"S.W.A.T." Thai Hard (TV Episode 2022) Poster

(TV Series)

(2022)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Worst SWAT episode yet
treyintexas10 October 2022
The writing was just awful. The production was terrible. The flashbacks were unnecessary and repetitive.

We usually REALLY enjoy this show, but this was so difficult to watch.

The premise of some of the scenes was just so unbelievable.

They set out to steal a Jeep then for some reason only explained by a continuity "oops" too late to correct, they end up back where they were BEFORE they set off for the Jeep (and then set off for the Jeep again).

Shows like this require some suspension of disbelief, but the writing was sophomoric.

Do yourself a favor and skip this episode. Unless you are a masochist, in which case you will love it!
13 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A little fish out of water on this one (cops not spy's)
grlym-4684915 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Live review.

Ok cool...an Indiana Jones atmosphere. Maybe this will be a cool adventure.

  • or the cast and producers wanted a free vacation on the network dime.


Sticking to a cliche 72 hours prior format.

Plot is odd...somehow LAPD has international investigative abilities?? And have swat o cel resources in the fly during their vacation in Thailand.

A lot of wasted cliche scenes of "Asian people eat weird food". "Talk to them like Lone Ranger and Tonto in the 1940's version.

The shots make me really want to travel there. Very beautiful.

A lot if this episode , like the trading a time arch for cell phone. Only to have a team following see the guy with the watch feels like an exact play out of the British tv show Strike Back (which is a great show)

Unsure why they have to repeat the same scene over again. Seem like filler .

As far as swat shows goes, it wasn't the best. But far better than the worst. And I really liked the beautiful Thailand footage.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Aaron Spelling approves
jgreco74 March 2023
What audiences loved most about 70s television in the time of Watergate was that it was a mindless distraction from the real-life soap opera playing out between newscasts. Producers Spelling and Goldberg were the masters of the derivative, soft-core, prime-time sex and violence suitable for the whole family. But more to the point, they were virtuosos of the spin-off, those enduring formulas that saturated the airwaves with predictable, oversimplified characters, exposition crammed dialogue, wisecracking banter, touchy-feely anecdotes, chummy camaraderie, and minimal socially relevant, timeworn storylines. In truth, the creative trust responsible for television entertainment since its inception has regularly fallen back on mindless and derivative material for comfort and profit, but, in the decades between Nixon and Reagan, audiences had grown to expect it and even prefer it. And they weren't embarrassed to admit as much.

While Aaron Spelling's mediocre talent and looks may not have been a great loss to the acting world, they were a boon to those he employed, many of whom made their names in a Spelling/Goldberg production. Capitalizing on teenage rebellion in the midst of the Vietnam War, he found his niche in prime-time escapism with "Mod Squad," a psychedelic, cop show upgrade, featuring attractive, young actors, most significantly, a woman and an African-American. It was a winning formula that spawned a happy breed, including "The Rookies," "S. W. A. T," "Starsky and Hutch," and, the series that put the jiggle in TV, "Charley's Angels." The momentum continued through the 80s with "Dynasty" (conspicuous decadence, just say yes to money, and Nolan Miller) and with "The Love Boat" and "Fantasy Island" (last resorts for aged Hollywood actors, inoffensive humor, and Nolan Miller). It was an age when politically correct meant which party you joined, race inclusivity meant backstories for the black help, and gender equality meant women could be as violent as men. To be fair, Spelling did make some strides--small ones--to reverse the paradigm and create television that reflects the real world, but opted instead for a sociological study of adolescent issues and urges in "Beverly Hills 90201" and its spinoff "Melrose Place." They were ratings winners and for Spelling the apotheosis of his long career.

With due credit to Mr. Spelling, the sixth season of the "S. W. A. T" reboot arrives, featuring sculpted body and facial hair, Shemar Moore. Updated, somewhat, with enough psychology and emotions to make Joe Friday apoplectic, and with heaps of fire power and state-of-the-art killing technology, the series still retains all of the former's nuts and bolts--the high fives, the fist bumps, the bro hugs, the testosterone--everything that made it a winning formula in the 70s, yet with tighter fitting uniforms. The muscles might be more pumped up, like the hair, but the characters who have them haven't changed, much. There is still at least one young hot dog who gets in and out of trouble; some older and wiser characters who mentor, advise, and encourage; at least one female (a trendy Latina bisexual); a brawny not a brainy Asian (against type); and at the helm a stalwart leader (Moore), who's intrepid yet sensitive, unremittingly angry (has knitted brows to prove it), self righteous to a fault with a faultless work ethic, a complicated man whom no one understands but his mama. Moore is perfectly cast in this part, very much similar to his 70s counterpart Steve Forrest, Hondo the first. He and the series are a workmanlike effort, as one might expect from routine television serials, entertaining and nostalgic, but not much else to think about. Aaron Spelling approves.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed