Reviews

17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
American Music Shop (1990–1994)
10/10
Low key brilliance!
21 August 2021
Came across this while exploring the elegies about the recent passing of Nanci Griffith. American Music Shop was a series of of 1-hr specials, each episode with different host and featured various singer/songwriters.

Music was variously country / folk / traditional - minimal Nashville glitz.

I came across this one exploring the outpouriug of salutes, elegies etc on the passing of the magnificent Nanci Griffith (August '21) She hosted Townes Van Zandt (3 wonderful songs), Janis Ian, Jerry Jeff Walker, Frank Christian

These episodes are not easy to find - but well worth the effort!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
As others have noted - Edna May Oliver steals this.
23 July 2020
Rather brittle stuff, with Crawford and Montgomery listlessly sparring, despite all the MGM gloss - but EMO shines. Her opening appearance is priceless, and every time she appears, she breathes life into the lumbering plot. Fascinating to watch how she steals scenes while staying part of the ensemble!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A beautiful film, but that intrusive music often overpowers the good
7 May 2019
Good script and direction, some wonderful performances (esp Perkins and Cooper) -- but the syrupy Tiomkin score, esp the theme tune, are used incessantly to hammer home every plot point. (A sin John Williams is often guilty of!) One wonder why producers can't trust fine performances, a literate script and excellent photograph to carry a film. Too often syrup is poured over fine work and warps the final product ... another example, at random - "Out of Africa."
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dulcy (1940)
3/10
Loud, tedious and unfunny ....
8 March 2019
... despite the presence of some wonderful actors. One is hard-pressed to understand why any of these contortions would ever be considered amusing. The production values are high, but the endless succession of predictable sight gags and cruel mishaps descend into near-gibberish. Ann Sothern looks lovely, but embarrassed. Even Roland Young, for me one of the most most dependably skilled comic actors ever, just plows ahead dutifully until the whole thing grinds to a halt.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Succession (2018–2023)
9/10
It's not supposed to be Billions - it's the Murdochs!
5 July 2018
Don't quite understand all the hate for this, esp the swooning for "Billions - that is a show w/complex characters, but certainly not 'likable' - and the plot line are increaingly ridiculous - the whole S&M thing -- really??? Also - Billions is about the worlds of corporate law and high speeed securities trading. Neither are believaby presented. Good actors keep it barely watchable, but I never mind if I miss an episode or six. "Succession" potrays the world of thrashing media empire being barely held together by the will of an increasingly cranky, physically failing and occsionally demented. The parallels are outrageously similiar to the Murdochs - surprised there have not been lawsuits, But in the current atmosphere, the portrayal of "news" that has little to do with facts, accuracy or honest is sadly, very timely. Same thing with thoughtless greed.

I'm curious - on what big-budget pay tv series are characters really 'likable"? Game of Thrones? The Sopranos? Westworld? The Crown? Homeland? If you want likable, you might want to stick with broacast tv -- maybe "Big Bang Theory" - oh, wait ....
52 out of 81 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Twin Peaks: Part 18 (2017)
Season 1, Episode 18
10/10
Heartbreaking --
5 September 2017
Cooper crossed over, and as he told Diane -- everything may be different. The Diane he found was not Diane, the Laura he found could not be Laura, and the optimistic can-do Agent Cooper that we were (OK, I certainly was) so happy to see re- emerge was lost in the wreckage of his dreams.

I have never been as fascinated by the tortuous dark wraiths of Lynch as by his skewed portrayal of 'normal' American life, and that was certainly true of the finale episodes. To see Sheryl Lee and Sherilyn Finn today, after seeing so much of their entrancing characters in the inital TP was ... what? Riveting, certainly, and sad, and puzzling -- they have aged, and so have I, and so has everyone who was so fascinated by the original series. Incredibly brave of both these women to go all in for these portrayals. The overarching theme of life as a lonely highway was chilling & lovely.

As for Lynch -- all criticisms are valid, but his work is beyond regular TV criteria. The Showtime placement was genius --he got to make what he wanted, w/no commercial interruption, and no time limits -- and we were free to watch or not. He stands apart, and thank God he has given us so much to puzzle over, and argue about, and remember. So -- do we live in a dream?
89 out of 102 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Time (2017)
2/10
Wha ???
4 September 2017
Don't quite understand the very high ratings for this -- I picture friends of the producer, or interns at the distributor working away to find new ways to praise with faint damns. I saw it at BAM in Brooklyn, and the mostly hipster audience sat in stunned silence throughout - with occasional relieved chuckles at the few flashes of stupidity that came off as funny. Loud, violent, all closeups and menacing pretentious music unrelated to the action.

Pattinson indeed breaks his pretty boy mold, and works very hard - but a lot of "fucks" and running very fast down urban streets does not constitute a breakout performance. JL Leigh does her usual sterling job as a frighteningly dumb victim -- but she was on screen for maybe 4 minutes. The only performance that worked was the 16yo girl Crystal -- Taliah Webster seemed to inherently get the power of underplaying, and she did it brilliantly. Of course, she disappears as the whole mess grinds down, ceding the screen to the boys.

The coda at the end was indeed touching - but not in the way the director(s) may have intended. Actual (?) mentally disabled clients in treatment were shown in a therapy group as the credits rolled -- they were sweet and fascinating, but they were being used - hard - in a commercial film, as a career move by a millionaire actor.

Also, for a story trading so freely in the Queens, NY milieu - the sudden emergence of a large haunted house fun park, setting for a pointlessly violent beating of one of the few interesting characters, followed by giving him a huge dose of LSD -- was ridiculous. Not gritty, just cruel & pointless.

I debated a few seconds between a 2 or 3 rating -- but honesty won out. It's a 2.
173 out of 432 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Claws (2017–2022)
10/10
a LOT of fun - and yeah, raunchy - not for the prudish!
23 June 2017
TBT continues to dazzle. They promoted the hell out of this, somebody spent a lot of $ - and it shows, in a raunchy and engrossing noir comedy. But - a little puzzled that some seem surprised by the graphic (and witty!) vulgarity - "prurient"? yep, definitely! anyone who had seen a promo, or looked at the first 2 minutes - would know that this was not going to be Downton Abbey or The Good Wife. South Florida is a strange & wonderful place - and Claws is worthy of that milieu.

The cast: Niecy Nash has been a particular favorite since the wonderful Reno 911 - happy to see that she has found a perfect showcase. Carrie Preston, sometimes a bit too twee in her Good Wife stint. is letter-perfect,often raunchy funny but also deeply moving in her fragile gentility. Judy Reyes is always a welcome sight - a world away from her Carla on Scrubs. Great secondary characters -eg, the brilliant Dale Dickey, with her face for the ages. Dean Norris and the other males are all good, but the women rule here.

Nash's clothes, like her attitude, are magnificent, the stripper biker funeral in Episode 2 has to be seen to be believed, and Florida looks great.

A last note: "Tailored to a very specific audience" as the last line of a rather hateful 1-star review - really? Seems to be flirting with racism ... altho, I'm surely part of that target audience, and I'm a middle aged white man from the south, so yeah - target away!
40 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A quintessential soaper -- Davis shines.
16 May 2017
Yes, it's a ridiculous, confusing plot. Yes, the characterizations are clichéd archetypes. The portrayal of her son shows a child yanked around with what we would see today as neglect, or even cruelty. But David fully commits, and elevates the entire enterprise. She is showcased, and provides a subtlety and range of emotion far beyond the script, e.g., she makes her interaction with the child actor believable. Fonda hangs in there, but his character doesn't give him much to work with. And some scenes rise to her level -- especially the conversation with Anita Louise in her wheelchair. We see the characters reacting to one another in an unlikely and awkward plot contrivance, and simultaneously see two skilled actresses working together to make all this believable and even moving. Plus, the wheelchair action is ... remarkable. Davis looks great, beautifully photographed, well-lit, with the famous eyes showcased repeatedly, to great effect. The finale has to be seen to be believed. What the involved viewer expected - and dreaded - is suddenly revealed to have taken place, and the effect is -- hilarious relief. Certainly not a great film, but essential for those who appreciate and admire Davis.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Chaotic mess - but Viola makes it compulsory viewing
18 February 2016
Viola Davis continues monumental, but - the this viewer found the plot incomprehensible, and even worse - boring. Who killed who, when - what? None of the students or teachers go to class anymore?? Who's really dead or fake dead? Strange to watch a drama just to ss one character - I've done that with disposable comedies (eg. Jennifer Coolidge in anything!) Liked the format better when it was a crime a week, plus the underlying student/teacher plot - this business with the murderous twins (and law students sleeping with suspects in cases they are assisting with - wha??? ) requires more concentration & gives less satisfaction. However, if they had Viola just reading the phone book for an hour every week - I'd probably be there.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A fine film - you might need to pay attention
20 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
A thoughtful, beautiful film - fine acting, an excellent script, beautiful camera-work. Interesting to see naysayers complaining "nothing happens" - a great deal happens - but no gratuitous beatdowns, no jazzy editing, no hammy scene stealing - and no 'nostalgia' or playing for camp associations II loved American Hustle, but did notice how I had some difficulty seeing the characters behind the costumes and wigs). Oscar Isaac is on screen virtually the entire film, and you can't take your eyes off him - but he is quiet, watchful, smart. Jessica Chastain's role is less visible, but her character hovers over the film - her enmeshment with her husband. Chastain's standout line (from memory): "You don't want to see what happens if I have to get involved." Interestingly, the conclusion at first felt like a letdown. But with a few minutes reflection, an unspoken element, based on clear signals earlier in the film, makes for a spectacular denouement: SPOILER: Where did the money Chastain 'skimmed' really come from? What was her background? What does that mean for Isaac's attempts to stay out of the mud? The signals click into place. Also: The title refers to the reallife events occurring in the city that years, quietly simmering away onradio (remember radio?) and TV broadcasts. The violence in the film was occasional, unexpected - and inevitable.

The etire film had a stately feeling. We saw an entire distany panorama unfold that had unexpected resonance with events today. Theentire film is about oil and power.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Under the Dome: Go Now (2014)
Season 2, Episode 13
1/10
Hilarious!
22 September 2014
I watch only out of idle curiosity about how stupid this can get. It's the logical culmination of DVR series TV - you can skip episodes, DVR and then skip back & forth, fall asleep out of boredom & miss 20 minutes, get up in the middle of a sentence & go to the bathroom - doesn't make any difference, the cheese just rolls on & on, and you don't feel like you missed anything important or interesting. It seems the actors are struggling mightily to stay involved in the 'script' w/o betraying the boredom or panic that they landed in this unreeling piece of cheese. Whenever "the egg" appears, the humiliation reaches a new crescendo. "Big Jim" - where did they get that name? A late John Wayne movie? Tennessee Williams?? -- is the epitome of what's wrong with all this - wide character arcs, mindless reactions, terrible, terrible writing, A fine actor's talents wasted.

BTW - the Dome told me to write this, so don't be hating.
17 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Medora (2013)
9/10
Beautiful
31 March 2014
An unflinching look a small Indiana town that at first glance appears to be dying. We follow several members of a very small high school's basketball team. The boys emerge as distinct personalities; the direction is unobtrusive, the musical score is unobtrusive but moving, the boys are awkward but gradually emerge as dignified presences. Some might see a bit of sentimentality here – but the reality of poverty, the boys' very tentative hopes to simply survive, and the whole towns' overwhelming dissociation from almost everything we see on television and from Hollywood is immensely touching. Beautifully photographed - there are several priceless views of the boys' watchful, proud, mostly silent mothers. The coaches – a policeman, a young pastor, an older stonemason - are good men doing immensely important work simply because - it is the right thing to do. Definitely worthwhile.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vino Veritas (2013)
8/10
Outstanding performances, classic premise
21 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
An interesting exercise - saw this via Netflix at the recommendation of a friend. Wasn't disappointed, but mildly frustrated - a LOT of topics, some thoughtfully explored, a few touched upon & quickly dropped, with some outstanding work by skilled actors, and mostly tight, efficient direction.

The suburban setting was letter perfect for the premise: two couples meet before a Halloween party, drink some "magic" blue wine, and get down to exploring truths. Their common ground initially is their focus on their children, whom we never see; misperceptions & frustrated hopes for their kids are uncovered and confronted. We also get believable, if somewhat rushed, glances at 9/11, atheism, suburban hypocrisy, career and money anxieties, etc - modern life.

All four actors were excellent. Preston & White were the more vividly written couple; Preston had several chances to do her patented 'zany' characterization (see "The Good Wife"), and White was quite believable as an ambitious & somewhat oblivious MD. Interestingly, in a discussion of 9/11, bias d/t his ethnicity was only glancingly touched upon, an opportunity for deeper exploration unexplored. Rather, real and imagined sexual peccadilloes of both are mined.

Raffo & Hutchison are less exotic, but the eventual history of their relationship is more heartfelt; they also seem to have a visible sexual chemistry not evident in the other couple. Raffo is touching in a somewhat underwritten role as a restless and disappointed mate to a man who, vaguely, is no longer as ... "exciting" as when they were married. Hutchison quite convincingly portrays a charming, somewhat goofy suburban dad who reveals unexpected depths; his reaction when he and Raffo discuss losing a child is immensely moving, and that discussion give the film a center it needs. Both he and Raffo deserve wider exposure.

Less successful were the extraneous 'hooks' evidently meant to power the screenplay. The blue wine of truth was unnecessary - high-proof vodka would have done as well; 'roofies' (rohypnol) as an 'antidote' was just silly. Being an atheist or agnostic is not really so dumbfounding, right? The Halloween costumes were interesting, but extraneous; the trope of "two couples settling in for an evening of drinking and verbal jousting" is tried & true for a reason - it works, & doesn't need a lot of explication.

Overall, an 8 - because I stayed interested until the end, and the acting was excellent.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beautifully made, austere ....
20 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
In a year of out-sized entertainments, ILD was an anomaly - minimal special effects, much silence - music used within the story, rather than an emotion-yanking soundtrack. Beautiful performances, down to the smallest role - the two couples who were guests at the professors apartment - amazing. Minimal pyrotechnics beyond one abortive beating.

But for me - difficult to enter. I remember that scene well, went to college in NYC in the 60's, and the film was immersed in aura I remember - not with nostalgia or sentimentality, but accurately. Kids without money scrambling to make some sort of music career, old Village characters and Times Square types holding out. A cold winter, no money, road trips, overdoses - the beginning of Vietnam, but all Llewyn can focus on is keeping himself warm & fed. The outside world is like the weather - chill, oppressive, dangerous.

I did not understand the timeline of the ending, but that didn't really bother me; probably wasn't meant to be understood. I'm glad I saw it, but I would recommend it cautiously - not an easy ride. Stark Sands singing "Last Thing on my Mind" broke my heart.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Major Crimes: Return to Sender: Part 2 (2014)
Season 2, Episode 19
4/10
Bad, bad writing ... and casting
20 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Watched this show this season on DVR to see how weird it could get. Answer: very. The ever-increasing focus on 'Rusty' became a downward spiral of nonsense, interspersed w/grimy little torture porn vignettes - often homophobic. Capt Raydor moved from a proficient, interestingly straitlaced senior police officer to a quivering parody of foster motherhood.

'Rusty' continued sulky, impulsive, Vulnerable w/a capital V, flipping his elaborate shag incessantly - and an entire Metropolitan police division devoted most of their working hours to obsessively worrying about that vulnerability. Raydor has a protected witness living in her apartment? She's his new, good mother?? Very, very weird - and unpleasant.

Teenage hustling is an old story in major cities - sad, often tragic, with neglect and survival at odds on a daily basis. Having a 23yo actor portray a 16? 17? yo teen is not believable - call that character a child is just discordant. Making the bewigged killer a victim of the same vicious cycle comes off as sensationalistic homophobia.

A cast of very talented actors have created interesting and believable characters in both this series and and the previous "Closer" - but the quality of the scripts has drastically deteriorated. "Rusty Gets Stalked" has become an occasionally hilarious wincefest - but thank god for DVR, so we can get through this time filler in 20 minutes - if we bother to watch at all.
3 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blackout (1940)
Strange and v ....
23 August 2011
Just watched this on TCM, where it appeared in their day-long tribute to Veidt - parenthetically, their August programs featuring one actor per day have unearthed some marvelous stuff (eg, early Ann Dvorak). TCM aired it as "Contraband", the original British title - and it's a very British piece indeed. The plot is complex & often nonsensical, but I don't think one ever watches Michael Powell films for tidy screenplays. Veidt and Hobson encounter one another on his ship, and then whiz across London, first pursuing/eluding one another, then working together to undo a German spy ring. Much hugger-mugger, with a multitude of British character actors working in blackout darkness and then brightly-lit, often chaotic interiors (train compartments, restaurants, ship's lounges, nightclubs, elevators ....) Veidt and Hobson are charming in tandem, with a grownup sexual tension that for this viewer was a striking contrast to the more standard youthful leads of that time (and ours). As other commenters have noted, the filmmakers include a subtle thread of delight in bondage, mild fetishism, etc (eg,Hobson's shoes & feet during her captivity). Ah, the British. Clearly made on a budget, the entire production nonetheless looks & feels terrific - gritty shipboard all-male scenes, a couple of nightclub production numbers that have to be seen to be believed, a swell Art Deco townhouse - and underneath it all, maneuvering through the London blackout as a necessary given, a condition of life that the Brits seem to take for granted as the darkest days of the war approach. I had never seen Veidt so sympathetic - here a memorable leading man, versus his more well-know villains..And I was until now unfamiliar with Hay Petrie, here in a double role as Veidt's shipboard second-in-command, and that character's brother, a volatile (& hilarious) Danish restaurateur (don't ask!) All in all - a delight.
24 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed