets, and plot are all great! While every single situation isn't believable, it isn't supposed to be. It's called "suspension of disbelief," and those who aren't capable of it should not be watching TV. Besides, those who are fans of "Buffy" and "Lost" are complaining about the show not being realistic? Give me a break! Watch the first three episodes, and I guarantee you'll be hooked!! You'll spend your whole weekend watching one episode after another. The series is stylish and suspenseful. While some plot twists you might see coming, most will surprise and intrigue you--leaving you wanting more.

Sarah Michelle Gellar plays the dual roles with aplomb, clearly delineating the personality differences between the two. Pohala and Groffard are also excellent.

All in all, the show is fun, fun, fun to watch even if it isn't the most realistic drama of all time. The biggest shortcoming is the CW canceling it before resolving the story. Big mistake. I just hope enough fans watch and comment on the series to motivate the show's creators to wrap up the story in a second season, a mini-series, or a TV movie.
21 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Wow, certainly zips along at a fair old pace!
Joxerlives20 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Like most other people I watched this because I was a huge Buffy fan and was always glad to see SMG back on the screen. With Ringer she has a much more challenging role, trying to play 2 sisters who are physically absolutely identical but light years apart in terms of their personalities and circumstances. Also nice to see Amber Benson guest starring as one of Bridget's stripper pals, a very radical departure from Tara. Shame we never get to see her perform and that she doesn't have any scenes with SMG.

So what happened next? Personally I was looking for the pair to be reconciled. Who knows, maybe they will be? Or maybe they'll still stay apart, Siobhan using her appearance to burgle Henry and Andrew's apartments and start over again with her twins, she seems an extremely resourceful lady with no shortage of brains and looks she can exploit. Not least she knows that Henry killed Tyler and it would be unthinkable that she wouldn't use that against him at some point (at the end of the series the sister's circumstances are effectively reversed from what we see at the beginning). What happened to Malcom? Is he the body the FBI found in the final episode and if so was her killed by Bodicay or by Andrew? Or if we'd made it to a second season would he have popped up again? Will Andrew take Bridget back? Will he ever find out about his new twin daughters?

So all told I enjoyed Ringer very much and would definitely have watched a second season, shame we never got one.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It has some potential
bosicans15 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Just witnessed the pilot of the show. First of all may I say that it's nice to see SMG in a show again it's been a while. Age didn't do her harm, quite the opposite, she's a fine little lady :). Anyway as the plot said it's about a woman, Bridget, that was working as a prostitute and was also an eye witness, important in a case to put a mob guy behind bars. What's more intriguing is that she has a twin sister,Siobhan, that enjoys all the benefits of life. Or does she? It's on Bridget to find out, cause after just crossing her path with her sister again, her twin is supposedly committed suicide and it seems like a good opportunity for Bridget to take hers sister identity. But was it a good call? Soon Bridget and the rest of us will find out watching the rest of the show, cause Siobhan's life is not that beneficial after all.
17 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great show with lots of potential
sesheppard28 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Ringer will turn out to be a wonderful show. Like with the vampire diaries, it will take a few episodes to get the ball rolling and personally I cannot wait. Last weeks episode(3) was excellent. I wonder if Shiv will see things differently now that she knows that she is pregnant. To the people that think Ringer is like the lying game. It so totally is not. Ringer is more adult with so much more substance to the plot. The actors are amazing especially the dude from Lost that rocks the guy liner. Sarah Michelle Gellar was born for this role and she is as beautiful as ever! I cannot wait for the flashback episodes when she witness the murder and SMG playing a stripper. I cannot wait to see what is in store for us as the viewer, bring it on!!
28 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I like this
betsyh2 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The thriller aspects are more intriguing over several episodes so far. I plan to continue to watch.

******* MAJOR SPOILERS*******

My biggest problem so far was the jarring contrast between scenes in a luxurious room, with Geller in a ball gown, while her African American best friend is sadistically tortured in order to locate her. The juxtaposition seemed grossly egregious.

Almost equal problem: That there is hardly any questioning of Bridget's portrayal of her twin. Nobody in Siobhan's life so far seem to know she was a twin, but that there is almost no puzzlement about differences in mannerisms, behavior, etc., There have to be a huge number.

I think It would add more interest if Siobhan's friends and family acted puzzled or even suspicious about more than just why she's become vaguely nicer. it would add nuance to see Bridget switching behaviors and adapting more. Would require real acting of course.

Other cons: why the director seems to have a microphone directed at Geller's footsteps a lot of the time. Too much heel tapping.

I accept that this show is aimed at women. I like the fashions. The ball gown was fab. I can lust after that closet. But there are too many repetitious scenes in it.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Ouch.
completelycrazy16 December 2011
With such a respectable 7.2, I expected Ringer to be quite good.How wrong was I. Bad acting, highly predictable story lines and an unbelievably ridiculous boat scene convinced me to stop hurting my eyes watching this show.I did love Sarah Michelle Gellar in Buffy, but I'm sorry to say that she doesn't seem convinced at all by the role she was given. The other actors don't do much to save the show either (although at this stage it would be quite hard to save). The storyline is a more grown- up version of "The lying game": both shows using tired tropes and plots that one can see coming during the first minutes of the 1st episode. In short, don't waste your time on this show, it's not worth it.
14 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Absolutely Fantastic! Don't think you know what it's all about.
GoddessCeCe2 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
It's been too long since the very beautiful and talented Sarah Michelle Gellar has graced our television screen. She is back now, better than ever, in this very complex, wonderfully dark new show.

For those of you who don't know, Sarah Michelle plays twins - Bridget & Siobhan. Bridget is the estranged twin who has a history of stripping and substance abuse, who is the witness to a brutal crime that has her fearing for her life. Her sister Siobhan is the privileged New Yorker who seemingly has the perfect life - a successful, wealthy, attractive husband; tons of money, great friends and a beautiful home.

Bridget and Siobhan clearly are strained; from the looks of it, something happened to Siobhan's son, and we don't yet know Bridget's part in it. However, they have mended ways enough for Bridget to get the offer to stay with Siobhan in New York. On a boating trip, while Bridget naps, Siobhan disappears overboard and is presumed dead. But only Bridget was there, so she is the only one who knows this. Grieving aside, she figures stepping into her sister's shoes, her sister's life, will help her hide from those out to kill her. She easily slides into Siobhan's life.

You know what they say about the grass being greener? Well, be careful what you wish for. It turns out that Siobhan's life was anything but carefree. Bridget realizes that her sister's marriage was in shambles; her stepdaughter hated her; she was sleeping with her best friend's husband; and, worse of all, someone is trying to kill Siobhan as well.

This show is very dark, which I love, and very well written. The surrounding cast, although small, is equally wonderful. I can say that this show is much deeper, much more complex than it may be given credit for. Just when you think you know what's going to happen, you realize that you don't. It's very suspenseful, creepy and downright scary at times (how about a dead body in a trunk, cell phone ringing, in a room full of wealthy party goers?). New York, as it often does, plays a character all its own. Set in the unfinished lofts and plush Park Avenue Pent Houses, don't let the high pedigree fool you. The cinematography is rich and gorgeous; lots of dark shadows to give you an appropriate sense of foreboding. It's like watching a really fun scary movie, without the gore but including all of the suspense.

Lastly, I saw someone compare this to ABC Family's "The Lying Game", which I also watch and think is absolutely fantastic. I assure you, it's nothing like that. "The Lying Game" is somewhat lighter in tone and the twin sisters are working together while maintaining contact. Here, they most assuredly are not.

To summarize, this is a wonderful show that should be given a chance to grow. Hopefully, the CW will realize its worth and give it a full season.
28 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It just keeps on getting better...
sksophia19 October 2011
Initially, I was reluctant as to whether or not I wanted to watch this show but I am so glad that I finally got round to it. The pilot was a good start - the story came together well and the characters were very well played by the cast. It was a great pilot, expect one very poor green room scene (but that's a minor glitch).

As I started to watch more episodes, I began to fall in love with the show even more. Everything about it is just awesome. The music, the characters, the plot - everything. Sarah Michelle Gellar is an amazing actress and so are the rest of the brilliant cast.

If you're into thriller type stuff (with some drama and romance) then this is definitely for you. It's a great show with some real jaw dropping moments. Its' not too intense but enough to keep you wondering what the hell is going on.

Give it a chance. You'll love it.
28 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A show that had a lot of promise but a disappointing ending
tapio_hietamaki27 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
'Ringer' was a lot of fun to watch when it aired, but if you marathon it nowadays you're setting yourself up for a disappointment. The show was cancelled and the creators had to write the season into a dead end.

Sarah Michelle Gellar of 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer' fame does a pretty great role here as white trash whose life takes a sharp, unexpected turn when her twin sister is lost at sea. Bridget is an ex-druggie, stripper and loser, whereas her sister Siobhan was wealthy and connected to the New York socialites. But Bridget almost accidentally ends up in a position where she can steal her sister's life - her husband, her house, her stepdaughter, her lover. Soon it turns out that Siobhan's outwardly picture-perfect life had a couple of hardships, too, and they're all thrust on Bridget's less-than-capable shoulders.

The premise is endlessly entertaining with all its possibilities of delicious misunderstandings and embarrassing situations. The show takes a turn into thriller territory and has a lot of suspense, cliffhangers and surprises.

It also has its faults. It treats its viewers as morons by having endless pointless flashbacks that irritatingly remind us of something that everybody remembers, and the anticlimactic ending ruins the build-up. Still, it was a lot of fun to watch and anticipate future episodes.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Best Show I ever watched. Please keep it going.
wsquires-344-21819514 April 2012
My husband and I cannot wait for Tuesday to get here so we can watch Ringer. It is the most suspense show we have ever seen. It is so interesting how Sarah can play both sides, good and bad.We always tape it so we can rewatch it again. We just love Ringer and we hope it will be around for a second season. We hope we can vote to keep it around. Ringer is a show that keeps you wondering what is going to happen next with Andrew and his daughter. Also the climax at the end of each episode is the most exciting part of next week show, My heart is so deep into the show, that it is like my own experience with life. My sister and I are very close with one another that I can relate to the pain that she and I experience with life. Please keep the show going.
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Shrugging off Buffy
darj4411 October 2011
Only seen three episodes but not bad.. not bad at all.. Whilst the other stars from Buffy have moved on (Eliza Dukshu, Alyson Hannigan, Nathan Fillion) Sarah Michelle Gellar has never really shrugged off the tag off being 'Buffy', but this show may finally help. The main selling point of this show is that she is in it, so if she does not put up a faultless performance, viewers will not tune in.. Luckily she thrives in being the 'lead' again and can showcase what a good actress she is. Even though there are other 'actors', ultimately she is the focal point. Also the plot is quite different to what we have seen before and it will be interesting to see how the writers develop this, as i am not too sure how long the premise of the show can last..

Overall, the show shows promise and i am glad Buffy.. i mean Sarah.. is back on our screens!
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
an exercise in complete frustration
blanche-215 September 2014
What is the problem with CW that they took this off the air after one season? Yes, season 1 was tied up for the most part, but you knew from the end that there were lots of exciting plots for season 2. The characters were left in limbo. Couldn't they have least done a special two-hour episode where they finished up? I'm really angry about this. I binge-watched, so I saw more flaws maybe than the average viewer. However, there are two things that I love - movies about twins and makeover movies, where someone has plastic surgery and changes their face.

Sarah Michelle Gellar stars as twins, Siobhan and Bridget. Bridget is a drug user and prostitute who witnessed a murder and right before she is supposed to testify against the killer, who is a monster, she becomes frightened and takes off for parts unknown. She runs to New York city and to her estranged sister, Siobhan. Siobhan married money, but she's a piece of work, as you will see.

Bridget and Siobhan seem to have settled their differences and go out to Siobhan's beach house. While they are out on Siobhan's boat, Bridget falls asleep. When she wakes up, her sister is gone, and it seems that she has committed suicide. As in "A Stolen Life," "Dead Ringer," "Deceptions," and "The Dark Mirror," Bridget steals her sister's identity. She intends to leave as soon as her Narcotics Anonymous sponsor can get to her, but it doesn't work out that way.

Ringer was a really good series, not as good as something like Homeland or The Americans or Mad Men, but still good. There were some problems, one of which was some of the dialogue. "We have to talk" was said at least 20 times on every episode - I might not have noticed except as I said, I binge watched. The other problem was the situation with Henry - I mean, how many times can he say he's through and stop seeing her? He broke things off with Siobhan in just about every episode.

Here's the next problem. Sarah Michelle Gellar, an immensely popular actress. Personally, I didn't find her very good, though attractive, and here's why. First of all, in real life, twins can't really substitute for one another unless the person absolutely doesn't know them. Everyone has their own aura, their own way of talking and moving, and it doesn't matter how identical they are. Case in point: a young woman was hit on the head with a rock, woke up in the park, and had amnesia (true story). With no identification, the hospital put her photo in the paper. Her parents rushed to the hospital. When they met her, they weren't sure it was really her. Because she didn't know who she was, everything about her was different. So it's not just looks, and differentiating twins by having one with her hair down and one with her hair up is a cheap trick.

Bridget was street-wise, rougher, tougher, unsophisticated. She wouldn't have spoken like Siobhan, she wouldn't have moved like Siobhan. Siobhan had an air of sophistication honed by several years of marriage to money and living the good life. She was also a colder person and more detached. Yet sometimes, even with the hairdos, I wasn't sure who it was in the scene.

That aside, the cast was fine: Welsh actor Ioan Gruffud as Siobhan's husband, Andrew Martin; Kristoffer Polaha as Siobhan's friend Gemma's husband Henry; Nestor Carbonell as Victor Machado, the detective assigned to Bridget's case; Zoey Deutch as Siobhan's stepdaughter; soap star Justin Bruening as Siobhan's boyfriend Tyler; and Andrea Roth as Andrew's ex-wife Catherine.

I think CW made a mistake taking this off the air. It became more and more interesting as the episodes continued, and I understand there was a campaign to keep it on the air. A shame it didn't work.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Can't believe this show was cancelled
retty132-16 July 2012
When I watched the first episode of this show I had my doubts. The special effects let it down and when the two twins hugged the body double had hair that was a different colour. But by the end of the episode the storyline had me fully involved.

As the season progressed I got caught up in the whole thing, there were a few narrative strands that were a little dull but come the end of the season everything meant something in such a clever way. Each episode ended in a cliffhanger which had me watching episodes back to back. It was very addictive even in the weakest of episodes it would turn things around in the last five minutes.

I wish there was a season two of this as they ended the series with a variety of questions left. Due to the show getting axed I'm not sure whether I would recommend it because although you will most definitely enjoy all 22 episodes you're left wanting more, and there just isn't any more.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The worst show I've ever seen and I've seen a lot of shows!
her_majesty_mirela18 December 2011
This show is a joke! There is nothing good about it. I usually try to write a fair review but this cheese fest doesn't even deserve my typing. The only reason I am writing this review is to try and save those who haven't yet subjected themselves to this torture. The story is oh sooooo predictably stupid. Sarah Michelle Gellar has lost every trace of acting talent or ability. She is so terrible in this show, she should've stayed at home and let us remember her as Buffy. Every episode gets more and more ridiculous as the show mocks the audience with "plot twists" that a three year old wouldn't buy. Nothing about this show is plausible and if your brain is bigger then a peanut, you will be offended at how stupid the writers of this monstrous failure expect you to be. Honestly, watching your daytime soap opera is a better option. Poor Nestor Carbonell. I can't believe that he has come to this after playing the almighty Richard Alpert on Lost. This show is embarrassing anyone associated with it and Sarah Michelle Gellar should never get an acting gig again.
15 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good enough to keep watching
andres-rosenberg15 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I'm not going to explain the plot cause it's written everywhere, but just my overall look on the Pilot: It's OK.

The Bad: The scene on the ocean looks so fake, it hurts. Another bad point is that there is too much put together without further explanation. And some very corny storytelling also hurts: the woman that dates her best friend's husband, and so on...

The Good: The ending on the Pilot is spot on and leaves you wanting more. As it turned out, Bridget was safer being Bridget than being Siobann, and the real Siobann pretended to be dead.

Overall the series got some potential, and it is really nice to see SMG again. She's a very good actress when it comes to convey an emotion, or lack of emotion if necessary.
33 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Too much like a soap
wbault-640753 January 2022
I'm ticked CW didn't end the series with a finale. I did like the show. I most likely would not have continued to watch it after the finale, though. Too soapy. I'll be certain not to watch series on CW for fear they won't show the finale.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Unfortunately the writing often hurts
mike-ryan45526 February 2012
I have seen about a dozen episodes now. By now I can say a few things about this show with utter surety.

The most notable one to me is that the authors have never been to Narcotics Anonymous and it shows, badly. I have spent enough time in AA meetings to know that. The worst part is their notion of a "sponsor." You wouldn't get a sponsor who could be in a sexual tension situation. It's one of the things VERY clearly stated in the "Big Book" of Alcoholics Anonymous. Yet this happens not once but twice. They use it as a convenience but it hurts to watch.

This sloppy writing carries onto other areas and will kill the show. Not even having Buffy and Richard Alpert from Lost is the detective after her can save it.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed