"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Caretaker (TV Episode 2018) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A concept hard to wrap your mind around
bkoganbing2 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I kind of had to take exception to one reviewer's comment that it is inconceivable that a parent could convince themselves that their child is better off dead in some circumstances. You'd be surprised at what folks can convince themselves of. I can only cite John List for instance who back in the 60s murdered his wife and kids and mother in one afternoon and then remained at large for about 20 years. There's a fine film that starred Robert Blake as List and one viewing of that and you'll know how plausible this film is frightening as the concept is to get your mind to wrap around it.

Sasha Alexander is our mother/killer and she does in her husband and two small children, stabbing them while they sleep. She's conscious of what she does, she tries to throw the blame on their maid.

Gary Basaraba does a nice turn as Alexander's defense attorney who has to sell insanity to the jury made up of people who might have trouble with the family annihilator concept. It's one Mariska Hargitay has trouble believing as for the past few seasons she's become a mother.

You won't forget Sasha Alexander, Maura Isles she's not.
25 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It Had the Potential
MrsTheFrog5 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The concept for this episode was really good - and its opening is horrific, very well done. However, the episode begins to fall flat when you realize the defense that the mother is going with.

The idea that she had to be "perfect" or else her family had to die is so laughable that the actors even struggle to get through the trial part of this episode. Liv and Rollins' emotional portrayals try hard to make up for what's lacking here, but it doesn't quite get the story over the hump.

I would have loved to see the idea of a female family annihilator done well, here, but the reasoning behind it really needed to be more compelling. The Season 8 episode, "Annihilated" is a much better written, intense portrayal of this particular type of killing.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good for the most part
randomusernaame8 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I liked the episode, the only thing I didn't like was the whole Rollins and Olivia struggling part (like I understand it but don't at the same time) I also didn't like the ending. The episode was pretty good until the ending. It just seems like the ending didn't fit. It would have been much better if she was found not guilty for all counts and see where it went from there.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An outstanding episode
judyolsz2 November 2018
The theme is shocking and depressing. I have always loved Sasha in all her roles. How she made that believable is stunning. No wasted words. No wasted shots. Just amazing acting. The usual cast is always good.
24 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Scott Bryce!! Always a treat to see!
slklutz12 November 2018
So, this review is personal.. Staples High School, Mr. Pia, "Our Town" during the summer... The memories came flooding back... it was so good to see Scott on screen! He was always a great actor...
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Double Standard
coreycitn636 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Almost a decade earlier you had a husband and Father played by Dylan Walsh who wanted to have another life with a younger woman murders his wife and children and Elliot Stabler was so morally outraged that during interrogation he nearly kills him.

Now fast forward a decade later but this time the family annihilator is a wife and mother which is more repugnant that Olivia Benson can't see that she can kill. In all her years Olivia Benson has seen all kinds of depravity that she still allows her feminist bias come into play. Sasha Alexander does a fantastic job as the family annihilator and almost comes off as sympathetic but she is later found guilty in murdering her husband but not guilty with the deaths of her children cause the jury felt that she had to be insane in murdering her children.

As the story end she commits suicide and dies in prison.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Family Annihilator
jmgimbel24 June 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This episode could've been super interesting but fell flat. Men commit this crime, it's more unusual for a woman to, but it happens.

They gave it away too soon and went downhill from there. I miss the suspense of older, better written SVU.

I also found the women's take on this as implausible. They see horrific crimes for years on end, yet can't comprehend a female snapping like a man? It felt almost sexist in a very dark way.
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Caretaker
bobcobb3016 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The cold opens are getting darker and darker on this show which some fans might appreciate, but I don't know it if is necessary to tell the story.

Right now SVU is a bit of a mess. They are opting for "grosser" premises rather than better written ones. That was clearly on display tonight.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Annihilation
TheLittleSongbird19 May 2023
Family annihilation is not new territory for 'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit' and also not for the franchise. Examples coming to mind being the original 'Law and Order's' "Invaders" and 'Special Victims Unit's' "Annhilated" and "Home Invasions", "Invaders" and "Home Invasions" were excellent and "Annihilated" was rather average. My feelings on first watch of "Caretaker" were rather mixed and a strong example of the guest star being better than the episode itself.

My feelings are pretty much the same. Was bowled over by the main guest turn and found her character fascinating and unnerving, but "Caretaker" is another episode in a long line of Season 20 episodes where one half was significantly better than the other. In this case, it started off great, but once the truth is revealed it fell apart and became ridiculous rather than the disturbing case it started off as. "Caretaker" is not a terrible episode, though it may have been a poor one if the guest star wasn't so brilliant, but it could have been a good deal better and has the same problems that other family annihilation episodes in the franchise have.

"Caretaker" has good things. The best thing about it is the absolutely unforgettable performance of Sasha Alexander, a strong contender for the best guest star performance of the season and actually in some while. She convinces movingly as a grieving mother but is even better and gives the creeps when the truth is revealed, and absolutely loved how psychologically fascinating her character was. Truly brilliant and deserving of a better episode. Did like her big scene with Mariska Hargitay's Olivia, which could be mistaken for a scene from the Seasons 7-10 period.

The episode starts off incredibly well, cannot remember seeing a more graphic opening scene of the show for a long time and it is tense, dark and intriguing up to a point. The production values are slick and professional, not ever resorting to cheap or untested gimmicks or anything, and liked that the photography was intimate without it being claustrophobic. The music is haunting in the right places and isn't constant or too loud.

However, "Caretaker" could have been so much better. The second half is nowhere near as good, and a big part of the problem is the all over the place pacing. Events of the legal scenes move too quickly but the lack of suspense or emotion make the second half feel pedestrian. After such a promising first quarter, the case came over as too predictable and bland. It was too clear too prematurely who was responsible which took away immediately from the suspense when revealed, just something about their manner if you have seen the franchise's other family annihilation episodes and real life headlines stories of this type of crime (i.e. Manling Tsang Williams). The motive while actually not unheard of was to me ridiculous and didn't make sense with how the perpetrator was behaving.

Did feel that the regulars seemed tired here, including Hargitay and Phillip Winchester is still not working as Stone. Who also comes over as neurotic and making remarks that are unprofessional, on a side note to me his behaviour in dealing with his sister's death has been very inconsistent throughout the season. A lot of the dialogue is over-heated and cliched, primarily in the second half.

In conclusion, started great but fell part. 5/10.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The writing was just bad on thisn
janetbhughesx2 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I gave it five stars because the acting was as usual great. The plot was muddy. Some of the lines so bad that it was almost funny. To have Olivia day something like "mommies don't kill their children" when Olivia has seen 20 years of people, including parents do unthinkable things to children. And trying in the last few minutes to make it about feminism. Not the mention the jury results. This is just a few examples of why this episode is not up to SVU standards.
24 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
What happened
yazguloner22 May 2021
This story, I think, should have been presented differently. It's special topic about mom, family and children. This story had to be processed as deep and theatrical as Totem, Alta kockers, Part 33 and something happened.

It was like a violent episode that reminded me of criminal minds series.

Svu writers and production.. Please, ignore concerns such as audience, media rating.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Pacing and story development was awful
chris-j-chuba22 August 2019
The thing that makes SVU special from its sister shows is the intense pacing, the way they throw the twists and turns at you, the investigators are excited and it hooks you. In this episode, the crime is resolved very early and it becomes a subpar morality play. I thought the main characters looked bored. It's not worth the time.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Poorly written .. Not up to SVU standards
patrickphair15 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I have to say this was just awful. A brutal murder of three kids. They chase down the maid, throw her in jail when we all knew she was not guilty. Oh for the days when this show was about finding the perp, not finding them ASAP and then psychoanalyzing them.

But wait, in the second half Olivia testifies like she's a freaking psychiatrist. She's always acts superior to everyone, but this was too much. Right after that we see roses delivered to Rollins so she and Olivia can get all misty about their kids.

Lastly the lawyer defending her sucked.

What a disappointing episode. Let me add as usual Stone was awful. Not a fan. Plus the ending was so cheap. She hangs herself and it goes away.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Didn't like that!!!
SheHawGol842 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
What a ridiculous episode!! The fact that any parent could convince themself that their child is better off dead because their life might not be perfect is ridiculous!! The episode based its entire premise around what possible reason a sane, successful woman would have to kill her entire family but guess what, THERE IS NO REASON!!!
11 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed