Amityville 3-D (1983) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
127 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Enter the gateway to hell
veryape-887-91390510 February 2014
A new dimension in ultimate evil has been added to the story to what has probably become the world's most notorious haunted house in America.

A magazine writer's investigation into a séance turns to horror when an abandoned well beneath the basement floor turns out to be the gateway to hell.

This film starred: Tony Roberts, Tess Harper & Meg Ryan

In my opinion this wasn't one of best entries in the Amityville film series, not the worst but no where near the best. It had a bad plot about the gateway to hell being a well in the basement. 93 minutes wasted in my opinion, it had a couple of entertaining scenes but nothing special.

**/***** Poor.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Well at least now they won't have that house to play around with any more
sol12184 April 2005
***SPOILERS*** Hell literally freezes over in this third and final chapter of the infamous Amityville House by the river with the place being blown to bits taking an entire crew of ghost investigators, or busters, and ghost detectives along with it.

I wondered watching the movie unfold if it was the two investigative reporters for the skeptical Reveal Magazine John & Melanie, Tony Roberts & Candy Clark, trying to be too smart about their ability to expose psychic frauds that lead to the horrors that happened to them as well as everyone else in the movie. Doing their job in exposing psychic frauds both John & Melanie flush out the Caswells, John Beal & Leora Dana, in a phony and staged psychic reading that they gave them for their dead young son Ricky in, of all places, the Amityville Horror House.

Feeling good about himself in his job as a "Ghost Exposer" John really goes overboard by buying the dangerous and haunted house himself since no one wants to not only live in it but even live next to it. With John about to move into the haunted house strange things begin to happen. The real estate agent Clifford Sanders, John Harkins,who sold the house to John is found dead by John on the steps of the house from an apparent heart-attack.

Melanie who took a number of photos of John and Sanders finds that the photos of Sanders have a strange smug on them that when it's magnified the smug looks like a little devil. Things start to get out of hand with Melanie ending up dead in a car crash where she burned to a crisp and John's daughter Susan, Lori Loughlin, drowning in the river outside the house. To the surprise of her mom Nancy Baxter, Tess Harper, she's seen alive walking up the stairs to her room dripping wet with a weird smirk on her face.

John himself has a few close calls with death in an elevator in the building where he works and in his bathroom when he's confronted with live steam gushing out of the bathroom faucets and the walls in the bathroom closing in on him. With his co-worker , Melanie, roasted to death his daughter, Susan, drowned and his wife, Nancy, going insane John gives in and decides to have his house checked out by a "Ghost Buster" team lead by psychic expert and investigator Eillot West, Robert Joy, to find out and see if there's something to all this tragedy that struck John his family and friends. What the team finds out isn't pretty in that before their through checking out the Amityville House the Amityville House will be through with them.

Passable horror movie that does have it's moments and at least tries to make some sense to it's audience of what's happening on the screen with a very young Lori Loughlin and Meg Ryan as Susan Baxter and Susan's best friend Lisa who's also a armature medium and psychic in the film.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A Silly and Boring Movie, Where the Greatest Attraction is Meg Ryan in the Beginning of Her Career
claudio_carvalho14 May 2004
In the house where Sonny slaughtered the Montelli family, the reporter John Baxter (Tony Roberts) and the photographer Melanie (Candy Clark) disclose two charlatans, who cheated the persons pretending they were medium. The broker, who presently owns the house, is having difficulties to sell the mansion due to its fame, and John decides to buy the house by very low price. When he moves to the cursed place, many fatal tragedies happen with the broker, his daughter and his lover Melanie. This movie is very silly and boring. Its greatest attraction in the present day is to see Meg Ryan in the beginning of her career. The Brazilian DVD is a shame: it has a recent picture of Meg Ryan on the cover, and her name is highlighted as if she were the lead actress, showing a total lack of respect of the distributor with the viewers and consumers. My vote is four.

Title (Brazil): `Amityville 3D'
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Succeeds on its own modest terms
bwaynef9 April 1999
Surprisingly, this second sequel to the supposedly fact based thriller "The Amityville Horror" is a worthy installment in the otherwise wretched series of shockers. Richard Fleischer, a Hollywood veteran whose directorial credits include such diverse fare as "The Vikings" and "The Boston Strangler," brings a skill to the proceedings that were conspicuously absent from the original film, which was more notable for the laughably bad performances of James Brolin and Rod Steiger than it was for inducing chills. The performances in "Amityville 3-D," or "Amityville: the Demon" as it is known on television, didn't deserve Oscar consideration, but they are professional and, in the case of Candy Clark's suspicious photographer, almost inspired.

The movie opens in typical haunted house fashion: a seance is being held in the notorious Long Island house where, in earlier films, toilets backed up (shudder!), marching bands played in the dead of night (shudder again!), and a giant red-eyed pig named Jody roamed the premises and engaged in small talk with children (Babe in an early role?). The seance produces mysterious apparitions and odd noises, all of which are exposed by two of the participants--a reporter and his photographer-- as a hoax. The realtor denies any involvement in the souped-up spookiness and explains to the reporter (Tony Roberts on holiday from Woody Allen's repertory company) that the house's infamous reputation is such that he's willing to sell it at a bargain rate. Roberts, newly divorced and eager for a peaceful environment in which to write his great American novel, buys it, all the while ignoring the warnings of his less courageous colleague, the delightful Miss Clark.

Roberts, a stubborn type who sneers at the supernatural, moves in and continues his sneering even as anyone who sets foot in the house experiences terror and, ultimately, death. But, dumbo that he is, he continues to pooh-pooh any notions that the house is cursed.

Some talented performers are on view in this film, and if not for their admirable abilities to keep a straight face, the movie would be a lot funnier than it's supposed to be and sometimes is. Roberts is his usual non-plussed self, refusing to accept any supernatural explanations for the bizarre circumstances taking place around him.

The special-effects are adequate, but they do the trick, and probably worked better in 3D, which is the way the film was presented theatrically. The process is evident in the use of so many scenes in which hands are extended toward the camera and, in one scene, a frisbee is tossed directly at the audience.

"Amityville 3D" will never take its place beside the greats of the horror genre, but neither will its two predecessors. However, unlike those failed shockers, number 3 succeeds on its own modest terms, providing, amid the occasional unintended chuckle, a few moments of genuine suspense and a thrill or two. It's a satisfying spook show on the same level as the William Castle flicks of the late 50s and early 60s ("The Tingler," "House on Haunted Hill," et al).
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Awful. Even 3-D couldn't save this flop.
theshadow90812 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The Amityville Horror was based on a true story, and it was only one story. There's not that many stories you can tell. I guess the producers of this trash thought different.

This movie tells the story of a reporter moving into the Amityville house after insisting the hauntings weren't real. Lo and behold, weird stuff starts happening. However, unlike the first movie, this movie relies heavily on violent deaths. The house even causes a woman to burn up in her car before she can get there. It's utterly ridiculous. The movie just gets even more goofy when paranormal investigators show up and demons start popping out of the basement floor and the house decides to implode on itself. The story is bad, the acting is bad, and it's not scary at all. It's actually funny.

This movie was 3-D in theatres, though not on DVD, and even the stuff that was in 3-D wasn't exciting. What was it? Tree branches and fisbees smacking into the camera lens.

2/10. The only good part is an appearance by a young Meg Ryan.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Fun In Its Way
utgard1424 December 2013
Magazine writer John Baxter (Tony Roberts) and his partner Melanie (Candy Clark) expose a fake psychic racket operating in the Amityville house. Being recently divorced and needing a new house, John decides to buy the place. He gets a good deal in exchange for keeping the real estate agent, who knew about fake psychics, out of the story. John is a disbeliever and skeptic of supernatural phenomenon so he's not worried about the house's history. Once he moves in, of course, strange things start happening.

Amityville 3-D has a bad reputation and most of it is deserved. The plot is tiresome and the scares are often laughable. Still, I can't help but enjoy it on some guilty pleasure level. Tony Roberts is a stiff lead. He reminds me of a less charismatic Ron Perlman. Yet there's something fascinating about watching this guy work. Maybe it's the hair. Or maybe it's that he clearly believes he is above the material. Lori Loughlin makes her film debut as his daughter. She doesn't get a lot to do but she's good enough so that you wouldn't automatically assume this was her first movie. Meg Ryan (!) plays her friend in one of Meg's early film roles. I was a little worried after Amityville II that we'd get some inappropriate sexual action between Tony Roberts and Meg Ryan or, worse yet, Roberts and Lori Loughlin. But thankfully nobody has sex with Tony Roberts. The often awful Candy Clark rounds out the main cast. She's up to her usual scenery chewing so everybody grab a seat. The best performances would come from Tess Harper as the ex-wife and Robert Joy as a paranormal investigator.

Perhaps the most amusing change to the Amityville series here comes from the fact the "ghosts" can attack someone even if they are miles away from the house. It's silly but allows for some enjoyable shock scenes. Look, this isn't a great movie. It isn't even a good one, really. But it still entertains in a so-bad-it's-good way. If you're looking for something like that, awesome! Here you go. But if you want something you can seriously be scared by, look elsewhere.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Clichéd to heck and back, but actually enjoyable.
FiendishDramaturgy2 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
First off, check out Meg Ryan as the lesbian lover of the lead character's daughter. This flick is from 1983. That was back when she was still the darling of Another World (as Betsy Stewart Montgomery Andropoulos).

Actually not part of the "series" (lies), and an actual work of fiction rather than a distorted claim of "true story," this installment is better than both originals AND the remake. At the time of this writing, the IMDb average is 3.6/10 compared to 4.4/10 for 2, and 5.5/10 for the original stink-fest. But that's because, by 1983, we all knew it was not true, and no one cared anymore. Apparently, no one cares even now.

It feels like a 1980's Made for TV Movie in its direction style, film quality, and musical score and plays like a half-interesting who-dun-it.

All in all, not nearly as bad as the previous two, but still not great.

5/10 on the B scale from...

the Fiend :.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A movie probably made just to capitalize on the 3D craze.
b_kite9 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I wouldn't be surprised at all if this thing wasn't just cranked out so someone could get rich off the whole 1983 3D craze, then let's water it down with a PG rating. There really isn't anything here to recommend. The kills suck, the effects suck, the 3D sucks, a young Meg Ryan and Lori Loughlin are here, but, it's hardly worth a recommendation for that. The best thing about the whole film is the scene were the one dude gets his face eaten off and screams like a little girl, and the final were the house literally erupts into a fireball which was freaking awesome. That alone is worth a very generous three stars, but, beyond that just don't.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I thought this Amityville was full of cheesy fun.
Aaron137512 May 2009
There must have been a law in the 1980's that stated that if you are to make a third film to a set of horror movies you must make them in 3-d as this was one of them, along with other such fine films as Jaws 3-D and Friday the 13th part III in 3-D. Sad to say, but I enjoyed all these movies even though I know in my heart of heart they were all bad movies. However, just because a movie is bad does not make it non-entertaining. Well at least to me it does not...perhaps to a more mainstream viewer, I admit I am a little more offbeat than most people to say the least. This story has a guy moving into the Amityville house for whatever reasons after he proves this one little group of people are fake psychics. Through a series of events though he begins to find out just how real the horrors are in the house that has had cast evil upon all those who lived there. I have to say the movie is not as graphic as the second movie, but it has a lot more to it than the first movie in the ways of scares and such and it has a nice conclusion too. Still the movie has to many 3-D moments too to be a really good movie. You know the scenes, pointless scenes where they aim something directly at the camera and such. Still, the movie runs at a fast clip and is entertaining to watch, plus you get to see a young Meg Ryan in one of her first roles.
26 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Great in 3-D, mediocre otherwise
squeezebox28 January 2003
Warning: Spoilers
For some reason, many critics liked this entry, which, overall, got the best reviews of the series. There are certainly good points to it, such as solid performances, excellent cinematography and some terrific 3-D effects. But otherwise, there's little about this movie to recommend.

Skeptical journalist Tony Roberts buys the infamous Long Island house, ignoring warnings coming from every direction, and shrugs all the "phenomena" off as a string of coincidences. His real estate agent has a heart attack in the house, his partner (Candy Clark) is burnt to a crisp in a car fire while investigating the house, and finally his daughter (Lori Loughlin) is drowned after having a seance in which the makeshift Ouija board tells her she's in danger. All coincidence, right? When his ex-wife (Tess Harper) goes berserk in the wake of their daughters death, he hires a parapsychologist friend (Robert Joy) to prove to her that the house ISN'T haunted. The team of ghost investigators sets up shop in the house and all hell breaks loose. Broken glass, furniture and even a stuffed swordfish fly at the viewer in a 3-D tour-de-force that must have been jaw-dropping in the movies.

Finally, the demon (the same one that appears at the conclusion of AMITYVILLE II) bursts from the well in the basement and melts off Joy's face. The house explodes, and Roberts and Harper barely get out alive.

Outside of a few wacky moments, this is a rather dull and uneventful movie. It's PG rating also ensures that any T&A or gore will be kept to a minimum. Meg Ryan has an early role as Loughlin's friend. Retitled AMITYVILLE THE DEMON for cable.

It was recently released as a 2-disc special edition DVD by Sanctuary Entertainment in the U.K., with an anaglyph (red and blue) 3-D version on disc two. The 3-D version occasionally works, but it takes a heck of a lot of TV color and tint fiddling to get it right.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fun to watch, lots of jumps in a dark room!
benjaminjschmitt29 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I found this movie to be one of the better installments in the Amityville series, actually the second best, behind the original. The beginning with the con artists is hilarious, and I just love the characters in this movie. I found the characters likable, especially M.r Baxter's friend, the photographer. Meg Ryan also makes a guest appearance (before she was famous) and she is a delightfully annoying character. I also could tell this would be a very fun movie to see in its original 3D, especially the daughter's spirit in the end. The only reason this didn't get 10 out of 10, is because I didn't get to see it in 3D! Definitely watch this movie if you liked the first one!
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Actually, not bad at all...
trancejeremy13 February 2004
Probably the best movie of the series, I think. Okay, that's not saying much, but it's actually quite enjoyable. And probably the strongest, plot wise.

A magazine writer who happens to debunk psychics ends up buying the infamous house for cheap, blackmailing the current owner (a realtor, who is worried about his reputation, he had leased the house to two fake pyschics). And wackiness ensues. But it's not over the top at first, more general creepiness. There's nothing really special effect wise until the end, at which it does get a bit silly, but it's quite a finish.

It was originally in 3-D, and so you see a lot of shots that were intended to capitalize on this - frisbees thrown at the camera, flying swordfish, etc.

Also notable about this movie, it's the source for a quote frequently sampled by My Life With the Thrill Kill Kult.
27 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good Idea Goes South
aesgaard4111 November 2000
Yikes! I liked this movie the first few times I saw it,but the more often I see it,I get a little more bolder,a little more wiser and a little more sensible. Premise: Magazine editor moves into reputedly haunted house to prove it is not haunted as everyone dies and wigs out around him.This great idea, however, goes awry as the scripts throws in every sort of haunted house cliche in the world. One nice observation:I fell in love with the bad girl Lisa from this movie not knowing she would turn out to be the famous Meg Ryan years later.Her scene describing the Amityville mythos to Lori Loughlin is a small indication to the talent and repertoire she shows today. This movie does seem to generalize the actions of Dr. Stephen Kaplan, the prominent parapsychologist who went around debunking and citing hoax to the true original Amityville story. Tony Roberts' character almost mirrors the late Dr. Kaplan in common sense and logic. That should have been more what this movie should have been about,but instead it just fizzles out and dies. There is no psychological suspense as shown in the first movie,or any stream of style. The movie's just one long cliche and not worth the effort unless you're like me and just are a fan of the genre.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Ghost Story.
Gizmo3861 March 1999
This is not like the horror movies that were coming out around the time this was released. Everyone says how bad it is, but if this were made in the sixties, it would be one of the greatest horror movies of all time. It has awful special effects, but it contains ideas, like most good movies should. I suggest you rent, or even buy it if you stumble across a copy.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Give it a second chance.
aesgaard4121 November 2000
Warning: Spoilers
I know I've already commented on this flick, but I recently found a copy of this film in the bottom of my video store's discount bin. Breaking down and watching it again [Man, that Meg Ryan is so timelessy cute!], it dawned on me that there are certain facets of this flick that border on making this a great movie, such as the scene where Tony Roberts wrestles with a pipe and the walls behind him unseenly move. I actually wanted to get into the movie to warn him ! I've never noticed that before! Spoilers withstanding,there's also a scene where Ryan and Lori Loughlin are petrified as an unidentified presence comes down to meet them in the basement. Still,much of this flick is just ridiculously pretentious,but still, there is a halfway decent movie underneath most of this crud.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Before They Were Famous
view_and_review1 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
In this episode of "Before They Were Famous" we have a young Meg Ryan and Lori Loughlin. Meg Ryan is most known for her role in "When Harry Met Sally" and "You've Got Mail." In Amityville 3-D she's the daredevil friend that wants to test the evil spirits. You may know Lori Loughlin as Aunt Becky in the show "Full House" or you may know her more recently for being the most famous person busted for buying her kids way into USC through back channels. In this movie she is the daughter of the guy who just bought the Amityville house.

Amityville 3-D had a strong start but it was an unjust movie. John Baxter (Tony Roberts) is a natural skeptic. He works for "Reveal" magazine which is dedicated to exposing fake paranormal events. His skepticism and his ego lead him to buy the Amityville house. His coworker, Melanie (Candy Clark), was also a skeptic, but she sobered up from being a disbeliever real quick. Not only did she believe that the house was haunted she refused to A.) ever go back and B.) to listen to John's arguments about how she was just delusional. In other words, she was the exact type of person you look for in a scary movie--the smart I-can-take-a-hint type that's not going to dismiss the phantasmagorical event she just witnessed.

So why did she have to die and John live? Not fair. She should have been rewarded for heeded the paranormal signs and John punished for ignoring them. Instead the opposite happened.

That's not what made this a bad movie though. They strayed too far from the source material in favor of gimmicky special effects as though they were an adequate substitute for true dark fright. Furthermore, they liberally borrowed from "The Entity" which had scientist set up a bunch of monitoring equipment. Like Jaws, Amityville should've avoided the 3-D
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Haunted house sequel
smellthecult-com-126 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The house on the hill seeks fresh victims. Yes, the third instalment of the much maligned Amityville series sees another gaggle of hapless buffoons venture between the four walls where, if we remember correctly from part 2 a young man slaughtered his entire family with a shotgun and the walls dripped blood. Suave wannabe writer John Baxter purchases the property for a knock down price (not surprised about that, to be honest) and moves himself and his teenage daughter in and, yep, it's not long before mysterious things start to happen: Voices, objects moving around etc etc. His daughter takes it upon herself to hold a séance with a bunch of friends, including a very young Meg Ryan, where she is informed that she is in peril. Shortly afterwards, she drowns. Or did she? Her mother swears blind that the daughter was with her moments before the alleged incident, but now she can't be found. Time to call in the psychic investigators, time to follow that pulsing light down to the basement and see what really dwells in the mysterious well. Could it be a big slimy monster? You'll have to watch it to find out but the answer is, of course, yes. It's all very run of the mill, using every horror cliché in the book, but it's not in any way terrible. It's not in any way frightening either though, but if you have an hour and twenty five minutes to kill one evening, you could do a lot worse.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
High School cute Meg Ryan
willandcharlenebrown1 October 2020
Such a gem to find her and young Lori Loughling in a scary movie. Even if the movie isn't remotely scary! On a scare level the movie gets a 1.5 out of 10! On a level of star studded cast and bearable movie to watch..... 5 out of 10. Meg Ryan truly was a cutie pie!!!!!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Enjoyable Haunted House Yarn, But Lame Resolution
ShootingShark18 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
After doing an exposé story on a supernatural scam at the infamous Amityville haunted mansion, a sceptical journalist going through a divorce decides to buy the cursed house. It isn't long before mysterious things start happening and people begin to die ...

I quite like this movie, but it shoots itself in the foot in the last reel. For the first hour and a bit, it's a spooky little drama with nice art direction, good performances (particularly Clark) and plenty of suspense. Unfortunately, the ending is your standard all-Hell-breaks-loose finish which is not very impressive technically and spoils the creepy ambiance that precedes it. For a second sequel to what was a slightly hysterical horror flick in the first place though, it's not at all bad, with some nice ideas - for instance, I love the way the dead girl's ghost appears before we know she's dead, and there are some hair-curling moments like the scene with the walls in the bathroom closing in our unwitting hero. It does commit a heinous crime though by not taking the opportunity to kill Ryan in some gruesome fashion. This movie is one of a handful shot in 3D with Arriflex cameras, and features optical effects by Gary Platek, who also worked on the similar but far superior Poltergeist. Produced by the great independent mogul Dino De Laurentiis, who financed many interesting pictures in the eighties (The Dead Zone, Cat's Eye, Manhunter, Blue Velvet, etc). Worth catching if there's nothing else interesting on.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not Scary, but Fun
packfanman1 April 2006
Okay - Amityville 3-D will not go down as one of the scariest films of all time. Not even one of the best. However, if you use your imagination and complete the 3-D effects in the film, it is a very fun time. Imagine the pipe shattering the car window coming through your TV screen. The spit of the old woman flying out at you. The boom mike ready to take your next words and amplify them through the house. Watch it again, and pay special attention to when the 3-D effects appear - and have fun with them. Also, a special acting nod goes to the branch at the beginning - scratching the camera screen, even when there's not a tree around. Now, that's acting!
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
One of the 3 best in the series
ryangilmer00713 March 1999
Of all the movies in this series (currently 8), this is one of the three best. It is at least an average and a very watchable film (unlike some of the movies in the series which have parts that are like pulling teeth). While the effects aren't great on tape (ie no 3D and not a bunch of other stuff), the movie at least has an interesting story (including a paranomal investigator (who is just plain stupid;ok so he has to confront the demon, but does he have to do this by being sucked down the well?). It also has Meg Ryan (in a role that is not totally explained (a family friend I guess). And best of all it adds closure to the series. If The Amityville Horror, II:The Possesion, and 3D were the entire series, then it wouldn't be all bad (especially if the ending to II was edited out). Of course (the demon/well has to send a fly out to spread the evil (and thus continue the series). Maybe they should re-release the 3D version.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very underrated haunted house story
para_fernandoborges20 January 2021
Richard Fleischer never directed a truly bad movie. He always stretches for originality and his films are so different one from the other. I think this one is highly underrated. If you watch it with an open mind and do not expect it all to make perfect sense you may be surprised about how much you can enjoy it. The 3 D approach gives us some very interesting perspective shots. The dialogues are well written and develop some intriguing ideas. There are echoes of Hitchcock in human/animals interaction. Also some of the scenes could have inspired the Final Destination franchise. There are some very skeptical characters, and that gives the film more credibility. As a curiosity factor, we have a very young Meg Ryan in a funny role. However, I must say: the ending is a little over the top, too absurd for it's own sake. It is like the movie suddenly becomes a total guilty pleasure. But, hey, that is not a bad thing if you enjoy campy, goofy fun. Simply adjust your mind frame for a sudden change of mood and go along for the ride. I have been postponing to watch this one because of the bad ratings and reviews here on Imdb, but today I thought of giving it a chance because I love the director's filmography. I could not be more pleased to acknowledge that Richard Fleischer has not disappointed me yet. Ignore the ratings, take the risk and judge for yourself. This a decent haunted house story with interesting ideas and creative concepts. It tried to do something different and that is always commendable.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A silly sequel, but lots of fun.
BA_Harrison23 March 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Even when viewed without the benefit of its 'third dimension', Amityville 3-D is still an enjoyably cheesy piece of 80s horror—not quite as good as my favourite in the series, Amityville 2: The Possession, but still far more entertaining than the po-faced original.

Subtitled The Demon, Part 3 sees its infamous Long Island property snapped up by reporter John Baxter who refuses to believe that the house is home to malevolent supernatural phenomena. Even when several of John's friends and acquaintances die in mysterious circumstances, his scepticism does not wane.

However, after his own daughter Susan (Lori Loughlin) becomes the latest victim of the Amityville curse, the distraught writer finally agrees to turn his house over to a group of paranormal investigators who are particularly keen to check out the hole in the basement floor, which is rumoured to be a gateway to Hell!

This being a 3D movie, director Richard Fleischer is obliged to deliver plenty of 'in your face' action, and objects are frequently dangled and poked towards the audience (which is kind of fun to watch, even in 2D), but to his credit, Fleischer also manages to conjure up quite a bit of atmosphere and a few decent scares along the way: in particular, the scene in which photographer Melanie (Candy Clark) is left alone in the house is extremely well handled and very creepy, as is the moment when Susan's mother is confronted by the sodden ghost of her recently drowned daughter.

Of course, this being a 'second sequel' made in the early 80s and a 3D effort to boot, it's not all well crafted scares: there are plenty of tacky moments for fans of B-movie horror to enjoy, and the messy finalé is a total blast, with almost every prop being thrust into the foreground, and a silly rubber demon popping up to say 'Hi!' from the bottom of his Hellish jacuzzi. Oh, and don't forget that Meg Ryan also makes an early appearance as Susan's ghost obsessed pal Lisa.

I rate Amityville 3D a reasonable 6.5 out of 10, rounded up to 7 for IMDb; let's face it, any film that features a 3D fly attack and a flying stuffed swordfish has got to be worth at least that!
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Amityville 3-D shows us Meg Ryan & Lori Loughlin as teens starting out.
cdbearre26 July 2005
Amityville 3D is not a complete bust in any sense of the imagination. Of course, watching on you 'telly' the 3D stuff is diminished but,even so, the real redeeming quality of this flick is that we get to see a young Meg Ryan and Lori Loughlin before fame and television sitcom taints them. It is refreshing to watch them in this pristine early stage.

There is one scene in which they are in the evil house with some teenage boys. The group gathers on the floor around a set of cards formed in a Quija sort of configuration. But, at the same time, there was a spin the bottle effect. The scene is alluring and in the midst of the tension, a mix of sexual and fear, a bit of Ryan's acting charm shines. Don't miss this because it is tucked away in a slow moving 3D movie, which ain't really all that bad.

Candy Clark of American Pie fame is in the movie as well and does a good job as a nonbeliever who finally comes around to see the darkside.

Another plus of this movie is there wasn't a lot of blood and guts. Perhaps this is why it is receiving the low ratings. Gore doesn't make a horror movie.

Finally, this was a 3D film and the payoff in the end is good. There is even a Hitchcockian moment at the end with one 3D effect that gave me a bit of a thrill and then a chuckle after.

The movie is far from a bust. Watch it and remember the context in which it was shot. Look for the gems. I believe they exist in every work of art, movies, books, paintings, etc.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed