Gone in 60 Seconds (1974) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
108 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
What a different world it was back then
ebiros25 September 2011
This was the seminal movie that raised publics awareness about automobile security. Back then nobody knew actually fast a car can be heisted. Gone in 60 seconds said it all in its title and people became aware how vulnerable their prized possessions were. Now because of this, we have an entire industry dedicated to protecting automobiles.

Looking at this movie is shocking in a way because it shows how "raw" the society was back then. I really love the movie because I can see the nostalgic landscape of Los Angeles shown in all their glories. I can catch some of the landmarks that exists even today. The "cars" are lavish for back then. Pantera, Mangusta, Daytona, Rolls, and of course the '73 Mustang. Very cool.

There's something primal about this movie. Maybe because the production is so basic. There's no special effects, or attempt to make the characters pretty. It feels like drinking water right out of the faucet. This rawness makes this movie moving in a way like no other movies I've seen recently.

This is one heck of a movie, and you owe it to yourself to see it at least once.
25 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Real Independent Film
Rambler27 June 2001
In this day of "so called" independent film making, the majority of

which is backed by big studio money and ruined by the meddling

of "suits", it's so refreshing to see a truly independent film! "Gone

In 60 Seconds" was written, produced, directed and distributed by

the same man, H.B. Halicki, who also stars AND did most of the

stunt driving! This is truly a film the likes of which we will never see

again, thanks to our over-protective, sue-happy, society of wimps

and victims. Several comments are made about the acting in this

film. I would say that for none of the cast being professionals, they

handled themselves very well. And as for this being Halicki's first

film as a director, he must've known a few things and/or had some

great tech people working with him because the film is cut

together so wonderfully. Then too there is the sheer guilty

pleasure of see cars obliterated. I wish I could've seen this on the

big screen. So, if you're looking for a film with a lot of meaning,

skip this one. If you just want to enjoy a well crafted little film, and

see lots of Plymouth police cars get crunched--run out and get

GONE IN 60 SECONDS (but drive safely, please)!
40 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The cars, the stunts, the mayhem!
Mr-Fusion14 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
"Gone in 60 Seconds" is easily one of the great car chase movies, and it works almost in spite of its inherent "rough" quality. The acting here is pretty low-rent, and the pacing (for the first half, that is) is probably on the sedate side for the modern audience. Me, I was in candyland with one shot after another of '70s muscle cars, not to mention the array of foreign sports (Panteras don't grow on trees). And the movie is distinctly of its time and place. Verrry '70s. Who can hate that? And there are several shots of panicked pedestrians during the final chase - and according to the trivia section, those weren't stunt people. Guerilla filmmaking, baby!

But then we get to the second half, which is all car chase. Forty god-loving minutes of car chase. So much wanton destruction, it borders on demolition derby. And it's not the modern cut-to-ribbons in the editing room, noisy, dizzying bonanza - it's a genuine let-it-build series of near-misses, clipped-fenders and t-bones that actually thrills and builds to a pretty cool jump. And that's not even the cool payoff that is the slick getaway in the final moments.

You can fault this movie for its pedestrian first half, but I can't think of any reason to hate the second. And even if you bought the film and just skipped to the car chase, "Gone in 60 Seconds" still earns its place.

7/10
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The original car-jack classic.
boris-2611 March 2001
I've only seen trailers for the Summer 2000 release of GONE IN SIXTY SECONDS. But the trailers show a big budget, MTV style editing, and big stars. What it didn't show was that this thriller about a master car thief is a remake of this 1974 no-budgeter by auto man Halicki. The 1974 GI60S's charm is that it is very low budget. Some scenes, such as the auto auction in the run down lot, or the Radio DJ's cramped little studio add to some crisp atmosphere. However, the first half of GI60S is rather amateurish (One entire scene is terribly out of focus) and we have trouble following Halicki's unprofessionally written plot. The second half of the film is a car chase that has to be seen to be believed! In 40 minutes, close to 90 cars are destroyed in a massive auto chase spanning several cities, freeways, parks, lots, you just name it. For all it's sloppiness, the original 1974 version of GI60S has a neat charm.
46 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Car chase classic
A guy who has a normal job works an additional sideline as a car thief and ranks among the best in the business. He and his team are hired to steal a large "order" for a powerful client, but right as the last car is being jacked our hero realizes that the cops have been tipped off and he goes to do what he does best - puts the pedal to the metal.

This movie has really not much to offer you unless you go gaga over car chases. And if you do and can excuse the highly amateurish production and the thin storyline in the first half then be prepared for a fun ride during the spectacular second half. Our hero tears through five cities in a nice 1973 Mustang leaving a slew of wrecked cars in his wake of high speed mayhem. Going on highways, alleyways, fields, and just about everywhere that a car can go, he goes! Terrific breakneck fun. 7/10

Rated PG for metal crunching mayhem
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another GREAT car chase
ilovejack10419 March 2007
I think i have rated this film almost purely on the car chase towards the end the rest of the film is'nt to super, although it is v good. A film for all film goes who love a good car chase, which deserves 9/10.

The car chase towards the end IS 100% real where the stunt person(can't remember his name) driving the yellow mustang (when he spun off the highway)DID get hurt and spent time in off recovering.

Probably one of the best car chases of the 70's and very influential. The chase lasts some time compared to some others which last for only half the time.

If like me you enjoy the thrill and excitement of car chases captured on film then buy/watch this
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Golden Age
amadeuseisenberg12 December 2019
The HD remaster is great, especially when paired with a good speaker system. Brings out the heavenly car sounds. The famous 40 minute chase has its high points and low points, but it's a fantastic showcase of the durability of golden age cars. The main character, the Mustang "Eleanor", survives the movie after the insane chase it goes through and still works decades later, as shown in a clip during credits, which is apparently from 2000!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Why cars have security systems!
jrpeet20 January 2001
This movie is worth viewing! The viewer needs to go into this knowing that this is a low budget, stunt "comedy" along the lines of the Keystone Cops.

Great acting it is NOT!

Great stunts it IS!

I appreciate this movie because Toby Haliki wrote it, produced it, funded it, starred in it, and did his own stunts!

The DVD edition has a nice introduction by his widow! (Toby died in a stunt accident making the sequel to this!)

Have to say ... the original is better than the 2000 edition!

Another thing "fun" about the movie ... the 70's hair styles, 70's clothing, 70's music, 70's muscle cars. All very cool! Aren't we glad we moved onto a new millennium!

I saw this movie back in 1974 when my wife was out of town and I had a guy's night out! Then completely forgot about it until I went to 2000 version with my 18-year-old son! I told him ... the original was better.

Today I bought the original. My wife, my son and I all enjoyed it.

It has comedic elements ... the car wash conclusion for example!

This is a classic ... just like the "yellow" Eleanor (Looks more like pumpkin to me!)... STUNT movie! Enjoy it for what it is and it is worth a look!

As a side ... I used to have a gold 1973 Plymouth Sebring like the blue one featured early in the film. I told my son ... "I used to have a car like that!" ... He had never seen one before!
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The best car-chase film of all time
ShadySovereign6 June 2005
The original "Gone In 60 Seconds" will be remembered by many viewers as the best car-chase film of all time. It will also be remembered as the film that featured lots of destroyed cars in a 40 minute chase. As said in the film's IMDb trivia: "93 cars are crashed in this 97 minute movie."

The best part of this whole movie is the 40-minute chase scene. So many cars are crashed and destroyed during the chase, including original city police cars. What's more, the chase scene had absolutely NO special effects, meaning that all the crashes and smashes were real. Furthermore, H.B. Halicki himself wrote, directed, and starred in the movie. He even drove the "star car" (the Mustang) throughout the chase!

My only negative comment about the film is that the beginning of the movie is very slow; so slow that you may be very eager to get to the 40-minute chase scene. However, if you have the DVD, you can just watch the film starting from the chase scene if you want to.

Overall, this movie had an awesome chase scene. It is the best chase scene ever filmed in a movie. It has to be seen to be believed.

P.S: This movie is much much better than the awful remake.
48 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
No storyline. All action.
PatrynXX20 January 2004
Warning: Spoilers
(spoilers)?

This movie is pure fun. One of the few times where the lack of a storyline equals a good rating. Clearly though, I can't compare this movie with the 2000 movie of the same name. Though it has a couple of items in the 2000 , they are different movies. It's not a "remake" . It's more of an homage to. Both are better and worse in certain places.

On this movie, 1974.. our main character isn't a nice guy. But he's not a bad man. But he does steal cars and it isn't very glamorous.

I am a bit disappointed that they did not include a second disc with the original soundtrack to it. With the original special effects. (I'm talking about the 2001 dvd release)

7/10

Quality: 2/10 Entertainment 10/10 Replayable: 10/10
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
No Actors Were Harmed (or Used) In This Movie
lincolnhawk-8737730 August 2020
I watched this movie just to see the original, having seen the remake around the time it first came out. There is a hell of a lot wrong with it, but it had a certain simple charm about it that kind of made up for the bad. I'm sure the vast majority of people won't be able to get past the horrific acting; besides the lead, I don't think a single person cast had any acting ability whatsoever, a ballsy move when making a movie. It is also overly long for a Grand Theft Auto movie; it could easily have been cut to under 90 minutes and would've benefited from losing a lot of fluffy scenes, with less scenes in this movie meaning less bad acting. However, this movie was made for the car chases and it does those nicely. There is a scene where a mobile security guard chases one of the thieves who has hooked up the stolen vehicle to a tow truck; one of the highlights of the movie. It's always nice to spot a moment or shot in a movie that was later paid homage to by Tarantino; seeing the array of sunglasses of different tints lined up on a dash just like in Earl McGraw's car in Kill Bill was a little bonus. It's also interesting to watch originals after seeing a remake. I can see why they wanted to remake this; it had the bones and polishing it up with a tidier script and some professional actors should've been an easy score if done with a competent hand. However, as is often the case the remake sacrifices the simple charm of the original and here it really "Cages" it up, loaded with extra cheese like an East Indian pizza, to the point where all you taste is the cheese. It goes without saying that you really need to have a specific desire to see this movie; I suggest reading both the 1-star and the 10-star reviews and see which camp your sensibilities most lean towards.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Ace Chase
russell100uk26 January 2006
Crap acting, dodgy voice dubbing, lack of plotting... no matter, the reason for this films existence is highly evident, the stunts are superb, the final chase builds like a classical music piece, starting off small and basic before escalating into a full blown crescendo. The sheer amount of destruction on-screen is astounding, but unlike most car chases this actually shows the consequences, with cutaways of the chase "victims" placed in between the hi-octane spills and tyre squealing thrills. Unlike the recent Nic Cage remake, which purports to be a Ferrari but is actually a Fiat Uno in disguise, this version keeps things simple and lets the action do the talking. Shallow, yes, but you'll hard pressed to find a more exciting car chase this side of Ronin.
33 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
the great chase
funkyfry16 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This is a very interesting movie for a lot of reasons -- it's a great car chase film for the drive-in crowd, and remarkably manages to create more vehicular devastation than bigger budget films like "The French Connection" and "Bullitt" (although I would note that this film is actually pretty expensive compared to many drive-in films). It's also something of an homage to films like "The Asphalt Jungle" with its modestly subversive focus on the mechanisms of the criminal element.

The first part of the movie is a bit slow granted, but compared to a lot of the newer auto-crash/race type movies it's somewhat welcome that the film allows the pace to build up somewhat. Let's not get carried away talking about characters and motivation and so forth -- about halfway through the movie I still couldn't tell who the main character was supposed to be. I don't think this is a defect in the movie, it's actually part of its self-conscious charm -- the producers of the film have only listed one star for the film: Eleanor, a 1973 Ford Mustang. Basically the plot is about a trio of kids who inherit their daddy's insurance business and use their savvy and information to become wholesale auto thieves. They get an order to deliver 48 cars in a 48 hour period and thus begins a mad spree that makes Corman and Howard's "Grand Theft Auto" look conservative.

Minimal sexual/exploitation value here -- it's probably best as a movie for car lovers, the type of movie you used to see all the time on "Lost Drive In" and shows of that type. It's notable that the movie's style is more of a throw-back to films as I say like "Asphalt Jungle" and "The Killing" -- instead of focusing on the kind of shenanigans that the so-called "biker" movies by AIP and CI from the late 60s this one is pretty much only concerned with allowing us to vicariously enjoy the element of theft and with its fascination with fine auto machinery. This gives it a refreshingly adult and even documentarian quality. Someone looking back a century from now wanting to see the great sports cars of the late 20th Century in action could do worse than to watch this movie.

One of the aspects of the film that gets a lot of attention is the extensive stunt driving, much of which was apparently done by the film's star/director H.B. Halicki, a famous auto collector who died while making one of his subsequent films. In this area the film certainly lives up to its reputation because it's hard to believe that people actually walked away from some of these stunts without some kind of permanent reminder. The car itself undergoes such an unbelievable beating that by the end you feel like you owe it some kind of respect regardless of how you feel about the movie, like Rocky and Apollo Creed after their big fight.

I think this is one of the drive-in films that will survive and be seen as a model of what can be done on a relatively small budget by people with a lot of passion and focus. It will never be considered a straight-up "classic" per se because the dialog is pretty awkward and there's a bit too much of it perhaps in the first half. But once the film really starts going it never slows down to let you think too much about the details, and it sure is a lot of pure fun.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I never thought that a car chase could be so boring
bpv6v11 June 2000
A movie with a forty minute car chase. Never mind that the quality of acting is that of low quality porn (without the redemption of sex), this thing should be non-stop, edge of your seat, adrenaline pumping excitement. Sadly, I have never found an action sequence so boring. With one or two exceptions, the stunts are all cliche, there is little if any innovation. And just when you think the chase is over, it begins again, and again, until you are praying for it to be over. The "surprise" ending was clever, but that's about the only saving grace this thing had. You get the feeling that this movie was directed by the stunt coordinator. Oh wait....it was.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Independent Filmmaking At Its Finest
redbosox3 August 2004
If you've seen the remake of Gone In 60 Seconds (not a bad movie either) then you must see this outstanding original. Unfortunately, a movie nowadays could never be done like this. H.B. "Toby" Halicki had a dream and he certainly accomplished it here. He must have had more connections than the Gotti Family. It's good to have connections. You take care of people and they take care of you. Toby certainly took care of people and was given the freedom to make this high octane movie the way he wanted to. He had a magnificent collection of cars, among many other items, and used them all in this movie. He bought cars simply to destroy in the movie. He did his own amazing stunt driving, produced, directed, and everything in this movie. Though no one was a professional actor everyone performed well. This isn't an oscar-winning movie, but it's certainly amazing to see what had to be done to make this movie happen. I think this movie is slowly starting to become a cult classic. I can find it in any store nowadays, along with his other few great movies. If you're a fan of the car chase, you'll love this movie for the realism of the impressive 40 minute car chase at the end of the movie. It is AWESOME! Best thing since Bullitt with Steve McQueen. It's great considering you didn't have the special effects. Enjoy the movie! It's a must see!
21 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Shocking levels of car violence
Atreyu_II25 November 2011
First off, I saw the remake first and only after I found that there is an original. The remake is mediocre. The original is nothing special either, but at least it's better than the remake.

For anyone who have seen the remake first, the original's plot is familiar but there are many differences. One of the many differences spotted is the total number of stolen cars which is 48 in this version instead of 50.

Like the remake, the original is worth for the cars, not for the plot, cast or the acting by the actors. The cars are the real stars, but the original triumphs by having a lot more nice cars.

On one hand, this movie is recommendable for car lovers, but on the other hand it may hurt their sensibility because of the brutal treatment given to the cars. I am a car person myself and it's unbearable to see the cars being treated like that, such as the Dodge Challenger which is reduced to dust, the beautiful Cadillac that gets burned and the poor "Eleanor" which is so badly wrecked. And still, despite all the abuse it is victim of, "Eleanor" never once shows the slightest sign of fatigue and just keeps running and running. This testifies how strong "she" is. No modern car could take half the abuse "she" does.

The "Eleanor" chase sequence is the longest car chase I've ever seen in a movie: it lasts as far as 34 minutes.

The car violence isn't just "fiction", it is actually very realistic. More cars than anyone can imagine were destroyed and badly wrecked and there were real accidents and people got hurt. They did many dangerous things. Such is the violence that in a scene a garbage truck overturns the moment when two police cars smash into its side.

H.B. Halicki, also known as "The Car Crash King", was greatly involved in this film, not only because he portrays (well) the expert car thief Maindrian Pace but also because he wrote, produced and directed this.

There is a lot of adrenaline, yes, but at the cost of safety and brutal treatment given to the cars. There are many beautiful and exotic cars and it's terrible to see such a waste of so many fine cars.

The story in this version is harder to understand than in the remake. The best part is the "Eleanor" chase (despite everything) but even that sequence is often interrupted by lame and unnecessary scenes. The rest of the movie has some good moments but some are quite lame too.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Just watch it for the climax
Leofwine_draca28 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
GONE IN 60 SECONDS is a well-remembered car chase thriller of the 1970s. It was one of many films involving fast cars and races with the police, sequences that even made their way into mainstream films like the James Bond/Roger Moore movies for instance. People may remember that this film was made into a glossy version with Nic Cage in 2000, which has absolutely nothing to do with the original other than having the same title.

This film is quite low budget and for most of the running time it's very ordinary. The plot doesn't really go very far and there's little in the way of excitement or interest. Below average, in fact, and the poor acting merely compounds this. However, the film is well worth watching purely because of the car chase climax, which lasts no less than 40 minutes! 40 minutes of vehicular mayhem in which a Ford Mustang is chased through the streets by a whole array of police cars while endless destruction abounds. It's pure entertainment and spectacle and you never lose interest for a second. Great fun.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
not that strong but the car chase is really cult
trashgang11 March 2015
It was the dream of H.B. Halicki to make a movie about a car chase. And the man did it all, he wrote, directed, produced, acted and did stunts for this flick. It became cult due that reason. The flick itself doesn't really has a good story to tell. It's pure a flick about a car chase and here we have a Ford Mustang Fastback called Eleanor to be transported from one point to another. But the driver is being ripped-off by his boss and the chase is on.

It is the chase that makes it worth watching. Knowing that these days a lot of the cars being demolished in this flick are worth a lot of money. The chase itself clocks in over 40 minutes and it's all about crashes going on between cops and parked cars and of course cops against cops. For the lovers of muscle cars it is naturally worth watching but it's easy to spot that it was a low budget flick. The 'actors' in the flick were what they did in real life. I mean, a cop was a real cop...

The people standing on the streets just have a look at that, they are bait for the cars. Luckily no accidents did occur. But also it is so fine to see the real US back then in the early seventies. I do prefer 'Vanishing Point (1971)' but this cult classic here is also a must see.

Gore 0/5 Nudity 0/5 Effects 0/5 Story 2,5/5 Comedy 0/5
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Superlative Achievement!!!!
Wexler22 January 1999
The Citizen Kane of the postwar years, H.B. Yalicki's masterpiece turns the car chase film into an operatic melodrama of epic proportions. In the hands of a poet like Yalicki, cars crashing into each other again and again and again for the entire duration of the movie becomes a metaphor for our times. Don't be fooled by the amateur acting and directing, for the film's shoddiness is part of its genius. Forget Cannonball Run or Gumball Rally, Gone in 60 Seconds is the real deal when it comes to mundane 70's car chase flicks.
10 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Watch it for the Cars, Not the Cast
angrytexan10 November 2001
A "great movie" is not necessarily one that combines superb acting, character development, intelligent comedy and artistic direction. Instead, a great movie is one that succeeds in doing what it set out to do, and therefore the original Gone in 60 Seconds is great indeed.

The car chase scenes in this movie are superior to all others. The 40 minute chase at the end of the movie is obviously cinematic history, but the chase that excited me the most was when the tow truck was trying (and succeeding) to outrun the police. Critics of this movie fail to understand the joy that is brought to a car-loving audience such as myself when a tow truck with an actual car in tow powerslides and fishtails and eventually gets away. This is not something you see in modern high-budget car chase movies. This is the type of genius you see only in a movie created by a guy who really knows the subject matter.

If you want quality acting, well-written drama, and striking cinematography, go elsewhere... it's as simple as that. The world only needs one Lawrence of Arabia. But if you want to be stunned with incredible action scenes featuring REAL cars (instead of oh, say a Lincoln Navigator like the one in the remake), pick up a copy of this movie. And if you must have something to accompany the car chases, listen closely to the dialogue; while it may not be poetic enough for some people's ears, it'll make you laugh whether the writer intended it or not.
46 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good And Bad
pkneer19 March 2021
This is a very interesting film - but you must understand that this is a low low low budget film. The acting is just plain horrendous and the camera work is amateurish at best. But if you can hang in there for the final "steal", you are treated to one of the better car chase scenes ever made. The final chase scene lasts 40 minutes and crashes over 90 cars. That is truly epic - to devote that much screen time to a car chase is insane. For the most part, the chase itself stays pretty cohesive.

But that chase scene and some of the old cars to see make it worth your while.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
give this dog a bone.
disdressed1228 June 2009
yeesh,talk about craptastic.this thing is brutal.horrible voice dubbing,even more horrible acting and no discernible plot.apparently there are some great chase scenes,but the problem is,you have to get to that point first,and i just couldn't.the 20 or so minutes i endured felt more like a root canal than a movie.i suppose i could have fast forwarded it,and i recommend you do the same,unless you have very extreme pain tolerance or your a masochist.i don't fall into either category.i still have a migraine from this thing so i'm about to perform some dental surgery without anesthetic just relive the migraine.bottom line,horrendous. 0/10
10 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The standard against all subsequent are measured!
planet_mamoo19 June 2004
It's amazing what could be done with a tiny budget and no digital effects. I watched this after having seen the trashy remake, and expected a similar degree of dumb wisecracks and hackneyed sub-plots.

I was impressed, however, to discover real talent behind the camera. The plot is simple: a car thief has to steal 40 fancy cars in a very short time. Using a combination of skill, insider knowledge of the insurance business and just sheer brass, the protagonist and his pals start their automotive harvest. Everything seems done and taken care of, when everything goes to hell at the last moment, leading to what surely be the longest car chase put to film.

The best thing about this movie is its low-budget feel. Many of the early scenes are almost mimed, with voices overdubbed later; you don't see actual dialogue, just hear it on top of the action. But as things progress, it begins to show more polish, and by the time we get to the big chase, you get what appears to be the entire 7th Cavalry Division in squad cars chasing one li'l yellow Mustang.

A very smart touch during the big chase was to frequently cut to the aftermath of car crashes, with wounded cops and civilians being dragged from burning cars and hustled away in ambulances -- it added an edge to the film, to show there are actually consequences to these actions (and how often is that shown on the big screen?).

Aside from the marvelously-choreographed action sequences, there are many moments of great wit, which I won't describe so's not to spoil them.

All in all, a brilliant piece of film-making, made not with glitz, glamor, star-power or special effects -- just sheer talent (and pretty cars, o'course!).
21 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
great smashing fun
al_phillips200017 December 2001
This original is much better than the Nick Cage stinkeroonie from 2000. This version rates a "10" for action and fun, but perhaps a "5" or less for plot and acting. Aren't all the actors in it mechanics or friends of Toby Halicki ? Halicki had no budget to speak of, and a script of 5 pages total ! The train accident at the very beginning was a real wreck that director Halicki heard about, so he went down to the scene to film it and include in the movie. Halicki didn't have permission to film on the highways, so those are all real commuters being overtaken by "Eleanor". The scene where "Eleanor" crosses the freeway, loses control and hits the lamp post was unscripted. Halicki split the scene of the accident to spare the legal hassles and left the broken lamp post by the side of the road. The wedding scene was a real wedding and Halicki decided to include it for some reason. This film is pure car chase scenes, so viewer beware !
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Give me an L! Give me an A! Give me an M! And give me and E! What does that spell?
zetes24 May 2000
LAME! This movie is incredibly lame! Before the car chase begins, the story makes no sense whatsoever. I was sitting there waiting for the famed car chase, yawning a bit. And then it came. And then, forty grueling minutes later, it was over. If I were not watching it with a friend, I would have turned it off about ten minutes through the chase. If I just could have fallen asleep!

Really, I'm not against car chases. But there was no reason to care about anything that happened in this movie. Did the characters even have names in this movie? I don't remember. If you're the kind of person who likes car chases a lot, all three Mad Max movies have chases that are a thousand times more exciting than the ones in Gone in 60 Seconds. There are characters we care about, and the stunts are innovative. The ones in this movie are repetitive and uninventive and unrealistic.

So really the only reason to watch this movie is to see muscle cars from the 60s and 70s, and if you're that type of person, you should just be slapped back and forth in the face for eternity. Absolutely one of the biggest wastes of time ever made, devoid of anything remotely worthwhile. 1/10
9 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed