The Cabin in the Cotton (1932) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
26 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
should be remembered for more than Bette Davis' famous line
kidboots30 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Can it really be Bette Davis - earlier the same year she was a very mousey, nothing special "girl" in "Hell's House". Now blonded, sparkling and vivacious - Bette Davis has sex appeal.

Even though it's main claim to fame is sultry Bette Davis and her "legendary" line "I'd like to kiss ya but I just washed ma hair" - this film is much more.

It was one of Warner Brother's "social" dramas, focusing on the clashes between the wealthy planters and the sharecroppers (called peckerwoods). Richard Barthelmass plays Marvin Blake, a share cropper's son who aspires to higher things. Dorothy Peterson plays his mother. When his father dies from over work, Norwood, the planter (Berton Churchill) encourages Marvin to stay at school and later on gives him a job looking after the plantation accounts. The honesty and purity of Marvin's personality keep him in limbo. He feels he doesn't belong to any group. He wants his people to accept him but they are suspicious of his involvement with Norwood. Dorothy Jordan, a popular ingénue in the early 30s, plays Betty, the sharecropper girl who always believes in him. He, in turn, feels loyalty for Madge because he thinks she loves him but he is just a plaything for her.

Although not as hard hitting as other Warner's social dramas, it improved in the last half - with an impassioned speech by veteran silent actor Henry B. Walthall as an old sharecropper trying to explain to Marvin what they are fighting for. In the court case at the end of the film Marvin gives an emotional speech about the planters and share croppers working together. Clarence Muse makes a few notable appearances as a blind singer.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Feudalism in Thirties America
sunlily4 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
As a social issue picture and an early breakout effort of Bette Davis, this movie shines! Miss Davis devours every scene she's in with her typical gusto! And it's her first performance as a Southern belle and contains the famous line, "Ah'd love t'kiss you, but Ah jes washed mah hayuh." Richard Barthelmess plays Marvin Blake, a poor sharecropper's son, to whom Bette's character Madge is drawn. The only problem is that Richard was thirteen years older than Bette and too old to be playing this part and it shows. This is not helped by the fact that he spends a large part of the picture overly made up. But he does a fine job and when he gets to play a wonderful scene at the end of the movie, giving an eloquent speech on behalf of the poor tenant farmers from whom he came, he relishes the opportunity! The tension of the movie is contained in Marvin's torn loyalties, the division of the haves and the have nots, and his physical attraction to Madge.

My Mom, who watched this movie with me, commented that Bette was hyperactive, which goes a long way to explain her constant motion! This is a movie that explores feudalism in Thirties America and is a good commentary on injustice. The photography is lovely and it's directed by Michael Curtiz. (Casablanca) See it if you get the chance and enjoy!
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Come up to my room for a minute. I want to talk to ya about sumthin'."
utgard144 November 2015
Corny Pre-Coder about a peckerwood (Richard Barthelmess) on a Southern plantation who is torn between the poor cotton pickers and the greedy plantation owner, all while falling for the owner's seductive daughter (Bette Davis). Davis is the whole show here, giving a fun performance that borders on camp. Even her straight lines seem humorous thanks to her risible Southern accent. The movie's most memorable scene is when Bette drawls "I'd like to kiss you but I just washed my hair" and runs away while a sexually frustrated Richard Barthelmess stares after her. Barthelmess is just short of terrible in this, doing all of his acting in close-ups of his constipated face. Berton Churchill, Erville Alderson, and Russell Simpson are all good in supporting roles.

It's a film that's hard to take seriously at times but, if you stick with it, there is a decent 'message movie' here, the kind Warner Bros. excelled at in the 1930s. The interesting thing about the movie's pro-labor rights message is that, while the plantation owner is a villain, so are the poor workers. They include a slimeball who forces Barthelmess' widowed mother into marrying him in an unsettling scene. Their leader's another piece of work, gleefully planning to blackmail Barthelmess into helping them. So no "white hats and black hats" here; just different shades of despicable. But it's not a movie you watch for the story as much as for the performance of a young and attractive Bette Davis. She's really a treat to watch. My favorite scene is when Bette invites Barthelmess up to her room to seduce him. It's both sexy and unintentionally funny. Which pretty much sums up Bette Davis in this movie and why you just have to see it for her.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Musically Interesting
gcking24 November 2002
With all the emphasis on Bette Davis in this film, it is easy to overlook the musical interest. I counted four different musical groups, each assigned to a different "class". There was the marching band at the funeral (black used at a poor white event), the jug band (white, at the poor white party), the jazz band (black, at the rich white party), and the blues singer. This is a surprisingly rich array of styles.

Interestingly, only the blues singer (Clarence Muse) is credited.
20 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Social Significance With A Little Sex
bkoganbing8 June 2009
The workingman's studio, better known as Warner Brothers, did most of its social commentary films with an urban setting. Which in itself makes The Cabin In The Cotton a very unique product to come out of this studio. It's not a bad film, could have been better in delivering its message with a lighter hand. But what the Brothers Warner did was go back on an old standby.

Watching The Cabin In The Cotton this morning put me in mind of a much better film in which Preston Sturges satirized the making of films like these. If you remember in Sullivan's Travels, director John L. Sullivan played by Joel McCrea wants to make films like these, the epic he wants to do is entitled Oh Brother Where Art Thou. But in order to sell it he's advised to make sure it has 'a little sex'.

Which brings me to why The Cabin In The Cotton is remembered today at all. It's because of what Bette Davis brings to the film, a little sex. This film was a big milestone in her career as she plays the hedonistic daughter of that old southern planter Berton Churchill who keeps his sharecroppers, black and white, in virtual peonage.

The lead Richard Barthelmess plays a bright young sharecropper's son and Churchill takes an interest in him, sending him to school to be educated because he has no son to help run the old plantation. What he does have is one sexpot of a daughter to keep Barthelmess on the side of the rich and privileged instead of finding true love with one of his own class in Dorothy Jordan.

Churchill has been systematically exploiting the sharecroppers with high interest and cheating them on price. They in turn have been stealing cotton and selling bits of it on the black market. Henry B. Walthall and Russell Simpson have been leading the quiet peasant's revolt which threatens to get open and nasty. I'd have to say that the ending of the film has a forced and obvious conclusion both romantically and socially, but you'll have to see it for yourselves to find out.

The Cabin In The Cotton is a dated, but historically valid film about conditions in the old Confederacy before the New Deal. But the sex that Bette Davis brings to her role is timeless.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tale of two stars traveling in opposite directions
AlsExGal12 November 2009
This film is probably most important because it showcases two stars - Bette Davis and Richard Barthelmess - whose careers are traveling in opposite directions. Barthelmess actually headlines here, but he is a silent star whose career is on the decline, and he has a hard time getting parts after 1934. Bette Davis is a star on the rise, in only her first year of her contract with Warner Bros. where she will become a major star.

Unlike many silent era stars, Barthelmess' problem was not his voice but his acting style. He was just a little too wooden to turn in a truly dynamic performance, and this film is no exception. The story is pretty interesting - Barthelmess plays Marvin Blake, a sharecropper's son who is educated by the plantation landowner and ends up keeping his books. His loyalty is torn between the planter who is sponsoring him, and whose daughter attracts him, and the sharecropper families with whom he grew up. The planter owns everything and is always charging high fees and interest via the company store and thus cheating the sharecroppers out of what they need. The sharecroppers have cooked up a plan to short the planter some of their cotton and sell it themselves and reap the rewards.

It's really hard to take sides in this film because everyone seems so unsympathetic - both sides are stealing from the other without any remorse or much redeeming value for that matter. It is worth a look if you can find it, although it is not yet on DVD.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a little campy but a really good film nevertheless
planktonrules21 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This was not a "big" movie from Warner Brothers, but a relatively inexpensive film starring its lesser actors. It just so happens that one of these "lesser" actors turned out to be a very young and vivacious Bette Davis. Sure, her accent is a bit broad, but she does a lovely job playing the happy-go-lucky daughter of a rich Southern land owner. Richard Barthlemess plays a poor but decent guy caught between loyalties to the land owner and the sharecroppers he knows and loves. Perhaps the biggest down-side to this film is Barthelmess--his character often seems very weak and wussy--though he does a great job in the end standing up to both sides. On the plus side, the dialog and direction is generally very good, and like most Warner films it's great entertainment tied to an interesting social message. Not the best film by any means, but well-made and worth seeing.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sharecroppers, planters, and a very young Bette Davis
blanche-226 June 2009
"Cabin in the Cotton," made in 1932, is famous for a blond, 23-year-old Bette Davis saying, "Ah'd love to kiss ya, but ah just washed mah hairah," a completely meaningless line that she made fun of in the '70s when she was touring with John Springer.

She's very pretty here, and plays the haughty daughter of a planter who's after Richard Barthelmess.

The film is a serious one, made during the depression, about the plight of sharecroppers who are exploited by planters. It's actually a compelling story. Unfortunately, I have never been a fan of Richard Barthelmess in sound films, so there for me, it falls short.

Worth seeing, and if you're a Davis fan, don't miss this.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brave and original social issue picture.
David-24021 November 1999
The problems of Capital and Labor are well explored in this tight little drama set amongst cotton tenant farmers and their landlords. Striking cinematography and excellent direction, from Michael Curtiz, combine with a first-rate and intelligent screenplay to create a memorable film. The two sides are well presented, both good and bad, and, although the solution for reconciliation is never really explained, the result opens up areas for debate that are still relevant today.

The performances from everyone are very fine - the supporting cast is an extraordinary group of unique faces and personalities. And then there is Bette Davis, in one of her first roles, looking sensational (platinum blonde) and being very naughty - an implied nude seduction is a highlight - as is that famous line. She eats poor Richard Barthelmess for breakfast, spits him out at lunch, and devours his remains for dinner. Barthelmess' performance is wonderful - he was one of the best actors of the silent era and here is strong in one of his rare talkies. He is so good that he almost makes you forget that he is far too old for the idealistic boy straight out of school that he is supposed to be playing. Great film - see it.
31 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A very fine film...other than the terrible acting of the Richard Barthelmess
vincentlynch-moonoi22 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The first issue I have with this film is Richard Barthelmess. Now I don't usually pay much attention to age in movies, but this was a little ridiculous. Barthelmess' character is just going' ta schule for larnin' ritmetic. Barthelmess was 37 when he made the film. Guess he musta bin a leetel slow.

Beyond that, Barthelmess was considered a good actor??? Really? Here he is wooden, has an almost constant odd stare that actually made me feel uncomfortable. If I were to give an award for the Worst Actor, he'd certainly be a nominee.

Aside from the Barthelmess problem, this was quite an ambitious film in 1932, and I would imagine not very popular down South! The screenplay was written by a Pulitzer Prize winning playwright. The film shows the evil on both sides in the rural South -- the poor sharecroppers, often cotton pickers, some of whom steal with abandon; and the wealthy plantation owners who are ruthless in keeping the poor "in their place". While the film says it doesn't take sides, it clearly does. Chasing one of the thieves through the swamp with dogs, and the resulting lynching, is quite powerful. And the climactic scene in a community meeting is done quite well. It's a good script, too bad the main actor was of questionable talent.

Dorothy Jordan (who?) gets second billing here, and does fine as the poor love interest, but Bette Davis -- the rich love interest -- with third billing is more central to the plot and more interesting to watch. This was Davis' eleventh film...all done in just 2 years! She was learning fast! In the supporting cast, Berton Churchill is quite good as the main plantation owner. You'll notice a number of other familiar faces in the supporting cast. But I was particularly pleased to see a wonderful character actor named Henry B. Walthall, as one of the sharecroppers. Every time I run across him in an old film I am impressed with his talent.

The ending of the film -- so optimistic -- seems a bit unrealistic considering the tenor of emotions in the town, but the screenwriter did set up the things that would need to happen to make such as ending feasible.

If it weren't for Barthelmess' acting, I'd be tempted to give this film an "8", so we'll have to settle for a "7". It's an ambitious and serious film, and they did well...especially for 1932. It won't end up on my DVD shelf, but I'll watch it again sometime when it is on TCM again.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Bette Davis Takes Charge
wes-connors29 June 2009
Cotton-picking farm boy Richard Barthelmess (as Marvin Blake) is saddened by the sudden death of his father, who was conflicted by young Barthelmess' growing fondness for higher education. In order to support his poor family, Barthelmess goes to work for the sharecroppers' miserly plantation owner, Berton Churchill (as Lane Norwood), who also pays for his schooling. Alas, an educated Barthelmess causes political trouble for his fatherly employer.

Barthelmess is really too old to be playing a school-age kid. The costume, lighting, and make-up do not hide the strain. Fortunately, Barthelmess, a fine actor, would follow this with some more suitable roles, like "Heroes for Sale" (1933). "The Cabin in the Cotton" has good direction (by Michael Curtiz), an interesting story, and a finely-wizened supporting cast. Barthelmess' leading ladies are sweet Dorothy Jordan (as Betty Wright) and sassy Bette Davis (as Madge Norwood). Ms. Davis, who delivers the memorable line, "I'd like to kiss ya, but I just washed my hair," is outstanding.

***** The Cabin in the Cotton (10/15/32) Michael Curtiz ~ Richard Barthelmess, Bette Davis, Dorothy Jordan, Berton Churchill
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Bette Davis shines as a Southern Vamp
olet21 August 2001
For those who are looking for a thoughtful and socially relevant Hollywood film, Cabin In The Cotton is it. The movie is rather quaint, even compared to other films of its time, but that's part of its charm.

The subject matter is unusual, in that both the struggling sharecroppers, and the wealthy land owners are portrayed as flawed individuals. Bette Davis performance as Madge gave her an early career opportunity to impress critics. Unlike her future roles, though, it isn't large or challenging. There is enough there to allow her to be a vulnerable,spoiled, and sexy minx. She also has eccentric dialogue and a glamorous wardrobe. Richard Barthelmess, in the lead role, as well as the supporting players, give very authentic performances. The cinematography is striking,giving the film a realistic rural atmosphere. A powerful and intelligent scene near the end reminds us that, in any profession, the necessary relationship between labor and management will always be a difficult battle.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
young Bette Davis
SnoopyStyle21 April 2023
In the deep south, the Blakes are a poor tenant farming family picking cotton for wealthy landowner Lane Norwood. The father sends his only son, Marvin Blake (Richard Barthelmess), to school and works himself to death. Lane's daughter Madge Norwood (Bette Davis) hires Marvin for her store and keeps him with his studies.

This is a pre-Code drama. I would like a more specific time and place to nail down the situation. There are some brutal subject matters although this movie is not about the black folks. I've seen Barthelmess before. He retired after the war. His acting style in this reminds me of the silent era. It stands out from the others and is a little awkward, but that does fit his character. Of course, the bigger name is Bette Davis. Sometimes, I do wonder if screen presence is more recognition than acting power. In this case, Bette is playing the sassy flirt which allows for some big acting.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Drawling Davis steals the show...
moonspinner5516 October 2007
It's the Planters vs. the Tenants (but the producers object to taking sides!). Hilariously hoary drama from First National Pictures involves a studious young man, son of Southern cotton-pickers, who graduates from school and takes a job as bookkeeper to a surly land-owner who wants to know who's been stealing his cotton. The boss's firebrand daughter is played by a very young, very blond Bette Davis, easily slipping into Southern Belle mode while pulling some real zingers out of the musty script ("I'd love to kiss ya, but I just washed mah hair...'bye!"). The leading role is played by former silent-screen star Richard Barthelmess, who hasn't adjusted his acting techniques to this improved movie-medium and looks woefully stiff (with a pasty, silent-era make-up job). Dorothy Jordan is the poor girl he loves--she's pretty lively, but this is really Davis' show. ** from ****
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bette Davis steals the show
drednm7 May 2006
Interesting film about the plight of planters vs. share croppers in 1930s South. Richard Barthelmess plays a share cropper's son who is good at school and is sponsored by a planter (Berton Churchill). Although the boy becomes a bookkeeper for him he 's caught between the two worlds and the two girls from each side of town: the planter's daughter (Bette Davis) and a share cropper's neighbor (Dorothy Jordan).

As the war between the planters and croppers increases, Barthelmess is caught in a moral dilemma. He knows the croppers are stealing cotton and he knows they burned down the local mercantile (owned by the planter) because they think they've destroyed the the records. But Barthelmess has an extra set.

The film is a little slow and maybe too old fashioned but the subject matter is interesting and of course the film features Davis' famous line, "I'd like to kiss ya, but I just washed my hair. Bye!" Aside from that the film offers Barthelmess in his last starring role and good performances by Churchill and Henry B. Walthall as a crippled cropper.

Also co-stars David Landau, Virginia Hammond, Russell Simpson, Tully Marshall, Dorothy Peterson, Hardie Albright, and Clarence Muse.

Worth a look
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Didn't Go Quite Far Enough
view_and_review11 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
"The Cabin in the Cotton" attempted to address a serious issue going on in the South at that time. I say attempted because I think it neglected to go deeper into the issue.

The movie took place somewhere in the South on a cotton farm. The principle characters were Lane Norwood (Berton Churchill), a landowner and cotton farmer, Marvin Blake (Richard Barthelmess), the son of a tenant farmer who worked for Mr. Norwood, and the tenant farmers collectively.

Mr. Norwood was representative of most big farmers with tenants: he was rich, unsympathetic toward his sharecroppers, and a cheat. In his case he wouldn't outright lie or steal from the sharecroppers, but he would overcharge for everything and charge them exorbitant interest on whatever they borrowed.

The tenant farmers were represented by several different characters. They were portrayed as ignorant, tribal, uncouth, and tactless. So even though they had a legitimate gripe it came off as simple greed and ignorance of the system.

Marvin was between the two. Marvin showed promise as a little boy and, unlike most tenant farmer children, he went to school. Because Mr. Norwood's daughter, Madge (Bette Davis), showed an interest in Marvin, her father hired him. That put Marvin in the precarious position of being between two worlds. One world was the one he'd just left, that of the poor farmers trying to get by. The other world was the world Marvin just entered, that as the bookkeeper of Mr. Norwood, so he had a feeling of some sort of fidelity and loyalty toward Mr. Norwood.

Marvin was torn between the two groups. The tenant farmers wanted their rights even if it meant stealing the cotton, while Mr. Norwood wanted them to keep working based upon the system he set up. In the end Marvin came up with a share plan that was supposed to be best for both parties.

Even though TCitC showed the treachery of the planters I don't think it went far enough because they showed the relationship between white landowners and white tenant farmers while we know that the relationship between white landowners and Black tenant farmers was far worse. Whatever injustices white tenant farmers suffered you can multiply that by ten for Black tenant farmers. Not only were they routinely cheated, if they even broached the topic of being cheated they could get lynched, and don't even think about a revolt of some kind. So, while TCitC sheds some light upon the landowner-tenant relationship, they could've gone further.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
wov!
karlericsson17 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This film was probably made possible through FDR:s "New Deal". It does proclaim a middle road between vulgar capitalism and vulgar communism and so does not take a totally firm side against the owners but it still beats anything made today and what is Reilly a beauty is how well the ideas put forth blend in with the story, which is a sure sign for any masterpiece, which this certainly is. You have to go to Germany and "Kuhle Wampe" to find something similar but that is more like a loosely constructed road-movie compared with this. Truly astonishing stuff. As for Bette Davies and her antics - those are completely secondary and were probably only put there to work as a smokescreen for the producers. Should be shown in every school.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Bette on the Rise
nycritic3 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Slim Summerville? I'd say nay... watch Bette Davis' performance as the daughter of a plantation owner as she tries to seduce Richard Barthelmess on three occasions and you will see the makings of an actress with preternatural control of her own self and body language. Going against the code that a woman should be submissive and demure, she utters her immortal line "Ah'd like to kiss ya, but Ah'd jes washed my hair. Good bye!" with a conscious wink in her eye, as if she knew what her effect was on Barthelmess. Later, she does a slow strip-tease mainly off-screen, fully aware of her effect and willing to carry it out, and later still she sits and lazily eats dinner with Richard Barthelmess, her eyes a little sleepy and parted lips suggesting so much. I can't see what could have prompted Davis to believe herself unworthy of Hollywood. An early performance with hints of what she'd do in later films playing women in control, teamed with Barthelmess who was on the way out and with this movie had his last major starring role, and a movie that while at the time might have hit audiences with its social commentary, now seems ancient and distant.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Davis' First Strong Role as a Confident Young Woman
springfieldrental14 December 2022
Michael Curtiz was none too happy having Bette Davis thrusted upon him when he was directing October 1932 "The Cabin in the Cotton." Producer Darryl F. Zanuck saw some spunk in the young actress that the Hungarian director failed to see. Besides a lead in George Arliss' 1932 "The Man Who Played God," Davis' roles were minor playing mostly meek characters. Her part as Madge Norwood called for a head-strong, devious sexpot that the director felt demanded a more hardened, experienced actress.

"Are you kidding?" huffed Cortez to Zanuck when he was told Davis was going to be the lead in his film. "Who would want to go to bed with her?" Having no choice in the matter, the director expressed throughout the shoot his lack of confidence in her right to Davis' face. He described loudly so everyone could hear that she was a "lousy actress," and followed up under his breath that she was a "nothing, no good sexless son of a b" when filming her love scenes with actor Richard Barthelmess. Davis, though sensitive to his insults, let his comments slide off her. "Mr. Curtiz," said Davis years later, "was a monster as he was a great European moviemaker. He was not a performer's director. You had to be very strong with him. And he wasn't fun. Cruelest man I have ever known. But he knew how to shoot a film well." Hard to believe, but the two ended up making seven films together.

"The Cabin in the Cotton," focused on the confrontation between a plantation owner in the Deep South and his sharecroppers. The script was adapted from a 1931 Harry Kroll novel of the same name. Barthelmess stars as Marvin Blake, a sharecropper's son whose ambition is to get a school degree instead of remaining in the fields picking cotton all day. Davis is Madge, the plantation owner's daughter, a free spirit who sides with her father. To be fair, the book and the Warner Brothers' picture doesn't take sides; both are ripping each other off. The farmstead owners are more secretive and clever by cooking the books, while the sharecroppers are visibly stealing from the plantation owners.

In one sense, "The Cabin in the Cotton" is a transformative movie transitioning from Hollywood's silent era to sound films. Davis in later years talked frankly about one of silent movie's greatest actors, Richard Barthelmess, and his acting style. "He did absolutely nothing in the long shots, followed basic stage directions for medium shots, and reserved his talent for the close-ups," noted the actress. "In that way it was necessary to use his close-ups almost entirely." Meanwhile, Barthelmess, 37, said of the 24-year-old Davis, "There was a lot of passion in her, and it was impossible not to sense that. One got the sense of a lot of feeling dammed up in her, a lot of electricity that had not yet found its outlet. In a way it was rather disconcerting - yes, I admit it, frightening."

Modern film reviewer Stacia Jones wrote, "Bette Davis' Madge is one of the few reasons to watch this film. Highly sexual and confident, Madge smokes, parties, and when leaving the car of a rich boyfriend, breezily tells him, 'Better luck next time!' She's modern in both style and acting. Her appearance is in stark contrast to Barthelmess' aged silent movie star look."

Davis, quoting directly from Kroll's novel, said one of the more famous lines comedian impersonators of hers loved to mimic. Madge, leaving her father's store, says energetically in her Southern drawl to Marvin, who works there and whom she is attracted to, "I'ld like ta kiss ya, but I just washed my hair."
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
There's something rotten near the Cabin in the Cotton.....
mark.waltz1 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
In the case of every situation having three sides, only the truth is right here. The "Peckerwoods" (cotton field workers) and "Planters" (basicaly the man who gets the money...) all have pros and cons for each of their concerns in this depression era issue picture that showed slavery wasn't really dead. It just had a different name.

Berton Churchill owns a large plot of land which he rents out to the "Peckerwoods" to tend. What they raise, they sell back to him. One of those "PW's" is David Landau who has worked for Churchill his whole life and ends up dying having barely hit middle age. He has raised an intelligent son (Richard Barthelmess) who wants to go to school, and Churchill notices potential in him, so he hires him. Already in love with poor, sweet Dorothy Jordan, Barthelmess must decide between her and Churchill's equally beautiful daughter Bette Davis, a flirt who has eyes on Barthelmess herself. Then, learning that some of the other PW's are stealing the cotton rather than selling it back to Churchill, Barthelmess is put in the position of betraying his own people.

There is no real side to take. Both Churchill and the PW's are guilty of various crimes, Churchill for cheating his tenants and the PW's for theft and vandalism. This all sets up for a good plot, but unfortunately, due to some embarrassingly poor acting by Barthelmess, this ranks among Warner's weaker "poor man fighting rich man" dramas. This will always be known for a famous line uttered by Bette Davis (which was admittedly her favorite), and she really is the best thing about this movie. Her smile is radiant; Like that quote from "The Women", "She's got those eyes that run up and down a man like a searchlight." Churchill, too, is excellent; He instills his character with likability even though he's not totally honest. His character reminded me of Donald Crisp in "The Valley of Decision", a basically very good man with power trying to do the best he can, but sometimes abusing it a little. But Barthelmess was perhaps Warner Brothers' weakest leading men, genuinely boring. Something tells me he was better in silent movies. Davis had more "heat" from George Arliss. Someone like George Brent or Paul Muni would have had more presence, particularly in the final court room scene. The ending wraps everything up too neatly, something I fear would never have happened in the south in real life.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Caught in the crossfire
dbdumonteil14 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The lead (37 when the movie was made) is obviously too old for the part.He is gauche,clumsy,nothing of a working class hero.He's supposed to be clever and educated but we do not feel it.Fortunately the supporting cast is up to scratch ,with a superb Bette Davis at her bitchiest.It's a wonder she can be seduced by such an oaf.

Marvin is a smart young man who knows that the way to get out of poverty in the cotton fields is education.Note that his dad passes away as he is reading an article in a newspaper which advocates the right of peoples to education ,be they rich or poor ..

During all the movie,Marvin will be caught in the crossfire: his boss,a land owner(Madge's (Davis) father),after laughing when Marvin's father tells him his sonny wants to study quickly understands the whiz kid could be a marvelous informer.When the young man becomes a gentleman ,the tenants feel they are betrayed by one of them..

Curtiz superbly places side by side the two worlds during Betty's and Madge's parties.Marvin is ill-at-ease in both.In Betty's house ,he has become out of place in his Sunday's best.In Madge's desirable mansion,during the ball with a jazz band (that costs a arm and a leg,as Marvin tells to his brothers in his final speech), those vulgar popular dances are held up to ridicule by the wealthy man's daughter's guests.

The conclusion is the reconciliation between capital and labor (the cooperation) a la "Metropolis" where Marvin is the arbitrator.

Curtiz never forgot to tell a story and this old film,despite the reservation expressed about the male lead,can still grab today's audience.Anyway,the numerous Davis' fans would not like to miss one of her early films.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
About half of the Holy Gospels is redacted . . .
oscaralbert5 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
. . . (that is, censored, cut out, and excised) from the not-so-Good Books on the shelves of U.S. President Putin's For-Profit Charter Brainwashing Shacks, overseen by his Secretary of Miseducation, Pyramid-Scheming Billionairess Betsy "Amway Calling" DeVos. WHICH half, you might wonder? It's all those verses where Jesus says that Chris Christie could pass through the Eye of a Needle easier than a Rich Fat Cat One Per Center Putin Oligarchical Traitor getting through the Pearly Gates, as well as the Parables about Good Mexicans tending to newly-impoverished American 99 Per Centers while Putin's Puppet Rump, Paul Ryan, and Mitch McConnell cross to the other side of the road. With THE CABIN IN THE COTTON, Warner Bros. warns the U.S. South of a Day when their Castrated Version of the Bible and their multi-generational plot to stunt most of their population through deficient nutrition, exercise, and schooling will result in Backwards Masses capable of Rigging Sacred Elections in favor of self-confessed Red Commie KGB-backed Serial Finger Rapist Game Show Hosts. Warner Bros. gave the Confederate Fat Cat Traitors a Choice: Pay Reparations NOW (1932), or face Repercussions LATER (2017). According to the Book of Revelations, it won't be long Today until the Red State Boulevards run shoulder-deep with Oligarchical Arterial Spray. Warner tried to warn of this with its CABIN IN THE COTTON, but this message fell upon cob-webbed wallets.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Cabin in the Cotton; or How Two Wrongs Still Make A Wrong
film-critic3 March 2010
Described as a political film, coupled with love, betrayal, and valor "The Cabin in the Cotton" successfully touches on everything that it promises. There is no denying that fact. Bette Davis plays the sultry love interest. Richard Barthelmess plays the hokey, dumbfounded man caught in the middle. The stage is set, angry plantation owners, angry growers, but (…and here comes the first analogy…) it feels as if "The Cabin in the Cotton" is a house, and while our players and writer may be doing the best they can, the foundation of it all was rushed, crafted by items found at a refuse lot, not new material. This film represents the idea of quantity over quality. Warner, head of the studio at the time, knew that he could use these raw goods and create a political mafioso about the current American economic standard. The problem, which became apparent 15 minutes into the film, is that this film has no direction. The cloud of romance is in one corner, the air of politics is in another, and then we have this deep lacking history of the south that seems to loom all around like a fog - yet none blend together. None built together a strong enough foundation, or subsequent walls, to make "The Cabin in the Cotton" anything more than just an opportunity to see Bette Davis use good lines.

Watched within a group, this reviewer was the only one to question the "Cabin in the Cotton" point. What was the focus of this film? When did poor construction pass for great film-making? From the opening definition of the obscure family to the over-hyped courtroom scene in which the point that two wrongs obviously make a right – nothing is defined or developed. But, let's begin at the start. Our actors. Bette Davis, playing a New York Southerner was worth the 78-minutes alone. She was handed some of the greatest lines, some of the sauciest scenes, and completely went perpendicular to her co-star, Barthelmess, who – honestly, didn't feel comfortable going from silent to sound. He was a classic example of a star that may have been big during the silent era, but couldn't translate well beyond that. As he lurched around everything in this film, he successfully was able to demonstrate that no chemistry was needed to act with Bette Davis. Then, with no emotion for nearly ¾ of the film, he is asked to inspire at the end. He is asked to raise his voice, demonstrate his chops, and ultimately fail miserably. If we couldn't believe that he could "woo" Bette Davis, why would I believe that he could inspire a group of angry men? I couldn't. The remaining actors fell into two categories; either angry or angrier. There was little sympathy coming from anyone, much less our main actors. Again, I ask, why would I then feel emotion for this film?

With our actors causing problems over problems (the excuse, "It was made in 1932" doesn't cut it), you are left with the story. Does "Cabin in the Cotton" work with just the story, as our characters (again, outside of Bette Davis) flounder throughout – does this political film work? To me, it did not. The lacking construction of developing the poor characters makes this film fail, on every level. Director Michael Curtiz, obviously working for the Hollywood factory, didn't even bother finishing scenes. He provided us with Point-A (the boy), Point B (the crime), Point C (the courtroom) and nothing else. There was a random lynching which was used to heighten an already depressed emotion, but it failed. When our only reaction between Barthelmess and his crew was anger, why would he be upset by a lynching? The consistency just wasn't there. Rumor had it that Mr. Norwood provided an education for Barthelmess' character – but again, my argument, there wasn't any connection between anyone. No connection between Barthelmess and his ladies, none between Barthelmess and the cotton pickers, none between him and the plantation owners – nothing. The glue to the film isn't even strong enough to keep our central guys together, why would it care about the background? Questions plague this review, but they plagued me while watching this film. I understood the political nature of the film, I loved Bette Davis' line, but everything else was atrocious. There was no redeeming value to this film, perhaps political, perhaps love story – who knows!?

As this review wraps, I continue to think perhaps I have misjudged what this film represents. Maybe it was only supposed to be a political film, an allegory to the truth of what conditions were like in the south, or in the USA, but then I think about other films, like "My Man Godfrey" made four years later – and how well developed that film was. Why couldn't "Cabin in the Cotton" be more like that? Why did our lead actor have to be so horrid at his job? Questions that will remain unanswered through the cinematic time vault. For anyone new to "Cabin in the Cotton" beware, it is worthy of only seeing a young Bette Davis … nothing else.

Overall, in case it wasn't obvious, "Cabin in the Cotton" was a failure. Davis, and her lines, allow for one star, but that is it. Nothing worked, from the acting to the direction to the construction of the film, it just didn't work from one scene to the next. The value of this film was missing. What was this film? Political. Love story. Random family? Nothing made sense, and while I will remain in the minority, I ask you to revisit this film and see what makes it spark. In the end it was a wasted 78 minutes.

Grade: * out of *****
2 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Tol'able Marvin
lugonian2 May 2023
THE CABIN IN THE COTTON (First National Pictures, 1932), directed by Michael Curtiz, stars Richard Barthelmess, one of the more popular leading men of the silent screen, in one of his finer movie offerings in the early talkie era. With Barthelmess now forgotten as much of his many movie titles, THE CABIN IN THE COTTON has the distinction of being better known more for the presence of young Bette Davis. Billed third after Barthelmess and Dorothy Jordan, Davis is given the sort of role more to her liking than anyone could imagine, even though this is essentially a Barthelmess movie from start to finish.

Set in the South (hence the title and underscoring to Stephen Foster's famous composition of "Swanee River"), the story (based on the novel by Harry Harrison Kroll) deals with the dispute between the rich land-owners known as Planters and the poor pickers known as tenants, or Peckerwoods. Tom and Lily Blake (David Landau and Dorothy Peterson) work as tenants picking cotton for a living under Lane Norwood (Berton Churchill), a rich landowner. Noticing their elder son, Marvin, is not among the pickers, away in school getting his education, Norwood insists the young man give up his schooling and return to work. Before Tom is to discuss the future of his life to Marvin (Richard Barthelmess), Tom dies, forcing him to quit school to look after his mother and younger siblings. With Lily remarrying to Sock Fisher (Erville Alderson), at the urging of his daughter, Madge (Bette Davis), Norwood financially helps Marvin complete his education, graduating with diploma, and offering him a job working at his store. Though Madge is interested in Marvin, he is loved by his neighbor, Betty Wright (Dorothy Jordan), who becomes jealous over Marvin's attentions towards this flirtatious young lady. Later promoted to bookkeeper, aside from discovering something startling in Norwood's books, Marvin is torn between the loyalty to his own people and his gratitude towards Norwood, whose cotton is being mysteriously stolen. Featured in the supporting cast are Hardie Albright, Russell Simpson, Edmund Breese, William LeMaire and Clarence Muse.

Though an early talkie, THE CABIN IN THE COTTON seems to have all the ingredients of a silent movie under the direction of D. W. Griffith. Even its casting of former silent actors as Barthelmess, Henry B. Walthall, Erville Alderson and Tully Marshall certainly gives this movie that silent movie feel. The film is also a welcome change seeing Berton Churchill in a substantial role as opposed to his usual two minute bits as judge or crooked politician.

Even if Bette Davis never became a super star as she would become by the end of the decade, she nearly steals every scene she's in from her leading performers, Barthelmess and Dorothy Jordan. Davis most notable scenes include her singing briefly "Willie the Weeper," and featuring her now classic line, "I'd like to kiss ya, but I just washed my hair." Her Southern accent sounds authentic, indicating her fine talent so early in her career that would benefit her in the future. She is quite a vixen here.

Unseen on commercial television since Philadelphia's WPHL, Channel 17's broadcast in 1973-74, THE CABIN IN THE COTTON surfaced decades later first on TNT (Turner Network Television) from 1989-1993 and finally Turner Classic Movies (since 1994). It also consists of availability on both video cassette and DVD formats to assure its rediscovery. (***)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Despite a Few Issues
Michael_Elliott9 August 2012
The Cabin in the Cotton (1932)

*** (out of 4)

Set in the South, this melodrama from Warner deals with the rich plant owners who continue to get everything they want while the poor "tenants" continue to grow poorer and not being able to feed their children. Marvin Blake (Richard Barthelmess) grew up as one of the poor kids but after getting an education thanks to land owner Norwood (Berton Churchill) he's put in the middle of the two sides. THE CABIN IN THE COTTON isn't a complete success but the cast is so good and the direction by Michael Curtiz is so on the mark that you can't help but be entertained. The biggest thing going for the film are the performances with Barthelmess leading the way in his part as the man caught in the middle. I thought the actor did a very good job at being torn by the two sides and you really believe everything that his character is going through. Dorothy Jordan is good as the poor girl who loves him and Bette Davis is grand as the Southern Belle who's also after him. Davis is incredibly beautiful here and she fits the role perfectly and especially the now famous line dealing with her refusing to kiss because she's just washed her hair. Churchill is also very effective in his role as is David Landau, Tully Marshall and Henry B. Walthall. The biggest problem with the film is that it's quite predictable from start to finish. Also, there's a prologue saying that the producers aren't taking sides in the matter and that they're presenting this film "as is" it is in life. Well, I think having all the poor people being whites was a bit unfair and I do think this takes away from the film. Still, fans of the stars will still want to check this out.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed