I get that the focus of this documentary series is on the financial aspects of the artists however it would be more believable and enjoyable if they actually featured that artist's music or even photos of their albums, for example. Apparently their budget didn't include paying any licensing or royalty fees for even a few seconds of the Beatles' songs that were mentioned in the piece, e.g. When they make mention of an album that went double- platinum for example they don't even show the album cover. Obviously this series was done on the cheap and so for me it loses credibility.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
