A new economy 2016
A commercial for those who are "in the community" (mentioned with an open masonry jar in focus in the camera for a long time).
The selected "few" are always right? This is supposed to be the "The Next System Project". After the regressive elite has stopped a natural development of the service society by removing democratic tolls (you canno't have democracy without tolls, they're literally the means to benefit one value over another depending on what the parliment decides - yes there are bad practises and at times stagnancy in the markets occur, but it also entails taking more values than profit into consideration - something humanity after pressure from the leading plutocratic superpower are very very short on).
One of the first notions that are sold is that 20'th sentury capitalism and 20'th century socialism doesn't work. Equalising the two as if they're counterparts somehow... Swedens saga that more or less ended in the late 80's and definitively in the early 90's after a person in power (who has been shown to be an agent under NSA's influence) - that is most likely an economic hitman, locked the exchange rate and caused a perfect situation to raise debt and circumvent the democratical rule to by means of terms on loan change the political landscape. Now allmost all media is owned by one actor, most state owned companies and markets have been deregulated and sold off and concurrently Sweden is plummeting through the lists from the top towards the low 10's on the same lists. Norway has oil, which anyone who argues will bring up if you bring up that their policies still are mostly socialdemocratic ones. Finland and Iceland are the two other good candidates to show, Iceland has been active when it comes to regulate fishing (which is sort of similar to how hunting is regulated in Sweden). Denmark is not a good candidate as it has always been to continental. EU is also actively forced in a too large manner to conform to fascism by USA (one example is what members of the EU parliment had to go through to simply read the secret agreement TTiP - go to USA to simply get to read it, not make any copies, be scanned to make sure no copies were made etc).
The movie continues to show home breweries as good examples, restarting an evolutional cycle is not taking a step forward, it's taking one backwards when it comes to general terms - which makes that arguement an ad absurdum (home brewery - back to the middle ages, in this case). Yes, there is a strong arguement for locally produced (which won't happen without tolls/regulation when the rich drags wealth from the poor and makes life harder in the middle class "white collar" society, where time is allready scarce) and ecologically produced produce, but there is nothing really speaking for really, really small production lines as they canno't compete cost wise (rise of ecological produce does happens low in the chain but it shifts upwards and the middle sized farms often quick to jump onboard once reliability and economical benefits have been established). That means that a larger portion of value (note, not currency as that would simply imply inflation) needs to be in circulation and currently the rich are stacking the system and removing value from circulation and markets increasing the relative differences in wealth (it's being pushed through loans, the secondary money printing machine). Why do you think there is a wide stream of celebrities going off to poor nations right now to show how bad it is and how bad it could be; "sit down and be quiet"/"silence in the ranks" you have it good enough is the notion to take away (or the "scarier" version - this could be you, which at this rate it also could).
The first real good notion in an American perspective comes a bit in where unlike other parts a real in depth problem peeks forward; we're not taught to trust (think of all the boardgames - 20min in) - taking from a purely USA perspective that seems to be true, fascism is built on disparity. Boardgames have "always" been present though, through monarchy, fascism, liberalism, social democracy, socialism, communism and you will find that the most advanced military strategists do look for ways to stack the odds and working together while seperating their enemy - aka the notion of building trust is present amongst anyone who's advanced enough and have played games where more than 2 players partake.
The metaphor or using a group of musicians as society soon gets tiresome. It's the age old saga of the modern plutocratic lie, later THE self told lie of liberals; that everyone pulling their seperate ways will through free markets magically create the greater good for society (it requires more than that). We are now at the brink of destruction of modern society and progression of man is about to halt, regressive (conservatives and their like) has no solution to that question (anyone with some introspection should realise that they need to evolve, regressive policies are about upkeeping status quo) in their ideology, moral has no use if you dont directly gain from upkeeping it (the historical aristocratic lie regarding meritocracy suddenly takes on one more layer and becomes very ironic). All societies are built together, making certain basic needs and basic regulation function well is the basis that modern society stands on - anyone who has read Putnam and his inability to explain society (how amassing social captial works, trust), whilst others succeed extraordinarly well should have noted that.
The notion of introspection and evolution is in the picture - that granted one extra star, cinematography etc also gave 1 star. But don't get confused, this is a "documentary" most likely simply intended to muddy the waters by the unsupported assertions it gives off the hand (yes, a propaganda piece).
One of the first notions that are sold is that 20'th sentury capitalism and 20'th century socialism doesn't work. Equalising the two as if they're counterparts somehow... Swedens saga that more or less ended in the late 80's and definitively in the early 90's after a person in power (who has been shown to be an agent under NSA's influence) - that is most likely an economic hitman, locked the exchange rate and caused a perfect situation to raise debt and circumvent the democratical rule to by means of terms on loan change the political landscape. Now allmost all media is owned by one actor, most state owned companies and markets have been deregulated and sold off and concurrently Sweden is plummeting through the lists from the top towards the low 10's on the same lists. Norway has oil, which anyone who argues will bring up if you bring up that their policies still are mostly socialdemocratic ones. Finland and Iceland are the two other good candidates to show, Iceland has been active when it comes to regulate fishing (which is sort of similar to how hunting is regulated in Sweden). Denmark is not a good candidate as it has always been to continental. EU is also actively forced in a too large manner to conform to fascism by USA (one example is what members of the EU parliment had to go through to simply read the secret agreement TTiP - go to USA to simply get to read it, not make any copies, be scanned to make sure no copies were made etc).
The movie continues to show home breweries as good examples, restarting an evolutional cycle is not taking a step forward, it's taking one backwards when it comes to general terms - which makes that arguement an ad absurdum (home brewery - back to the middle ages, in this case). Yes, there is a strong arguement for locally produced (which won't happen without tolls/regulation when the rich drags wealth from the poor and makes life harder in the middle class "white collar" society, where time is allready scarce) and ecologically produced produce, but there is nothing really speaking for really, really small production lines as they canno't compete cost wise (rise of ecological produce does happens low in the chain but it shifts upwards and the middle sized farms often quick to jump onboard once reliability and economical benefits have been established). That means that a larger portion of value (note, not currency as that would simply imply inflation) needs to be in circulation and currently the rich are stacking the system and removing value from circulation and markets increasing the relative differences in wealth (it's being pushed through loans, the secondary money printing machine). Why do you think there is a wide stream of celebrities going off to poor nations right now to show how bad it is and how bad it could be; "sit down and be quiet"/"silence in the ranks" you have it good enough is the notion to take away (or the "scarier" version - this could be you, which at this rate it also could).
The first real good notion in an American perspective comes a bit in where unlike other parts a real in depth problem peeks forward; we're not taught to trust (think of all the boardgames - 20min in) - taking from a purely USA perspective that seems to be true, fascism is built on disparity. Boardgames have "always" been present though, through monarchy, fascism, liberalism, social democracy, socialism, communism and you will find that the most advanced military strategists do look for ways to stack the odds and working together while seperating their enemy - aka the notion of building trust is present amongst anyone who's advanced enough and have played games where more than 2 players partake.
The metaphor or using a group of musicians as society soon gets tiresome. It's the age old saga of the modern plutocratic lie, later THE self told lie of liberals; that everyone pulling their seperate ways will through free markets magically create the greater good for society (it requires more than that). We are now at the brink of destruction of modern society and progression of man is about to halt, regressive (conservatives and their like) has no solution to that question (anyone with some introspection should realise that they need to evolve, regressive policies are about upkeeping status quo) in their ideology, moral has no use if you dont directly gain from upkeeping it (the historical aristocratic lie regarding meritocracy suddenly takes on one more layer and becomes very ironic). All societies are built together, making certain basic needs and basic regulation function well is the basis that modern society stands on - anyone who has read Putnam and his inability to explain society (how amassing social captial works, trust), whilst others succeed extraordinarly well should have noted that.
The notion of introspection and evolution is in the picture - that granted one extra star, cinematography etc also gave 1 star. But don't get confused, this is a "documentary" most likely simply intended to muddy the waters by the unsupported assertions it gives off the hand (yes, a propaganda piece).
