I Do (1921) Poster

(1921)

User Reviews

Review this title
17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Rather predictable.
kyrat11 April 2006
The plot is predictable and thus (to me) not that amusing. There were some nice touches, (like what turned out to really be in the baby carriage!)

The animation at the beginning was quite clever. Not being a film historian I don't know how common animation was at the time, but I liked it's inclusion in a live action short.

I would recommend other Harold Lloyd films instead, such as "Number, Please" or "Bumping Into Broadway".

I have nothing more to say, please change the minimum line requirement to something that rewards, not punishes brevity!
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The booze buggy, the kid from Hades, and the haunted house.
weezeralfalfa23 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
A Harold Lloyd comedy short, originally 3 reels long, but cut down to a long 2 reels. It can easily be divided into 3 segments, which are summarized in my review title......It begins with Lloyd jaywalking across a very busy road, oblivious to oncoming traffic because he's bringing flowers to his sweetie. Looks like a very dangerous stunt, which he will later repeat, pushing a baby carriage.: even more dangerous.. Their wedding day is presented as a cartoon. Why? Then, it cuts to 1 year later, when they are walking a baby buggy down the sidewalk. But, it looks to be empty, with just a blanket. Actually, it's functioning as a booze buggy, transporting some bootleg liquor. A lady stops them and pulls back the cover, which is said to cover a baby. Pretty soon, we see lots of other booze buggies being wheeled around........Lloyd's wife (played by actual future wife Mildred Davis) enters a store, leaving Lloyd to finish the booze run. But, before he makes it home, he passes his brother-in-law's house, His brother-in-law is sitting on the front steps with his 2 children: 4y.o. Jackie Morgan, and baby Jackie Edwards, wondering who's going to take care of them for the next day. He basically dumps them on Lloyd, claiming they won't be any bother. Yea. right!! Upon arrival at home, J.M. couldn't wait to explore things. He discovers the liquor bottle in the buggy, so Lloyd has to hide it elsewhere. While Lloyd is in another room, he dumps the contents of a box of 'things' on the floor. As Lloyd puts them back in, he takes them out again. At this point, the wife arrives and comforts J.E.. J.M. finds a tool box,, and begins to saw off the leg of a stuffed chair. While Lloyd is fixing a baby bottle for J.E., J.M. nails his shoes to the floor. Lloyd is very clumsy transferring milk from the milk bottle to the baby bottle, and capping it. He ends up spilling most of it when it falls of the floor. Since there is no more regular milk, he refills it with buttermilk. We don't get to see what the baby thinks of buttermilk.......They read about a burglar who has hit several houses in their area, and imagine what they might do if he comes to their door. That night , Lloyd is disturbed by a circle of light, like a flashlight, moving around his bedroom(This is never explained). He gets up to investigate. The cat knocks over several things , scaring Lloyd., like he's afraid of a ghost(as in Lloyd's "Haunted Spooks"). The cat again makes mischief by knocking over a box of marbles, which roll down the steps. Also, it accidentally releases a helium balloon with a scary face. This gets caught on Lloyd's back, hence follows him. Eventually, the balloon bursts, causing Lloyd to assume he's been shot. An African American woman is walking around in the dark investigating the apparent gunshot. Lloyd crashes into her as he is running, causing her to drop her candle, which lands on a pile of firecracker rockets, which soon begin to zoom around the room. Then, someone knocks at the front door. Inadvisably, Lloyd opens it to reveal a face like he saw in the newspaper. He runs upstairs to the bedroom, and locks the door. The man runs after him, and beats on the door, claiming he's the night watchman, come to investigate the disturbances in this house. Lloyd doesn't believe. Meanwhile, the African American climbs the stairs and beats on the burglar, knocking him to the floor. Lloyd opens the door. What happens next is obscure. Lloyd opens the package his wife bought that day, and finds a tiny outfit for a baby. He assumes she is pregnant, which she confirms. Lloyd mouths "Oh, God", in horror........There are many highly unlikely contrivances in this section, which add to the fun, but make me cringe in disbelief.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I DO (Hal Roach, 1921) **1/2
Bunuel19762 January 2007
This Harold Lloyd short opens with a potentially dangerous but carefully choreographed gag in which the love-struck comedian is impervious to the heavy traffic while crossing the road. It also features an amusing gag concerning the hiding of liquor bottles by the hero and heroine inside a baby carriage, with curious bystanders wanting to peek at what they think is a baby (somehow, this subterfuge seems to have subsequently been adopted by the entire neighborhood!).

Later, the plot revolves around a lengthy set-piece in which some opportunistic relatives of the Lloyds dump their irrepressible kids in their care (considering that my family have been 'suffering' from this very same burden - with the boy in question being my own mentally-retarded cousin - for the last 17 years, I found this section of the film somewhat uneasy) but the invention here was certainly up to snuff - as when one of the children starts sawing the furniture and then nails Harold's slippers to the floor, and especially the star's disastrous attempt at preparing a bottle of milk for an infant. Also incorporated at this point is the possible intrusion into the couple's home by a suspicious-looking character (who turns out to be just the night-watchman).
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Has Some Funny Sequences, Uneven Overall
Snow Leopard24 October 2005
This Harold Lloyd comedy has some funny sequences that are enjoyable to watch, even though it is somewhat uneven overall. Lloyd himself is always funny, and it is only a matter of providing him with decent material in order to make for good comedy. This feature pulls together several sequences with comedy ideas that very somewhat in their level of creativity, and that do not always fit together all that well.

Lloyd and Mildred Davis star as a young married couple. One of the interesting aspects of the movie is the short animated sequence at the beginning, which apparently replaced a reel of material that did not turn out as well as everyone had hoped. The main body of the film as it stands follows Lloyd and Davis as they contend with Prohibition, baby-sit some troublesome children, and deal with a neighborhood burglary threat.

A number of the gag ideas work well, and the two stars also get some help from imposing Noah Young in the second half of the movie. The young child playing their nephew is also quite believable as a young trouble-maker. There are a few stretches of relatively routine slapstick material, but the good parts make it worth seeing.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Uneven, But Funny
atlasmb5 February 2020
This Harold Lloyd short is the story of newlyweds who use subterfuge to transport some bootleg liquor, then agree to watch a couple of children while the brother-in-law is otherwise occupied. The story includes a bad guy who seems to be checking out the neighborhood.

The best part of the film is the small section that deals with the ornery nature of the young boy left in their charge. I could have watched an entire film about the duel of wits between Lloyd and the kid.

As others have pointed out, the film is uneven, but its best parts are truly funny.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Harold Lloyd Meets His Match
evanston_dad16 June 2008
In this Harold Lloyd short, Lloyd and Mildred Davis play a newlywed couple who get stuck watching their two nephews. One is a baby, the other a toddler, and they proceed to drive Lloyd crazy as only little children can. Lloyd finds his slippers nailed to the floor, finds that preparing a bottle isn't as easy as it might seem and really finds out what it means to be a dad when the toddler comes home with an armload of fireworks and begins shooting them at him and the maid.

As far as Lloyd's short comedies go, this isn't one of his funniest, but it's only 25 minutes long, and hey, it's Harold Lloyd after all. You'll be able to see the ending coming practically before the movie has even started.

Grade: B-
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I Do? No, I Didn't
ccthemovieman-113 October 2006
This Harold Lloyd short wasn't really much; not one of his funnier efforts. Of course, I never see bratty kids as anything hilarious. That's what the bulk of this story is, Harold and his wife, Mildred Davis, babysitting his in-laws two young kids. One is a baby who is constantly crying and the other is a four-year-old terror who does everything but demolish the house. Letting the kid create havoc over and over was not entertaining to me.

The best part was the last four or five minutes when the couple thinks that this big goon (Noah Young) is burglarizing their house. Half the time it's the pet cat scaring the couple, but overall, that segment is fun with some good sight gags, reminding me of another Lloyd short, "Haunted Spooks."

However, the good ending doesn't save the whole picture, which I probably wouldn't watch again. Lloyd has done too many other good things to waste even 25 minutes on this one again. It just isn't that funny.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not the best , but worth a watch
WadeVC-115 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Not the best Harold Lloyd I have seen, but it has a few moments. It does show that obnoxious children are nothing unique to these recent decades and that these types of kids can drive an adult half-insane.

There are a few funny bits scattered here-and-there, such as the scene where he tries to cross the street and when it is discovered that the couple (Llyod & Mildred Davis) are pushing a large jug of "hootch" in the bassinet, and not a child.

A bright spot in the film is the beautiful Mildred Davis who stars as Lloyds wife (and became his wife in real-life as well). Overall not the best Lloyd film I have seen, but not a waste of time neither.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Domestic Difficulties With Mr. Lloyd
Ron Oliver1 October 2003
A Hal Roach HAROLD LLOYD film.

When he says `I DO' at his nuptials, a young man has no idea the travail his wife's family will put him through.

Harold Lloyd had another winner with this domestic comedy in which he must deal with his wife's nephews, the elder a dreadful little brat and the younger a crying baby, during a long & frightful night. As so often happened, Harold's superb athletic abilities enhance his role, even with half of his mutilated right hand hidden by a special glove. Lloyd's hilarious HOT WATER, which came three years later, doubtless drew some of its inspiration from this film.

I DO originally ran longer, but when the preview audience didn't respond with enough laughs to the opening scenes Harold removed the entire first reel, tightening the picture down to a tad under 25 minutes. The animated sequence depicting the wedding is a nice touch.

Mildred Davis appropriately plays Harold's wife - they would soon be married in real life. Noah Young, who acted many a tough guy in Lloyd's films, lends his menacing presence to the end of the movie.

Robert Israel has composed an excellent film score which perfectly complements Harold's antics on the screen.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Quota Quickie?
JoeytheBrit23 January 2010
The perils of parenthood are explored in this rather dull Harold Lloyd vehicle. If you've watched more than a couple of Lloyd's films from this era then you won't need me to tell you who is playing the part of his wife. The film opens with them wheeling a pram down a typical suburban neighbourhood, only this pram doesn't contain a baby, as the horrified expression on the face of a passing priest makes all too clear, but a bottle of illicit booze.

Before long a plot twist sees the formerly carefree couple temporarily burdened with a couple of tots, one who cries incessantly, the other a destructive little boy who likes nothing more than sawing through the legs of furniture or nailing Harold's slippers to the floor. Given the rich vein of material available in such a scenario, it's surprising just how routine the whole thing is. Like most popular comedians of the era, Lloyd's contract called for him to complete a given number of films within a specified period of time, and it's likely that this was one of the films that was made purely to ensure that quota was filled rather than because of any burning desire on the part of Lloyd to get it made.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lower Lloyd
Michael_Elliott25 November 2006
I DO (1921)

** (out of four)

After marrying his wife, Harold Lloyd then gets the job of babysitting his two nephews who turn out to be a nightmare. This is a seriously unfunny film that has plenty of site gags but none of them work. The only bright spot is the start of the film where Lloyd is trying to cross a busy street. Apparently when released this had a third reel but Lloyd cut it due to all the negative reviews. With that in mind, I can't help but agree that this is certainly a lesser short from the Third Genius.

Available on DVD through Kino and New Line.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I don't
Horst_In_Translation28 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"I Do" is an American 25-minute short film from 1921, so it will have its 100th anniversary 5 years from now. The director is centenarian Hal Roach, still in his 20s here, and lead actor is Harold Lloyd, also still under 30. The cast includes people who have worked with Lloyd on may occasions, such as as Noah Young or female protagonist Mildred Davis, a couple years before she married Lloyd. The story here is about a man who has to take care of babies and lots of chaos ensues as he has to keep the kids away from the alcohol and make sure a criminal, who is on the loose, does not cause any problems. Lots of trouble for Mr. Lloyd here. Unfortunately also lots of trouble for the audience as this short film here was neither really funny nor particularly interesting. Same problems as usual: Not enough intertitles and Lloyd (as good as he may be) plays the same character as he does many other times when his films make no dramatic impact, but totally rely on the comedy. I recommend the watch here only to the very biggest black-and-white silent film fans. Everybody else should skip this one.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
a mixed bag with this domestic comedy
planktonrules11 May 2006
Generally, I liked this short by Harold Lloyd, though I have to admit that part of the final minutes of the film looked like a re-hash of HAUNTED SPOOKS (also by Lloyd--a year earlier).

Harold is newly married and the first portion of the film concerns he and his wife's attempts to sneak wine into their home during Prohibition. For the most part, this is just an okay portion of the film.

Later, Harold's brother-in-law drops off his two kids for the Lloyd's to watch. The baby seems like a pretty typical child, but the 4 year-old is the spawn of Satan! He is just 100% awful--which is a strength and weakness of the film. It's a strength because some of the horrible things the kid does are pretty funny--such as sawing off the legs of furniture (it's funny to see such a cute little kid do this so easily) and nailing Harold's slippers to the floor! The problem is, after a while some of the evil things the kid does are just ridiculous (such as leaving the house and coming back with an armload of fireworks--this is just too contrived). Plus, there gets a point when it's no longer funny--you just are rooting to see Harold belt the kid! All-in-all, not a great film but full of funny moments--enough to please all but the worst curmudgeons out there.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Harold Lloyd and Mildred Davis deal with domestic issues in I Do
tavm3 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Just watched this Harold Lloyd comedy short on Kino Video's DVD of "The Harold Lloyd Collection". There's an animated sequence of Harold and Mildred's wedding that was pretty amusing before it becomes one year later and we see them carrying a carriage with people watching admirably. If you're familiar with the year of this film, you've probably figured out the punchline. Anyway, they later are made to take care of a young toddler boy and his infant brother. On top of that, there's a possible prowler on their street. I'll stop there and say once again there are laughs galore here with what I just mentioned and it's nice to know not all heavyset African-American maids depicted in movies during this time, like Marie Mills as Magnolia here, are all complete scaredy cats! Oh, and I must mention how I cringed when I saw Lloyd trying to fill a baby bottle with buttermilk which I remember hating as a kid so much I never tried it again and I wondered why my school would even carry it! Despite many contrivances-how can a kid get away with getting fireworks when he's underage-I did enjoy I Do enough that I'm definitely recommending it.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Harold's trouble with children
Petey-1020 July 2010
Harold Lloyd and Mildred Davis are newlyweds who have a jug of bootleg liquor in a pram.As she stops to do some shopping he meets his brother-in-law (William Gillespie) who asks him to be a babysitter for his two children (Jack Morgan and Jack Edwards).It makes the life of this fresh couple considerably more difficult.Also, a neighbor warns them of a burglar loose in the neighborhood.I Do (1921) is a Harold Lloyd short directed by Hal Roach.In the early 20's Lloyd starred in a number of short films.This one is quite amusing.The animated wedding in the beginning is fun to watch.And Harold being quailed by the balloon with a face.Not the best of Lloyd but works.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Do Me A Favor
RainDogJr10 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
During the first minutes of this Harold Lloyd as the boy and Mildred Davis as the girl short film there's an animated scene and now Lloyd's character and Davis' character are husband and wife. A year after we watch the couple with their baby who turns to be just their little bottle of liquor! Just the same day the boy accepts to do a favor to his brother-in-law, it is a normal favor that seems to be quite easy and according to the bother-in-law his 4-year-old son is a saint so the boy will not even notice his presence and neither the presence of the baby. So the boy and his wife will look after these two infants and the problems begin quite soon, when the boy is still alone with the two infants, thanks to the 4-year-old kid who is just a destroyer. So is kind of a simple patron, the boy and his wife wants to keep calm the baby but they really can't leave alone one single minute the 4-year-old kid!

We enjoy very funny moments, the kid is not a likable character but that's funny for us however and of course not very funny for the boy. And if these two infants were not enough to make a very problematic day for the boy the possibility that a burglar is in the neighborhood will make the night even more difficult so a little funnier for us.

There are two particular moments that I really loved; one is during the day and after the boy had some very funny problems when he tried to prepare a feeding bottle for the baby. Is when the boy finally can make the feeding bottle but without any liquid just with some white paint! And the other moment that I loved happens during the night. The boy thinks that the burglar is inside the house and he thinks that a balloon is the burglar so he "attacks" but after that the balloon sticks in the back of the boy so he can't see that but he feels that. Later the boy feels something in his head, it is a statue and the point of it is touching the head of the boy but the boy thinks that the burglar's gun is the thing that is touching him and suddenly the balloon exploits, the sound makes the boy think that the burglar has shoot him and he falls like dead!!! Finally, this one is just a good short film.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great Developmental Stuff
redryan6414 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
REPRESENTING SOME SORT of a midway in the development of Mr. Harold Lloyd's 'glasses character', this comedy short boasts of several disparate elements; all being very important to future productions. Definite signs of the go-getter, the shy with girls yet very interested, super athleticism, extreme optimism and very Fairbanks-ian stunts all peppered this film.

THE ONE UNUSUAL item for a Lloyd comedy was his socio-economic situation. His being down, out and broke made him, in effect a sort of Chaplinesque "Little Tramp". This was perhaps a throwback to his stint with his character of "Lonesome Luke" in some of the many early one and two reelers devoted to that character.

IF THERE IS one main attribute that sums up the Harold Lloyd screen persona it is dogged determination. That is most prominently put on display here in this I DO short.

THE OFT USED theme in screen comedy of not wanting to run afoul of authority in the guise of the local Cop on the Beat is also in strong, if atypical, evidence here. This also made him more akin to Chaplin's character in this movie. Let's not forget the inclusion of the little stray pooch and the lost little girl; who could be compared to Jackie Coogan's character in THE KID.

IN PREDATING THE ultimate "Police Riot"* as portrayed in Buster Keaton's COPS(1922) by a year, Mr. Hal Roach and Lloyd did a fine job in creating a sort of different way of getting up a posse of lawmen. In order to save the fair maiden in distress, the Boy (Lloyd) has to physically assault them one by one in a variety of ways. This results in about a dozen foot patrolmen being led to the gang who have the Girl (Mildred Davis) hostage.

THE FILM ALSO makes use of longtime Lloyd foil and second banana, Harry "Snub" Pollard in a more substantial role of kidnapper.

GOTTA GO NOW, bye-bye from Schultz and me!

NOTE * This "Police Riot" is a phrase that was coined for use in the WALKER REPORT on the riots that accompanied the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. It was authored by one Dan Walker, a future Illinois Governor; who later did time foe embezzlement.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed